, better known by the name of Woollstonecraft, a lady of very extraordinary genius, but whose history and opinions
, better known by the name of Woollstonecraft, a lady
of very extraordinary genius,
but whose history and opinions are unhappily calculated to
excite a mixture of admiration, pity, and scorn, was born
in or near London, April 27, 1759, of poor parents, who
then resided at Epping, but afterwards removed to a farm
near Beverley in Yorkshire, where this daughter frequented
a day-school in the neighbourhood. From this place her
father again removed to Hoxton near London, and afterwards to Walworth. During all this time, and until Miss
Woollstonecraft arrived at her twenty-fourth year, there
appears little that is interesting, or extraordinary in her
history, unless it may be considered as such that she early
affected an original way of thinking, accompanied with
correspondent actions, and entertained a high and romantic
sense of friendship, which seems greatly to have prevailed
over filial affection. In her twenty-fourth year, she formed
the plan of conducting a school at Islington, in
conjunction with her sisters, which in the course of a few months
she removed to Newington-green, where she was honoured
by the friendship of Dr. Price. Of her opinions on religious subjects at this time, we have the following singular
account from her biographer: “Her religion was, in
reality, little allied to any system of forms, and was rather
founded in taste, than in the niceties of polemical discussion. Her mind constitutionally attached itself to the
sublime and amiable. She found an inexpressible delight
in the beauties of nature, and in the splendid reveries of
the imagination. But nature itself, she thought, would be
no better than a vast blank, if the mind of the observer
did not supply it with an animating soul. When she
walked amidst the wonders of nature, she was accustomed
to converse with her God. To her mind he was pictured
as not less amiable, generous, and kind, than great, wise,
and exalted. In fact she had received few lessons of religion in her youth, and her religion was almost entirely of
her own creation. But she was not on that account the
less attached to it, or the less scrupulous in discharging
what she considered as its duties. She could not recollect
the time when she had believed the doctrine of future
punishments,
” &c.