, a monk of St. Germain-des-Pres, was the author of a poetical relation
, a monk of St. Germain-des-Pres,
was the author of a poetical relation of the siege of Paris
by the Normans and Danes towards the end of the 9th
century. He was himself of Normandy, and an eye-witness; and if not eminent as a poet, is at least a faithful
and minute historian. His poem consists of twelve hundred
verses, in two books, and has been admitted into Pithou’s
and Duchesne’s collections; but a more correct edition,
with notes, and a French translation, may be seen in the
“Nouvelles Annales de Paris,
” published by D. Toussaint
Duplessis, a Benedictine of the congregation of St. Maur,
1753, 4to. There are also “Five select Sermons
” under
his name in vol. IX. of D'Acheri’s Spicilegium; and in vol.
V. Bibl. P. P. Colon. 1618, is “Abbonis Epistola ad Desiderium episc.
” There was originally a third book to his
History of the siege, addressed “to the Clergy,
” which his
editors omitted as having no connexion with the history.
, or Aymar, a monk of St. Martial, born in the year 988, rendered himself
, or Aymar, a monk of St. Martial, born in
the year 988, rendered himself famous by the active part
he took in the dispute respecting the pretended apostleship
of St. Martial, but is now known chiefly by his “Chronicle
of France
” from the origin of the monarchy to Nouvelle Bibliotheque
des Manuscripts,
” and in other collections of French history.
Mabillon, in his “Analecta,
” has given the famous letter of
Ademar’s on the apostleship of St. Martial, and some
verses or acrostics.
nulph, bishop of Rochester in the reign of king Henry I, was a Frenchman by birth, and for some time a monk of St. Lucian de Beauvais. Observing some irregularities
, or Earnulph, or Ernulph, bishop of
Rochester in the reign of king Henry I, was a Frenchman
by birth, and for some time a monk of St. Lucian de
Beauvais. Observing some irregularities among his brethren, which he could neither remedy nor endure, he resolved to quit the monastery but first he took the advice
of Lanfranc archbishop of Canterbury, under whom he had
studied in the abbey of Bee. That prelate, who was well
acquainted with his merit, invited him over into England,
and placed him in the monastery of Canterbury, where he
lived till Lanfranc’s death. Afterwards, when Anselm
came into that see, Arnulph was made prior of the monastery of Canterbury, and afterwards abbot of Peterborough,
and to both places he was a considerable benefactor, having
rebuilt part of the church of Canterbury, which had fallen
down, and also that of Peterborough, but this latter was
destroyed by an accidental fire, and our prelate removed
to Rochester before he could repair the loss. In 1115, he
was consecrated bishop of that see, in the room of Radulphus or Ralph, removed to the see of Canterbury. He
sat nine years and a few days, and died in March 1124,
aged eighty-four. He is best known by his work concerning the foundation, endowment, charters, laws, and other
things relating to the church of Rochester. It generally
passes by the name of Textus Roffensis, and is preserved in.
the archives of the cathedral church of Rochester. Mr.
Wharton, in his Anglia Sacra, has published an extract of
this history, under the title of “Ernulphi Episcopi Roffensis Collectanea de rebus Ecclesise Roffensis, a prima
sedis fundatione ad sua tempora. Ex Textu Roffensi,
quern composuit Ernulphus.
” This extract consists of
the names of the bishops of Rochester, from Justus, who
was translated to Canterbury in the year 624, to Ernulfus
inclusive benefactions to the church of Rochester; of the
agreement made between archbishop Lanfranc, and Odo
bishop of Bayeux how Lanfranc restored to the monks
the lands of the church of St. Andrew, and others, which
had been alienated from them how king William the son
of king William did, at the request of archbishop Lanfranc,
grant unto the church of St. Andrew the apostle, at Rochester, the manor called Hedenham, for the maintenance
of the monks and why bishop Gundulfus built for the
king the stone castle of Rochester at his own expence
a grant of the great king William Of the dispute between
Gundulfus and Pichot benefactions to the church of
Rochester. Oudm is of opinion, our Arnulph had no hand
in this collection; but the whole was printed, in 1769, bj
the late Mr. Thorpe, in his “Registrum Roffense.
”
There was another of the same name, a monk of St. Alban’s; who left behind him a collection of some
There was another of the same name, a monk of St. Alban’s; who left behind him a collection of some treatises that are of no great value. They are extant in the king’s library.
, a monk of St. Edmund’s bury in the fourteenth century, and who
, a monk of St. Edmund’s bury in the
fourteenth century, and who is thought to have died in
1410, was one of the first collectors of the lives of English
writers, and the precursor of Leland, Bale, and Pitts. He
searched indefatigably all the libraries of the kingdom, and
wrote a catalogue of the authors, with short opinions of
them. Archbishop Usher had the most curious ms copy of
this book, which became afterwards Mr. Thomas Gale’s property. Wood mentions another smaller catalogue of his
writing. He wrote also “Speculum ccenobitarum,
” in
which he gives the origin and progress of monachism;
and a history of his own monastery. “De rebus cœnobii
sui,
” which last is lost, but the former was printed at
Oxford 1722, 8vo, by Hall at the end of “Trivet. Annal.
”
, a monk of St. Alban’s, and a Latin poet of the twelfth century,
, a monk of St. Alban’s, and a Latin
poet of the twelfth century, was a native of this country,
and educated at Oxford, where he took a master’s degree.
He is said to have travelled through a great part of Europe,
and during a long residence at Paris, studied rhetoric, and
was distinguished for his taste even among the numerous
and polite scholars of that flourishing seminary. On his
return to England, he became a Benedictine monk in the
abbey of St. Alban’s, where he died about the beginning
of the thirteenth century. He wrote a long Latin poem in
nine books, dedicated to Walter bishop of Rouen, entitled
“Architrenius,
” which Warton, who has given a long specimen of it, pronounces a learned, ingenious, and very entertaining performance, containing a mixture of satire and
panegyric on public vice and virtue, with some historical
digressions, but not enough to justify Simlerus’s blunder
in the epitome of Gesner’s Bibliotheca, where he says the
subject is *' de antiquitatibus Britannise." This work was
printed at Paris, 1517, 4to, and is scarce; but there are
two manuscripts of it in the Bodleian library, with some
epistles, epigrams, and other poems by the same hand.
, a celebrated archbishop of Rheims, and one of the most learned men of his time, was originally a monk of St. Denys in France. He was elected archbishop in the
, a celebrated archbishop of Rheims, and one of the most learned men of his time, was originally a monk of St. Denys in France. He was elected archbishop in the year 845, and shewed great zeal for the rights of the Gallican church. He also acquired much influence at court,. and among the clergy, but made a tyrannical use of it to accomplish his de&igiis. He condemned Gotescalc, and deposed Hincmar bishop of Laon his nephew. He died in 882, at Epernay, to which place he had escaped from the Normans in a litter. Several of his works remain, the best edition of which is by Sirmond, 1645, 2 vols. foL useful as to ecclesiastical history, and learned in theology and jurisprudence, but the style is harsh and barbarous. What Hincmar wrote concerning St. Remi of Rheims, and St. Dionysius of Paris, is not in thi* edition, but may be found in Surius. There is also something more of his in Labbe’s Councils, and in the Council of Douzi, 1658, 4to.
, Hucbald, or Hugbald, a monk of St. Amand, in Flanders, who preceded Guido more than
, Hucbald, or Hugbald, a monk of St.
Amand, in Flanders, who preceded Guido more than one
hundred years, was contemporary with Remi, and author
of a treatise on music, which is still subsisting in the king
of France’s library, under the title of “Enchiridion Musicae,
” No. 7202, transcribed in the eleventh century. In
this work there 4s a kind of gammut, or expedient for delineating the several sourrds of the scale, in a way wholly
different from his predecessors; but the method of Guido
not only superseded this, but by degrees effaced the
knowledge and remembrance of every other that had been
adopted in the different countries and convents of Europe.
However, the awkward attempts at singing in consonance,
which appear in this tract, are curious, and clearly prove
that Guido neither invented, nor, rude as it was before his
time, much contributed to the improvement of this art.
, born in 1065, was a monk of St. Vannes at Verdun, and afterwards abbot of Flavigny
, born in 1065, was a monk of
St. Vannes at Verdun, and afterwards abbot of Flavigny in
the 12th century, but was dispossessed of that dignity by
the bishop of Autun, who caused another abbot to be elected.
Hugh, however, supplanted St. Laurentius, abbot of Vannes,
who was persecuted by the bishop of Verdun for his attachment to the pope, and kept his place till 1115, after which
time it is not known what became of him. He wrote the
“Chronicle of Verdun,
” which is esteemed, and may be
found in P. Labbe’s * Bibl. Manuscript."
f St. Michael. He had many years before begun a translation of the History of Charles VI. written by a monk of St. Denys, and continued by John le Fevre, called of
Having taken orders in the church, he was made almoner to the king, and collated to the priory of Juvigne.
In 1664, his majesty, out of his special favour, made him
commander of the order of St. Michael. He had many
years before begun a translation of the History of Charles
VI. written by a monk of St. Denys, and continued by
John le Fevre, called of St. Remy; but though this translation was finished in 1656, it was not published till 1663,
and then too came out with a very small part of those commentaries, which, according to his promise, were to have
filled two volumes. He had also published in 1656, the
history of the marshal of Guebriant, with the genealogy
of Budos, and some other houses in Britanny; and gave
the public the memoirs of Michael de Castelnau, with several genealogical histories, 1659, in 2 vols. folio, a scarce
and highly-valued edition. He continued to employ himself in writing other pieces in the same way, some of which
were published after his death, which happened in 1675.
Le Long and others are of opinion that Laboureur had
some hand in the two last volumes of Sally’s Memoirs.
He had a brother named Louis Le Laboureur, who was
bailiff of Montmorency, and author of several pieces of
poetry. He died in 1679. These also had an uncle,
Claude Le Laboureur, provost of the abbey of L'isle Barbe,
upon the Seine, near Lyons, who, in 1643, published
“Notes and Corrections upon the Breviary of Lyons;
” and
in Les Mesures de L'Isle Barbe,
”
i. e. an historical account of every thing relating to that
abbey; but the little caution which he observed in speaking of the chapter of St. John at Lyons obliged him to
resign his provostship, and raised him an enemy in the person of Besian d'Arroy, a prebendary of the church, who,
in 1644, refuted his “Notes and Corrections,
” and his
“Measures
” in L'Apologie de PEglise de Lyon
” and the other, “Histoire de PAbbaie de l'lsle Barbe.
” Dom. Claude published
“A Treatise of the Origin of Arms, against Menetrier,
”
and “A genealogical History of the House of St. Colombe,
”
which was printed in
rn at Langham in Rutlandshire, whence he took his name, but the date is nowhere specified. He became a monk of St. Peter, Westminster, in 1335, and soon attained a
, archbishop of Canterbury, and cardinal, was probably born at Langham in Rutlandshire, whence he took his name, but the date is nowhere specified. He became a monk of St. Peter, Westminster, in 1335, and soon attained a considerable degree of eminence among his brethren. In 1346 he officiated at the triennial chapter of the Benedictines, held at Northampton, by whom in 1349 he was elected prior, and two months after abbot. The revenues of this monastery having been much wasted in his predecessor’s time, the new abbot directed his attention to a system of ceconomy, and partly by his own example, and partly by earnest persuasion, was soon enabled to pay off their debts. When he began this reformation of the abuses which had crept into the cloister, he (knowing the disposition of his fraternity) thought that those which respected the articles of provision were of the first importance. He therefore took care that their mistricordia, or better than ordinary dishes, and those dinners which were somewhat similar to what in our universities have obtained the names of Exceeding and Gaudy-days, should be common to the whole society; and not, as had formerly been the practice, confined to a few, to the extreme mortification of the rest. To effect this purpose, he relinquished the presents which it had been usual for preceding abbots, at certain times, to accept.