ued during the remainder of his life. He came in with his old friends, the duke of Newcastle and the earl of Hardwicke, and in the most honourable manner; for he resumed
On the 12th of July 1749, his lordship was made viceadmiral of Great Britain, an appointment that is more of a civil than a military nature; but which, nevertheless, is always given to a military man. On the 12th of June 1751, he was preferred to be first commissioner of the admiralty, in the room of the earl of Sandwich; and in the years 1752 and 1755, he was one of the lords justices of the kingdom, during his majesty’s absence. The affair of Minorca occasioned him to be much blamed by the party writers of the time, in his character of first lord of the admiralty; but when this was inquired into, the resolutions of the House of Commons acquitted him and his colleagues of any neglect of duty. On the 16th of November 1756, upon a change of administration, he resigned his office in the admiralty; but, having been in the interval made an admiral, he was again placed at the head of the board, where he continued during the remainder of his life. He came in with his old friends, the duke of Newcastle and the earl of Hardwicke, and in the most honourable manner; for he resumed his seat with the concurrence of every individual in the ministry, Mr. Pitt resuming the seals as secretary of state, and with the particular approbation of king George II. All the rest of his conduct, as first commissioner of the admiralty, was crowned with success, under the most glorious administration which this country ever saw. The last time that he commanded at sea, was in 1758, to cover the expedition against the coast of France. Being then admiral of the white, and having hoisted his flag on board the Royal George, of 100 guns, he sailed from Spithead, on the first of June, with a formidable fleet, sir Edward Hawke serving under him; and by cruizing continually before Brest, he protected the descents which were made that summer at St. Malo’s, Cherbourg, &c. The French fleet not venturing to come out, he kept his own squadron and seamen in constant exercise; a thing which he thought had been too much disregarded. On the 30th of July 1761, his lordship was raised to the dignity of admiral and commander in chief of the fleet; and in a few days he sailed from Harwich, in the Charlotte yacht, to convoy her present majesty to England, in 1762, he went to Portsmouth, to accompany the queen’s brother, prince Charles of Mecklenburgh, and to show him the arsenal, and the fleet which was then upon the point of sailing, under the command of sir George Pocock, for the Havannah. In attending the prince, however, he caught a violent cold, that was accompanied with a gouty disorder, under which he languished two or three months. This cold, at length, settled upon his lungs, andrwas the immediate occasion of his death. He died, at his seat at Moor Park, in Hertfordshire, on the 6th of June 1762, and was buried in the family vault at Colwich. His character may be justly estimated from the particulars we have given. In his official department, he acted with great judgment, and was a steady friend to merit. Of his private virtues, it is a sufficient test that he was never the object of slander or blame. It has, indeed, been asserted that he was addicted to gaming; but the author of the life we have followed in this account denies the charge, admitting only that he played for amusement. He left his fortune to his brother Thomas Anson, esq. who was member of parliament for Lichfield, a gentleman well known for his liberal patronage of, and his exquisite skill in, the fine arts. On his decease, the united fortunes of the family devolved to his nephew, by his eldest sister, George Adams, esq. who assumed the name of Anson.
d favour of the late lord high chancellor Hardwicke, then attorney-general; to whom, and to the late earl of Hardwicke, he was indebted for all his preferments. The chancellor
How much Mr. Birch was affected by this calamity appears from some verses written by him, August 3d, 1729, on his wife’s coffin, and inserted in Mrs. Rowe’s Miscellaneous Works. That Mrs. Birch was a woman of very amiable accomplishments, is not only evident from the verses now mentioned, but from two Latin epitaphs drawn up for her one by her husband, and the other by Dr. Dale, which last was translated into English by Mr. James Ralph. In both these epitaphs, she is celebrated as having- possessed an uncommon share of knowledge and taste, and many virtues. After this melancholy event, he was ordained deacon by the bishop of Salisbury, Dr. Hoadly, Jan. 17, 1730, and priest by the same prelate, Dec. 21, 1731, and at the same time was presented to the rectory of Siddington St. Mary, and the vicarage of Siddington St. Peter, in Gloucestershire. He had been recommended, by a common friend, to the friendship and favour of the late lord high chancellor Hardwicke, then attorney-general; to whom, and to the late earl of Hardwicke, he was indebted for all his preferments. The chancellor gave him the living of Ulting in the county of Essex, to which he was instituted by Dr. Gibson, bishop of London, on the 20th of May, and he took possession of it on the day following. In 1734, he was appointed one of the domestic chaplains to William earl of Kilmarnock, the unfortunate nobleman who was afterwards beheaded, on the 18th of August, 1746, for having been engaged in the rebellion of 1745. The earl of Kilmarnock was, we believe, in more early life, understood to be a whig; and under no other character could Mr. Birch have been introduced to his lordship’s notice. On the 20th of February, 1734-5, Mr. Birch had the honour of being chosen a member of the royal society, sir Hans Sloane taking a leading part in the election. The same honour was done him on the llth of December 1735, by the society of antiquaries of which he afterwards became director. A few weeks before he was chosen into the latter, the Marischal college of Aberdeen had conferred on him, by diploma, the degree of master of arts. In the Spring of 1743, by the favour of his noble patron before mentioned, he received a more substantial benefit; being presented by the crown to the rectory of Landewy Welfrey in the county of Pembroke. To this benefice, which was a sinecure, he was instituted on the 7th of May, by Dr. Edward Willes, bishop of St. David’s. On the 24th of February, 1743-4, he was presented to the rectories of St. Michael, Wood-street, and St. Mary, Staining, united. His next preferment was likewise in the city of London; being to the united rectories of St. Margaret Pattens, and St. Gabriel, Fenchurch-street, to which he was presented in the beginning of February, 1745-6. In January, 1752, he was elected one of the secretaries of the royal society, in the room of Dr. Cromwell Mortimer, deceased. In January 1753, the Marischal college of Aberdeen created him doctor of divinity and in that year, the same honour was conferred on him by that excellent prelate, Dr. Thomas Herring, archbishop of Canterbury. Our author was also a trustee of the British Museum. The last preferment given to Dr. Birch, was the rectory of Depden in Essex; for which he was indebted to the late earl of Hardwicke. Depden itself, indeed, was in the patronage of Mr. Chiswell, and in the possession of the rev. Dr. Cock. But the benefice in lord Hardwicke’s gift, being at too great a distance from town, to be legally held by Dr. Birch, he obtained an exchange with Dr. Cock. Dr. Birch was instituted to Depden by the late eminent bishop Sherlock, on the 25th of February 1761; and he continued possessed of this preferment, together with the united rectories of St. Margaret Pattens, and St. Gabriel, Fenchurch-street, till his decease. In 1765, he resigned his office of secretary to the royal society, and was succeeded by Dr. Maty. Dr. Birch’s health declining about this time, he was ordered to ride for the recovery of it but being a bad horseman, and going out, contrary to advice, on a frosty day, he was unfortunately thrown from his horse, on the road betwixt London and Hampstead, and killed on the spot. Dr. William Watson, of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, as soon as he heard of the accident of the fall, hastened to the relief of his friend, but in vain. It is not known whether Dr. Birch’s fall might not have been occasioned by an apoplexy. This melancholy event happened on the 9th of January 1766, in the 61st year of his age, to the great regret of the doctor’s numerous literary friends. Some days after his death, he was buried in the chancel of his own church of St. Margaret Pattens. Dr. Birch had, in his life-time, been very generous to his relations; and none that were near to him being living at his decease, he bequeathed his library of books and manuscripts, many of which are valuable, to the British Museum. He, likewise, left the remainder of his fortune, which amounted to not much more than five hundred pounds, to be laid out in government securities, for the purpose of applying the interest to increase the stipend of the three assistant librarians. Thus manifesting at his death, as he had done during his whole life, his respect for literature, and his desire to promote useful knowledge.
, appeared in 1749; and, in an introductory discourse to the honourable Philip Yorke, esq. (the late earl of Hardwicke), Dr. Birch makes some reflections on the utility
Having related the more personal and private circumstances of Dr. Birch’s history, we proceed to his various
publications. The first great work he engaged in, was
“The General Dictionary, historical and critical
” wherein
a new translation of that of the celebrated Mr. Bayle was
included and which was interspersed with several thousand lives never before published. It was on the 29th of
April, 1734, that Dr. Birch, in conjunction with the rev.
Mr. John Peter Bernard, and Mr. John Lockman, agreed
with the booksellers to carry on this important undertaking; and Mr. George Sale was employed to draw up the
articles relating to oriental history. The whole design
was completed in ten volumes, folio; the first of which
appeared in 1734, and the last in 1741. It is universally
allowed, that this work contains a very extensive and useful body of biographical knowledge. We are not told
what were the particular articles written by Dr. Birch
but there is no doubt of his having executed a great part
of the dictionary neither is it, we suppose, any disparagement to his coadjutors, to say, that he was superior
to them in abilities and reputation, with the exception of
Mr. George Sale, who was, without controversy, eminently
qualified for the department he had undertaken. The
next great design in which Dr. Birch engaged, was the
publication of “Thurloe’s State Papers.
” This collection,
which comprised seven volumes in folio, came out in 1742.
It is dedicated to the late lord chancellor Hardwicke, and
there is prefixed to it a life of Thurloe but whether it
was written or not by our author, does not appear. The
same life had been separately published not long before.
The letters and papers in this collection throw the greatest
light on the pe'riod to which they relate, and are accompanied with proper references, and a complete index to
each volume, yet was a work by which the proprietors
were great losers. In 1744, Dr. Birch published, in octavo,
a “Life of the honourable Robert Boyle, esq
” which
hath since been prefixed to the quarto edition of the works
of that philosopher. In the same year, our author began
his assistance to Houbraken and Vertue, in their design of
publishing, in folio, the “Heads of illustrious persons of
Great Britain,
” engraved by those two artists, but chiefly
by Mr. Houbraken. To each head was annexed, by Dr,
Birch, the life and character of the person represented.
The first volume of this work, which came out in numbers,
was completed in 1747, and the second in 1752. Our
author’s concern in this undertaking did not hinder his
prosecuting, at the same time, other historical disquisitions: for, in 1747, appeared, in octavo,“His inquiry
into the share which king Charles the First had in the
transactions of the earl of Glamorgan.
” A second edition
ef the Inquiry was published in Miscellaneous works of sir Walter Raleigh
” to which was prefixed the life of that unfortunate and injured man. Previously to this, Dr. Birch
published “An historical view of the negociations between
the courts of England, France, and Brussels, from 1592
to 1617; extracted chiefly from the ms State Papers of
sir Thomas Edmondes, knight, embassador in France, and
at Brussels, and treasurer of the household to the kings
James I. and Charles I. and of Anthony Bacon, esq. brother to the lord chancellor Bacon. To which is added, a
relation of the state of France, with the character of Henry
IV. and the principal persons of that court, drawn up by
sir George Carew, upon his return from his embassy there
in 1609, and addressed to king James I. never before
printed.
” This work, which consists of one volume, in
octavo, appeared in 1749; and, in an introductory discourse
to the honourable Philip Yorke, esq. (the late earl of Hardwicke), Dr. Birch makes some reflections on the utility of deducing history from its only true and unerring
sources, the original letters and papers of those eminent
men, who were the principal actors in the administration
of affairs; after which he gives some account of the lives
of sir Thomas Edmondes, sir George Carew, and Mr. Anthorry Bacon. The “Historical View
” is undoubtedly a
valuable performance, and hath brought to light a variety
of particulars relative to the subjects and the period treated
of, which before were either not at all, or not so fully
known. In 17.51, was published by our author, an edition,
in two volumes, 8vo, of the “Theological, moral, dramatic, and poetical works of Mrs. Catherine Cockburn
”
with an account of her life. In the next year came out
his “Life of the most reverend Dr. John Tillotson, lord
archbishop of Canterbury. Compiled chiefly from his
original papers and letters.
” A second edition, corrected
and enlarged, appeared in 1753. This work, which was
dedicated to archbishop Herring, is one of the most pleasing and popular of Dr. Birch’s performances; and he has
done great justice to Dr. Tillotsou’s memory, character,
and virtues. Our biographer hath likewise intermixed
with his narrative of the good prelate’s transactions, short
accounts of the persons occasionally mentioned; a method
which he has pursued in some of his other publications.
In 1753, he revised. the quarto edition, in two volumes, of
Milton’s prose works, and added a new life of that great
poet and writer. Dr. Birch gave to the world', in the following year, his “Memoirs of the reign of queen Elizabeth, from the year 1581, till her death. In which the
secret intrigues of her court, and the conduct of her favourite, Robert earl of Essex, both at home and abroad,
are particularly illustrated. From the original papers of
his intimate friend, Anthony Bacon, esq. and other manuscripts never before published.
” These memoirs, which
are inscribed to the earl of Hardwicke, give a minute account of the letters and materials from which they are
taken and the whole work undoubtedly forms a very valuable collection in which our author has shewn himself
(as in his other writings) to be a faithfnl and accurate compiler and in which, besides a full display of the temper
and actions of the earl of Essex, much light is thrown on
the characters of the Cecils, Bacons, and many eminent
persons of that period. The book is now becoming scarce,
and, as it may not speedily be republished, is rising in its
value. This is the case, likewise, with regard to the edition of sir Walter Raleigh’s miscellaneous works. Dr.
Birch’s next publication was “The history of the Royal
Society of London, for improving of natural knowledge,
from its first rise. In which the most considerable of those
papers, communicated to the society, which have hitherto
not been published, are inserted in their proper order, as
a supplement to the Philosophical Transactions.
” The
twq first volumes of this performance, which was dedicated
to his late majesty, appeared in 1756, and the two other
volumes in 1757. The history is carried on to the end of
the year 1687 and if the work had been continued, and
had been conducted with the same extent and minuteness,
it would have been a very voluminous undertaking. But,
though it may, perhaps, be justly blamed in this respect,
it certainly contains many curious and entertaining
anecdotes concerning the manner of the society’s proceedings
at their first establishment. It is enriched, likewise, with
a number of personal circumstances relative to the members, and with biographical accounts of such of the more
considerable of them as died in the course of each year.
In 1760, came out, in one volume, 8vo, our author’s “Life
of Henry prince of Wales, eldest son of king James I.
Compiled chiefly from his own papers, and other manuscripts, never before published.
” It is dedicated to his
present majesty, then prince of Wales. Some have objected to this work, that it abounds too much with trifling
details, and that Dr. Birch has not given sufficient scope
to such reflections and disquisitions as arose from his subject. It must, nevertheless, be acknowledged, that it affords a more exact and copious account than had hitherto
appeared of a prince whose memory has always been remarkably popular; and that various facts, respecting several other eminent characters, are occasionally introduced. Another of his publications was, “Letters, speeches,
charges, advices, &c. of Francis Bacon, lord viscount St.
AJban, lord chancellor of England.
” This collection,
which is comprised in one volume, 8vo, and is dedicated
to the honourable Charles Yorke, esq. appeared in 1763.
It is taken from some papers which had been originally in
the possession of Dr. Rawley, lord Bacon’s chaplain, whose
executor, Mr. John Rawley, having put them into the
hands of Dr. Tenison, they were, at length, deposited in
the manuscript library at Lambeth. Dr. Birch, speaking
of these papers of lord Bacon, says, that it can scarcely
be imagined, but that the bringing to light, from obscurity
and oblivion, the remains of so eminent a person, will be
thought an acquisition not inferior to the discovery (if the ruins of Herculaneum should afford such a treasure) of a
new set of the epistles of Cicero, whom our immortal
countryman most remarkably resembled as an orator, a
philosopher, a writer, a lawyer, and a statesman. Though
this, perhaps, is speaking too highly of a collection, which
contains many things in it seemingly not very material, it
must, at the same time, be allowed, that nothing can be
totally uninteresting which relates to so illustrious a man,
or tends, in any degree, to give a farther insight into his
character. To this catalogue we have still to add “Professor Greaves’s miscellaneous works,
” Intellectual System,
” (improved from the Latin edition of Mosheim) his discourse on the
true notion of the Lord’s Supper, and two sermons, with
an account of his life and writings, 1743, in two vols. 4to.
An edition of Spenser’s “Fairy Queen,
” Letters
between col. Robert Hammond, governor of the Isle of
Wight, and the committee of lords and commons at Derbyhouse, general Fairfax, lieut.-general Cromwell, commissary general Ireton, &c. relating to king Charles I. while
he was confined in Carisbrooke-castle in that island. Now
first published. To which is prefixed a letter from John
Ashburnham, esq. to a friend, concerning his deportment
towards the king, in his attendance on his majesty at
Hampton-court, and in the Isle of Wight,
” The life of Dr. Ward,
” which
was finished but a week before his death, was published
by Dr. Maty, in 1766.
e are speaking of lay for a long time in manuscript, till happily falling into the hands of the late earl of Hardwicke, it was communicated by him to Dr. Birch, who published
When sir George Carew returned in 1G09 from his
French embassy, he drew up, and addressed to king James
the First, “A Relation of the state of France, with the
characters of Henry the Fourth, and the principal persons
of that court;
” which reflects great credit upon his sagacity and attention as an ambassador, and his abilities as
a writer. In this piece are considered, 1. The name of
France. 2. Its ancient and modern limits. 3. Its quality,
strength, and situation. 4. Its riches. 5. Its political ordeis.
6. Its disorders and dangers. 7. The persons governing,
with those who are likely to succeed. 8. In what terms the
French live with their bordering neighbours. And lastly,
the state of matters between the king of England’s dominions and theirs. These heads are divided, as occasion
requires, into other subordinate ones. The characters are
drawn from personal knowledge and close observation, and
might be of service to a general historian of that period.
The composition is perspicuous and manly, and entirely
free from the pedantry which prevailed in the reign of king
James I. his taste having been formed in a better aera, that
of Queen Elizabeth. The valuable tract we are speaking
of lay for a long time in manuscript, till happily falling
into the hands of the late earl of Hardwicke, it was communicated by him to Dr. Birch, who published it in 1749,
at the end of his “Historical view of the Negotiations
between the Courts of England, France and Brussels, from
the year 1592 to 1617.
” That intelligent and industrious
writer justly observes, that it is a model, upon which ambassadors may form and digest their notions and representations and the late celebrated poet, Gray, spoke of it as
an excellent performance.
20, properly selected, and as occasion required, abridged, or only noted, were published by the late earl of Hardwicke, in 1757, in one vol. 4to, with an historical preface.
With regard to the general abilities and character of
lord Dorchester, it appears from alt his political remains,
that he was a judicious, faithful, and diligent minister, and
better qualified for his department than any who were his
immediate predecessors or successors in the same office.
King Charles himself, who was a good judge of his servants’ abilities, used to say, as sir P. Warwick relates in
his Memoirs, “that he had two secretaries of state, the
lords Dorchester and Falkland; one of whom was a dull
man in comparison of the other, and yet pleased him the
best for he always brought him his own thoughts in his
own woreds: the latter cloathed them in so fine a dress, that
he did not always know them again.
” Allowing for some
defects of stiffness and circumlocution, which are common
to all the writings of that time, lord Dorchester’s dispatches
are drawn up in that plain, perspicuous, and unaffected
stile which was fittest for business. Domestic concerns
were no part of his province, but entirely managed by the
lord treasurer Weston and archbishop Laud. He held the
pen singly in foreign affairs, and was regretted by those
who were used to receive the instructions of government
from a secretary of state, upon whom they could depend
that he would make a just report of their services, and that
he would not mislead or misrepresent the ministers with
whom he corresponded. That he died much lamented by
the public in general, and with the reputation of an honest
and well-deserving statesman, is declared by sir Thomas
Roe, in a manuscript letter to a friend in Holland. The
earl of Clarendon’s assertion, that lord Dorchester was
unacquainted with the government, laws, and customs of
his own country, and the nature of the people, is disputed
by Dr. Birch, in his “Review of the Negociations,
” who
considers it as absolutely incompatible with the experience
which he must have acquired in the house of commons.
But, not to mention that the noble historian, who had no
prejudice against his lordship, could not well be deceived
in the fact, it is, we think, confirmed by the figure he
made in the parliament of 1626, and by his acquiescence
in all the obnoxious measures of Buckingham, Weston,
and Laud. The following articles are attributed to his
pen, by Anthony Wood and lord Orford: 1. “Balance
pour peser en toute equite & droicture la Harangue fait
vagueres en L'Assemblee des illustres & puissans Seignoures
Messeigneurs les Estats generaux des Provinces Unies du
Pais has, &c.
” Harangue fait au Counseile
de Mess, les Estats generaux des Provinces Unies, touchant le Discord & le Troubles de PEglise & la Police,
causes par la Doctrine d'Arminius,
” 6 Oct. 1617, printed
with the former. 3. Various Letters in the “Cabala, or
Scrinia sacra,
” London, Cabala, or Mysteries of
State,
” London, Ger. Jo. Vossii
& clarorum Virorum ad.eum Epistoiae,
” London, Sir Ralph Winwood’s Memorials,
” published at
London, in folio, Howard’s Collection.
” 9. Memoirs
for Dispatches of political Affairs relating to Holland and
England, arm. 1618; with several Propositions made to the
States. Manuscript. 10. Particular Observations of the
military Affairs in the Palatinate, and the Low Countries,
annis 1621, 1622. Manuscript. 11. Letters relating to
State Affairs, written to the king and viscount Rochester,
from Venice, ann. 1613. Manuscript. The manuscript
pieces here mentioned, are probably no more than parts of
the collections preserved in the Paper office. The letters
from and to sir Dudley Carleton, during his embassy in
Holland, from January 1615-16, to December 1620, properly selected, and as occasion required, abridged, or only
noted, were published by the late earl of Hardwicke, in
1757, in one vol. 4to, with an historical preface. The second edition of the same work, with large additions to the
historical preface, appeared in 1775, and has been twice
reprinted since. These letters, if some allowances be made
for party violences and prejudices, contain more clear,
accurate, and interesting accounts of that remarkable period of Dutch history to which they relate, than are anj
where extant. There are, likewise, discussed in the
course of them, many points of great importance, at that
time, to the English commerce. Lord Hardwicke’s excellent preface has furnished the materials of the present
sketch.
university, 1778, for a valuable consideration. Whilst they were in this gentleman’s possession, the earl of Hardwicke paid 200l. for the perusal of them, and, it is
no reason to expect that honour.“Daniel Purcell, another nonjuror.
Soon after the accession of George I.,
fraying the expences of transcribing letters, negotiations,
and other materials of the like nature; and, in the December following, the companies of grocers and vintners
subscribed 25l. a year each to the same purpose; and the
chapter of Durham, 2 1l. The university of Oxford, and
the societies of New-college, Magdalen, Brazen-nose, and
Trinity, were contributors, but no mention is made of
Cambridge in the dedication of the first volume. Pro^
posals for printing the history were circulated in 1746, and
the first volume of it was completed in December 1747;
when the credit of a work which had been ushered into the
world with so much preparation and expectation, and
which had been supported by such ample subscriptions, was
almost wholly overturned by a remarkable act of literary indiscretion. Mr. Carte, having taken occasion to speak of
the unction of our kings, and of the great effects annexed
to it, introduced in a note a story of one Christopher
JLovel, a native of Wells, in Somersetshire, who is represented as having been healed of the evil, at Avignon, in
1716, by application to the pretender. The indiscretion
he had been guilty of was hurtful to his interest, and produced the three following pamphlets: 1.
” Remarks on
Mr. Carte’s General History of England;“2.
” A letter
to the Jacobite Journalist, concerning Mr. Carte’s History, by Duncan Mac Carte, a Highlander; 11 and 3. “Some
Specimens of Mr. Carte’s History of England, with Remarks thereon, by Donald Mac Carte.
” But this was not
all: the corporation of London unanimously resolved, in
April 1748, to withdraw their subscription; and the
history fell into very general neglect . It is to the honour
of Mr. Carte’s fortitude, that he was not discouraged from
prosecuting his undertaking; and perhaps he might receive private aid and support, though public assistance
was withdrawn. Whatever may have been the case in that
respect, his second volume, containing an account of all
public transactions, from the accession of Henry III. in
1216, to the death of Henry VII. in 1509, appeared in
1750. The third volume, which extended to the marriage
of the elector palatine with the princess Elizabeth, daughter
of James I. in 1613, was published in 1752. The fourth
volume, which Mr. Carte did not live to complete, appeared in 1755. It was intended to have been carried on
to the restoration, but concludes with the year 1654. It
was his design to have brought the narration down to the
revolution, for which purpose he had been at uncommon
pains to cpllect materials wherever they could be found.
Notwithstanding our author’s peculiar opinions and prejudices, his general history is undoubtedly a work of great
merit in point of information. It is written with eminent
exactness and diligence, and with a perfect knowledge of
original authors; and has of late years risen considerably
in reputation, as well as in price, especially since it was
discovered how much Hume was indebted to it. Mr. Carte
died at Caldecot-house, near Abingdon, Berkshire, April
2 S 1754, and was buried at Yattenden church, in a vault
on the north side of the chancel. The disorder which carried him off, was a diabetes. At his decease, all his papers came into the hands of his widow, daughter of colonel
Brett, who afterwards married Mr. Jernegan, a gentleman
intended for orders in the church of Rome. Mrs. Carte
left the papers to her second husband for life, and after
his death to the university of Oxford. They are now deposited in the Bodleian library, having been delivered by
Mr. Jernegan to the university, 1778, for a valuable consideration. Whilst they were in this gentleman’s possession, the earl of Hardwicke paid 200l. for the perusal of
them, and, it is said, might have purchased them for
1500/, but we do not see how this can be reconciled with
the terms of the will. It is certain, however, that as late
as 1775, Mr. Jernegan advertised the use of them. For a
consideration of 300l. Mr. Macpherson had the use of them;
who, from these and other materials, compiled his history
and state papers. Mr. Carte was a man of a strong constitution, and indefatigable application. When the studies
of the day were over, he would eat heartily; and in conversation was cheerful and entertaining; but his external
appearance was slovenly and uninviting.
. Harrington (afterwards sir John Harrington), then a student at the university of Cambridge. In the earl of Hardwicke’s miscellaneous State Papers, besides a number
Out of the large multitude of lord Burleigh’s letters,
which are extant in various places, many have found their
way to the press. Thirty-three are printed in Peck’s Desiderata Curiosa, and three in Howard’s Collections. Many
more may be met with in Dr. Forbes’s, Haynes’s, and
Murdin’s State Papers. The two last publications are specifically taken from the original letters, and other authentic memorials left by lord Burleigh, and now remaining at
Hatfield -house, in the library of the earl of Salisbury.
Haynes’s collection, which was published in 1740, extends
from 1542 to 1570. Murdin’s, which appeared in 1759,
reaches from 1571 to 1596. Both these publications throw
great light on the period to which they relate, and have
been of eminent service to our recent historians. The
whole course of the proceedings, relative to Mary queen
of Scots, is particularly displayed in these collections; on
which account much use has lately been made of them by
Dr. Gilbert Stuart. In the original papers of Mr. Anthony
Bacon, are several letters of lord Burleigh, from which
various extracts have been given by Dr. Birch, in his “Memoirs of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth.
” There is also in
the Nugsc Antiques, a letter of advice, written by his lordship in 1578, to Mr. Harrington (afterwards sir John Harrington), then a student at the university of Cambridge. In
the earl of Hardwicke’s miscellaneous State Papers, besides
a number of letters addressed to Cecil, there are seven of
his own writing, relative to important public concerns.
One of them shews in a striking view, the friendly behaviour of lord Burleigh to the earl of Leicester, when that
nobleman laboured under the queen’s displeasure, and
reflects great honour on the old treasurer’s memory. It is
strange, says the earl of Hardwicke, that Camden passes it
over in silence: but, indeed, adds his lordship, that historian’s omissions are very unpardonable, considering the
lights he had. As to lord Burleigh’s unpublished papers,
they are still exceedingly numerous, and are extant in the
British Museum, in the libraries of the earls of Salisbury
and Hardwicke, and in other places.
dustry and prosperity. He retained this high appointment till May 1801, when he was succeeded by the earl of Hardwicke. The same year he was appointed plenipotentiary
This important war being now ended, so highly to the honour of the British arms, lord Cornwallis returned to England, to receive the rewards justly due to his merit. He had before been invested with the insignia of the garter; and he was, in August 1792, advanced to the dignity of marquis Cornwailis, admitted a member of the privy-council, and, in addition to his other appointments, was nominated to the office of master-general of the ordnance. In 1798, the rebellion in Ireland appearing both to the viceroy, lord Camden, and to his majesty, to require a lordlieutenant who could act in a military as well as a civil capacity, the king appointed lord Cornwallis to that important service, which he executed with skill, promptitude, and humanity; and after quelling the open insurrection, he adopted a plan of mingled firmness and conciliation, which, executed with discriminating judgment, tended to quiet that distracted country, and prepare matters for a permanent plan, that should both prevent the recurrence of such an evil, and promote industry and prosperity. He retained this high appointment till May 1801, when he was succeeded by the earl of Hardwicke. The same year he was appointed plenipotentiary to France, and signed the peace of Amiens.
ichester, some of whose relations had been connected with the author. He communicated it to the late earl of Hardwicke, and to Dr. Douglas, the late bishop of Salisbury,
His History of Great Britain, from the revolution in
1688 to the accession of George I. was published in
two vols. 4to, in 1787. It was written by Mr. Cunningham in Latin, but was translated into English by the rev.
Dr. William Thomson. The original manuscript came
into the possession of the rev, Dr. Hollingberry,
archdeacon of Chichester, some of whose relations had been connected with the author. He communicated it to the late
earl of Hardwicke, and to Dr. Douglas, the late bishop of
Salisbury, both of whom recommended the publication.
In a short preface to the work, the archdeacon says: “My
first design was to have produced it in the original; but,
knowing how few are sufficiently learned to understand,
and how many are indisposed to read two quarto volumes in
Latin, however interesting and entertaining the subject
may be, I altered my purpose, and intended to have sent
it into the world in a translation. A nervous fever depriving me of the power, defeated the scheme.
” Accordingly, he afterwards transferred the undertaking to Dr.
Thomson; and, we are told by Dr. Hollingberry that this
gentleman “has expressed the sense of the author with
fidelity.
” The work was undoubtedly well deserving of
publication. It contains the history of a very interesting
period, written by a man who had a considerable degree
of authentic information, and his book contains many curious particulars not to be found in other histories. His
characters are often drawn with judgment and impartiality:
at other times they are somewhat tinctured with prejudice.
This is particularly the case with respect to general Stanhope and bishop Burnet, against whom he appears to have
conceived a strong personal dislike. He sometimes also
indulges himself in severe sarcasms on the clergy, and on
the female sex. But he was manifestly a very attentive
observer of the transactions of his own time; his works
abound in just political remarks; and the facts which he
relates are exhibited with great perspicuity, and often
with much animation. Throughout his book he frequently
intersperses some account of the literature and of the most
eminent persons of the age concerning which he writes;
and he has also adorned his work with many allusions to
the classics and to ancient history.
t he was acquainted with Richard Owen Cambridge, esq. the honourable Philip Yorke (afterwards second earl of Hardwicke), Daniel Wray, esq. the honourable Charles Yorke,
The early part of Mr. Edwards’s life was chiefly spent in town, and at Pitzhanger in Middlesex. But in 1739 he purchased an estate at Turrick, in the parish of Ellesborough, in Buckinghamshire, where he resided till his decease. This, however, did not prevent his frequent mixture with his literary friends, who were numerous and, respectable, both in rank and character. It appears that he was acquainted with Richard Owen Cambridge, esq. the honourable Philip Yorke (afterwards second earl of Hardwicke), Daniel Wray, esq. the honourable Charles Yorke, Isaac Hawkins Browne, esq. the lord chancellor Hardwicke, archbishop Herring, lord Willoughby of Parham, Mr. Samuel Richardson, George Onslow, esq. (now lord Onslow), Dr. Heberden, the right honourable Arthur Onslow, Mr. Highmore the painter, and other accomplished gentlemen. Dr. Akenside’s regard for him has already been displayed. Three of his letters to Dr. Birch may be perused in the fifty-third volume of the Gentleman’s Magazine;" and Mrs. Chapone, -when Miss Mulso, addressed an elegant ode to him, which he answered by a sonnet.
. This elegant scholar was one of the writers of the celebrated “Athenian Letters,” published by the earl of Hardwicke in 1798, 2 vols. 4to.
The bishop resigned the mastership of Bene't college in
July 17G4. After the death of lord Willoughby of Parham
in 1765, the literary conversation meetings of the royal
society, &c. which used to be held weekly at his lordship’s
house, were transferred to the bishop of Lincoln’s in Scotland yard, as one of their most accomplished members.
In July 1771, on a representation to his majesty, that, with
distinguished learning and abilities, and a most extensive
diocese, bishop Green (having nocommendam) had a very
inadequate income, he was presented to the
residentiaryship of St. Paul’s, which bishop Egerton vacated on his
translation to the see of Durham. He now removed to his
residentiary-house in Amen-corner, and took a small country-house at Tottenham. It has often been noticed as a
circumstance conducing to our prelate’s honour, that, in
May 1772, when the bill for relief of protestant dissenters,
&c. after having passed the house of commons, was rejected, on the second reading, by the house of lords
(102 to 27), he dissented from his brethren, and was the
only bishop who voted in its favour. Without any particular previous indisposition, his lordship died suddenly in
his chair at Bath, on Sunday, April 25, 1779. This elegant scholar was one of the writers of the celebrated
“Athenian Letters,
” published by the earl of Hardwicke
in
marked, the production of Dr. Green: Mr. Hurd, however, wrote “The opinion of an eminent lawyer (the earl of Hardwicke) concerning the right of appeal from the vice-chancellor
In May 1750, by Warburton’s recommendation to
Dr. Sherlock, bishop of London, Mr. Kurd was appointed
one of the Whitehall preachers. At this period the university of Cambridge was disturbed by internal divisions,
occasioned by an exercise of discipline against some of its
members, who had been wanting in respect to those who
were entrusted with its authority. A punishment having been inflicted on some delinquents, they refused
to submit to it, and appealed from the vice-chancellor’s
jurisdiction. The right of the university, and those to
whom their power was delegated, becoming by this means
the subject of debate, several pamphlets appeared, and
among others who signalised themselves upon this occasion,
Mr. Kurd was generally supposed to have written “The
Academic, or, a disputation on the state of the university
of Cambridge, and the propriety of the regulations made
in it on the 1 Ith day of May and the 26th day of June
1750, 8vo
” but this was, as we have already remarked, the
production of Dr. Green: Mr. Hurd, however, wrote
“The opinion of an eminent lawyer (the earl of Hardwicke)
concerning the right of appeal from the vice-chancellor of
Cambridge to the senate; supported by a short historical
account of the jurisdiction of the university; in answer
to a late pamphlet, intituled * An Inquiry into the right
of appeal from the vice-chancellor, &c.' By a fellow of a
college,
” A Letter to the
Author of a Further Inquiry,
”
an English peer, but died without issue of his marriage with the lady Isabella Grey, daughter of the earl of Hardwicke, and heiress of the last duke of Kent; a peeress
, a nobleman of great learning and accomplishments, was born in 1708. He was the third in succession to, and the last inheritor of, that title; there being no male descendants of his grandfather, sir Patrick Hume, the first earl, and his lordship having survived his only son, Alexander lord Polwarth, who had been created an English peer, but died without issue of his marriage with the lady Isabella Grey, daughter of the earl of Hardwicke, and heiress of the last duke of Kent; a peeress in her own right, under a limitation by Charles II. of the barony of Lucas of Cruduell.
ies recommended him to sir Philip Yorke, then lord-chief-jqstice of the King’s-bench, and afterwards earl of Hardwicke, for the instruction of his eldest son the second
, a learned English divine, was the
eldest son of Dr. Samuel Salter, prebendary of Norwich,
and archdeacon of Norfolk, by Anne-Penelope, the daughter of Dr. John Jeffery, archdeacon of Norwich. He was
educated for some time in the free-school of that city,
whence he removed to that of the Charter-house, and was
admitted of Bene't-college, Cambridge, June 30, 1730,
under the tuition of Mr. Charles Skottowe. Soon after his
taking the degree of B. A. in 1733, he was chosen into a
fellowship, and took his master’s degree in 1737. His natural and acquired abilities recommended him to sir Philip
Yorke, then lord-chief-jqstice of the King’s-bench, and
afterwards earl of Hardwicke, for the instruction of his
eldest son the second earl, who, with three of his brothers,
in compliment to abp. Herring, was educated at that college. As soon as that eminent lawyer was made Jordehancellor, he appointed Mr. Salter his domestic chaplain,
and gave him a prebend in the church of Gloucester, which
he afterwards exchanged for one in that of Norwich. About
the time of his quitting Cambridge, he was one of the writers
in the “Athenian Letters.
” Soon after the chancellor gave
Mr. Salter the rectory of Burton Goggles, in the county of
Lincoln, in 1740; where he went to reside soon after, and,
marrying Miss Seeker, a relation of the then bishop of
Oxford, continued there till 1750, when he was nominated
minister of Great Yarmouth by the dean and chapter of
Norwich. Here he performed the duties of that large
parish with great diligence, till his promotion to the
preachership at the Charter-house in January 1754, some
time before which (in July, 1751), abp. Herring had honoured him with the degree of D. D. at Lambeth. In 1756,
he was presented by the lord-chancellor to the rectory of
St. Bartholomew near the Royal Exchange, which was the
last ecclesiastical preferment he obtained; but in Nov.
1761, he succeeded Dr. Bearcroft as master of the Charter-house, who had been his predecessor in the preachership. While he was a member of Bene't college, he
printed Greek Pindaric odes on the nuptials of the princes
of Orange and Wales, and a copy of Latin verses on the
death of queen Caroline. Besides a sermon preached on
occasion of a music-meeting at Gloucester, another before
the lord-mayor, Sept. 2, 1740, on the anniversary of the
fire of London, a third before the sons of the clergy, 1755,
which was much noticed at the time, and underwent several alterations before it was printed; and one before the
House of Commons, Jan. 30, 1762; he published “A
complete Collection of Sermons and Tracts
” of his grandfather Dr. Jeffery, Moral and Religious Aphorisms,
” by Dr. Whichcote, with large additions of some
letters that passed between him and Dr. Tuckney, “concerning the Use of Reason in Religion,
” &c. and a biograpiiical preface, 1751, 8vo. To these may be added,
“Some Queries relative to the Jews, occasioned by a late
sermon,
” with some other papers occasioned by the
“Queries,
” published the same year. In Letters of Ben Mordecai;
” written by the rev. Henry
Taylor, of Crawley in Hants. In 1776, Dr. Salter printed
for private use, “The first 106 lines of the First Book of
the Iliad; nearly as written in Homer’s Time and Country;
” and printed also in that year, “Extract from the
Statutes of the House, and Orders of the Governors, respecting the Pensioners or poor Brethren
” (of the Charterhouse), a large single sheet in folio; in 1777, he corrected
the proof-sheets of Bentley’s “Dissertation on Phalaris;
”
and not long before his death, which happened May 2,
1773, he printed also an inscription to the memory of his
parents, an account of all which may be seen in the
“Anecdotes of Bowyer.
” Dr. Salter was buried, by his
own express direction, in the most private manner, in the
common burial-ground belonging to the brethren of the
Charter-house.
of the first part of it, corrected and enlarged, divided into two volumes, with a dedication to the earl of Hardwicke. The same year appeared “A Sermon preached before
In 1751, Mr. Warburton published an edition of Pope’s
“Works,
” with notes, in nine volumes, octavo and in the
same year printed “An Answer to a Letter to Dr. Middleton, inserted in a pamphlet entitled The Argument of the
Divine Legation fairly stated,
” &c. 8vo. and “An Account of the Prophecies of Arise Evans, the Welsh Prophet, in the last Century;
” the latter of which pieces
afterwards subjected him to much ridicule. In 1753, Mr.
Warburton published the first volume of a course of Sermons, preached at Lincoln’s-inn, entitled “The Principles
of natural and revealed Religion occasionally opened and
explained;
” and this, in the subsequent year, was followed by a second. After the public had been some time
promised lord Bolingbroke’s Works, they were about this
time printed. The known abilities and infidelity of this
nobleman had created apprehensions, in the minds of many
people, of the pernicious effects of his doctrines; and
nothing but the appearance of his whole force could have
convinced his friends how little there was to be dreaded
from arguments against religion so weakly supported. The
personal enmity, which had been excited many years before
between the peer and our author, had occasioned the former
to direct much of his reasoning against two works of the
latter. Many answers were soon published, but none with
more acuteness, solidity, and sprightliness, than “A View
of Lord Bolingbroke’s Philosophy, in two Letters to a
Friend,
” The, Divine Legation
” having being called for, he
printed a fourth edition of the first part of it, corrected
and enlarged, divided into two volumes, with a dedication
to the earl of Hardwicke. The same year appeared “A
Sermon preached before his grace Charles duke of Marlborough president, and the Governors of the Hospital for
the small-pox and for inoculation, at the parish church
of St. Andrew, Holborn, on Thursday, April the 24th,
1755,
” 4to; and in Natural and Civil Events the
Instruments of God’s moral Government, a Sermon preached
on the last public Fast-day, at Lincoln’s-inn Chapel,
” 4to.
In Remarks on
Mr. David Hume’s Essay on the Natural History of Religion;
” which is said to have been composed of marginal
observations made by Dr. Warburton on reading Mr.
Hume’s book; and which gave so much offence to the author animadverted upon, that he thought it of importance
enough to deserve particular mention in the short account
of his life. On Oct. 11, in this year, our author was ad* Soon after he attained this pre- Neal’s History of the Puritans, which
ferment, he wrote the Remarks on are now added to his Works.
“vanced to the deanery of Bristol and in 175&republished
the second part of
” The Divine Legation,“divided into
two parts, with a dedication to the earl of Mansfield, which
deserves to be read by every person who esteems the wellbeing of society as a concern of any importance. At
the latter end of next year, Dr. Warburton received the
honour, so justly due to his merit, of being dignified
with the mitre, and promoted to the vacant see of
Gloucester. He was consecrated on the 20th of Jan.
1760; and on the 30th of the same month preached -before the House of Lords. In the next year he printed
” A
rational Account of the Nature and End of the Sacrament
of the Lord’s Supper,“12mo. In 1762, he published
” The
Doctrine of Grace: or, the office and operations of the
Holy Spirit vindicated from the insults of Infidelity and
the abuses of Fanaticism,“2 vols. 12mo, one of his performances which does him least credit; and in the succeeding year drew upon himself much illiberal abuse from
some writers of the popular party, on occasion of his complaint in the House of Lords, on Nov. 15, 1763, against
Mr. Wilkes, for putting his name to certain notes on the
infamous
” Essay on Woman.“In 1765, anotber edition
of the second part of
” The Divine Legation“was published, as volumes III. IV. and V.; the two parts printed
in 1755 being considered as volumes I. and II. It was this
edition which produced a very angry controversy between
him and Dr. Lowth, whom in many respects he found more
than his equal. (See Lowth, p. 438.) On this occasion
was published,
” The second part of an epistolary Correspondence between the bishop of Gloucester and the late
professor of Oxford, without an Imprimatur, i.e. without a
cover to the violated Laws of Honour and Society,“1766,
8vo. In 1776, he gave a new edition of
” The Alliance
between Church and State;“and
” A Sermon preached
before the incorporated Society for the Propagation of the
Gospel in foreign Parts, at the anniversary Meeting in the
parish church of St. Mary-le-bow, on Friday, Feb. 21,“8vo.
The next year produced a third volume of his
” Sermons,“dedicated to lady Mansfield and with this, and a single
” Sermon preached at St. Lawrence-Jewry on Thursday,
April 30, 1767, before his royal highness Edward duke of
York, president, and the governors of the London Hospital.
&c.“4to, he closed his literary labours. His faculties continued unimpaired for some time after this period; and, in
1769, he gave the principal materials to Mr. Ruffhead, for
his
” Life of Mr. Pope." He also transferred 500l. to lord
Mansfield, judge Wilmot, and Mr. Charles Yorke, upon
trust, to found a lecture in the form of a course of sermons; to prove the truth of revealed religion in general,
and of the Christian in particular, from the completion of
the prophecies in the Old and New Testament, which relate to the Christian church, especially to the apostacy of
Papal Rome. To this foundation we owe the admirable
introductory letters of bishop Hurd and the well- adapted
continuation of bishops Halifax and Bagot, Dr. Apthorp,
the Rev. R. Nares, and others. It is a melancholy reflection, that a life spent in the constant pursuit of knowledge frequently terminates in the loss of those powers, the
cultivation and improvement of which are attended to with
too strict and unabated a degree of ardour. This was in
some degree the misfortune of Dr. Warburton. Like Swift
and the great duke of Marlborough, he gradually sunk into
a situation in which it was a fatigue to him to enter into
general conversation. There were, however, a few old
and valuable friends, in whose company, even to the last,
his mental faculties were exerted in their wonted force;
and at such times he would appear cheerful for several
hours, and on the departure of his friends retreat as it were
within himself. This melancholy habit was aggravated by
the loss of his only son, a very promising young gentleman, who died of a consumption but a short time before
the bishop himself resigned to fate June 7, 1779, in the
eighty-first year of his age. A neat marble monument has
been lately erected in the cathedral of Gloucester, with the
inscription below *.
d his acquaintance and friendship with the noble family of Yorke; and in 1745, Mr. Yorke, afterwards earl of Hardwicke, as teller of the exchequer, appointed Mr.Wray
, a man of taste and learning, was born
Nov. 28, 1701, in the parish of St. Botolph, Aldersgate.
His father, sir Daniei Wray, was a London citizen, who
resided in Little Britain, made a considerable fortune in
trade (as a soap-boiler), and purchased an estate in Essex,
near Ingatestone, which his son possessed aftr r him. Sir
Daniel served the office of sheriff for that county, and was
knighted in 1708 on presenting a loyal address to queen
Anne. His son was educated at the Charter-house, and
was supposed in 1783 to have been the oldest survivor of
any person educated there. In 1718 he went to Queen’s
college, Cambridge, as a fellow commoner. He took his
degree of B. A. in 1722, after which he made the tour of
Italy, accompanied by John, earl of Morton, and Mr. King,
the son of lord chancellor King, who inherited his title.
How long he remained abroad between 1722 and 1728 is
not precisely ascertained, except by the fact that a cast in
bronze, by Pozzo, was taken of his profile, in 1726, at
Home. It had this inscription upon the reverse, “Nil actum reputans, si quid superesset agendum,
” which line is
said to have been a portrait of his character, as he was in
all his pursuits a man of uncommon diligence and perseverance. After his return from his travels, he became
M.A.-in 1728, and was already so distinguished in philosophical attainments, that he was chosen a fellow of the
Royal Society in March 1728-9. He resided however generally at Cambridge, though emigrating occasionally^ to
London, till 1739, or 1740, in which latter year, January
1740-41, he was elected F. S. A. and was more habitually a
resident in town. In 1737 commenced his acquaintance
and friendship with the noble family of Yorke; and in 1745,
Mr. Yorke, afterwards earl of Hardwicke, as teller of the
exchequer, appointed Mr.Wray his deputy teller, in which
office he continued until 1782, when his great punctuality
and exactness in any business he undertook made the constant attendance of the office troublesome to him. He was
an excellent critic in the English language; an accomplished judge of polite literature, of virtft, and the fine
arts; and deservedly a member of most of our learned societies; he was also an elected trustee of the British Museum. He was one of the writers of the “Athenian Letters
” published by the earl of Hardwicke; and in the first
volume of the Archaeologia, p. 128, are printed “Notes on
the walls of antient Rome,
” communicated by him in Extracts from different Letters from Rome, giving an
Account of the Discovery of a most beautiful Statue of Venus, dug up there 1761.
” He died Dec. 29, 1783, in his
eighty. second year, much regretted by his surviving friends,
to whose esteem he was entitled by the many worthy and
ingenious qualities. which he possessed. Those of his heart
were as distinguished as those of his mind; the rules of religion, of virtue, and morality, having regulated his conduct from the beginning to the end of his days. He was
married to a lady of merit equal to his own, the daughter
of Barrel, esq. of Richmond. This lady died at Richmond, where Mr.Wray had a house, in May 1803. Mr.
Wray left his library at her disposal and she, knowing his
attachment to the Charter-house, made the governors an
offer of it, which was thankfully accepted and a room was
fitted up for its reception, and it is placed under the care
of the master, preacher, head schoolmaster, and a librarian.
The public at large, and particularly the friends of Mr.
Wray, will soon be gratified by a memoir of him written by
the lare George Hardinge, esq. intended for insertion in
Mr. Nichols’s “Illustrations of Literature.
” This memoir,
of which fifty copies have already been printed for private
distribution, abounds with interesting anecdotes and traits
of character, and copious extracts from Mr. Wray’s correspondence, and two portraits, besides an engraving of the
cameo.
ril 1754, advanced to the rank of an earl of Great Britain, with the titles of viscount Royston, and earl of Hardwicke. This favour was conferred unasked, by his sovereign,
After he had executed the high office of lord high chancellor about seventeen years, in times and circumstances of
accumulated difficulty and danger, he was, in April 1754,
advanced to the rank of an earl of Great Britain, with the
titles of viscount Royston, and earl of Hardwicke. This
favour was conferred unasked, by his sovereign, who
treated him through the whole of his reign with particular
esteem and confidence, and always spoke of him in a manner which shewed that he set as high a value on the man as
on the minister. His resignation of the great seal, in November 1756, gave ah universal concern to the nation,
however divided at that time in other respects. But he still
continued to serve the public in a more private station; at
council, at the House of Lords, and upon every occasion
where the course of public business required it, with the
same assiduity as when he rilled one of the highest offices in
the kingdom. He always felt and expressed the truest affection and reverence for the laws and constitution of his
country: this rendered him as tender of the just prerogatives invested in the crown, for the benefit of the whole, as
watchful to prevent the least incroachment upon the liberty
of the subject. The part which he acted in planning, introducing, and supporting, the “Bill for abolishing the
heritable Jurisdictions in Scotland,
” and the share which he
took, beyond what his department required of him, in
framing and promoting the other bills relating to that
country, arose from his zeal to the Protestant succession,
his concern for the general happiness and improvement of
the kingdom, and for the preservation of this equal and
limited monarchy which were the governing principles of
his public conduct through life. And these, and other
bills which might be mentioned, were strong proofs of his
talents as a legislator. In judicature, his firmness and dignity were evidently derived from his consummate knowledge and talents; and the mildness and humanity with
which he tempered it, from the most amiable disposition.
He was wonderfully happy in his manner of debating causes
upon the bench. His extraordinary dispatch of the business
of the court of chancery, increased as it was in his time
beyond what had been known in any former, was an advantage to the suitor, inferior only to that arising from the
acknowledged equity, perspicuity, and precision, of his
decrees. The manner in which he presided in the House
of Lords added order and dignity to that assembly, and expedition to the business transacted there. His talents as a
speaker in the senate as well as on the bench, were universally admired: he spoke with a natural and manly eloquence, without false ornaments or personal invectives; and,
when he argued, his reasons were supported and strengthened by the most apposite cases and examples which the
subject would allow. His manner was graceful and affecting; modest, yet commanding his voice peculiarly clear
and harmonious, and even loud and strong, for the greater
part of his time. With these talents for public speaking r
the integrity of his character gave a lustre to his eloquence,
which those who opposed him felt in the debate, and which
operated most powerfully on the minds of those who heard
him with a view to information and convictions, is<
, earl of Hardwicke, the eldest son of the preceding, was born Dec.
, earl of Hardwicke, the eldest son of the preceding, was born Dec. 20, 1720. At the school of Dr. Newcome, at Hackney, he received the first rudiments of his education, and from that seminary, on 26th May, 1737, was removed to Bene'c college, Cambridge, under the tuition of the Rev. Dr. Salter. In the year following ha was appointed one of the tellers of the exchequer, in the room of sir Charles Turner, bart. deceased. In 1740 he. left college, and soon after married lady Jemima Campbel, only daughter of John lord viscount Glenorchy, by the lady Amabel Grey, eldest daughter of Henry duke -of Kent, at whose decease she succeeded to the title of marchioness Grey and baroness Lucas of Crudwell. By this marriage he became possessed of a large part of the duke’s estate, together with his seat of Wrest-house, near Silsoe, in Bedfordshire. He early engaged as a legislator. In 1741 he was chosen member for Ryegate, in Surrey, and in 1747 one of the representatives for the county of Cambridge, as he was also in 1754 and 1761. At the installation of the duke of Newcastle, as chancellor of the university of Cambridge, in 1749, he had the degree of LL.D. conferred upon him. In 1764 he succeeded his father in his title and estate; and after a strong contention for the office of lord high steward of the university, he obtained that honour against Lord Sandwich. The infirm state of his lordship’s health, combined with his attachment to literary pursuits, prevented him from attending to, or joining in, the politics of the day. He had the honour, however, of a seat in the cabinet during the existence of that short-lived administration in 1765, of which lord Rockingham was the head, but without any salary or official situation which, though repeatedly offered to- him, he never would accept. He died May 16, 1790.
large. At length, an elegant, correct, and authenticated edition, under the auspices of the present earl of Hardwicke, was published in 1798, in two volumes, 4to, and
His lordship through life was attentive to literature, and
produced several useful works, besides the assistance which
he rendered on various occasions to authors who have
acknowledged their obligations to him. On the death of
queen Caroline, in 1738, he inserted a poem amongst the
Cambridge verses printed on that occasion. Whilst a
member of the university of Cambridge, he engaged with
several friends in a work similar to the celebrated Travels
of Anacharsis into Greece, by Monsieur Barthelemi. It
was entitled “Athenian Letters; or the Epistolary Correspondence of an Agent of the Kin r of Persia residing at
Athens during the Peloponnesian War,
” and consisted of
letters supposed to have been written by contemporaries of
Socrates, Pericles, and Plato. A few copies were printed
in 1741 by Bettenbam, and in 1782 a hundred copies were
reprinted; but still the work was unknown to the public at
large. At length, an elegant, correct, and authenticated
edition, under the auspices of the present earl of Hardwicke,
was published in 1798, in two volumes, 4to, and an advertisement prefixed to the first volume, attributes its having
been so long kept from the public to an ingenuous diffidence which forbad the authors of it, most of them extremely young, to obtrude on the notice of the world what
they had considered merely as a preparatory trial of their
strength, and as the best method of imprinting on their own
minds some of the immediate subjects of their academical
studies. The friends who assisted in this publication were,
the hon. Charles Yorke, afterwards baron Morden, who died
in 1770; Dr. Rooke, master of Christ’s college, Cambridge;
Dr. Green, afterwards bishop of Lincoln; Daniel Wray,
esq., the rev. Mr. Heaton, of Bene't college; Dr. Heberden, Henry Coventry, esq., the rev. Mr. Laury, Mrs. Catherine Talbot, Dr. Birch, and Dr. Salter.