, a noble Roman, was the fourth in decent from the preceding, and
, a noble Roman, was the fourth in decent from the preceding, and in a very similar career of
honours, obtained yet more glory than his ancestor. He
also was consul five times, in the years 233 Ant. Chr. 228,
C 15, 214, and 210; and dictator in the years 221 and 217.
His life is among those written by Plutarch. In his first
consulship, he obtained the honour of a triumph for a
signal victory over the Ligurians. His second consulship
produced no remarkable event, nor, indeed, his first dictatorship, which seems to have been only a kind of civil
appointment, for the sake of holding comitia, and was
frustrated by some defect in the omens. But in the consternation which followed the defeat at Thrasymene, his
country had recourse to him as the person most able to
retrieve affairs, and he was created dictator a second time.
In this arduous situation he achieved immortal fame, by
his prudence in perceiving that the method of wearing out
an invader was to protract the war, and avoid a general
engagement, and his steady perseverance in preserving
that system. By this conduct he finally attained the
honourable title of Cunctator, or protector. But before
he could obtain the praise he merited, he had to contend
not only with the wiles and abilities of Hannibal, but with
the impatience and imprudence of his countrymen. The
former he was able to baffle, the latter nearly proved fatal
to Rome. “If Fabius,
” said Hannibal, “is so great a
commander as he is reported to be, let him come forth
and give me battle.
” “If Hannibal,
” said Fabius in reply, “is so great a commander as he thinks himself, let
him compel me to it.
” A battle in Apulia, however, was
brought on by the rashness of his master of the horse, Minucius, and it required all the ability of Fabius to prevent
an entire defeat. His moderation towards Minucius afterwards, was equal to his exertions in the contest. After
he had laid down his office, the consul Paulus jEmilius
endeavoured to tread in his steps; but rashness again prevailed over wisdom, and the defeat at Cannae ensued in
the year 215, and then the Romans began to do full justice
to the prudence of Fabius. He was called the ^ield, as
MarcelU is the sword of the republic; and, by an honour
almost unprecedented, was continued in the consulship
for two successive years. He recovered Tarentum before
Hannibal could relieve it, and continued to oppose that
general with great and successful skill. It has been laid
to his charge that when Scipio proposed to carry the war
into Africa, he opposed that measure through envy; and
Plutarch allows that though he was probably led at first to
disapprove, from the cautious nature of his temper, he
afterwards became envious of the rising glory of Scipio.
It is, however, possible, that he might think it more glo
rious to drive the enemy by force out of Italy, than to draw"
him away by a diversion. Whether this were the case or
not, he did not live to see the full result of the measure,
for he died in the year 203, at a very advanced age, being, according to some authors, near a hundred. This was
the very year preceding the decisive battle of Zama, winch
concluded the second Punic war. The highest encomiums
are bestowed by Cicero upon Fabius, under the person of
Cato, who just remembered him, and had treasured many
of his sayings.
k at Rome. Silius Italicus, Stella, and Pliny the younger, were his friends and patrons. Stertinius, a noble Roman, had so great an esteem for his compositions, that
, an ancient Latin
poet, and the model of epigrammatists, was born at Bilbilis, now called Bubiera, a town of the ancient Celtiberia
in Spain, which is the kingdom of Arragon. He was born,
as is supposed, in the reign of Claudius, and went to
Rome when he was about twenty-one. He was sent thither with a view of prosecuting the law; but soon forsook
that study, and applied himself to poetry. He excelled
so much in the epigrammatic style, that he soon acquired
reputation, and was courted by many of the first rank at
Rome. Silius Italicus, Stella, and Pliny the younger,
were his friends and patrons. Stertinius, a noble Roman,
had so great an esteem for his compositions, that he placed
> his statue in his library, while he was yet living; and the
emperor Verus, who reigned with Antoninus the philosopher, used to call him his Virgil, which was as high an
honour as could well be paid to him. We learn also from
Pliny and Tacitus, as well as from several passages in his
own writings, that he had honours and dignities bestowed
upon him by some of the emperors. Domitian, whom it
must be confessed he has flattered not a little, made him
a Roman knight, and gave him likewise the “Jus trium
liberorum,
” the privileges of a citizen who had three children. He was also advanced to the tribunate. But though
he was so particularly honoured, and had so many great and
noble patrons, who admired him for his wit and poetry, it
does not appear that he made his fortune among them.
There is reason to think that, after the death of Domitian,
his credit and interest declined at Rome; and if he had
still remaining among the nobles some patrpns, such as
Pliny, Cornelius Priscus, &c. yet the emperor Nerva took
but little notice of him, and the emperor Trajan none at
all. Tired of Rome, therefore, after he had lived in that
city about four and thirty years, and grown, as himself
tells us, grey-headed, he returned to his own country
Bilbilis, where he took a wife, and had the happiness to
live with her several years. He admired her much, as
one who alone was sufficient to supply the want of every
thing he enjoyed at Rome. She appears to have brought
him a very large fortune; for, in one of his epigrams
he extols the magnificence of the house and gardens
he had received from her, and says, “that she had made
him a little kind of monarch.
” About three years after he
had retired into Spain, he inscribed his twelfth book of
Epigrams to Priscus, who had been his friend and benefactor; and is supposed to have died about the year 100.
As an epigrammatist, Martial is eminently distinguished,
and has been followed as a model by all succeeding wits.
All his efforts, however, are not equally successful, and
many of his epigrams are perhaps unjustly so called, being
merely thoughts or sentiments without applicable point.
He offends often by gross indelicacy, which was the vice
of the times; but his style is in general excellent, and his
frequent allusion to persons and customs render his works
very interesting to classical antiquaries.
, or P0MPEIUS (CNEius), surnamed Magnus, or the Great, was of a noble Roman family, the son of Pompeius Strabo, and Lucilia.
, or P0MPEIUS (CNEius), surnamed Magnus, or the Great, was of a noble Roman family, the son of Pompeius Strabo, and Lucilia. He was born the same year with Cicero, but nine months later, namely, in the consulship of Csepio and Serranus, 105 years before the Christian sera. His father was a general of great abilities, and under him he learned the art of war. When he was only twenty-three he raised three legions, which he led to Sylla. Three years after, he drove the opponents of Sylla from Africa and Sicily. Young as he was, he had already won the soldiers sufficiently, by his mildness and military talents, to excite the jealousy of Sylla, who therefore recalled him to Rome. His soldiers would have detained him in spite of the dictator’s orders, but he obeyed, and was rewarded on his arrival by the name of Magnus, given him by Sylla, and soon after confirmed unanimously by his countrymen. He obtained also the honours of a triumph, which the dictator permitted rather unwillingly, and was the first instance of a Roman knight, who had not risen to any magistracy, being advanced to that elevation. This was in 81 B. C. In a short time, he had obtained as much power by the voluntary favour of the people, as Sylla had before by arms and after the death of that extraordinary man, obliged Lepidus to quit Rome, and then undertook the war against Sertorius in Spain, which he brought to a fortunate conclusion. For this victory he triumphed a second time, B. C. 73, being still only in the rank of a knight. Not long afterwards he was chosen consul. In that office he re-established the power of the tribunes; and, in the course of a few years, exterminated the pirates who infested the Mediterranean, gained great advantages against Tigranes and Mithriclates, and carried his victorious arms into Media, Albania, Iberia, and the most important parts of Asia; and so extended the boundaries of the Roman empire, that Asia Minor, which before formed the extremity of its provinces, now became, in a manner, the centre of them. When he returned to receive a triumph for these victories, he courted popularity by dismissing his troops and entering the city as a private citizen. He triumphed with great splendour but not feeling his influence such as he had hoped, he united with Caesar and Crassus to form the first triumvirate. He strengthened his union with Ccesar by marrying his daughter Julia; he was destined nevertheless to find in Caesar not a friend, but too successful a rival. While Caesar was gaining in his long Gallic wars a fame and a power that were soon to be invincible, Pompey was endeavouring to cultivate his popularity and influence in Rome. Ere long they took directly contrary parties. Pompey became the hope and the support of the patricians and the senate, while Caesar was the idol of the people. On the return of the latter from Gaul, in the year 51 A. C. the civil war broke out, which terminated, as is well known, by the defeat of Pompey in the battle of Pharsalia, A. C. 49, and the base assassination of him by the officers of Ptolemy in Egypt. It appears that Pompey had not less ambition than Caesar, but was either more scrupulous, or less sagacious and fortunate in his choice of means to gratify that passion. He was unwilling to throw off the mask of virtue and moderation, and hoped to gain every thing by intrigue and the appearance of transcendant merit. In this he might have been successful, had he not been opposed to a man whose prompt and decisive measures disconcerted his secret plans, drove things a once to extremities, and forced him to have recourse to the decision of arms, in which victory declared against him. The moderate men, and those who were sincerely attached to the republic of Rome, dreaded, almost equally, the success of Pompey and of Caesar. Cato, who took the mourning habit on the breaking out of the civil war, had resolved upon death if Caesar should be victorious, and exile if sue* cess should declare for Pompey.