, a very learned and eminent divine of the church of England, although a native of France, and well known by his numerous and excellent
, a very learned and eminent divine of the church of England, although a native of France, and well known by his numerous and excellent writings, was born in 1641 at Alençon; and having received a liberal education, which highly improved his great natural parts, he became minister of the reformed church at Rouen. At this place, before he was thirty-five years of age, he distinguished himself by publishing some very able pieces, which excited much notice, and he was invited to Charenton, then the principal church the reformed had in France, and whither the most considerable persons of the Protestant religion constantly resorted. As he now saw himself in a condition to promote the interest of the church, he applied himself to the task with all imaginable zeal, and preached several valuable sermons in defence of the faith, against the artful attempts of the bishop of Meaux, who was then labouring to overturn the reformed religion, by seeming concessions to its professors. Upon the revocation of the edict of Nants, Mr. Allix found himself obliged to quit France, and had prepared a pathetic discourse, which he intended to have delivered as his farewell to his congregation, but was obliged to omit it, although it was afterwards printed.
, a surgeon of some eminence in London, was originally a native of France, and a member of the Academy of surgery at
, a surgeon of some
eminence in London, was originally a native of France,
and a member of the Academy of surgery at Paris, which
city he left about the year forty-six or seven, and came to
reside in London. Here he published several works, particujarly on Ruptures; the first was entitled “Dissertations on Ruptures,
” Plain and familiar instructions to persons afflicted
with Ruptures,
” 12mo; “Observations on Aneurism,
” Familiar instructions on the diseases of the Urethra and
Bladder,
” Dissertations on Hermaphrodites,
” A discourse on the importance of Anatomy,
” delivered
at Surgeons’ hall, Jan. 21, 1767, 4to. His principal work
appeared in 1768, entitled “Memoires de Chirurgie, avec
des remarques sur l'etat de la Medicine et de la Chirurgie
en France et en Angleterre,
” 2 vols. 4to. This is the only
work he published in French, after his coming to England
It consists of eleven memoirs, two of which are translated
from the English of Dr. Hunter’s Medical Commentaries,
on the Hernia Congenita, and a particular species of
Aneurism. He appears, as a practitioner, to have possessed
much skill, and as a writer to have been industrious in collecting information on the topics which employed his pen,
but was somewhat deficient in judgment, and not a little
credulous. So much was he attached to the ancient prejudices of his church, that he employs one of the memoirs
in these volumes on the question, whether a rupture should
incapacitate a man from performing the functions of the
Romish priesthood, which he, however, is disposed to
decide in the negative. Ie informs us in this work, that
he had studied rupture cases for the space of fifty years,
and that the same study had been cultivated in his family
for the space of 200 years. The only notice we have of
his reputation in his own country is to be found in the dis
course on Anatomy which he delivered in Surgeons’ hall.
In this he informs us that he had the honour to instruct
Adelaide of Orleans, princess of the blood, and a very
accomplished lady, in the operations of surgery.
, an engraver of considerable fame in this country, was a native of France, and there first learned his art. He was brought
, an engraver of considerable fame in this country, was a native of France, and there first learned his art. He was brought into England by Duhosc, with whom he went to law respecting the plates for the storyof Ulysses, engraven from die designs of Rubens in the collection of Dr. Meacle. Being afterwards reconciled, Baron accompanied Dubosc to Paris in 1729, and engraved a plate from Watteau, and engaged to do another from Titian in the king’s collection, for Mons. Crozat, for which he was to receive 60l. sterling. While at Paris, they both sat to Vanloo. How soon afterwards he returned to England, is not known, but he died in Panton-square, Piccadilly, Jan. 24, 1762. His manner of engraving seems to have been founded on that of Nicholas Dorigny. It is slight and coarse, 2 without any great effect; and his drawing is frequently very defective. He executed, however, a great number of works, a few portraits, and some considerable pictures after the best masters; as the family of Cornaro, at Northumberland house; Vandyke’s family of the earl of Pembroke, at Wilton; Henry VIII. giving the charter to the barber surgeons, from Holbein; the equestrian figure of Charles I. by Vandyke, at Kensington; its companion, the king, queen, and two children; and king William on horseback with emblematic figures, at Hampton-court. His last considerable work was the family of Nassau, by Vandyke. This, and his St. Cecilia from Carlo Dolce, he advertised in 1759, by subscription, at a guinea the pair.
, an engraver, was a native of France, and being invited to England by Nicholas Dorigny,
, an engraver, was a native of
France, and being invited to England by Nicholas
Dorigny, assisted him for some time in engraving the cartoons of Raphael; and afterwards separating from Dorigny,
he undertook to engrave the cartoons for the printsellers.
He also engraved the duke of Marlborough’s battles, for
which he received 80l. per plate; and, assisted first by
Du Guernier, and afterwards by Beauvais and Baron, he
completed them within two years, in 1717. He then became a printseller, and published, by subscription, the
translation of Picart’s Religious Ceremonies. As an engraver, he possessed no great merit: his style is coarse
and heavy, and the drawing of the naked parts of the
figure in his plates is very defective. The “Continence
of Scipio,
” from a picture of Nicholas Poussin, in the
Houghton collection, is one of his plates. He flourished
in 1714.
, an engraver, who flourished about the year 1657, was a native of France. His first manner of engraving was partly copied
, an engraver, who flourished
about the year 1657, was a native of France. His first
manner of engraving was partly copied from that of Francis
de Poilly; but he afterwards adopted a manner of his own,
which, though not original, he greatly improved; and,
accordingly, he finished the faces, hands, and all the naked
parts of his figures very neatly with dots, instead of strokes,
or strokes and dots. This style of engraving has been of
late carried to a high degree of perfection, particularly in
England. Notwithstanding several defects in the naked
parts of his figures, and in his draperies, his best prints
are deservedly much esteemed. Such are “A Holy Family,
” from Fran. Corlebet; “Virgin and Child,
” from
Simon Vouet; “The Pompous Cavalcade,
” upon Louis
the XlVth coming of age, from Chauveau; “The Virgin
with the infant Christ,
” holding some pinks, and therefore
called “The Virgin of the Pinks,
” from Raphael; “The
Virgin de Passau,
” from Salario;“” Christ carrying his
Cross,“from Nicolas Mignard;
” A dead Christ, supported by Joseph of Arimathea." He also engraved many
portraits, and, among others, that of Charles II. of England. He likewise engraved from Leonardo de Vinci,
Guido, Champagne, Stella, Coypel, and other great masters, as well as from his own designs.
, an elegant Latin poet, was a native of France, and born at Chateauneuf, in Berri, Jan. 25,
, an elegant Latin poet, was a native of France, and born at
Chateauneuf, in Berri, Jan. 25, 1711, and entered the
order of the Jesuits, in whose schools he taught rhetoric
for some years. When invited to Paris, to the college of
Louis-le-Grand, he acquired great fame by his Latin poetry,
which was thought so pure, that he was usually styled ultimus Romanorum. On the abolition of the order of the
Jesuits in France, Desbillons found an honourable asylum
with the elector palatine, who gave him a pension of a
thousand crowns, and a place in the college of Manheim,
where he died March 19, 1789. He wrote Latin Iambics
with great ease, and even wrote his will in that measure,
in which he bequeathed his valuable library to the Lazarists. His works are: 1. “Fabulae libri XV.
” Paris,
1775, and 1778, elegantly printed by Barbou; but it is
rather singular that the first five books of these fables were
originally printed at Glasgow in 1754, and a second edition at Paris, in 1756; at which time the author acknowledged the work, and added five more books, the whole
then containing about three hundred and fifty fables. The
greater part are translated or paraphrased from the writings
of the most eminent fabulists, ancient and modern, particularly among the moderns, La Fontaine; but there is a
considerable number of originals. He afterwards increased
the number of books to fifteen, as in the edition first mentioned. They have been also reprinted in Germany, and
the author himself translated them into French, with the
Latin text added, which edition, usually reckoned the best,
was published at Manheim, 1769, 2 vols. 8vo. His Latin
style is peculiarly chaste and unaffected. 2. “Nouveaux
eclaircissemens sur la vie et les ouvrages de Guillaume
Postel,
” Histoire de la vie et des exploits militaires de madame de St. Balmont,
” Ars bene valendi,
” Phaxlrus,
” with three dissertations on
the life, fables, and editions of Phacdrus, and notes, Manheim, 1786, 8vo, and an edition of Thomas a Kempis.
He wrote also some dramatic pieces in Latin, and a history of the Latin language, which is still in manuscript.
In 1792 his “Miscellanea Posthuma
” were published at
Manheim, 8vo, containing a fifteenth and sixteenth book
of Fables; “Monita Philosophica,
” against the modern
French philosophers; and a Latin comedy, “Schola Patrum, sive Patrum et Liberorum indoles emendata.
”
, a learned Dominican, a native of France, was born about 1499, and went into Portugal
, a learned Dominican, a native of France, was born about 1499, and went into Portugal in his infancy, and was there educated. He afterwards entered into the Dominican order at Louvain, where he died in 1566. He published some of the works of Euthymius Zigubenus, QScumenius, and Arethras, but is best known for the aid he contributed in publishing a beautiful edition of the Vulgate Bible, printed by Plantin in 1565, 5 vols, 12mo, and the Louvain Bible of 1547, reprinted 1583. The faculty of Louvain, who had engaged his assistance in these editions, employed him also on a less honourable commission, to collect from the works of Erasmus all erroneous and scandalous propositions, as they were called, that they might be laid before the council of Trent. This commission he executed in the true spirit of expurgatorial bigotry.
a French style was infinitely more tedious, and it was necessary to have every chapter corrected by a native of France, before it could be offered to the discerning
“The king of Denmark, then upon a visit to this country (1768), had brought with him an eastern manuscript,
containing the life of Nadir Shah, which he was desirous
of having translated in England. The secretary of state,
with whom the Danish minister had conversed upon the
subject, sent the volume to Mr. Jones, requesting him to
give a literal translation of it in the French language: but
he wholly declined the task, alleging for his excuse, the
dryness of the subject, the difficulty of the style, and
chiefly his want both of leisure and ability, to enter upon
an undertaking so fruitless and laborious. He mentioned,
however, a gentleman, with whom he was not then acquainted, but who had distinguished himself by the translation of a Persian history, and some popular tales froi
the Persic, as capable of gratifying the wishes of his Danish Majesty. Major Dow, the wriu-r alluded to, excuse
himself on account of his numerous engagements; and tl
application to Mr.lono, uus renewed. It was hinted, th
his compliance would be of no small advantage to him, at
his entrance into life; that it would procure him some mark
of distinction, which would be pleasing to him; and above
all, that it would be a reflection upon this country, if the
king should be obliged to carry the manuscript to France.
Incited by these motives, and principally the last, unwilling to be thought churlish or morose, and eager for reputation, he undertook the work, and sent the specimen of
it to his Danish majesty, who returned his approbation of
the style and method, but desired that the whole translation might be perfectly literal, and the oriental images accurately preserved. The task would have been far easier
to him, if he had been directed to finish it in Latin; for
the acquisition of a French style was infinitely more tedious,
and it was necessary to have every chapter corrected by a
native of France, before it could be offered to the discerning eye of the public, since in every language there are
certain peculiarities of idiom, and nice shades of meaning,
which a foreigner can never attain to perfection. The
work, however arduous and unpleasant, was completed in
a year, not without repeated hints from the secretary’s
office, that it was expected with great impatience by the
court of Denmark. The translation was not, however,
published until 1770. Forty copies upon large paper were
sent to Copenhagen; one of them, bound with uncommon
elegance, for the king himself: and the others as presents
to his courtiers.
”
, a native of France, and minister of state to Augustus elector
, a native of France, and minister of state to Augustus elector of Saxony, was born at Viteaux in 1518; and, having passed through his studies at home, went to Italy in 1547, to complete his knowledge in the civil law, of which he commenced doctor at Padua. Thence going to Bologna, he met with one of Melancthon’s works, which raised in him a desire to be acquainted with that eminent reformer; accordingly he made a tour into Germany, on purpose to visit him at Wittenberg in Saxony, where he arrived in 1549, and shortly after embraced the protestant religion. From this time there commenced a strict friendship between him and Melancthon, so that they became inseparable companions; and Melancthon, finding Languet well acquainted with the political interest of princes, and with the history of illustrious men, was wonderfully delighted with his conversation, and his extensive fund of information, in all which he was not only minutely correct as to facts, but intelligent and judicious in his remarks and conjectures.
, a native of France, was born in 1660, at Rouen, in Normandy, where
, a native of France, was
born in 1660, at Rouen, in Normandy, where also he
received his education, on the revocation of the edict of
Nantz he came over to England, and lived at first with his
godfather and relation, Paul Dominique, esq. but afterwards grew a considerable trader himself, kept a large
East-India warehouse in Leadenhall-street, and had a good
place in the foreign post-office. During his residence in
this kingdom, he acquired a great knowledge of the English language, and not only published a good translation of
“Don Quixote,
” but also wrote several “Songs,
” “Prologues,
” “Epilogues,
” &c. dedicated a poem “On Tea,
”
to the Spectator, and, what was still more extraordinary,
became a successful dramatic writer in the language of a
country of which he was not a native. The respective
titles of his numerous pieces of that kind may be seen in
the “Biographia Dramatica.
” Although married to a
very beautiful woman, his morals were licentious, and he
was one day found dead in a brothel in the parish of St.
Clement Danes, not without suspicion of having been
murdered; though other accounts state that he was in
some measure accessary to his death. This happened Feb.
19, 1717-18, which, being his birth-day, exactly completed his fifty-eighth year. His body was interred in his
parish-church, that of St. Andrew Undershaft, in the city
of London.
, a celebrated painter, was a native of France; but neither his Christian name, his age, nor
, a celebrated painter, was a native of France; but neither his Christian name, his age, nor the master under whom he studied, are known to the writers on these subjects. He has sometimes been called the French Claude, from his successful imitation of that master. In his figures he is clearly superior to him. The forms of his trees are elegant and free, his scenery rich, and his buildings and other objects designed in a very pleasing manner. His touch is light, yet firm; his colouring generally clear and natural. Two of his works have been engraved by Strange, and all of them prove that he studied nature with nice observation, and his choice from her productions was always agreeable. In France he is sometimes called, Paid le tue, or le bon Patd; and there was also a Patet le Jeune, of whom still less is known.
, an engraver, was a native of France, but came to England about 1750, and settled
, an engraver, was a native of France, but came to England about 1750, and settled in London. In the latter part of his life he resided at Mother lied Cap’s, near Kentish Town, where he died in 1774. He was of an amiable disposition and much respected, and had the honour of instructing both Ryland and Hall in the art of engraving.
, a saint of the fifth century, was a native of France, and originally a soldier; but determining
, a saint of the fifth century, was
a native of France, and originally a soldier; but determining to forsake the world, retired to the monastery of Lerins in Provence, and became a priest. The time of his
death is uncertain, but after that event he was canonized,
He wrote a work to which he is supposed to have owed this
honour, entitled “Commonitorium adversus Hsereticos,
”
in which he proposes to confute heretics by two authorities:
first, that of the Holy Scriptures; and secondly, that of the
church, and he advances many arguments that have at least
the appearance of ingenuity. There have been many
editions of this work abroad, and one at Cambridge, in 1687,
12mo. Mosheim calls it an excellent treatise, but his
translator says he sees nothing in it but that blind veneration for ancient opinions, which is so fatal to the discovery
and progress of truth, and an attempt to prove that nothing
but the voice of tradition is to be consulted in fixing the
sense of the holy scriptures.