Edmondes, Sir Thomas
, knt. memorable for his embassies at several courts, was born at Plymouth, in Devonshire, about 1563. He | was the fifth and youngest son of Thomas Edmondes, head customer of that port, and of Fowey, in Cornwall, by Joan his wife, daughter of Antony Delabare, of Sherborne, in Dorsetshire, csq. who was third son of Henry Edmondes, of New Sarum, gent by Juliana his wife, daughter of William Brandon, of the same place. Where he had his education is nut known. But we are informed that he was introduced to court by his name-sake, sir Thomas Edmonds, comptroller of the queen’s household; and, being initiated into public business under that most accomplished statesman, sir Francis Walsingham, secretary of state, he was, undoubtedly through his recommendation, employed by queen Klizabcth in several embassies. In 1592, she appointed him her resident at the court of France, or rather agent for her affairs in relation to king Henry IV. with a salary of twenty shillings a day, a sum so ill paid, and so insufficient, that we find him complaining to the lord treasurer, in a letter dated 1593, of the greatest pecuniary distress. The queen, however, in May 1596, made him a grant of the office of secretary to her majesty for the French tongne, “in consideration of his faithful and acceptable service heretofore done.” Towards the end of that year he returned to England, when sir Anthony Mild may was sent ambassador to king Henry; but he went back again to France in the beginning of May following, and in less than a month returned to London. In October, 1597, he was dispatched again M agent for her majesty to the king of France and returned to EngJand about the beginning of May 1598, where his stay Was extremely short, for he was at Paris in the July following. But, upon sir Henry Neville being appointed ambassador to the French court, he was recalled, to his great satisfaction, and arrived at London in June 1597. Sir Henry Neville gave him a very great character, and recommended him to the queen in the strongest terms. About December the 26th of that year, he was sent to archduke Albert, governor of the Netherlands, with a letter of credence, and instructions to treat of a peace. The archduke received him with great respect; but not being willing to send commissioners to England, as the queen desired, Mr. Edmondes went to Paris, and, having obtained of king Henry IV. Boulogne for the place of treaty, he returned to England, and arrived at court on Sunday morning, February 17. The llth of March | following, he embarked again for Brussels and, on the 22d, had an audience of the archduke, whom having prevailed upon to treat with the queen, he returned home, April 9, 1600, and was received by her majesty with great favour, and highly commended for his sufficiency in his negotiation. Soon after he was appointed one of the commissioners for the treaty of Boulogne, together with sir Henry Neville, the queen’s ambassador in France, John Herbert, esq. her majesty’s second secretary, and Robert Beale, esq. secretary to the council in the North; their commission being dated the 10th of May, 1600. The two last, with Mr. Edmondes, left London the 12th of that month, and arrived at Boulogne the 16th, as sir Henry Neville did the same day from Paris. But, after the commissioners had been above three months upon the place, they parted, July 28th, without ever assembling, owing to a dispute about precedency between England and Spain. Mr. Edmondes, not long after his return, was appointed one of the clerks of the privy-council; and, in the end of June 1601, was sent to the French king to complain of the many acts of injustice committed by his subjects against the English merchants. He soon after returned to England but, towards the end of August, went again, and waited upon king Henry IV. then at Calais to whom he proposed some measures, both for the relief of Ostend, then besieged by the Spaniards, and for an offensive alliance against Spain. After his return to England he was appointed one of the commissioners for settling, with the two French ambassadors, the depredations between England and France, and preventing them for the future. The 20th of May, 1603, he was knighted by king James I; and, upon the conclusion of the peace with Spain, on the 18th of August, 1604, was appointed ambassador to the archduke at Brussels. He set out for that place the 19th of April, 1605; having first obtained a reversionary grant of the office of clerk of the crown and, though absent, was chosen one of the representatives for the Burgh of Wilton, in the parliament which was to have met at Westminster, Nov. 5, 1605, but was prevented by the discovery of the gunpowder-plot. During his embassy he promoted, to the utmost of his power, an accommodation between the king of Spain and the States-General of the United Provinces .*
It appears from some of his dispatches, that prince Maurice was ex tremely averse to an accommodation and used all the efforts imaginable, to
|persuade Henry IV. to prevent the success of the treaty about the truce, And, while it was negotiating, he was of a very craving humour; for, not satisfied with the large treatments granted by the States not contented with the restitution from the archdukes of all the prince of Orange’s land in Burgundy, and the Netherlands, he farther demanded satisfaction for certain pretensions, grounded upon grants to his father from the States of Brabaut and Flanders, which carried with them no show of equity. In his conduct he appeared to have been of a very warm temper; apt to fly out upon contradiction, and to embrace hasty resolutions, from which he was afterwards obliged to recede, in a manner that did him no credit.
It is no small compliment to sir Thomas, that he was not a favourite at the French court. Mr. de Puisieux, one of the French prime ministers, takes notice in a letter t>> their ambassador in England, that they would get nothing by having him in the room of sir George Carew, since sir Thomas Edmomles understood them too well, If he should be sent,“adds Mr. de Puisicux, ”it it only with a design to make a fuller discovery of our affairs. We cannot nor oucht to oppose openly the appointment of him but whoever can underhand diveit this stroke would, in my opinion, do a good service.“And secretary de Villeroy, in a letter to the above-mentioned ambassador, has these words: ” Let me know, whether there is a means of procuring sir Thomas Edrnondes to be employed elsewhere; which would be a great relief to the queen. However, I am not of opinion that you should make this proposal; for, if it does not succeed, it will only serve to exasperate this little man, who has spirit and courage enough."
Biog. Brit. Lloyd’s State Worthies. riince’s Worthies. Lodge’s Illut-> trations.