The works which he more publicly avowed are, “Anecdotes of the Life of the Earl of Chatham,” 2 vols. 4to, and 3 vols. 8vo; “Biographical, Literary,
The works which he more publicly avowed are, “Anecdotes of the Life of the Earl of Chatham,
” 2 vols. 4to, and
3 vols. 8vo; “Biographical, Literary, and Political Anecdotes of several of the most eminent persons of the present
age, never before printed,
” 3 vols. 8vo, 1797. Both contain
many curious particulars of the political characters and contests of his day, picked up from the various members of parliament who frequented his shop, and confided in him. His
last publication was a collection of Mr. Wilkes’s pamphlets
and letters, with a life, in which he praises that gentleman
in the most extravagant manner, while he relates facts
concerning his character that elsewhere might have been
accounted defamation. In all his political career he was
attached to the party which supported Wilkes, and opposed
the measures of government in the early part of the present
reign. At that time it was not surprising that many of his
pamphlets were popular, or that he should be able to boast
of an intimacy with men of rank in the political world. He
had the hardihood to publish writings which booksellers of
established reputation would have rejected, and he ran
little risk, as the expence of printing was defrayed by his
employers, while he had the profits of the sale. Even of
those which, upon his own authority, we have given as his
productions, it is highly probable he was rather the editor
than the author. In those wbich more recently appeared
under his name, there is very little of the ability, either
argumentative or narrative, which could give consequence
to a political effusion.
About the year 1782, he retired from business as a bookseller; but in a tew years he married the widow of Mr.
Parker, printer of a newspaper called the General Advertiser, of which he then was proprietor and editor: the speculation however injured his fortune, and he became a prisoner in the king’s bench fora libel, and was afterwards
an outlaw. Extricated at length from his difficulties, he
retired again into Hertfordshire, where he died December
12, 1806, leaving his widow in great distress.
eech, which excited the admiration of the house, and drew very high praise from Mr. Pitt, afterwards earl of Chatham. The proceedings of the administration with which
Mr. Burke’s fame as a writer was now established; and what added another wreath to this character were some pamphlets written before the peace of 1763. These introduced him to the acquaintance of the late Mr. Fitzherbert, father of the present lord St. Helen’s; a gentleman who esteemed and protected men of letters; and who possessed, with a considerable share of elegant knowledge, talents for conversation which were very rarely equalled. Through the medium of Mr. Fitzherbert, and owing to some political essays in the Public Advertiser, he became acquainted with the late marquis of Rockingham, and the late lord Verney; events which opened the first great dawn of his political life: and soon after his acquaintance with lord Rockingham, a circumstance took place which gave this nobleman an opportunity to draw forth Mr. Burke' s talents. The administration formed in 1763, under the honourable George Grenville, becoming unpopular from various causes, his majesty, through the recommendation of his uncle, the duke of Cumberland, appointed a new ministry, of which the duke of Grafton and general Conway were secretaries of state, and the marquis of Rockingham first lord of the treasury. In this arrangement, which took place in 1765, Mr. Burke was appointed private secretary to the marquis of Rockingham, and soon after, through the interest of lord Verney, was returned one of the representatives in parliament for the borough of Wendover in Buckinghamshire. On this he prepared himself for becoming a public speaker, by studying, still more closely than he had yet done, history, poetry, and philosophy; and by storing his mind with facts, images, reasonings, and sentiments. He paid great attention likewise to parliamentary usage; and was at much pains to become acquainted with old records, patents, and precedents, so as to render himself complete master of the business of office. That he might communicate without embarrassment the knowledge which he had thus acquired, he frequented, with many other men of eminence, the Robin Hood society; and, thus prepared, he delivered in the ensuing session his maiden speech, which excited the admiration of the house, and drew very high praise from Mr. Pitt, afterwards earl of Chatham. The proceedings of the administration with which Mr. Burke was connected, belong to history; and it may be sufficient here to notice, that the principal object which engaged their attention was the stamp-act, which had excited great discontents in America. Mr. Grenville and his party, under whose auspices this act was passed, were for inforcing it by coercive measures; and Mr. Pitt and his followers denied that the parliament of Great Britain had a right to tax the Americans. By Mr. Burke’s advice, as it has been said, the marquis of Rockingham adopted a middle course, repealing the act to gratify the Americans, and passing a law declaratory of the right of Great Britain to legislate for America in taxation, as in every other case. But by whatever advice such a measure was carried, it argued little wisdom, the repeal and the declaratory act being inconsistent with each other. The ministry were therefore considered as unfit to guide the helm of a great empire, and were obliged to give way to a new arrangement, formed under the auspices of Mr. Pitt, then earl of Chatham. This change created a considerable deal of political commotion; and the public papers and pamphlets of that day turned their satire against the newly-created earl of Chatham; they charged him with weakening and dividing an interest which the public wished to be supported; and lending his great name and authority to persons who were supposed to be of a party which had been long held to be obnoxious to the whig interest of the country. Though these charges were afterwards fully refuted by the subsequent conduct of the noble earl, the late ministry were entitled to their share of praise, not only for being very active in promoting the general interests of the state by several popular acts and resolutions, but by their uncommon disinterestedness; as they shewed, upon quitting their places, that they retired without a place, pension, or reversion, secured to themselves or their friends. This was a stroke which the private fortune of Mr. Burke could ill bear; but he had the honour of being a member of a virtuous administration; he had the opportunity of opening his great political talents to the public; and, above all, of shewing to a number of illustrious friends (and in particular the marquis of Rockingham) his many private virtues and amiable qualities, joined to a reach of mind scarcely equalled by any of his contemporaries.
reflections, as to inform the ignorant, and entertain the wise. It was a favourite book of the great earl of Chatham, who, before he discovered it to be a fiction, used
The success of Crusoe induced De Foe to publish, in
1720, “The Life and Piracies of captain Singleton,
”
though not with similar success. In A
New Voyage round the World, by a course never sailed
before.
” In the life of Crusoe we are gratified by continually imagining that the fiction is a fact; in the “Voyage
round the World
” we are pleased, by constantly perceiving
that the fact is a fiction, which, by uncommon skill, is
made more interesting than a genuine voyage. In 1720
he published the “History of Duncan Campbell,
” who
was born deaf and dumb, but who himself taught the deaf
and dumb to understand. The author has here contrived
that the merriest passages shall end with some edifying
moral. The “Fortunes and Misfortunes of Moll Flanders
”
followed in Life of colonel Jaque,
” who was born a
gentleman, but bred a pick-pocket. In 1724, appeared
the “Fortunate Mistress, or the Adventures of Roxana.
”
The world, however, has not been made much wiser or
better by the perusal of these lives, which may have diverted the lower orders, but are too gross for improvement, and exhibit few scenes which are welcome to cultivated minds. Of a very different quality are the “Memoirs of a Cavalier during the Civil Wars in England.
”
This is a romance the most like to truth that ever was
written; a narrative of great events, drawn with such
simplicity, and enlivened with such reflections, as to inform the ignorant, and entertain the wise. It was a favourite book of the great earl of Chatham, who, before he
discovered it to be a fiction, used to speak of it as the best
account of the Civil Wars extant.
place in it, in the drawing of which several living characters were intended, particularly the late earl of Chatham. Mr. Fordyce left several other brothers, of whom
Early in 1752 was published, from a finished manuscript
of our author, “Theodorus: a Dialogue concerning the
art of Preaching,
” 12mo, which is a work of considerable
utility to young divines, and has been repeatedly printed
along with his brother Dr. James Fordyce’s sermon on
“The Eloquence of the Pulpit.
” Mr. David Fordyce’s
last production was left by him in an unfinished state, but
not so incomplete as to be unworthy of publication. It
was entitled “The Temple of Virtue, a Dream,
” and was
given to the world in
ons who now aspired to the management of the house of commons, were Mr. Fox and Mr. Pitt (afterwards earl of Chatham) whose parliamentary abilities had for some time
, Lord Holland, the first nobleman of
that title, was the second and youngest son of the second
marriage, of sir Stephen Fox, and brother of Stephen
first earl of Ilchester. He was born in 1705, and was
chosen one of the members for Hendon, in Wiltshire, on
a vacancy, in March 1735, to that parliament which met
Jan. 23, 1734; and being constituted surveyor-general of
his majesty’s board of works, a writ was ordered June 17,
1737, and he was re-elected. In the next parliament,
summoned to meet June 25, 1741, he served for Windsor; and in 1743, being constituted one of the commissioners of the treasury, in the administration formed by
the Pelhams, a writ was issued Dec. 21st of that year, for
a new election, and he was re-chosen. In 1746, on the
restoration of the old cabinet, after the short administration
of earl Granville, he was appointed secretary at war, and
sworn one his majesty’s most honourable privy-council.
On tbis occasion, and until he was advanced to the peerage, he continued to represent Windsor in parliament.
In 1754, the death of Mr. Pelham produced a vacancy in
the treasury, which was filled up by his broker the duke
of Newcastle, who, though a nobleman of high honour,
unblemished integrity, and considerable abilities, yet was
of too jealous and unstable a temper to manage the house
of commons with equal address and activity, and to guide
the reins of government without a coadjutor at so arduous
a conjuncture. The seals of chancellor of the exchequer
and secretary of state, vacant by the death of Mr. Pelham, and by the promotion of the duke of Newcastle, became therefore the objects of contention. The persons
who now aspired to the management of the house of commons, were Mr. Fox and Mr. Pitt (afterwards earl of Chatham) whose parliamentary abilities had for some time
divided the suffrages of the nation; who had so long fosterod reciprocal jealousy, and who now became public
rivals for power. Both these rival statesmen were younger
brothers, nearly of the same age; both were educated at
Eton, both distinguished for classical knowledge, both
commenced their parliamentary career at the same period,
and both raised themselves to eminence by their superior
talents, yet no two characters were ever more contrasted.
Mr. Fox inherited a strong and vigorous constitution, was
profuse and dissipated in his youth, and after squandering
his private patrimony, went abroad to extricate himself
from his embarrassment*. On his return he obtained a
seat in parliament, and warmly attached himself to sir
Robert Walpole, whom he idolized; and to whose patronage he was indebted for the place of surveyor-general
of the board of works. His marriage in 1744 with lady
Caroline Lennox, daughter of the duke of Richmond,
though at first displeasiug to the family, yet finally
strengthened his political connections. He was equally a
man of pleasure and business, formed for social and convivial
intercourse; of an unruffled temper, and frank disposition.
No statesman acquired more adherents, not merely from
political motives, but swayed by his agreeable manners,
and attached to him by personal friendship, which he fully
merited by his zeal in promoting their interests. He is
justly characterized, even by Lord Chesterfield, “as having
no fixed principles of religion or morality, and as too unwary in ridiculing and exposing them.
” As a parliamentary orator, he was occasionally hesitating and perplexed;
but, when warmed with his subject, he spoke with an animation and rapidity which appeared more striking from
his former hesitation. His speeches were not crowded
with flowers of rhetoric, or distinguished by brilliancy of
diction; but were replete with sterling sense and sound
argument. He was quick in reply, keen in repartee, and
skilful in discerning the temper of the house. He wrote
without effort or affectation; his public dispatches were
manly and perspicuous, and his private letters easy and
animated. Though of an ambitious spirit, he regarded
money as a principal object, and power only as a secondary concern. He was an excellent husband, a most indulgent father, a kind master, a courteous neighbour, and
one whose charities demonstrated that he possessed in
abundance the milk of human kindness. Such is said to
have been the character of lord Holland, which is here introduced as a prelude to some account of his more illustrious son. It may therefore suffice to add, that in 1756
he resigned the office of secretary at war to Mr. Pitt, and
in the following year was appointed paymaster of the forces,
which he retained until the commencement of the present
reign; his conduct in this office was attended with some
degree of obloquy; in one instance, at least, grossly
overcharged. For having accumulated a considerable fortune by the perquisites of office, and the interest of money
in hand, he was styled in one of the addresses of the city
of London, “the defaulter of unaccounted millions.
” On
May 6, 1762, his lady was created baroness Holland; and
on April 16, 1763, he himself was created a peer by the
title of lord Holland, baron Holland, of Foxley, in the
county of Wilts. In the latter part of his life he amused
himself by building, at a vast expence, a fantastic villa at
Kingsgate, near Margate, His lordship was also a lord
of the privy-council, and clerk of the Pells, in Ireland,
granted him for his own life and that of his two sons.
Lord Holland died at Holland-house, near Kensington,
July 1, 1774, in the sixty-ninth year of his age, leaving
three sons, Stephen, his successor; Charles James, the
subject of the next article; and Henry Edward, a general
in the army. Stephen, second lord Holland, survived his
father but a few months, dying Dec. 26, 1774, and was
succeeded by Henry Richard, the present peer.
In person he bore so striking a resemblance to the first earl of Chatham, that he was sometimes mistaken for him. This likeness
In person he bore so striking a resemblance to the first earl of Chatham, that he was sometimes mistaken for him. This likeness once produced considerable sensation in the house of commons. Lord Chatham was pointed to in the gallery; all believed him to be there; the person really present was Dr. Garthshore. He died worth about 55,000l. and by his will, made only a few days before -his death, after the payment of a considerable number of legacies, names as residuary legatee, John Maitland, esq. M. P.
e events of the American war gave rise, he is to be found more than once rising in reply to the late earl of Chatham; whose extraordinary powers of eloquence inspired
“The earl of Sandwich,
” says his biographer, “was
rather to be considered as an able and intelligent speaker,
then a brilliant and eloquent orator. In his early parliamentary career, he displayed uncommon knowledge of the
sort of composition adapted to make an impression on a
popular assembly; and from a happy choice of words, and
a judicious arrangement of his argument, he seldom spoke
without producing a sensible effect on the mind of every
impartial auditor. In the latter part of his political life,
and especially during the American war, his harangues
were less remarkable for their grace and ornament, than
for sound sense, and the valuable and appropriate information which they communicated. His speeches, therefore,
were regarded as the lessons of experience and wisdom.
He was never ambitious of obtruding himself upon the
house. He had a peculiar delicacy of forbearance, arising
from a sense of propriety; which, if more generally practised, would tend very much to expedite the public business by compressing the debates, now usually drawn out
to an immeasurable and tiresome length, within more reasonable bounds. If, after having prepared himself on any
important question, when he rose in the house any other
lord first caught the chancellor’s eye, he sat down with the
most accommodating patience; and, if the lord, who spoke
before him, anticipated the sentiments which he meant to
offer, he either did not speak at all, or only spoke to such
points as had not been adverted to by the preceding
speaker. Whenever, therefore, he rose, the House was
assured that he had something material to communicate:
he was accordingly listened to with attention, and seldom
sat down without furnishing their lordships with facts at
once important and interesting; of which no other peer
was so perfectly master as himself. During the period of
the American war he was frequently attacked in both
houses for his official conduct or imputed malversation.
When any such attempts were made in the House of Peers,
he heard his accusers with patience, and with equal temper as firmness refuted their allegations, exposing their
fallacy or their falsehood. On all such occasions, he met
his opponents fairly and openly, in some instances concurring in their motions for papers, which his adversaries
imagined would prove him a negligent minister; in others
resisting their object, by shewing the inexpediency or the
impolicy of complying with their requests. In the parliamentary contest, to which the unfortunate events of the
American war gave rise, he is to be found more than once
rising in reply to the late earl of Chatham; whose extraordinary powers of eloquence inspired sufficient awe to
silence and intimidate even lords of acknowledged ability.
Lord Sandwich never in such cases suffered himself to he
dazzled by the splendor of oratorical talents; or ever spoke
without affording proof that his reply was necessary and
adequate. In fact, his lordship never rose without first
satisfying himself, that the speaker he meant to reply to
was in error; and that a plain statement of the facts in
question would dissipate the delusion, and afford conviction to the house. By this judicious conduct his lordship
secured the respect of those whom he addressed, and commanded at all times an attentive hearing.
”
in the same vault with his countess, who died April 10, 1784, in Westminster-abbey, between the late earl of Chatham and lord Robert Manners.
His health continued to decline; but his mental faculties remained to the last very little impaired; he was
glad to receive visitors, and talk upon the events of the
time. Of the French revolution he is reported to have
said, that it was an extraordinary event and, as it was
without example, so it was without a prognostic no conjectures could be formed of its consequences. He lived
to March 20, 1793, and departed this life in the eightyninth year of his age. He left no children; and the earldom, which was granted again by a new patent, in 1792,
descended on his nephew, lord Stormont, together with
his immense fortune. His will was dated April 17, 1782;
it was written in his own hand, upon little more than a
half sheet of paper. It begins thus: “When it shall
please Almighty God to call me to that state, to which, of
all I now enjoy, I can carry only the satisfaction of my
own conscience, and a full reliance on his mercy, through
Jesus Christ: I desire that my body may be interred as
privately as may be; and, out of respect for the place of
my early education, I should wish it to be in Westminster
abbey.
” He was buried, about nine o'clock in the morning of March 28, in the same vault with his countess, who
died April 10, 1784, in Westminster-abbey, between the
late earl of Chatham and lord Robert Manners.
, earl of Chatham, one of the most illustrious statesmen whom this
, earl of Chatham, one of the most
illustrious statesmen whom this country has produced, was
the son of Robert Pitt, esq. of Boconnock in Cornwall, and
grandson of Thomas Pitt, governor of Madras, who was
purchaser of the celebrated diamond, afterwards called the
Regent. The family was originally of Dorsetshire, where
it had been long and respectably established. William
Pitt was born Nov. 15, 1708, and educated at Eton;
whence, in January 1726, he went as a gentleman-commoner to Trinity-college, Oxford. It has been said, that
he was not devoid of poetical talents, of which a few specimens have been produced; but they do not amount to
much, and of his Latin verses on the death of George the
First, it is natural to suspect that the whole merit was not
his own. When he quitted the university, Pitt was for a
time in the army, and served as a cornet; but his talents
leading him more decisively to another field of action, he
quitted the life of a soldier for that of a statesman, and
became a member of parliament for the borough of Old
Sarum, in February 1735. In this situation his abilities
were soon distinguished, and he spoke with great eloquence
against the Spanish convention in 1738. It was on the occasion of the bill for registring seamen in 1740, which he
opposed as arbitrary and unjustifiable, that he is said to
have made his celebrated reply to Mr. Horatio Walpole,
who had attacked him on account of his youth (though then thirty-two), adding, that the discovery of truth is
little promoted by pompous diction and theatrical emotion.
Mr. Pitt retorted, with great severity, “I will not undertake to determine whether youth can justly be imputed
to any man as a reproach; but I will affirm, that the
wretch who, after having seen the consequences of repeated
errors, continues still to blunder, and whose age has only
added obstinacy to stupidity, is surely the object of
either abhorrence or contempt, and deserves not that his
grey head should secure him from insults. Much more is
he to be abhorred, who, as he has advanced in age, has
receded from virtue, and becomes more wicked with less
temptation; who prostitutes himself for money which he
cannot enjoy; and spends the remains of his life in the
ruin of his country.
” Something like this Mr. Pitt might
have said, but the language is that of Dr. Johnson, who
then reported the debates for the Gentleman’s Magazine.
as created a peer, by the titles of viscount Pitt, of Burton Pynsent, in the county of Somerset, and earl of Chatham, in the county of Kent. Whatever might be his motives
The Rockingham ministry proving unable to maintain its ground, a new administration was formed, and Mr. Pitt, in 1766, was made lord privy seal. At the same time he was created a peer, by the titles of viscount Pitt, of Burton Pynsent, in the county of Somerset, and earl of Chatham, in the county of Kent. Whatever might be his motives for accepting this elevation, he certainly sunk by it in popularity, at least as much as he rose in nominal dignity. The great commoner, as he was sometimes styled, had formed a rank to himself, on the sole basis of his talents and exertions, for which the titular honours, which he was now to participate with many others, could not in the public opinion compensate. Still it must be owned that the high and hereditary distinction of the peerage is a just and honourable object of ambition to a British commoner; which, if he attains it, as Mr. Pitt appears to have done, without any improper concession or stipulation, may be considered as the fair reward of past services, and the most permanent monument of public gratitude. Lord Chatham, whatever might be the cause, did not long continue in office; he resigned the place of lord privy seal on the 2d of November, 1768, and it was the last public employment which he ever accepted. He does not indeed appear to have been desirous of returning to office. He was now sixty; and the gout, by which he had been long afflicted, had become too frequent and violent in its attacks, to allow of close or regular application to business. In the intervals of his disorder he continued occasionally to exert himself, on questions of great magnitude, and was particularly strenuous in 1775, and the ensuing years, against the measures pursued by the ministers in the contest with America. Nevertheless, in all things he maintained his native spirit. When France began to interfere in the contest, he fired with indignation at the insult; and when, in 1778, it was thought necessary, after the repeated misfortunes of the war, to acknowledge the independence of America, he summoned up all the strength that remained within him, to pour out his disapprobation of a measure so inglorious. He did so in a speech of considerable energy, and being answered in the course of the debate by the duke of Richmond, seemed agitated with a desire to reply: but when he attempted to rise, the effort proved too violent for his debilitated constitution, and he sunk, in a kind of fit, into the arms of those who were near him. This extraordinary scene of a great statesman, almost dying in the last exertion of his talents, has been perpetuated by the pencil, and will live for ever in the memory of his countrymen. He did not long survive this effort. This debate happened on the 8th of April, 1778, and he died on the 11th of May ensuing.
jesty, out of the civil list revenue, and confirmed in perpetuity by parliament, to the heirs of the earl of Chatham, to whom the title should descend. The monument raised
All parties appeared now to contend to do honour to his
memory: a public funeral and a monument in Westminster
abbey, at the national expence, were immediately voted by
parliament, and his majesty was addressed to settle upon
his family “such a lasting provision as he in his wisdom
and liberality should think fit, as a mark of the sense the
nation entertains of the services done to this kingdom by
that able statesman.
” A pension of 4,000l. a-year was accordingly appointed by his majesty, out of the civil list
revenue, and confirmed in perpetuity by parliament, to the
heirs of the earl of Chatham, to whom the title should descend. The monument raised to his memory is highly
worthy of the occasion, being perhaps the noblest effort of
British sculpture. His figure appears upon it, at full
length, in his parliamentary robes, and in the attitude of
speaking; the accompaniments are grand and appropriate,
and the inscription has a simple dignity, much more impressive than any pomp of words, announcing merely,
that the king and parliament have paid this tribute to his
merits.
not been reprinted. 6. The “Retort Courteous,” to the manager of the theatre. 7. An “Epitaph on the Earl of Chatham.” 8. “St. Peter’s Lodge,” a serio-comic legendary
Notwithstanding a due attention to business, Mr. Reed
found leisure to amuse himself and the world with many
miscellanies in prose and verse of very considerable merit.
The late Mr. Ritson, who had for Mr. Reed, what he extended to very few, a high respect, intended to have
edited some of these miscellanies, in a volume or volumes,
of which the following were to have been the contents:
1. “Madrigal and Trulletta, a mock tragedy,
” The Register Office,
” Tom
Jones,
” a comic opera, Dido,
” a tragedy, Retort Courteous,
” to
the manager of the theatre. 7. An “Epitaph on the Earl
of Chatham.
” 8. “St. Peter’s Lodge,
” a serio-comic legendary tale. 9. “A Rope’s end for Hempen monopolists.
” Besides the above articles, Mr, Reed was the author
of, 10. “A Poem, in imitation of the Scottish dialect, on
the death of Mr. Pope,
” printed in the Gentleman’s Magazine for August The Superannuated Gallant,
” a farce, Newcastle, A British
Philippic, inscribed to the right hon. the earl of Granville,
”
London, A Sop in the Pan for a physical critic, in a letter to Dr. Smollett, occasioned by a criticism (in the Critical Review) on Madrigal and Trulletta/'
1759. 14.
” A humorous account of his own Life,“printed in the Universal Museum for 1764. 15.
” The
Tradesman’s Companion, or Tables of Averdupois weight,
&c.“London, 1762, 12mo. 16.
” The Impostors, or a
Cure for Credulity,“a farce, acted for the benefit of Mr.
Woodward, March 19, 1776, with an excellent prologue,
not printed. To these may be added, several tragedies,
comedies, and farces, never acted or printed; a few unpublished poems; and some numbers of the
” Monitor,“a
political paper published in the administration of the earl
of Bute, and
” Letters“under the signature Benedict, in
defence of Mr. Garrick, on the publication of Kenrick’s
” Love in the Suds," printed originally in the Morning
Chronicle, and afterwards added to the fifth edition of that
poem.
nd retracts the opinion he ha i given of some of those statesmen in his history, particularly of the earl of Chatham and lord Bute. His biographer allows that many of
Soon after his arrival from the continent, his health still
decaying, he undertook a journey to Scotland, and renewed his attachment to his relations and friends. During
this journey, Dr. Moore informs us that “he was greatly
tormented with rheumatic pains, and afflicted besides with
an ulcer on his arm, which had been neglected on its first
appearance. These disorders confined him much to his
chamber, but did not prevent his conversation from being
highly entertaining, when the misery of which they were
productive permitted him to associate with his friends.
”
From Scotland he went to Bath, and about the beginning
of 1767 had recovered his health and spirits in a very considerable degree.
His next production, which appeared in 1769, proved
that br had not forgotten the neglect with which he was
treated by that ministry in whose favour he wrote “The
Briton.
” This was entitled the “Adventures of an Atom.
”
Under fictitious names, of Japanese structure, he reviews
the conduct of the eminent politicians who had conducted
or opposed the measures of government from the year 1754,
and retracts the opinion he ha i given of some of those
statesmen in his history, particularly of the earl of Chatham and lord Bute. His biographer allows that many of
the characters are grossly misrepresented, for which no
other reason can be assigned than his own disappointment.
The whole proves what has often been seen since his time,
that the measures which are right and proper when a reward
is in view, are wrong and abominable when that reward is
withheld.
ve his country in a more important station, being appointed under-secretary of state in 1759, by the earl of Chatham; during the whole of whose prosperous administration,
Mr. Wood was meditating future publications relating to other parts of his tour, especially Greece, when he was called upon to serve his country in a more important station, being appointed under-secretary of state in 1759, by the earl of Chatham; during the whole of whose prosperous administration, as well as in those of his two immediate successors, he continued in that situation.