, a very learned and useful Spanish biographer, was born at Seville
, a very learned and useful
Spanish biographer, was born at Seville in 1617. His father was made president of the admiralty established in that
city by Philip IV. He received his early education among
the dorainicans, and studied philosophy and divinity afterwards at Salamanca, under the ablest masters, particularly
Francis Ramos del Manzano, who was afterwards preceptor
to the king and preceptor to Charles II. He then returned
to Seville, and entirely devoted to study, passed the whole
of his time in the Benedictine convent, where Benedict
de la Serra, the abbot, had collected a very copious library,
and where Antonio first planned and composed his valuable
“Bibliotheca Hispana.
” When considerably advanced in
this work, he brought it with him to Rome in 1659, at
which time he was sent thither by Philip IV. in the character of agent-general of affairs concerning the crown of
Spain, the two Sicilies, and the inquisition, and he continued in this office twenty-two years, at the end of which
Charles II. recalled him to Madrid, and made him a member of his council. Notwithstanding these profitable employments, he was so charitable to the poor, as frequently
to be in want himself, but was considerably relieved by a
canonry of Seville, which pope Alexander VII. bestowed
upon him, on the recommendation of the cardinal of Aragon. He died at Madrid in 1684, and was then a ktiight
of the order of St. James. It is said that among his
papers was found a commission appointing him one
of the supreme council of justice, but it is certain
that he never filled that office. He left no property, but
a library of thirty thousand volumes. His publications
were, 1. “De exilio, sive de exilii poena antiqua et
nova, exsulumque conditione et juribus, libri tres,
” Antwerp, Bibl. Hispana.
” This is
said to have been written when he was only twenty-three
years old. 2. “Bibliotheca Hispana Nova,
” Rome, Bibliotheca Hispana vetus, complectens scriptores qui
ab Octaviani Augusti imperio usque ad annum M. floruerunt,
” Rome, Bibliotheca Nova,
” although published first, is in fact a
sequel to this last, which has also been reprinted by Bayer
at Madrid, 1788. Baillet prefers Antonio’s work to every
thing of the kind, and Morhof considers it as a model.
David Clement prefers it to all the Bibliothecas except
that of Quetif and Echarcl. He thinks him blameable,
however, for not giving the titles of books in their proper
language, an objection to which other biographers, and
particularly the French, until lately, have been justly liable. One other publication of Antonio was printed for
the first time so lately as 1742, at Valentia, under the titla
of “Censura de historias fabulas, obra postuma,
” fol. ornamented with plates, and published by D. Gregoire Mayans y Siscar. We know not whether this be part of a work
in which Antonio tells us he was long engaged, and which
was to be called “Trophaeum historico-ecclesiasticum
Deo veritatis erectum ex manubiis pseudo-historicorum,
qui Flavii Lucii Dextri, M. Maximi, Helecoe, Braulionis,
Luitprandi, et Juliani nomine circumferuntur; hoc est,
Vindiciae verae atque iludum notae Hispanarum rerum historise, Germanarum nostros gentislaudum non ex GermanoFuldensibus chronicis emendicatarum in libertatem et
puritatem plena assertio,
” a work which Bayle thinks would
have been of dangerous consequence, as people seldom
like to be set right as to the fabulous stories which have
long flattered their vanity.