, eldest son of a plain uneducated country gentleman, of Hales-Owen,
, eldest son of a plain uneducated country gentleman, of Hales-Owen, Shropshire, who
farmed his own estate, was born Nov. 18, 1714. He learned to read of an old dame, commemorated in his poem of
the “School-mistress;
” and soon received such delight
from books, that he was always calling for new entertainment, and expected that, when any of the family went to
market, a new book should be brought him, which, when
it came, was in fondness carried to bed and laid by him. It
is said, that> when his request had been neglected, his mo^
ther wrapped up a piece of wood of the same form, and
pacified him for the night. As he grew older, he went for
a while to the grammar-school in Hales-Owen, and was
placed afterwards with Mr. Crumpton, an eminent schoolmaster at Solihul, where he distinguished himself by the
quickness of his progress. When he was young (June 1724)
he was deprived of his father; and soon after (August 1726)
of his grandfather; and was, with his brother, who died
afterwards unmarried, left to the care of his grandmother,
who managed the estate. From school he was sent in 1732
to Pembroke-college in Oxford, a society which for half a
century had been eminent for English poetry and elegant
literature. Here it appears that he found delight and advantage; for he continued his name there ten years, though
he took no degree. After the first four years he put on the
Civilian’s gown, but without shewing any intention to engage in the profession. About the time when he went to Oxford, the death of his grandmother devolved his affairs to
the care of the reverend Mr. Dolman, of Brome in Staffordshire, whose attention he always mentioned with gratitude.
At Oxford he amused himself with English poetry; and in
1737, printed at Oxford, for private circulation, a small
miscellany of juvenile verses, without his name. He then
for a time wandered about, to acquaint himself with life 7
and was sometimes at London, sometimes at Bath, or any
place of public resort; but he did not forget his poetry.
He published in 1740 his “Judgment of Hercules,
” addressed to Mr. Lyttelton, whose interest he supported with
great warmth at an election: this was, two years afterwards,
followed by the “School-mistress.
” Mr. Dolman, to
whose care he was indebted for his ease and leisure, died in
1745, and the care of his own fortune now fell upon him.
He tried to escape it a while, and lived at his house with
his tenants, who were distantly related; but, finding that
imperfect possession inconvenient, he took the whole estate
into his own hands, more to the improvement of its beauty
than the increase of its produce. His delight in rural pleasure was now excited, and his ambition of rural elegance:
he began from this time, says Johnson, “to point his
prospects, to diversify his surface, to entangle his walks,
and to wind his waters; which he did with such judgment
and such fancy, as made his little domain the envy of the
great, and the admiration of the skilful; a place to be visited
by travellers, and copied by designers.
” Of these employ*
merits Dr. Johnson has perhaps formed a harsh estimate^
yet Shenstone’s affectionate apologist, Mr. Greaves, is obliged to confess that he spent his whole income in adorning the
Leasowes, and that it added little to his comfort, the only
happiness he felt being confined to the moment of improvement. It i$ said, that, if he had lived a little longer, he
would have been assisted by a pension such bounty could
not have been ever more properly bestowed and overtures
appear to have been made lor that purpose, but they came
too late he died at the Leasowes, of a putrid fever, Feb^
11, 1763 and was buried by the side of his brother in the
church-yard of Hales-Owen. He was never married,
though it appears that he was twice in love, and Johnson
says he might have obtained the lady, whoever she was, to
whom his “Pastoral Ballad
” was addressed. He is represented by his friend Dod^lev as a man of great tenderness
and generosity, kind to all that were within his influence
but, if once offended, not easily appeased inattentive to
(economy, and careless of his expences; in his person larger than the middle size, with something clumsy in his form; very negligent of his cloaths, and remarkable for wearing his grey hair in a particular manner; for he held that the fashion was no rule of dress, and that every man was to suit his appearance to his natural form. These, says Mr. Greaves, were not precisely his sentiments, though he thought right enough, that every one should, in some degree, consult his particular shape and complexion in
adjusting his dress; and that no fashion ought to sanctify
what was ungraceful, absurd, or really deformed.