Higgons, Sir Thomas
, son of Dr. Thomas Hi?gons, some time rector of Westburgh in Shropshire, was born in 1624, in that county became a commoner of St. Alban’s-hall in the beginning of 1638, when he was put under the tuition of Mr. Edward Corbet, fellow of Merton college, and lodged in the chamber under him in that house. Leaving the university without a degree, he retired to his native country. He married the widow of Robert earl of Essex; and delivered an oration at her funeral, Sept. 16, 1656. “Oratione funebri, a marito ipso, more prisco laudata fuit,” is part of this lady’s epitapii. He married, secondly, Bridget, daughter of sir Devil Greenvili of Stow, and sister to John earl of Bath and removed to Grewell in Hampshire was elected a burgess for Malmsbury in 16.38, and for New Windsor in 1661. His services to the crown were rewarded with a pension of 500l. a year, and gifts to the amount of 4000l.*
“King Charles II. sold Dunkirk to Louis XIV. and gave him English oak enough to build the very fleet that afterwards attacked and defeated one of ours in Bantry Bay on the coast of Ireland. This puts me in mind of the foresight of a gentleman, who had been some time envoy from the king to the princes and states of Italy, and who, in his return home, made the coast of France his road; in order to be as useful to his country as possible, and to his sovereign too, as he thought. In his audience of the kin;, he told his majesty, that the French were hard at work, building men of war in several of their ports, and that such a hasty increase of the naval power of France could not but threaten England’s sovereignty of the seas, and consequently portend destruction to her trade. The gentleman was in the right, for our trade and sovereignty of the seas are dependent on each other; they must live or die together. But what a recompeiise d you think he met with for his fidelity really such a one as I would hardly have believed, had I been told of it by any person but his own sou, the late Mr. Bevil Higgons, whose works, both in prose and verse, have made hrm known to all the men of letters in Britain, and whose attachment to the family of Stuart, evet to his dying day, puts his veraciiy in this point out of dispute. The recompense was a severe reprimand from the king, as the forerunner to the laying him aside, fur talking of things which his majesty told him it was not his business to meddle with.” I forget (says Mr. Nichols) from which of the political writers between 1730 and 1740 this anecdote was transcribed; most probably “The Craftsman.”
Nichols’s Poems. see Index. —Ath. Ox. vol. II.