, earl Cowper, lord high chancellor of Great Britain, was descended
, earl Cowper, lord high chancellor of Great Britain, was descended from an ancient family, and son to sir William Cowper, baronet, and member of parliament for the town of Hertford in the reigns of Charles II. and William III. He is supposed to have been born in the castle of Hertford, of which his family had been a considerable time in possession; but of the place or time of his birth, or where he was educated, we have not been able to obtain any certain information. It appears, however, that he made so great a proficiency in the study of the law, that, soon after he was called to the bar, he was chosen recorder of Colchester, and in the reign of king William he was appointed one of his majesty’s council. In 1695 he was chosen one of the representatives in parliament for the town of Hertford, and on the day he took his seat had occasion to speak three times, with great applause. The following year he appeared as counsel for the crown on the trials of sir William Perkins, and others, who were convicted of high treason, for being concerned in the plot to assassinate king William. He was also counsel for the crown on the trial of captain Thomas Vaughan, for high treason on the high seas; and he likewise supported in parliament the bill of attainder against sir John Fenwick. In 1704, in a speech in the house of commons, in the famous case of Ashby and White, he maintained that an action did lie at common law, for an elector who had been denied his vote for members of parliament. His reputation continuing greatly to increase, on the accession of queen Anne he was again appointed one of the counsel to the crown; and on October 11, 1705, he was constituted lord keeper of the great seal of England. A few days after, queen Anne addressed both houses of parliament in a speech, which was well received, and which was said to be written by the new lord keeper.
to the dignity of a viscount and earl, by the title of viscount Fordwich, in the county of Kent, and earl Cowper. The preamble to his patent was drawn up by Mr. Hughes
On the demise of queen Anne, lord Cowper was nominated one of the lords justices of the kingdom, till the arrival of king George I. from Hanover. On the 29th of
August, 1714, he was appointed lord chancellor of Great
Britain; and shortly after lord lieutenant and custos rotulorum of the county of Hertford. When a new parliament
was assembled, on the 27th of March, 1715, George I.
declared from the throne, “That he had ordered the lord
chancellor to declare the causes of calling this parliament
in his majesty’s name and words.
” He then delivered his
speech into lord Cowper’s hands, who read it to both
houses. On the 6th of February, 1716, his lordship was
appointed lord high-steward for the trial of the rebel lords;
as he was also, the following year, at the trial of the earl
of Oxford, to whom he behaved on that occasion with
great politeness. A change taking place in the ministry
in the beginning of March 1718, lord Cowper resolved to
resign the great seal; but, before his resignation, the king,
on account of his great merit and services, on the 18th of
that month, raised him to the dignity of a viscount and
earl, by the title of viscount Fordwich, in the county of
Kent, and earl Cowper. The preamble to his patent was
drawn up by Mr. Hughes the poet, whom he had patronized. He resigned the great seal in the month of April,
and was succeeded by lord Parker.
On the 15th of May this year, earl Cowper made a long speech in the house of peers, in opposition
On the 15th of May this year, earl Cowper made a long speech in the house of peers, in opposition to the bill for inflicting pains and penalties on bishop Atterbury. He urged a variety of arguments to shew, that the evidence against the bishop was extremely insufficient; and he pointed out the danger of such a precedent, as that of inflicting pains and penalties on a man without law, and without proper evidence against him. His lordship strongly objected to the distinction that had been made in the debate, between real evidence, anci legcl evidence; and maintained, that the law required only such real and certain proof, as ought in natural justice and equity, to be received. The last public transaction, in which we find earl Cowper engaged, was opposing the bill for taxing the papists; which he represented as an impolitic and indefensible measure; and when it passed, earl Cowper, and several other lords, signed a protest against it. His lordship lived but a few months after; for he died at his seat at Colne-green, in Hertfordshire, on the 10th of October, 1723; and on the 19th of that month, he was interred in Hertingfordbury church, in the same county.
The eloquence and abilities of earl Cowper were highly celebrated ii> his own time he made a very
The eloquence and abilities of earl Cowper were highly
celebrated ii> his own time he made a very conspicuous
figure at the bar he was a distinguished member of both
houses of parliament; his general character as a public
man appears to have been entitled to high praise, from
which, perhaps, in our days, it will be thought no deduction that he did not always act with the independence which
rejects party connections and views. But in his conduct
in the court of chancery he displayed great disinterestedness. He opposed the frequency and facility with which
private bills passed in parliament; and refused the new
year’s gifts, which it had been customary to present to
those who held the great seal. Mr. Tindal, who had an
opportunity of knowing him, says that he “was eminent
for his integrity in the discharge of the office of lord chancellor, which he had twice filled. There may have been
chancellors of more extensive learning, but none of more
knowledge in the laws of England. His judgment was
quick, and yet solid. His eloquence manly, but flowing.
His manner graceful and noble.
” Lord Chesterfield, in
his Letters to his Son, represents earl Cowper as more distinguished, as a speaker, by the elegance of his language,
and the gracefulness of his manner, than by the force of
his arguments; that his strength as an orator lay by no
means in his reasoning, for he often hazarded very weak
ones. “But such was the purity and elegancy of his style,
such the propriety and charms of his elocution, and such
the gracefulness of his action, that he never spoke without
universal applause. The ears and the eyes gave him up
the hearts and the understanding of the audience.
”
Earl Cowper was one of the governors of the Charterhouse, and a fellow
Earl Cowper was one of the governors of the Charterhouse, and a fellow of the royal society. He was twice
married. By his first wife, Judith, who was daughter and
heiress of sir Robert Booth, of London, knight, he had
one son, who died young. Mary, his second wife, who
did not long survive him, was daughter of John Clavering,
esq. of Chopwell, in the bishopric of Durham. By this
lady he had issue two sons and two daughters. His eldest
son, William, succeeded him in his titles and estate; and
his second son, Spencer, became dean of Durham. His
eldest daughter, lady Sarah Cowper, who is said to have
been “distinguished for her sense and accomplishments,
”
died unmarried in 1758. His. youngest, lady Anne, was
married in 1731 to James Edward Colleton, esq. of Hayneshill in Berkshire, and died in 1750.
William, the second earl Cowper, was twice married; in 1732, to lady Henrietta, youngest
William, the second earl Cowper, was twice married; in 1732, to lady Henrietta, youngest daughter and coheir of Henry D'Auverquerque earl of Grantham; and in 1750, to lady Georgina, daughter to earl Granville, and widow of the hon. John Spencer, esq. by whom she was mother of John earl Spencer. By lady Georgina, lord Cowper had no issue; but by his first countess, who died in 1747, he was father of George Nassau, third earl Cowper, who died at Florence in 1789, and was succeeded by his son George Augustus, who also dying in 1799, was* succeeded by Leopold Louis Francis, his brother, the present and fifth earl Cowper.
A few weeks before he died, he sent, as a testimony of gratitude, to his noble friend earl Cowper, his own picture drawn by sir Godfrey Kneller, which
A few weeks before he died, he sent, as a testimony of
gratitude, to his noble friend earl Cowper, his own picture
drawn by sir Godfrey Kneller, which he had received as a
present from that painter: upon which the earl wrote him
the following letter. “24 January 1719-20. Sir, I thank
you for the most acceptable present of your picture, and
assure you, that none of this age can set an higher value
on it than I do, and shall while 1 live; though I am sensible that posterity will outdo me in that particular.
”