ire, from which he retired in his latter days to his native town, where he died June 8, 1803. He was a man of some learning in biblical criticism, as appears by his
, a dissenting divine, was born at
Hinckley in Leicestershire in 1736, and was for many
years a preacher at Hampstead, near London, and afterwards at Coseley, in Staffordshire, from which he retired
in his latter days to his native town, where he died June 8,
1803. He was a man of some learning in biblical criticism,
as appears by his various publications on theological subjects. He wrote, 1. “An account of the occasion and
design of the positive Institutions of Christianity, extracted
from the Scriptures only,
” An essay towards an interpretation of the Prophecies of Daniel, with
occasional remarks upon some of the most celebrated commentaries on them,
” Considerations on
the doctrine of a Future State, and the Resurrection, as revealed, or supposed to be so, in the Scriptures; on the
inspiration and authority of the Scripture itself; on some
peculiarities in St. Paul’s Epistles; on the prophecies of
Daniel and St. John, &c. To which are added, some strictures on the prophecies of Isaiah,
” 1798, 8vo. In this
work, which is as devoid of elegance of style, as of strength
of argument, and which shows how far a man may go, to
whom all established belief is obnoxious, the inspiration of
the New Testament writers is questioned, the genuineness of the Apocalypse is endeavoured to be invalidated;
and the evangelical predictions of Isaiah are transferred
from the Messiah to the political history of our own times.
The most singular circumstance of the personal history of
Mr. Amner, was his incurring the displeasure of George
Steevens, the celebrated commentator on Shakspeare.
This he probably did very innocently, for Mr. Steevens
was one of those men who wanted no motives for revenge
or malignity but what he found in his own breast. He had,
however, contracted a dislike to Mr. Amner, who was his
neighbour at Hampstead, and marked him out as the victim of a species of malignity which, we believe, has no
parallel. This was his writing several notes to the indecent passages in Shakspeare, in a gross and immoral style,
and placing Mr. Amner’s name to them. These appeared
first in the edition of 1793, and are still continued.
sons, Jacob and Tillemant, who were both employed in the physi-garden. Jacob, who seems to have been a man of some learning, published the second volume of Morison’s
, a German horticulturist, who came
to England about the middle of the seventeenth century,
was appointed first superintendant of the physic-garden at
Oxford, founded in 1632 by Henry earl of Danby. Some
writers call him doctor, and some professor of botany, but
he was neither, nor was there any professor, properly so
called, before Dillenius. The “Catalogus -Plantarum
”
in this garden, published at Oxford in on rejoicing days
old Bobart used to have his beard tagged with silver.
” He
left two sons, Jacob and Tillemant, who were both employed in the physi-garden. Jacob, who seems to have
been a man of some learning, published the second volume
of Morison’s “Oxford history of Plants,
” several fine copies of verses
were wrote on so rare a subject.
” Bobart afterwards
owned the cheat but it was preserved for some years, as
a master-piece of art. Dr. Pulteney thinks Bobart was
alive in 1704; but he appears to have lived considerably
longer, as Dr. Abel Evans dedicated “Vertumnus,
” a
poetical epistle, to him in
. He died at Morden college, Sept. 13, 1787, aged eighty-four. His wife died in 1783. Mr. Browne was a man of some learning and piety, but as a poet, we fear he cannot
, vicar of Olney in Buckinghamshire, and chaplain of Morden college, was born in 1703,
and was originally a pen-cutter. Early in life he distinguished himself by his, poetical talents, and when only
twenty years of age, published a tragedy called “Polidus,
”
and a farce called “All-bedevilled,
” which were played
together at a private theatre in St. Alban’s-street, neither
of much merit. He became afterwards a frequent contributor to the Gentleman’s Magazine, and carried off several
of the prizes which Cave, the printer and proprietor of that
Magazine, then offered for the best compositions. When,
Cave published a translation of Du Halde’s China, he inscribed the different plates to his friends, and one to
“Moses Browne,
” with which familiar designation Browne
thought proper to be offended, and Cave, to pacify him,
directed the engraver to introduce Mr. with a caret under
the line. In 1729, he published his “Piscatory Eclogues,
”
without his name, which were reprinted in Poems on various subjects,
” 8vo, and again in an extended form, with notes, in 1773. For along time,
however, even after his abilities were known, he remained in
poverty, and in 1745, when it appears he had a wife and
seven children, we find him applying to Dr. Birch for the
situation of messenger, or door-keeper, to the royal society.
In 1750, he published an edition of Walton and Cotton’s
Angler, with a preface, notes, and some valuable additions,
which was republished in 1759 and 1772, and in the former year drew him into a controversy with sir John Hawkins, who happened to be then publishing an improved
edition of the same work. From his poems, as well as
from the scattered observations in the “Angler,
” he appears to have been always of a religious turn; and in 1752
published in verse, a series of devout contemplations, entitled “Sunday Thoughts,
” which went through a second
edition in The Nativity and Humiliation of Jesus
Christ, practically considered.
” In Percy Lodge,
” a seat of the
duke and duchess of Somerset, written by command of
their late graces, in 1749. In what year he was presented
to the vicarage of Sutton, in Lincolnshire, we are not informed; but in 1763, he was elected to the chaplainship of
Morden college in Kent, and some time after appointed the
late rev. John Newton for his curate at Olney. In 1765 he
published a sermon “preached to the Society for the
Reformation of Manners,
” and a few years after, a “Visitation Sermon,
” delivered at Stony Stratford. Besides
these, Mr. Browne is said to have published one or two political tracts; and in 1772, a translation of a work of John
Liborius Zimmerman, entitled “The Excellency of the
knowledge of Jesus Christ,
” London, 12mo. He died at
Morden college, Sept. 13, 1787, aged eighty-four. His
wife died in 1783. Mr. Browne was a man of some learning and piety, but as a poet, we fear he cannot be allowed
to rank higher than among versifiers.
united departments, and particularly examined the library of Brussels, which is rich in Mss. He was a man of some learning, and extensive knowledge of books; and
, a French physician, was born
at Paris in 1722, and died in the same city in 1772, at 50
years of age. He practised medicine there with great success, and wrote, 1. “Medicine de l'esprit,
” Paris, Abdeker,
” or the art of preserving beauty, Memoires sur divers sujets de
medicine,
” 1760, 8vo. 4. “Memoire sur Tetat actuel de la
Pharmacia,
” Projet d'aneaniirla Petiteverole,
” Medicine pratique,
” 3 vols.
12mo, and 1 vol. 4to. 7. “Amphitheatrum poeticum,
”
a poem, Journal
Economique,
” from Dissertations sur le
bois de charpente,
” Paris, Le Genie d'Architecture,
” ibid. Traite de la force de
bois,
” Le guide de reux qui veulent
batir,
” 2 vols. 8vo. He died July 24, 177.9. Another
brother, Armand Gaston Camus, who died in 1804, was
a very active agent in all the revolutionary measures of the
different French assemblies, and being sent to arrest Dumourier in 1793, was delivered by him to the Austrians,
and afterwards exchanged for the daughter of Louis XVI.
His political conduct belongs to the history of those turbulent periods. In 1800 he was commissioned to inspect the
libraries and collections of the united departments, and
particularly examined the library of Brussels, which is rich
in Mss. He was a man of some learning, and extensive
knowledge of books; and published, 1. “Observations sur
la distribution et le classement des livres d'une bibliotheque.
” 2. “Memoire sur un livre Allemand,
” the famous
Tewrdannckhs. 3. “Memoire sur Thistoire et les procédés du Polytypage et de la Stereotype.
” 4. “Rapport
sur la continuation de la collection des Historiens de la
France, et de celle des Chartres et Diplomes.
” 5. “Notice d'un livre imprim6 a Bamberg in 1462,
” a very curious memoir of a book, first described in the Magasin Hist.
Litt. Bibliog. 1792. 6. “Memoire sur la collection des
grands et petits voyages,
” Notices
des Mss. de la Bibl. Nationale,
” vol. VI. is an interesting
memoir by him, relating to two ancient manuscript bibles,
in 2 vols. fol. adorned with 5152 pictures, each of them
having a Latin and French verse beautifully written and
illuminated beneath.
y, went early to London, where he was employed as a corrector of the press, and appears to have been a man of some learning, a dictionary in Latin and English, which
, a truly great and original genius, is said by Dr. Burn to have been the descendant of a family originally from Kirkby Thore in Westmoreland. His grandfather, a plain yeoman, possessed a small tenement in the vale of Bampton, a village about fifteen miles north of Kendal in that county, and had three sons. The eldest assisted his father in farming, and succeeded to his little freehold. The second settled in Troutbeck, a village eight miles north-west of Kendal, and was remarkable for his talent at provincial poetry. The third, Richard, educated at St. Bee’s, who had been a schoolmaster in the same county, went early to London, where he was employed as a corrector of the press, and appears to have been a man of some learning, a dictionary in Latin and English, which he composed for the use of schools, being still extant in manuscript. He married in London, and kept a school in Ship-court in the Old Bailey. The subject of the present article, and his sisters Mary and Anne, are believed to have been the only product of the marriage.
an actor, but all spoke affectionately of his amiable manners and undeviating integrity. He was also a man of some learning, critically skilled in the dramatic art,
, a late dramatic and miscellaneous
writer, and an actor, was born in the Strand, London, in
1728, where his father was in considerable practice as an
apothecary. He was educated at the Charter-house, with
a view to the church, but afterwards embraced his father’s
profession, which, however, he was obliged to relinquish
after an unsuccessful trial. What induced him to go on
the stage we know not, as nature had not been very bountiful to him in essential requisites. He performed, however, for some time in the provincial theatres, and in 1759
obtained an engagement at Covent-garden theatre, which
he never quitted, unless for summer engagements. In
one of these he became acquainted with Shenstone the
poet, who, observing his irreproachable moral conduct, so
different from that of his brethren on the stage, patronized
him as far as he was able, and assisted him in writing his
tragedy of “Henry II.
” and “Rosamund.
” It was indeed Mr. Hull’s moral character which did every thing for
him. No man could speak seriously of him as an actor,
but all spoke affectionately of his amiable manners and undeviating integrity. He was also a man of some learning,
critically skilled in the dramatic art, and the correspondent
of some of the more eminent literary men of his time. His
poetical talents were often employed, and always in the
cause of humanity and virtue, but he seldom soared above
the level of easy and correct versification. In prose, perhaps, he is entitled to higher praise, but none of his works
have had more than temporary success. He died at his
house at Westminster, April 22, 1808. For the stage he
altered, or wrote entirely, nineteen pieces, of which a list
may be seen in our authority. His other works were, I.
“The History of sir William Harrington,
” a novel, Genuine Letters from a gentleman to a young
lady his pupil,
” Richard Plantagenet,
”
a legendary tale, Select Letters between
the late duchess of Somerset, lady Luxborough, miss Dolman, Mr. Whistler, Mr. Dodsley, Shenstone, and others,
”
Moral Tales in verse,
”
, a man of some learning, and no contemptible writer, but of despicable
, a man of some learning, and no
contemptible writer, but of despicable character, was born
in Sept. 1640, at Northampton, where his father, John
Parker, then practised the law. John had been bred to
that profession in one of the Temples at London, and inclining to the parliament against the king, was preferred
to be a member of the high court of justice in 1649, in
which office he gave sentence against the three lords, Capel, Holland, and Hamilton, who were beheaded. During
Oliver’s usurpation he was made an assistant committeeman for his county. In 1650, be published a book in defence of the new government, as a commonwealth, without a king or house of lords, entitled “The Government
of the People of England, precedent and present,
” with
an emblematical engraved title-page. In June 1655, when
Cromwell was declared protector, he was appointed one of
the commissioners for removing obstructions at Worcesterhouse, in the Strand, near London, and was sworn serjeant
at law next day. In Jan. 1659, he was appointed by the
rump-parliament one of the barons of the exchequer; but,
upon a complaint against him, was soon after displaced.
His character, however, appears to have been such, that
he was again made regularly serjeant at law, by the recommendation of chancellor Hyde, at the first call after
the return of Charles II.
ld, and Job Throckmorton, who published their joint effusions at a private printing press. Penry was a man of some learning and zeal for religion, but in his notions
, or Ap Henry, commonly known by
his assumed name of Martin Mar-prelate, or Alar-priest,
was born in 1559 in Wales, and studied first at Peterhouse, Cambridge, of which he was A. B. in 1584, and
afterwards at Oxford, in which latter university he took the
degree of master of arts, and was ordained a priest. Afterwards, meeting with some dissatisfaction, as it is said, and
being very warm in his temper, he changed his religion,
and became an Anabaptist, or rather a Brownist. He was
henceforward a virulent enemy to the church of England,
and the hierarchy of that communion, as appears sufficiently by his coarse libels, in which he has shewn his
spleen to a great degree. At length, after he had concealed himself for some years, he was apprehended at
Stepney, and tried at the King’s-Bench, before sir John
Pophain, chief-justice, and the rest of the judges, where
he was indicted and condemned for felony, for papers
found in his pocket, purporting to be a petition to the
queen; and was executed, according to Fuller, at St.
Thomas Waterings, in 1593. It appears, that some violence was put upon the laws, even as they then stood, to
form a capital accusation against him. For his libels be
could not be accused, the legal time for such an accusation having elapsed before he was taken: the papers upon
which he was convicted, contained only an implied denial
of the queen’s absolute authority to make, enact, decree,
and ordain laws; and implied, merely by avoiding to use
those terms, according to the very words of the lordkeeper Puckering. His execution was therefore in a high
degree unjust. His chief publications are, 1. “Martin
Mar-prelate,
” the tract that gave so much offence. 12.
“Theses Martinianae,
” 8vo. 3. “A view of publicke
Wants and Disorders in the service of God, in a Petition
to the high court of Parliament,
” An
Exhortation to the Governors and People of Wales, to
labour earnestly to have the preaching of the Gospel planted
among them,
” Reformation no Enemy
to her Majesty and the State,
” Sir Simon Synod’s Hue and Cry for the Apprehension of young
Martin Mar-priest, with Martin’s Echo,
” 4to. Most of
these, and some others, were full of low scurrility and
petulant satire. Several tracts, equally scurrilous, were
published against him; as, “Pappe with a Hatchet, or a
Country Cuffe for the Idiot Martin to hold his Peace;
”
“X A Whip for an Ape, or Martin displaied;
” and others of
the same kind. In the composition of these pamphlets,
he is said to have had the assistance of John Udall, John
Field, and Job Throckmorton, who published their joint
effusions at a private printing press. Penry was a man of
some learning and zeal for religion, but in his notions of
government, both of church and state, appears to have
adopted more wild theories than ever his successors, when
in power, attempted to carry into practice. His sentence,
however, was unjust, and the enemies of the hierarchy
have therefore found it no difficult matter to place John
Penry at the head of their list of martyrs.