nd in a manner suitable to the embarrassed finances of his country, he resided in the first floor of a bookseller in Piccadilly, and afterwards as a lodger in the
, late president of the United States of
America, and a political writer of considerable reputation,
was descended from one of the families who founded the
colony of Massachusets, and was born at Braintree, in that
colony, Oct. 19,1735. Before the revolution which separated
America from Great Britain, he had acquired much reputation in the profession of the law; and on the eve of that
event, he published “An essay on canon and feudal Law.
”
He afterwards employed his pen in the American papers,
and contributed essentially to widen the breach between
the mother country and her colonies. He was still, however, a friend to loyal measures; and when captain Preston
was tried for his life, for ordering the soldiers to fire upon
a mob, pleaded his cause with spirit and eloquence, and
Preston was acquitted. This in some measure injured Mr.
Adams’s character with the more violent party, but had so
little effect on the more judicious, that he was elected a
member of Congress in 1774, and re-elected in 1775. He
was one of the first to perceive that a cordial reconciliation,
with Great Britain was impossible; and was therefore one
of the chief promoters of the resolution, passed July 4, 1776,
declaring the American States free, sovereign, and independent. When, in the course of the war, the States entertained hopes of assistance from the courts of Europe,
Mr. Adams was sent, with Dr. Franklin, to that of Versailles, to negociate a treaty of alliance and commerce.
On their return, he assisted in forming a constitution for
the state of Massachusets. He was then employed by
America as her plenipotentiary to the States General of
Holland; and contributed not a little to bring on the war
between those States and Great Britain. He afterwards
went to Paris, and assisted in concluding the general peace.
His temperate advice, On this occasion, respecting the loyalists, again alarmed the republican party, who began to
consider him as a partizan of England. He was the first
ambassador America sent to this country, where, with true
republican simplicity, and in a manner suitable to the embarrassed finances of his country, he resided in the first
floor of a bookseller in Piccadilly, and afterwards as a
lodger in the same street.
ysician, was born at Nuremberg, in 1702. He was at first intended for his father’s business, that of a bookseller, but appears to have gone through a regular course
, a mathematician and physician, was born at Nuremberg, in 1702. He was at first
intended for his father’s business, that of a bookseller, but
appears to have gone through a regular course of study at
Altdorf. In 1735, he published his “Commercium literarinm ad Astronomiae incrementum inter hujus scientiæ
amatores communi consilio institutum,
” Nuremberg, 8vo;
which procured him the honour, of being admitted a member of the royal academy of Prussia. In 1743 he was
invited to Altdorf to teach mathematics, and three years
after was made professor of logic. He died in 1779. He
published also a monthly work on. Celestial Phenomena, in
German.
to have been related to Edward Aggas, the son of Robert Aggas, of Stoke-nayland in Suffolk, who was a bookseller of some note from 1576 to 1594; and from one or ether
, a surveyor and engraver in the sixteenth century, whose original plates are now extremely
rare. He first drew a plan of London, which, though referred to the time of Henry VIII. and Edward VI. appears
from several circumstances to have been made early in
Elizabeth’s reign, about 1560, on wood. It was republished
in 1618, with alterations, in six sheets, cut in wood, and
re-engraved by Vertue in 1748. The plates were bought
by the Society of Antiquaries, and published in 1776. His
next performances were plans of Oxford and Cambridge,
about 1578. The former is the oldest plan of the city of
Oxford extant. It was engraved at the expence of the
university in 1728, with ancient views, on the borders, of
the colleges and schools as they originally stood. This
plate was unfortunately destroyed at the fire which consumed so much literary property belonging to Mr. Nichols,
in 1808. The only other plan of Aggas’s workmanship,
now known, is one of Dumvich in SulVolk, dated March,
1589, on vellum, and not engraved. Ames attributes to
him a work entitled “A Preparative to platting of Landes
and Tenements for suweigh, &c.
”
e buried in obscurity for several ages, Until Papirius Masso found a manuscript of them by chance at a bookseller’s shop at Lyons, who was just going to cut it to
, archbishop of Lyons, was one of the most
celebrated and learned prelates of the ninth century. Dr.
Cave and Olearius tell us he was a Frenchman, but Du
Pin says there is no absolute proof of this. He was born
in the year 779, as father Mabillon deduced from a short
martyrology, upon which Agobard seems to have written
some notes with his own hand. In the year 782 he came
from Spain to France. Leidrade, archbishop of Lyons,
ordained him priest in the year 804, and nine years after
he was appointed coadjutor, or corepiscopus to that prelate, and when, in the year 816, Leidrade returned to a
monastery at Soissons, Agobard was substituted in his
room with the consent of the emperor, and the whole synod
of the French bishops, who highly approved of the choice
which Leidrade had made of a successor. This ordination, however, was objected to, as it is contrary to the
canons, that a bishop should choose his successor himself. Agobard notwithstanding enjoyed the see quietly
till he was expelled from it by the emperor Louis le Debormaire, because he had espoused the party of his sou
Lothaire, and been one of the chief authors of deposing
him in the assembly of bishops at Compiegne in the year
833. For Lewis, having secured himself against the injustice and violence which had been offered by Lothaire and
the bishops of his party, prosecuted the latter in the council of Thionville in the year 835. Agobard, who had retired to Italy, with the other bishops of his party, was summoned three times before the council, and refusing to appear, was deposed, but no person was substituted in his
room. His cause was again examined in the year 836, at
an assembly held at Stramiac near Lyons: but it continued
still undetermined, on account of the absence of the bishops, whose sole right it was to depose their brother. At
length, the sons of the emperor having made their peace
with him, they found means to restore Agobard, who was
present in the year 838, at an assembly held at Paris; and
he died in the service of his sovereign, in Xaintonge, June
5, in the year 840. This church honoured him with the
title of saint. He had no less share in the affairs of the
church, than those of the empire; and he shewed by his
writings that he was a much abler divine than a politician.
He was a strenuous defender of ecclesiastical discipline,
very tenacious of the opinions he had once espoused, and
very vigorous in asserting and defending them. Dupin,
however, acknowledges that he was unfriendly to the worship of images, and it appears that he held notions on that
subject which would have done honour to more enlightened times. He wrote a treatise entitled “Adversus dogma
Faslicis ad Ludovicum Imp.
” against Felix Orgelitanus, to
shew that Christ is the true son of God, and not merely by
adoption and grace. He wrote likewise several tracts
against the Jews, a list of which may be seen in the General Dictionary, 10 vols. fol. from whence our account of
him is principally taken. His style is simple, intelligible,
and natural, but without elevation or ornament. He reasons with much acuteness, confirming his arguments, as
was the custom then, by the authority of the fathers, whom
he has largely quoted. His works were buried in obscurity
for several ages, Until Papirius Masso found a manuscript
of them by chance at a bookseller’s shop at Lyons, who
was just going to cut it to pieces to bind his books with.
Masso published this manuscript at Paris in 1603 in 8vo,
and the original was after his death deposited in the king
of France’s library. But Masso having suffered many
errors to escape him in his edition, M. Baluze published
a more correct edition at Paris, 1666, 2 vols. 8vo, from the
same manuscript, and illustrated it with notes. He likewise added to it a treatise of Agobard entitled “Contra
quatuor libros Amalarii liber,
” which he copied from an
old manuscript of Peter Marnæsius, and collated with another manuscript of Chifflet. This edition has been likewise reprinted in the “Bibliotheca Patrum.
”
without explanations. After his death, Paruta’s plates having fallen into the hands of Marco Maier, a bookseller, he published at Lyons, in 1697, anew edition, in
, an eminent antiquary, lived in
the seventeenth century. Under the pontificate of Urban
VIII. he resided in the court of cardinal Barberini; and
afterwards pope Alexander VII. who had a great esteem for
him, gave him the appointment of examiner of antiquities
in the Roman territory. He published the two following
works, which are now scarce, and much valued. 1. “La
Sicilia di Filippo Paruta descritta con Medaglie, con la
giunta di Lionardo Agostini,
” Rome, Delia Sicilia di Filippo Paruta descritta con Medaglie,
parte prima.
” This first part, which has become very rare,
contains only engravings of the medals, to which a description was promised, in a second. part, which never appeared. Agostini used the same plates as Paruta, and added
about four hundred medals to those in Paruta’s edition, but
still without explanations. After his death, Paruta’s plates
having fallen into the hands of Marco Maier, a bookseller,
he published at Lyons, in 1697, anew edition, in folio,
entitled, “La Sicilia di Filippo Paruta descritta con Medaglie, e ristampata con aggiunta di Lionardo Agostini,
hora in miglior ordine disposta da Marco Maier, arrichita
d'una descrittione compendiosa di quella famosa isola.
”
But notwithstanding the explanations and historical additions of this editor, this edition is less valued than those of
Paruta and Agostini. The best and most complete is that
which Havercamp published in Latin, at Leyden, 1723,
3 vols. folio, with a commentary; these form the sixth,
seventh, and eighth volumes of Grsevius’s Thesaurus. The
other work of Agostini is, 2. “Le Gemme antiche figurate
di Lionardo Agostini, con le annotazioni del sig. Gio.
Pietro Bellori,
” part I. Rome, Consiglier di pace,
” which was written by Lionardo Agosti.
, an English minor poet of the seventeenth century, was the son of James Allestry, a bookseller of London, who was ruined by the great fire in 1666,
, an English minor poet of the
seventeenth century, was the son of James Allestry, a bookseller of London, who was ruined by the great fire in 1666,
and related to provost Allestry, the subject of the next article. Jacob was educated at Westminster school, and entered at Christ-church, Oxford, in the act-term 1671, at
the age of eighteen, and was elected student in 1672. He
took the degree in arts; was music-reader in 1679, and
terrte filius in 1681; both which offices he executed with,
great applause, being esteemed a good philologist and
poet. He had a chief hand in the verses and pastorals
spoken in the theatre at Oxford, May 21, 1681, by Mr.
William Savile, second son of the marquis of Halifax, and
George Cholmondeley, second son of Robert viscount Kells
(both of Christ-church), before James duke of York, his
duchess, and the lady Anne; which verses and pastorals
were afterwards printed in the “Examen Poeticum.
” He
died of the consequence of youthful excesses, October 15,
1686, and was buried, in an obscure manner, in St. Thomas’s church-yard, Oxford.
, a bookseller, author, and editor, was born at Liverpool, about
, a bookseller, author, and editor, was
born at Liverpool, about the year 1738, and was educated
at Warrington. About 1748 he was put apprentice to a
bookseller at Liverpool, but in 1756 he went to sea, as a
common seaman. In 1758 or 1759, he returned to England, and came to London, where, it is said, he soon became known to several wits of the day, as Dr. Goldsmith,
Churchill, Lloyd, and Wilkes. His turn, however, was
for political writing; and in 1759 he published “The
conduct of a late noble commander (lord George Sackville)
examined.
” This was followed by a compilation, in sixpenny numbers, of “A Military Dictionary,
” or an account of the most remarkable battles and sieges from the
reign of Charlemagne to the year 1760. Soon after, he
wrote various political letters in the Gazetteer newspaper,
which he collected and published under the title of “A
collection of interesting letters from the public papers.
”
About the same time he published “A Review of his Majesty (George II.'s) reign
” and when Mr. Pitt resigned in
1761, he wrote “A Review of his Administration.
” His
other publications were, “A Letter to the right hon.
George Grenville;
” “An history of the Parliament of
Great Britain, from the death of queen Anne to the death
of George II.;
” “An impartial history of the late War
from 1749 to 1763;
” “A Review of lord Bute’s administration.
” When Wilkes’s infamous essay on woman was
brought to light, Mr. Almon wrote an answer to Kidgell,
the informer’s, narrative. In 1763, he commenced bookseller in Piccadilly, and published “A Letter concerning
libels, warrants, and seizure of papers, &c.;
” “A history
of the Minority during the years 1762 1765;
” “The
Political Register,
” a periodical work, and the general receptacle of all the scurrility of the writers in opposition to
government; “The New Foundling Hospital for Wit,
” a
collection of fugitive pieces, in prose and verse, mostly of
the party kind: “An Asylum,
” a publication of a similar
sort; “Collection of all the Treaties of Peace, Alliance,
and Commerce, between Great Britain and other powers,
from the revolution in 1688 to the present time;
” “The
Parliamentary Register,
” an account of the debates in parliament; “The Remembrancer,
” another monthly collection of papers in favour of the American cause; “A collection of the Protests of the House of Lords;
” “Letter to
the earl of Bute,
” Free Parliaments, or a vindication of the parliamentary constitution of England, in
answer to certain visionary plans of modern reformers;
”
“A parallel between the siege of Berwick and the siege
of Aquilea,
” in ridicule of Home’s tragedy, the Siege of
Aquilea; “A Letter to the right hon. Charles Jenkinson,
”
ich could give consequence to a political effusion. About the year 1782, he retired from business as a bookseller; but in a tew years he married the widow of Mr. Parker,
The works which he more publicly avowed are, “Anecdotes of the Life of the Earl of Chatham,
” 2 vols. 4to, and
3 vols. 8vo; “Biographical, Literary, and Political Anecdotes of several of the most eminent persons of the present
age, never before printed,
” 3 vols. 8vo, 1797. Both contain
many curious particulars of the political characters and contests of his day, picked up from the various members of parliament who frequented his shop, and confided in him. His
last publication was a collection of Mr. Wilkes’s pamphlets
and letters, with a life, in which he praises that gentleman
in the most extravagant manner, while he relates facts
concerning his character that elsewhere might have been
accounted defamation. In all his political career he was
attached to the party which supported Wilkes, and opposed
the measures of government in the early part of the present
reign. At that time it was not surprising that many of his
pamphlets were popular, or that he should be able to boast
of an intimacy with men of rank in the political world. He
had the hardihood to publish writings which booksellers of
established reputation would have rejected, and he ran
little risk, as the expence of printing was defrayed by his
employers, while he had the profits of the sale. Even of
those which, upon his own authority, we have given as his
productions, it is highly probable he was rather the editor
than the author. In those wbich more recently appeared
under his name, there is very little of the ability, either
argumentative or narrative, which could give consequence
to a political effusion.
About the year 1782, he retired from business as a bookseller; but in a tew years he married the widow of Mr.
Parker, printer of a newspaper called the General Advertiser, of which he then was proprietor and editor: the speculation however injured his fortune, and he became a prisoner in the king’s bench fora libel, and was afterwards
an outlaw. Extricated at length from his difficulties, he
retired again into Hertfordshire, where he died December
12, 1806, leaving his widow in great distress.
lation of “Palafox’s theological and moral Homilies upon the passion of our Lord.” Frederic Leonard, a bookseller at Paris, having proposed, in the year 1692, to print
, called
by some Abraham Nicholas, but, according to Niceron,
Nicholas only appears in his baptismal register, was born
February. 1634, at Orleans. He was much esteemed at
the court of France, and appointed secretary of an embassy which that court sent to the commonwealth of Venice,
as appears by the title of his translation of father Paul’s
history of the council of Trent; but he afterwards published
writings which gave such offence, that he was imprisoned
in the Bastile. The first works he printed were the “History of the Government of Venice, and that of the Uscocks,
a people of Croatia:
” in l'Homme de Cour.
”
In his preface he defends Gracian against father Bouhours’
critique, and gives his reasons why he ascribes this book
to Baltasar and not to Laurence Gracian. He also mentions that he had altered the title, because it appeared too
ostentatious and hyperbolical; that of “l'Homme de Cour,
”
the Courtier, being more proper to express the subject of
the book, which contains a collection of the finest maxims
for regulating a court-life. In 1686, he printed “La Morale de Tacite;
” in which he collected several particular
facts and maxims, that represent in a strong light the artifices of court-flatteries, and the mischievous effect of their
conversations. In 1690, he published at Paris a French
translation of the first six books of Tacitus’s annals, with
his historical and political remarks, some of which, according to Mr. Gordon, are pertinent and useful, but many
of them insipid and trifling. Amelot having employed his
peri for several years on historical and political subjects,
began now to try his genius on religious matters; and in
1691 printed at Paris a translation of “Palafox’s theological and moral Homilies upon the passion of our Lord.
”
Frederic Leonard, a bookseller at Paris, having proposed,
in the year 1692, to print a collection of all the treaties of
peace between the kings of France and all the other princes
of Europe, since the reign of Charles VII. to the year 1690,
Amelot published a small volume in duodecimo, containing
a preliminary discourse upon these treaties; wherein he
endeavours to show the insincerity of courts in matters of
negociation. He published also an edition of. cardinal
d'Ossat’s letters in 1697, with several observations of his
own; which, as he tells us in his advertisement, may serve
as a supplement to the history of the reigns of Henry III.
and Henry IV. of France. Amelot died at Paris, Dec. 8,
1706, being then almost 73 years of age, and left several
other works enumerated by Niceron, who objects to his
style, but praises his fidelity. The freedom with which
he wrote on political subjects appears to have procured for
him a temporary fame, unaccompanied with any other advantages. Although he was admired for his learning and
political knowledge, he was frequently in most indigent
circumstances, and indebted to the bounty of his friends.
is called a broken heart, which happened a few months afterwards, became indebted to the charity of a bookseller for a grave; not to be traced now, because then no
Notwithstanding this show of firmness, and his other services, Mr. Amhurst was totally neglected by his coadjutors in
the Craftsman, when they made their terms with the crown;
and he died soon after, of a fever, at Twickenham. His death
happened April 27, 1742; and his disorder was probably occasioned, in a great measure, by the ill usage he had received. Mr. Ralph, in his “Case of Authors,
” speaks with much
indignation upon the subject. “Poor Amhurst, after having been the drudge of his party for the best part of twenty
years together, was as much forgotten in the famous compromise of 1742, as if he had never been born! and when
he died of what is called a broken heart, which happened
a few months afterwards, became indebted to the charity
of a bookseller for a grave; not to be traced now, because
then no otherwise to be distinguished, than by the freshness of the turf, borrowed from the next common to cover
it.
” Mr. T. Davies the bookseller, in his character of
Mr. Pulteney, expresses himself concerning the treatment
of Mr. Amhurst in the following terms: “But if the earl
of Bath had his list of pensioners, how comes it that Arnhurst was forgotten? The fate of this poor man is singular:
He was the able associate of Bolingbroke and Pulteney,
in writing the celebrated weekly paper called ‘ The
Craftsman.’ His abilities were unquestionable: he had
almost as much wit, learning, and various knowledge, as
his two partners: and when those great masters chose not
to appear in public themselves, he supplied their places
so well, that his essays were often ascribed to them. Am-,
hurst survived the downfall of Walpole’s power, and had
reason to expect a reward for his labours. If we excuse
Bolingbroke, who had only saved the shipwreck of his
fortunes, we shall be at a loss to justify Pulteney, who
could with ease have given this man a considerable income.
The utmost of his generosity to Amhurst, that I ever heard
of, was a hogshead of claret! He died, it is supposed, of a
broken heart, and was buried at the charge of his honest
printer, Richard Francklin.
” Mr. Amhurst was, however,
one of those imprudent and extravagant men, whose irregularities, in spite of their talents, bring them at length
into general disesteem and neglect; although this does
not excuse the conduct cf his employers. His want of
purity in morals was no objection to their connection with
him, when he could serve their purpose. And they might
have easily provided for him, and placed him above
necessity during the remainder of his days. The ingratitude of statesmen to the persons whom they make use of
as the instruments of their ambition, should furnish an instruction to men of abilities in future times; and engage
them to build their happiness on the foundation of their
own personal integrity, discretion, and virtue.
e des Lettres,” Amst. 1709, 12mo. This piece, which he was induced to undertake by the persuasion of a bookseller of Rotterdam, as a supplement to Bayle’s dictionary,
, son of the above, was born at
Metz, July 29, 1659: he began his studies in that city,
and went to Hanau for the prosecution of them. He afterwards applied himself to the civil law at Marpurg, Geneva,
and Paris, in the last of which cities he was admitted an
advocate. Upon his return to Metz, in 1679, he followed
the bar, where he began to raise himself a considerable
reputation. After the revocation of the edict of Nantes in
1685, the protestants of Metz deputed him to court, in
order to represent that they ought not to be comprehended in this revocation. But all that he could obtain
was, that this city should be treated with more lenity and
favour. He followed his father to Berlin, where the elector of Brandenbourg appointed him judge and director of
the French in that city. In 1695, that prince gave him,
new marks of his confidence and favour, by sending him to
Swisserland in order to negociate some affairs of importance. The marquis of Baden Dourlach, who was then at
Basil, having had an opportunity of seeing him, entertained
so great an esteem for him, that he chose him for his
counsellor, and desired the elector of Brandenbourg to
give Ancillon leave that he should serve him for some time.
Our author did not return to Berlin till the end of the
year 1699, and was then appointed inspector of all the
courts of justice which the French had in Prussia, and
counsellor of the embassy. The elector, being crowned
king of Prussia, made him likewise his historiographer and
superintendant of the French school, which had been
founded at Berlin, according to the scheme which he had
formed. He died in that city the 5th of July, 1715, being
fifty-six years of age. His works are, 1. “L‘Irrevocabilité de l’Edit de Nantes prouvé par les principes du droit
& de la politique,
” Amsterdam, Reflexions politiques, par lesquelles on fait voir que la persecution des reformez est contre les veritable interets de
la France,
” Cologne, Nouveaux Interets des
Princes.
” 3. “La France interessée a rétablir l'Edit de
Nantes,
” Amsterdam, Histoire de
l'Etablissement des François Refugiez dans les Etats de
son altesse electorate de Brandebourg,
” Berlin, Melange Critique,
” mentioned
before in his father’s article. 6. “Dissertation sur
l‘usage de mettre la premiere pierre au fondement des
edifices publics, addressée au prince electoral de Brandebourg, à l’occasion de la premiere pierre, qu‘il a posée lul
même au fondement du temple qu’on construit pour les
François Refugiez dans le quartier de Berlin nommé Friderichstadt,
” Berlin, Le dernier triomphe de Frederic Guillaume
le Grand, electeur de Brandebourg, ou discours sur la
Statue Equestre érigée sur le Pont Neuf du Berlin,
” Berlin, Histoire de la vie de Soliman II.
empereur des Turcs,
” Rotterdam, 1706, 8vo; a work not
very correct, but the preliminary matter is valuable, and
contains, among other particulars, some curious information respecting Thuanus, taken from the “Bibliotheque
Politique Heraldique Choisie,
” 1705, 8vo. 9. “Traité
des Eunuques, par C. Dollincan,
” Memoires concernant les vies
et les ouvrages de plusieurs modernes celebres dans la
Republique des Lettres,
” Amst. Histoire de la vie de M. Ltscheid,
” Berlin,
esent life, occasioned by his sermon, preached August 30, 1706, at the funeral of Mr. Thomas Bennet, a bookseller. The doctrine of this sermon Mr. Hoadly examined,
In 1700, a still larger field of activity opened, in which
Atterbury was engaged four years with Dr. Wake (afterwards archbishop of Canterbury) and others, concerning
the rights, powers, and privileges of convocations in which
he displayed so much learning and ingenuity, as well as
zeal for the interests of his order, that the lower house of
convocation returned him their thanks; and in consequence
of this vote a letter was sent to the university of Oxford,
expressing, that, “whereas Mr. Francis Atterbury, late of
Christ Church, had so happily asserted the rights and privileges of an English convocation, as to merit the solemn
thanks of the lower house for his learned pains upon that
subject; it might be hoped, that the university would be
no less forward in taking some public notice of so great a
piece of service to the church and that the most proper
and seasonable mark of respect to him, would be to confer
on him the degree of doctor in divinity by diploma, without doing exercise, or paying fees.
” The university approved the contents of this letter, and accordingly created
Mr. AtterburyD.D. Out author’s work was entitled, “The
Rights, Powers, and Privileges of an English Convocation
stated and vindicated, in answer to a late book of Dr.
Wake’s, entitled ‘ The Authority of Christian Princes over
their Ecclesiastical Synods asserted,’ &c. and several other
pieces,
” 8vo. The fame of this work was very great; but
it was censured by Burnet, and in November the judges
had a serious consultation on it, as being supposed to affect the royal prerogative. Holt, then chief justice, was
strongly of that opinion, and the same idea was encouraged
by archbishop Tenison, Dr. Wake, and others. Endeavours were made to prejudice king William against him,
but his majesty remained indifferent; and on the other
hand, Atterbury gained the steady patronage of sir Jonathan Trelawny, bishop of Exeter, of Lawrence earl of
Rochester, and of bishop Sprat. In December 1700, he
published a second edition of “The Rights,
” considerably
enlarged, and with his name, and a dedication to the two
archbishops. This was immediately answered by Drs. Kennet, Hody, and Wake. Another controversy of some importance was at this time also ably agitated by Atterbury,
the execution of the prtemunienles, a privilege enjoyed by
the several bishops of issuing writs to summon the inferior
clergy to convocation. Bishops Compton, Sprat, and Trelawny, were his strenuous supporters on this occasion, and
by the latter he was presented to the archdeaconry of
Totness, in which he was installed Jan. 29, 1700-1. His
attendance in convocation was regular, and his exertions
great. In placing Dr. Hooper in the prolocutor’s chair,
as the successor of Dr. Jane in the examination of obnoxious books in the controversy between the lower and
upper houses in considering the methods of promoting
the propagation of religion in foreign parts and in preparing an address to the king, his zeal distinguished itself.
About this time he was engaged, with some other learned
divines, in revising an intended edition of the Greek Testament, with Greek Scholia, collected chiefly from the
fathers, by Mr. archdeacon Gregory. On the 29th of May
he preached before the House of Commons; and on Aug. 16,
published “The power of the Lower House of Convocation
to adjourn itself,
” which was a sort of analysis of the whole
controversy. He also published “A letter to a clergyman in the country, concerning the Choice of Members,
&c.
” Nov. 17, 1701; a second, with a similar title, Dec.
10, 1701; and a third, in defence of the two former, Jan. 8,
1701-2. In October he published “The parliamentary
origin and rights of the Lower House of Convocation,
cleared, &c.
” At this period he was popular as preacher
at the Rolls Chapel, an office which had been conferred on
him by sir John Trevor, a great discerner of abilities, in
1698, when he resigned JBridewell, which he had obtained
in 1693. Upon the accession of queen Anne, in 1702,
Dr. Atterbury was appointed one of her majesty’s chaplains
in ordinary and, in July 1704, was advanced to the deanery of Carlisle but, owing to the obstacles thrown in his
way by bishop Nicolson, he was not instituted tintil Oct.
12, and the same year Sir Jonathan Trelawny bestowed on
him a canonry of Exeter. About two years after this, he
was engaged in a dispute with Mr. Hoadly, concerning the
advantages of virtue with regard to the present life, occasioned by his sermon, preached August 30, 1706, at the
funeral of Mr. Thomas Bennet, a bookseller. The doctrine of this sermon Mr. Hoadly examined, in “A letter
to Dr. Francis Atterbury, concerning Virtue and Vice,
”
published in Preface,
” Mr. Hoadly published in Asecond letter,
” &c. and in the Preface to his “Tracts,
”
tells us, these two letters against Dr. Atterbury were designed to vindicate and establish the tendency of virtue and
morality to the present happiness of such a creature as
man is which he esteems a point of the utmost importance
to the Gospel itself. In Jan. 1707-8 he published a volume
of Sermons, 8vo, and in the same year “Reflections on a
late scandalous report about the repeal of the Test Act.
”
In Concio ad Clerum Londinensem,
habita in Ecclesia S. Elphegi.
” Atterbury, in his pamphlet
entitled “Some proceedings in Convocation, A. D. 1705,
faithfully represented,
” had charged Mr. Hoadly (whom he sneeringly calls “the modest and moderate Mr. Hoadly
”)
with treating the body of the established clergy with language more disdainful and reviling than it would have become him to have used towards his Presbyterian antagonist,
upon any provocation, charging them with rebellion in the
church, whilst he himself was preaching it up in the state.“This induced Mr. Hoadly to set about a particular examination of Dr. Atterbury' s Latin Sermon; which he did in a
piece, entitled
” A large Answer to Dr. Atterbury’s Charge
of Rebellion, &c. London a 1710,“wherein he endeavours
to lay open the doctor’s artful management of the controversy, and to let the reader into his true meaning and design which, in an
” Appendix“to the
” Answer,“he
represents to be
” The carrying on two different causes,
upon two sets of contradictory principles“in order to
” gain himself applause amongst the same persons at the
same time, by standing up for and against liberty; by depressing the prerogative, and exalting it by lessening the
executive power, and magnifying it by loading some
with all infamy, for pleading for submission to it in one
particular which he supposeth an mcroachment, and by
loading others with the same infamy for pleading against
submission to it, in cases that touch the happiness of the
whole community.“” This,“he tells us,
” is a method
of controversy so peculiar to one person (Dr. Atterbury) as
that he knows not that it hath ever been practised, or attempted by any other writer.“Mr. Hoadly has likewise
transcribed, in this Appendix, some remarkable passages
out of our author’s
” Rights, Powers, and Privileges, &c."
which he confronts with others, from his Latin Sermon.
acknowledged was not unjust. He then quitted this settlement, and lived some time with Mr. Montague, a bookseller and bookbinder, employing his leisure hours in the
, an English miscellaneous writer of
some note, was born at Sunning, in Berkshire, in 1709,
and put apprentice to a weaver at Reading but accidentally breaking his arm before the expiration of his time,
he was unable to follow his trade, and for some time,
probably, lived upon charity. Ten pounds, however,
being left him by a relation, he came up to London, and
set up a book-stall in Spital-nelds, hoping to be as lucky
as Duck, who about this time raised himself to notice by
his poem called “The Thresher,
” in imitation of which
Banks wrote “The Weaver’s Miscellany,
” but without
success, which he afterwards acknowledged was not unjust.
He then quitted this settlement, and lived some time with
Mr. Montague, a bookseller and bookbinder, employing
his leisure hours in the composition of small poems, for a
collection of which he solicited a subscription, and sent
his proposals, with a poem, to Mr. Pope, who answered
him in a letter, and subscribed for two copies. He was
afterwards concerned in a large work in folio, intituled
the “Life of Christ,
” which was drawn up with much
piety and exactness. He also wrote the celebrated “Critical Review of the Life of Oliver Cromwell,
” 12mo,
which has been often printed, and is, upon the whole, an
impartial work. Towards the end of his life he was employed in writing the Old England and Westminster
Journals, and was now enabled to live in easy circumstances. He died of a nervous disorder at Islington, April
19, 1751. His biographer represents him as a pleasing
and acceptable companion, and a modest and unassuming
man, free from every inclination to engage in contests,
or indulge envy or malevolence.
enham, who put it into the hands of Dr. Bayly. The doctor read it, took a copy of it, and sold it to a bookseller who published it with Dr. Bayly’s name. — Such is
Dr. Bayly’s name is likewise to a well-known “Life of
bishop Fisher,
” which is said to have been the production
of Richard Hall, D.D. of Christ church, Cambridge, and
afterwards canon and official of the cathedral church of
St. Omer’s, where he died in 1604. The manuscript, after
his death, came into the possession of the English monks of
Dieulwart, in Lorrain; from whence a copy fell into the
hands of one Mr. West, who presented it to Francis a St.
Clara, alias Francis Davenport, a Franciscan friar. Davenport gave it to sir Wingfield Bodenham, who put it
into the hands of Dr. Bayly. The doctor read it, took a
copy of it, and sold it to a bookseller who published it with
Dr. Bayly’s name. — Such is the account Wood gives, and
in which he is followed by Dodd, on which we have only
to remark that this life is preceded by a dedication signed
with the doctor’s initials, and avowing himself to be the
author.
41, 3 vols. 4to, with Picart’s cuts, a well-known and most beautiful book. Bernard, who nourished as a bookseller of great eminence from the year 1711, died at Amsterdam
, an industrious and learned bookseller of Amsterdam, distinguished himself about
the beginning of the last century, both as author and editor of various works of considerable importance. He wrote
rather learnedly than elegantly, yet with so much impartiality and candour, that he had many readers. The following list has been given of the principal works of which
he was editor 1. “Recueil de voyages au Nord, contehant divers memoires tres-utiles an commerce et a la navigation,
” Amst. Memoires du comte de Brienne, rninistre d'etat
sous Louis XIV. avec des notes,
” ibid. 1719, 3 vols. 12mo.
3. “Picart’s Religious Ceremonies,
” ibid. Superstitions anciennes et modernes,
” Dialogues critiques et philosophiques, par
D. Charte-Livry (J.F.Bernard),
” ibid. Reflections morales, satyriques et comiques,
” Liege,
Histoire critique des
Journaux, par Camusat,
” Amst. Dissertations melees sur divers sujets importans et curieux,
” Amst.
ill-street, Westminster, 1635; and, after having left school, is said to have been put apprentice to a bookseller. The particulars, however, relating to the early
, a celebrated English actor,
was born in Tothill-street, Westminster, 1635; and, after
having left school, is said to have been put apprentice to
a bookseller. The particulars, however, relating to the
early part of his life, are not ascertained. It is generally
thought that he made his first appearance on the stage in
1656, at the opera-house in Charter-house-yard, under
the direction of sir William Davenant, and continued to
perform here till the restoration, when king Charles grained
patents to two companies, the one called the king’s cornpa ly, and the other the duke’s. The former acted at the
theatre royal in Drury-lane, and the latter at the theatre
in Lincoln’s-Inn-fields. Betterton went over to Paris, at the
command of king Charles II. to take a view of the French
scenery, and at his return made such improvements as
added greatly to the lustre of the English stage. For several
years both companies acted with the highest applause, and
the taste for dramatic entertainments was never stronger
than whilst these two companies played . The two companies were however at length united; though the time of
this union is not precisely known, Gildon placing it in
1682, and Cibber in 1684. But however this may be, it
was in this united company that Mr. 'Betterton first shone
forth with the greatest degree of lustre for, having survived the famous actors upon whose model he had formed
himself, he was now at liberty to display his genius in its
full extent. His merit as an actor cannot now be very accurately displayed, and much of the following passage
from Gibber’s Apology, seems to be mere stage-cant and
declamation. Cibber says, “Betterton was an actor,
as Shakspeare was an author, both without competitors,
formed for the mutual assistance and illustration of each
other’s genius! How Shakspeare wrote, all men who
have a taste for nature may read and know; but with what
higher rapture would he still be read, could they conceive
how Betterton played him! Then might they know the
one was born alone to speak what the other only knew to
write! Pity it is that the momentary beauties, flowing
from an harmonious elocution, cannot, like those of poetry, be their own record! that the animated graces of
the player can live no longer than the instant breath and
motion that present them, or at best can but faintly glimmer through the memory or imperfect attestation of a few
surviving spectators! Could how Betterton spoke be as
easily known as what he spoke, then might you see the
muse of Shakspeare in her triumph, with all her beauties
in her best array, rising into real life, and charming her
beholders. But alas! since all this is so far out of the
reach of description, how shall I shew you Betterton?
Should I therefore tell you that all the Othellos, Hamlets,
Hotspurs, Macbeths, and Brutuses, you have seen since
his time, have fallen short of him, this still would give you
no idea of his particular excellence. Let us see then what
a particular comparison may do, whether that may yet
draw him nearer to you? You have seen a Hamlet perhaps, who, on the first appearance of his father’s spirit,
has thrown himself into all the straining vociferation requisite to express rage and fury; and the house has thundered
with applause, though the misguided actor was all the
while (as Shakspeare terms it) tearing a passion into rags.
I am the more bold to offer you this particular instance,
because the late Mr. Addison, while I sat by him to see
this scene acted, made the same observation asking me,
with some surprise, if I thought Hamlet should be in so
violent a passion with the ghost, which, though it might
have astonished, had not provoked him? For you may
observe, that in this beautiful speech, the passion never
rises beyond an almost breathless astonishment, or an impatience, limited by a filial reverence, to inquire into the
suspected wrongs that may have raised nim from his peaceful
tomb and a desire to know what a spirit so seemingly
distrest might wish or enjoin a sorrowful son to execute
towards his future quiet in the grave. This was the light
into which Betterton threw this scene; which he opened with
a pause of mute amazement! Then rising slowly to a
solemn, trembling voice, he made the ghost equally terrible to the spectator as to himself. And in the descriptive part of the natural emotions which the ghastlyvision gave him, the boldness tit‘ his expostulation was still
governed by decency manly, but not braving his voice
never rising into that seeming outrage, or wild deli an ce,
of what he naturally revered. But, alas to preserve this
medium between mouthing, and meaning too little, to
keep the attention more pleasingly awake by a ’tempered
spirit, than by mere vehemence of voice, is, of all the
master strokes of an actor, the most difficult to reach. In.
this none have equalled Betterton. He that feels not himself the passion he would raise, will talk to a sleeping audience. But this was
” never the fault of Be item n. A farther excellence in him was, that he could vary iiis spirit to
the different characters he acted. Those wild impatient
starts, that fierce and flashing fire which he threw into
Hotspur, never came from the unruffled temper of his
Brutus (for I have more than once seen a Brutus as warm as Hotspur): when the Betterton Brutus was provoked in
his dispute with Cassius, his spirits flew out of his eyes his
steady looks alone supplied that terror which he disdained
an intemperance in his voice should rise to. Thus, with a
settled dignity of contempt, like an unheeding rock, he
repelled upon himself the foam of Cassius; not but in some
part of this scene, where he reproaches Cassius, his temper is not under this suppression, but opens into that
warmth which becomes a man of virtue; yet this is that
hasty spark of anger, which Brutus himself endeavours to
excuse. But with whatever strength of nature we see the
poet shew at once the philosopher and the hero, yet the
image of the actor’s excellence will be still imperfect to
you, unless language could put colours in our words to
paint the voice with. The most that a Vandyck can arrive at is, to make his portraits of great persons seem to
think a Shakspeare goes farther yet, and tells you what
his pictures thought; a BetU-rton steps beyond them both,
and calls them from the grave to breathe, and be themselves again in feature, speech, and motion, at once united
and gratifies at once-your eye, your ear, your understanding. From these various excel lenci s, Betterton had so
full a possession of the esteem and regard of his auditors,
that, upon his entrance into every scene, he seemed to
seize upon the eyes and ears of the giddy and inadvertent.
To have talked or looked another way, would have been
thought insensibility or ignorance. In all his soliloquies of
moment, the strongest intelligence of attitude and aspect
drew you into such an impatient gaze and eager expectation, that you almost imbibed the sentiment with your eye,'
before the er could reach it."
ten occurs in works of Bibliography, but who has not laid bibliographers under many obligations, was a bookseller at Emmerich, about the end of the seventeenth century.
, whose name often occurs
in works of Bibliography, but who has not laid bibliographers under many obligations, was a bookseller at Emmerich, about the end of the seventeenth century. His
design in his compilations was evidently to serve the cause
of literature, but although all his plans were good, they were
imperfectly executed, and have proved perplexing and
useless. His principal publications in this department
were: 1. “Bibliographia Juridica et Politica,
” Amsterdam,
Bibliotheca medica et physica,
” Gallia critica et experimentalis ab anno 1665 usque ad 1681,
” Amst. Journal des
Savans.
” 4. “Bibliographia mathematica et artificiosa,
”
Bibliographia historica, chronologica, et geographica,
” Bibliographia
crudilorum critico-curiosa, seu apparatus ad historian!
literariam,
” Amst. 1689—1701, 5 vols. 12mo, a sort of
general index to all the literary journals, but containing
too many alphabets to be easily consulted. It extends
from 1665 to 1700. 7. “Incunabula typographic, sive
Catalogus librorum proximis ab iwentione typographic
annis ad annum 1500, editorum,
” Amst.
, in Latin Benenatus, was a bookseller and printer at Paris, in the sixteenth century, and
, in Latin Benenatus, was a bookseller and printer at Paris, in the sixteenth century, and
celebrated for the beauty and correctness of his editions.
He became a printer in 1566, and married in that year the
widow of Morel, likewise a Greek and Latin printer, of
distinguished reputation. Bienne by this alliance becoming possessed of Morel’s printing-house, completed
the works which his predecessor had begun, particularly
the Greek Demosthenes of 1570, fol. and published also
various very excellent editions, particularly “Lucretius,
”
by Lambin, Synesii Hymni,
” Theodoretus de providentia,
” Gr. and Lat.
Henderson, a voluminous writer, who, in his title-pages styled himself A. M. and for some years kept a bookseller’s shop in Westminster-hall. Henderson’s first employment
, was educated at Edinburgh, and was,
as already noticed, related to Dr. Hugh Blair. He came
to London in company with Andrew Henderson, a voluminous writer, who, in his title-pages styled himself A. M.
and for some years kept a bookseller’s shop in Westminster-hall. Henderson’s first employment was that of an
usher at a school in Hedge-lane, in which he was succeeded by his friend Blair, who, in 1754, obliged' the
world with a valuable publication under the title of “The
chronology and history of the world, from the creation to
the year of Christ 1753. Illustrated in fifty-six tables; of
which four are introductory, and contain the centuries
prior to the first olympiad; and each of the remaining
fifty-two contain in one expanded view fifty years, or half
a century. By the rev. John Blair, LL. D.
” This volume, which is dedicated to lord chancellor Hardwicke,
was published by subscription, on account of the great
expence of the plates, for which the author apologized in
his preface, where he acknowledged great obligations to
the earl of Bath, and announced some chronological dissertations, in which he proposed to illustrate the disputed
points, to explain the prevailing systems of chronology,
and to establish the authorities upon which some of the
particular seras depend. In Dr. Hugh Blair’s life, it has
been noticed that this work was partly projected by him.
In January 1755, Dr. John Blair was elected F. R. S. and
in 1761, F. A. S. In 1756 he published a second edition
of his Chronological Tables. In Sept. 1757, he was appointed chaplain to the princess dowager of Wales, and
mathematical tutor to the duke of York; and, on Dr.
Townshend’s promotion to the deanry of Norwich, the services of Dr. Blair were rewarded, March 10, 1761, with
a prebendal stall at Westminster. The vicarage of Hinckley happening to fall vacant six days after, by the death
of Dr. Moires, Dr. Blair was presented to it by the dean
and chapter of Westminster and in August that year he
obtained a dispensation to hold with it the rectory of Burton Goggles, in Lincolnshire. In September 1763, he
attended his royal pupil the duke of York in a tour to the
continent; had the satisfaction of visiting Lisbon, Gibraltar, Minorca, most of the principal cities in Italy, and
several parts of France and returned with the duke in
August 1764. In 1768 he published an improved edition
of his Chronological Tables, which he dedicated to the
princess of Wales, who had expressed her early approbation of the former edition. To the edition were annexed fourteen maps of ancient and modern geography,
for illustrating the tables of chronology and history. To
which is prefixed a dissertation on the progress of geography. In March 1771 he was presented by the dean
and chapter of Westminster to the vicarage of St. Bride’s,
in the city of London which made it necessary for him
to resign Hinckley, where he had never resided for any
length of time. On the death of Mr. Sims, in April 1776,
he resigned St. Bride’s, and was presented to the rectorjr
of St. John the Evangelist in Westminster and in June
that year obtained a dispensation to hold the rectory of St.
John with that of Horton, near Colebrooke, Bucks. His
brother, captain Blair *, falling gloriously in the service
of his country in the memorable sea-fight of April 12, 1782,
the shock accelerated the doctor’s death. He had at the
same time the influenza in a severe degree, which put a
period to his life June 24, 1782. His library was sold by
auction December 1113, 1781; and a course of his
“Lectures on the canons of the Old Testament,
” has since
appeared.
, a bookseller at Hamburgh, and a man of considerable learning,
, a bookseller at Hamburgh, and a man of considerable learning, was born at Brunswick, Jan. 16, 1730, and died Dec. 13, 1793. He was long known for his controversial writings against the free-masons, but perhaps was more esteemed by his countrymen for his translations into German of various foreign popular works. Among these were Marmontel’s Incas and Montaigne’s Essays; and of the English series, Fielding’s Tom Jones, Sterne’s Sentimental Journey, and Tristram Shandy, and Goldsmith’s Vicar of Wakefield.
During the time he lived with lord Aylmer, he undertook, for Mr. Prevost, a bookseller, the “Historia Literaria,” a monthly publication
During the time he lived with lord Aylmer, he undertook, for Mr. Prevost, a bookseller, the “Historia Literaria,
” a monthly publication in the nature of a review,
the first number of which was published in the year 1730.
He wrote the preface to that work, and several of the articles, in Italian; not being, as he asserts, yet sufficiently
acquainted with the English to write in that language .
In the mean time he closely applied to the study of the
English tongue, and after six months began to think that
he had no further occasion for a translator, and he employed him no more.
Another of Mr. Nichols’s correspondents produces a letter from Mr. Stewart, the son of a bookseller at Edinburgh, who had long been intimately acquainted
Another of Mr. Nichols’s correspondents produces a
letter from Mr. Stewart, the son of a bookseller at Edinburgh, who had long been intimately acquainted with Mr.
Bpyse, in which the particulars of his death are related in
a different manner.
“Poor Mr, Boyse was one evening last winter attacked
in Westminster by two or three soldiers, who not only
robbed him, but used him so barbarously, that he never
recovered the bruises he received, which might very probably induce the consumption of which he died. About
nine months before his death he married a cutler’s widow,
a native of Dublin, with whom he had no money; but she
proved a very careful nurse to him during his lingering
indisposition. She told me, that Mr. Boyse never imagined he was dying, as he always was talking of his recovery; but, perhaps, his design in this might be to comfort
her, for one incident makes me think otherwise. About
four or five weeks before he breathed his last, his wife
went out in the morning, and was surprised to find a great
deal of burnt papers upon the hearth, which he told her
were old bills and accompts; but I suppose were his manuscripts, which he had resolved to destroy, for nothing
of that kind could be found after his death. Though from
this circumstance it may be inferred that he was apprehensive of death, yet, I must own, that he never intimated
it to me, nor did he seem in the least desirous of any
spiritual advice. For some months before his end, he had
left off drinking all fermented liquors, except now and
then a glass of wine to support his spirits, and that he
took very moderately. After his death I endeavoured all
I could to get him decently buried, by soliciting those
dissenters who were the friends of him and his father, but
to no purpose; for only Dr. Grosvenor, in Hoxton-square,
a dissenting teacher, offered to join towards it. He had
quite tired out those friends in his life-time; and the general answer that I received was, ‘That such a contribution was of no service to him, for it was a matter of no importance how or where he was buried.’ As I found nothing could be done, our last resource was an application
to the parish; nor was it without some difficulty, occasioned by the malice of his landlady, that we at last got
him interred on the Saturday after he died. Three more of
Mr. Johnson’s amanuenses, and myself, attended the corpse
to the grave. Such was the miserable end of poor Sam,
who was obliged to be buried in the same charitable manner with his first wife; a burial, of which he had often
mentioned his abhorrence.
”
unpresuming man, he was a sharer in their conversation, when they met after their morning’s walk, at a bookseller’s shop in Ave-Maria lane, Britton used to pitch his
About the commencement of the last century, a passion prevailed among several persons of distinction, of collecting old books and Mss.; and it was their Saturday’s amusement during winter, to ramble through various quarters of the town in pursuit of these treasures. The earls of Oxford, Pembroke, Sunderland, and Winchelsea, and the duke of Devonshire, were of this party, and Mr. Bagford and other collectors assisted them in their researches. Britton appears to have been employed by them; and, as he was a very inodest, decent, and unpresuming man, he was a sharer in their conversation, when they met after their morning’s walk, at a bookseller’s shop in Ave-Maria lane, Britton used to pitch his coal-sack on 'a bulk at the door, and, dressed in his b ue frock, to step in and spend an hour with the company. But it was not only by a few literary lords that his acquaintance was cultivated; his humble roof was frequented by assemblies of the fair and the gay; and his fondness for music caused him to be known by many dilettanti and professors, who formed themselves into aciub at his house, where capital pieces were played by some of the first professional artists, and other practitioners; and here Duboprg, when a child, played, standing upon a joint-stool, the Hrst solo that he ever executed in public.
a tract on the much disputed testimony of Josephus to Christ, was printed, and a few copies sent to a bookseller in either university; but as the pamphlet appeared
About this time was published Mr. Wood’s “Essay on.
the original genius and writings of Homer.
” Of this posthumous work, Mr. Bryant was the editor, the author having left his Mss. to his care; and in the same year, the
“Vindiciae Flavians),
” a tract on the much disputed testimony of Josephus to Christ, was printed, and a few copies sent to a bookseller in either university; but as the
pamphlet appeared without the name of its author, and no
attention was shewed it, Mr. Bryant recalled them, and
satisfied himself with distributing the copies thus returned
amongst a few particular friends. The new light, however, which Mr. Bryant threw upon the subject, and the
acuteness with which the difficulties attending it were discussed, soon brought the work into notice, and Mr. Bryant
published it with his name in 1780, and has effectually vindicated the authenticity of the passage in question. It is
no mean testimony of his success in this undertaking, that
Dr. Priestley confessed that Mr. Bryant had made a complete convert of him. That his conversion, however, extended no farther than the present subject, appeared in the
same year, when Mr. Bryant published “An Address to
Dr. Priestley, upon his doctrine of Philosophical Necessity illustrated,
” 8vo, which the doctor with his usual rapidity, answered in “A Letter to Jacob Bryant, esq.
”
Dr. Priestley, indeed, was not likely to be persuaded by a
writer who insinuated that his “necessity
” of philosophers was no other than the “predestination
” of Calvinists.
With respect to the “Vindiciae Flavians,
” it yet remains
to be mentioned that there is a great affinity between this
publication, and the observations on the same subject of a
learned Frenchman. See a letter to Dr. Kippis, at the
end of his life of Dr. Lardner, by Dr. Henley, where the
arguments for and against the authenticity of the passage
are distinctly stated.
use of his pupils, “Directions, prudential, moral, religious, and scientific;” which were pirated by a bookseller, and sold under the title of “Youth’s friendly Monitor.”
Mr. Burgh having, for many years, led a very laborious
life, and having acquired also a competem, though not a
large fortune (for his mind was always far raised above pecuniary views), he determined to retire trona business.
In embracing this resolution, it was by no means his intention to be unemployed. What he had particularly in
contemplation was, to complete his “Political Disquisitions,
” for which he had, during ten years, been collecting suitable materials. Upon quitting his school at Newrngton-greenj which was in 1771, he settled in a house at
Colebrooke-row, Islington, where he continued till his
decease. He had not been long in his new situation before
he became convinced (of what was only suspected before)
that he had a stone in his bladder. Witn this dreadful
malady he was deeply afflicted the four latter years of his
life; and for the two last of these years his pain was exquisite. Nevertheless, to the astonishment of all who
were witnesses of the misery he endured, he went on with
his “Political Disquisitions.
” The two first volumes were
published in Political Disquisitions: or, an enquiry into public errors, defects, and abuses. Illustrated by, and established upon, facts and remarks extracted from a variety
of authors ancient and modern. Calculated to draw the
timely attention of government and people to a due consideration of the necessity and the means of reforming
those errors, defects, and abuses; of restoring the constitution, and saving the state.
” The first volume relates to
government in general, and to parliament in particular;
the second treats of places and pensions, the taxation of
the colonies, and the army; and the third considers manners. It was our author’s intention to have extended his
Disquisitions to some other subjects, if he had not been
prevented by the violence of his disease, the tortures of
which he bore with uncommon patience and resignation,
and from which he was happily released, on the 26th of
August, 1775, in the sixty-first year of his age. Besides
the publications already mentioned, and a variety of manuscripts which he left behind him, he wrote, in 1753 and
1754, some letters in the General Evening Post, called
“The Free Enquirer;
” and in The Constitutionalist,
” in the Gazetteer; which
were intended to recommend annual parliaments, adequate
representation, and a place bill. About the same time he
also published another periodical paper in the Gazetteer,
under the title of “The Colonist’s Advocate;
” which was
written against the measures of government with respect
to the colonies. He printed likewise for the sole use of
his pupils, “Directions, prudential, moral, religious, and
scientific;
” which were pirated by a bookseller, and sold
under the title of “Youth’s friendly Monitor.
”
Adam and Eve. In consequence of which, as appears from a Latin letter written by himself to Walters, a bookseller at Amsterdam, dated Sept. 14, 1694, he desires to
On May 19, 1685, he was made master of the Charterhouse, by the interest of the duke of Ormond; and soon
after commenced LL. D. At what time he entered into
orders is not exactly known; but it is plain that he was a
clergyman at his election to this mastership, from the objection then made against him by some of the bishops who
were governors, namely, “that he generally appeared in
a lay-habit,
” which was over-ruled by his patron the duke
of Ormond, by asserting in his favour, that he had no
living or other ecclesiastical preferment; and that his life
and conversation were in all respects suitable to the clerical character. In the latter end of 1686, Dr. Burnet’s
integrity, prudence, and resolution, were fully tried in
his new station, upon the following occasion: one Andrew
Popham, a Roman Catholic, came to the Charter-house,
with a letter from king James to the governors, requiring
them to choose and admit him the said Andrew Popham a
pensioner thereof, “without tendering any oath or oaths
unto him, or requiring of him any subscription, recognition, or other act or acts, in conformity to the doctrine
and discipline of the church of England as the same is now
established; and notwithstanding any statute, order, or
constitution, of or in the said hospital; with which, says
his majesty, we are graciously disposed to dispense in his
behalf.
” On the meeting of the governors, the king’s
letter was read, and the lord chancellor Jefferies moved,
that without any debate they should proceed to vote whether Andrew Popham should be admitted a pensioner of
the hospital, according to the king’s letter. The master,
Dr. Burnet, as the junior, was to vote first, but he told
the governors, that he thought it was his duty to acquaint
their lordships with the state and constitution of that hospital; and, though this was opposed by some, yet, after
a little debate, he proceeded to observe, that to admit a
pensioner into the hospital without his taking the oaths of
allegiance and supremacy, was not only contrary to the
constitution of the ho&pital, but to an express act of parliament for the better establishment thereof. One of the
governors asked what this was to the purpose? The duke
of Ormond replied, that he thought it much to the purpose; for an act of parliament was not so slight a thing as
not to deserve a consideration. After some other discourse, the question was put, whether Popham should be
admitted? and passed in the negative. A second letter
from the king was afterwards sent; to which the governors,
in a letter addressed to his majesty, humbly replied, and
gave their reasons why they could not admit Andrew Popham as a pensioner of the hospital. This not satisfying
king James, he ordered chancellor Jefferies to find out a
way how he might compel their submission, and the master
was particularly threatened to be summoned before the ecclesiastical commissioners. But his subsequent quarrels
with the universities, and the commotions which followed,
prevented any farther proceeding on the part of the king.
This was the first stand made against the dispensing power
of that reign, by any society in England, and was of great
importance to the public, A relation of the Charter-house
proceedings upon this occasion was published by Dr. Burnet in 1689.
After the revolution, he was introduced to court by his
tutor and friend, archbishop Tillotson, and was made
chaplain to the king, and soon after, clerk of the closet.
He was now considered as in the high road to great preferment, and had certainly a fine prospect before him; when
he ruined all by some unadvised strokes of his pen. In
1692 he published “Archæologiæ philosophiæ; sive doctrina antiqua de rerum originibus,
” 4to, with a dedication
to king William, whose character he diws with great
strength of genius and art, and in that beautiful style
which was peculiar to himself. But neither the high rank
and authority of his patron, nor the elegance and learning
displayed throughout the work, could protect the author
from the clamours raised against him for allegorizing in a
very indelicate manner the scripture account of the fall of
Adam and Eve. In consequence of which, as appears
from a Latin letter written by himself to Walters, a bookseller at Amsterdam, dated Sept. 14, 1694, he desires to
have the most offensive parts omitted in the future editions
of that work. He had expressed himself to the same purpose, some time before the date of this letter, in a Latin
epistle, “Ad virum clarissimum circa nuper editum de
Archæologiis Philosophicis libellum;
” where he says, that
he cheerfully wished that any passages which have given
offence to the pious and wise, and particularly the dialogue
between Eve and the Serpent, may be expunged. The
person to whom this letter is addressed, and also a second
afterwards upon the same subject, was generally understood to be archbishop Tillotson. Both the letters are
subjoined to the second edition of “Archæologiæ philosophicæ,
” printed in
about the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth century, and sold by Nath. Crouch, a bookseller of that period, who is supposed to have composed
was a name placed in the titlepages of a numerous set of popular volumes printed about
the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth
century, and sold by Nath. Crouch, a bookseller of that
period, who is supposed to have composed them. In the
Bodleian Catalogue, Burton is called “alias Nat Crouch,
”
of whom Dunton says, “I. think I have given you the very
soul of his character, when I have told you that his talent
lies at * Collections.' He has melted down the best of
our English histories into Twelve-penny-Books, which
are filled with Wonders, Rarities, and Curiosities, for
you must know his title-pages are a little swelling.
” Of
his brother Samuel Crouch, Dunton speaks more favourably: “He is just and punctual in all his dealings; never
speaks ill of any man; has a swinging soul of his own;
would part with all he has to serve a friend; and that’s
enough for one bookseller.
” These Burton’s books were
formerly confined to the perusal of the lowest classes of
readers, and were long called chapmen’s books, and sold
only by the petty booksellers, and at fairs, &c. But of
late years they have become a favourite object with collectors, and their price has risen accordingly; and more completely to gratify the trifling taste of the age, some of them
have been reprinted in a pompous and expensive manner.
Being, therefore, from whatever cause, the subjects of modern attention, we shall subjoin a list of them, for which
we are indebted to Mr. Malone. 1. “Historical Rarities
in London and Westminster,
” Wars in England, Scotland, and Ireland,
” Wonderful prodigies of Judgment and Mercy,
” Strange and
prodigious religious Customs and Manners of sundry Nations,
” English Empire in America,
” Surprising Miracles of Nature and Art,
” Admirable Curiosities of Nature,
”
History of Scotland,
” 1685. 9.
” Two Journies to Jerusalem,“1685.
10.
” Nine Worthies of the World,“1687. 11.
” Winter’s Evening’s Entertainments,“1687. 12.
” The English
Hero, or the Life of Sir Francis Drake,“1687. 13.
” Memorable Accidents, and unheard-of Transactions,“1693.
14.
” History of the House of Orange,“1693. 15. Martyrs in flames,
” 1695. 16. “Curiosities of England,
” History of Oliver Cromwell,
” Unparalleled Varieties,
” Unfortunate Court Favourites of England,
” History of the Lives
of English Divines,
” Ingenious Riddles.
”
22. “Unhappy Princesses, or the history of Anne Boleyn,
and Lady Jane Grey,
” Esop’s Fables in prose
and verse,
” History of Virginia,
” English acquisitions in Guinea and the East Indies,
”
1728. 27.
” General History of Earthquakes,“1736.
8.
” The English Heroine, or the Life and Adventures of
Mrs. Christian Davis, commonly called Mother Ross.“29.
” Youth’s Divine Pastime."
delay a work which he hoped would contribute to the conversion of the Protestants, “he engaged with a bookseller at Caen to print only sixty copies, which he purposed
, a celebrated French philosopher, was
a native of Mesnil-Hubert, near Argenton, in the diocese
of Seez. About 165.5, he studied philosophy at Caen,
and afterwards divinity at Paris, but philosophy was his
favourite pursuit, and the foundation of his fame. In
1660 he taught in the college du Bois, in Caen, and became there acquainted with Huet, afterwards bishop of
Avranches, who acknowledged the assistance he derived
from Cally in his studies. Their intimacy, however, was
interrupted by Cally’s avowal of adherence to ttie Cartesian system. CaJly was the first in France who had the
courage to profess himself a Cartesian, in defiance of the
prejudices and numbers of those who adhered to the ancient philosophy. He first broached his Cartesianism in
the way of hypothesis, but afterwards taught it more
openly, which procured him many enemies. Huet, although then very young, ventured to censure him; and
father Valois, the Jesuit, who was a contemporary professor of philosophy, attacked both Cally and his opinions
in a work which he published under the name of Louis de
la Ville, in 1680, entitled “Sentimens de M. Descartes,
touchant Pessence et les proprietes des corps, opposes a la
doctrine de Peglise, et conformesaux erreurs de Calvin sur
I'eucharistie.
” Cally, not thinking there was much in this,
did not answer it until pressed by his friends, when he
wrote an answer in Latin, which, however, was not at
this time published. When the duke de Montausier was
appointed by Louis XIV. to provide eminent classical
scholars to write notes on the classics published for the use
of the Dauphin, Cally was selected for the edition of
“Boethius de Consolatione,
” which he published, accordingly, in Institutio philosophica,
” 4to, which he
afterwards greatly enlarged, and published in 1695 under
the title “Universae philosophise institutio,
” Caen, 4 vols.
4to. In 1675 he was appointed principal of the college of
arts in Caen, on which he began a new course of philosophical lectures, and laid out ten or twelve thousand francs
on rebuilding a part of the college which had fallen into
ruin. In 1684 he was appointed curate of the parish of
St. Martin, in Caen, and the Protestants who were then
very numerous in that city, flocked to his sermons, and he
held conferences once or twice a week in his vestry, which
they attended with much pleasure, and we are told he 'made
many converts to the Popish religion. But this success,
for which every Catholic ought to have been thankful, excited the envy of those who had quarrelled with him before
on account of his Cartesianism, and by false accusations,
they procured him to be exiled to Moulins in 1686, where
he remained for two years. Finding on his return that the
Protestants were still numerous in Caen, and that they
entertained the same respect for him as before, he wrote for
their use a work entitled “Durand cornmente, ou Paccord
de la philosophie avec la theologie, tonchaut la transubstantialion.
” In this, which contained part of his answer
to father Valois, mentioned above, he revives the opinion
of the celebrated Durand, who said, if the church decided
that there was a transubstantiation in the eucharist, there
must remain something of what was bread, to make a difference between the creation and production of a thing
which was not, and annihilation or a thing reduced to
nothing. Cally sent this work in ms. to M. Basnage, who
had been one of his scholars, but received no answer. la
the mean time, unwilling to delay a work which he hoped
would contribute to the conversion of the Protestants, “he
engaged with a bookseller at Caen to print only sixty
copies, which he purposed to send to his friends at Paris,
and obtain their opinion as to a more extended publication.
The bookseller, however, having an eye only to his own
interest, undertook to assure Cally that the work would be
approved by the doctors of the Sorbonne, and he therefore
would print eight hundred. Cally unfortunately consented, and the work no sooner appeared, than he who
fondly hoped it would convert heretics, was himself treated
as a heretic. M. de Nesmond, then bishop of Bayeux,
condemned the work in a pastoral letter March 30, 1701,
and Cally in April following made his retractation, which
he not only read in his own church, but it was read in all
other churches; and he also destroyed the impression, so
that it is now classed among rare books. It was a small
vol. 12mo, 1700, printed at Cologne, under the name of
Pierre Marteau. Cally also published some of his sermons,
but they were too philosophical and dry for the closet, although he had contrived to give them a popular effect in
the pulpit. A work entitled
” Doctrine heretique, &c.
touchant la primauté du pape, enseignee par les Jesuites
dans leur college de Caen," is attributed to him, but as it
bears date 1644, he must have then been too young. He
died Dec. 31, 1709.
anley supposes this second edition was published after Holland’s death in 1636, the title being like a bookseller’s; and that he made the translation without consulting
The first edition of his Britannia was in 1586, 8vo, and
not 4to, as Mr. Gough, probably by a slip t)f the pen, has
noted; and the sixth and last was in 1607, fol. This was
the first with maps. There were also several editions
printed abroad. The first translation of it was in 1610, by
Philemon Holland, who was thought to have consulted
Mr. Camden himself, and therefore great regard has been
paid by subsequent editors to his additions and explanations. Mr. Camden’s ms supplement to this edition of
1610, in the Bodleian library, expressly cautions the reader to hold only his “Latin copy for autentiq,
” but this
bishop Gibson denies; but in a later edition of his translation, 1637, fol. Holland has taken unwarrantable liberties.
Mr. Wanley supposes this second edition was published
after Holland’s death in 1636, the title being like a bookseller’s; and that he made the translation without consulting Camden.
rdered, that upon the first demand there should be delivered to him three or four hundred pounds, by a bookseller in London, whose name was Cromwell, whenever his
, son of the preceding, was born
at Geneva, August 14, 1599, and had the name of Meric
from Meric de Vicq, a great friend and benefactor to his
father. His first education he received at Sedan, but
coming to England with his father, in the year 1610, he
was instructed by a private master till 1614, when he was
sent to Christ Church, Oxford; and being put there under
a most careful tutor, Dr. Edward Meetkirk (afterwards Regius Hebrew professor), was soon after elected a student
of that house. He took the degree of bachelor of arts,
May 8, 1618, and that of master, June 14, 1621, being
even then eminent for his extensive learning; and the
same year, though he was but two and twenty, he published a book in defence of his father, against the calumnies of certain Roman catholics, entitled “Pietas contra
maledicos, &c.
” Loud. Vindicatio Patris, &c.
” Exercitations against Baronius’s Annals,
” but was diverted
by some accident. At length, when he came to maturity
of years for such a work, and had acquainted archbishop
Laud, his great friend and patron, with his design, who
was very ready to place him conveniently in Oxford or
London, according to his desire, that he might be furnished
with books necessary for such a purpose, the rebellion
broke out in England. Having now no fixed habitation, he
was forced to sell a good part of his books; and, after
about twenty years’ sufferings, became so infirm, that he
could not expect to live many years, and was obliged to
relinquish his design. Before this, however, in June
1628, he was made prebendary of Canterbury, through
the interest of bishop Laud; and when that prelate was
promoted to the archbishopric of Canterbury, he collated
him, in Oct. 1634, to the vicarage of Minster, in the Isle
of Thanet; and in the same month, he was inducted into
the vicarage of Monckton, in that island. In August 1636,
he was created doctor in divinity, by order of king
Charles I. who was entertained at the same time, with his
queen, by the university of Oxford. About the year 1644,
during the heat of the civil wars, he was deprived of his
preferments, abused, fined, and imprisoned. In 1649,
one Mr. Greaves, of Gray’s inn, an intimate acquaintance
of his, brought him a message from Oliver Cromwell, then
lieutenant-general of the parliament forces, desiring him to
come to Whitehall, on purpose to confer with him about
matters of moment; but his wife being lately dead, and
not, as he said, buried, he desired to be excused. Greaves
came again afterwards, and Dr. Casaubon being somewhat
alarmed, desired him to tell him the meaning of the matter; but Greaves refusing, went away the second time.
At length he returned again, and told him, that the lieutenant-general intended his good and advancement; and
his particular errand was, that he would make use of his
pen to write the history of the late war; desiring withal,
that nothing but matters of fact should be impartially set
down. The doctor answered, that he desired his humble
service and hearty thanks should be returned for the great
honour done unto him; but that he was uncapable in several respects for such an employment, and could not so
impartially engage in it, as to avoid such reflections as
would be ungrateful, if not injurious, to his lordship.
Notwithstanding this answer, Cromwell seemed so sensible
of his worth, that he acknowledged a great respect for him;
and, as a testimony of it, ordered, that upon the first demand there should be delivered to him three or four hundred pounds, by a bookseller in London, whose name was
Cromwell, whenever his occasions should require, without
acknowledging, at the receipt of it, who was his benefactor.
But this ofter he rejected, although almost in want. At
the same time, it was proposed by Mr. Greaves, who belonged to the library at St. James’s, that if our author
would gratify him in the foregoing request, Cromwell
would restore to him all his father’s books, which were then
in the royal library, having been purchased by king James;
and withal give him a patent for three hundred pounds a
year, to be paid to the family as long as the youngest sou
of Dr. Casaubon should live, but this also was refused.
Not long after, it was intimated to him, by the ambassador
of Christiana, queen of Sweden, that the queen wished
him to come over, and take upon him the government of
one, or inspection of all her universities; and, as an encouragement, she proposed not only an honourable salary
for himself, but offered to settle three hundred pounds a
year upon his eldest son during life: but this also he
waved, being fully determined to spend the remainder of
his days in England. At the restoration of king Charles II.
he recovered his preferments; namely, his prebend of
Canterbury in July 1660, and his vicarages of Monckton
and Minster the same year: but, two years after, he exchanged this last for the rectory of Ickham, near Canterbury, to which he was admitted Oct. 4, 1662. He had a
design, in the latter part of his days, of writing his own
life; and would often confess, that he thought himself
obliged to do it, out of gratitude to the Divine Providence,
which had preserved and delivered him from more hazardous occurrences than ever any man (as he thought) besides
himself had encountered with; particularly in his escape
from a fire in the night-time, which happened in the house
where he lived, at Geneva, while he was a boy: in his recovery from a sickness at Christ Church, in Oxford, when
he was given over for dead, by a chemical preparation administered to him by a young physician: in his wonderful
preservation from drowning, when overset in a boat on the
Thames near London, the two watermen being drowned,
and himself buoyed up by his priest’s coat: and in his
bearing several abuses, fines, imprisonments, &c. laid
upon him by the republicans in the time of his sequestration: but this he did not execute. He died July 14, 1671,
in the seventy-second year of his age, and was buried in the
south part of the first south cross aile of Canterbury cathedral. Over his grave was soon after erected a handsome
monument with an inscription. He left by will a great
number of manuscripts to the university of Oxford. His
character is thus represented. He was a general scholar,
but not of particular excellence, unless in criticism, in
which probably he was assisted by his father’s notes and
papers. According to the custom of the times he lived in,
he displays his extensive reading by an extraordinary mixture of Greek and Latin quotations and phrases. He was
wont to ascribe to Descartes’s philosophy, the little inclination people had in his time for polite learning. Sir William Temple very highly praises his work, hereafter mentioned, on “Enthusiasm;
” and unquestionably it contains
in any curious and learned remarks; buthisbeingamaintainer
of the reality of witches and apparitions, shews that he was
not more free from one species of enthusiasm than most of
his contemporaries. In his private character he was eminent for his piety, charity to the poor, and his courteous
and affable disposition towards scholars. He had several
children, but none made any figure in the learned world;
one, named John, was a surgeon at Canterbury .
ng of silver plate. Whilst he was engaged in this business, the elder Mr. Bowyer accidentally saw in a bookseller’s shop, the lettering of a book uncommonly neat;
, eminent in an art of the greatest consequence to literature, that of letter-founding, was born in 1692, in the part of the town of Hales-Owen which is situated in Shropshire. Though he justly attained the character of being the Coryphaeus in letter-founding, he was not brought up to the business; and it is observed by Mr. Mores, that this handiwork is so concealed among the artificers of it, that he could not discover that any one had taught it to another; but every person who had used it had acquired it by his own ingenuity. Mr. Caslon served a regular apprenticeship to an engraver of ornaments on gun-barrels, and, after the expiration of his term, carried on this trade in Vine-street, near the Minories. He did not, however, solely confine his ingenuity to that instrument, but employed himself likewise in making tools for the book-binders, and for the chasing of silver plate. Whilst he was engaged in this business, the elder Mr. Bowyer accidentally saw in a bookseller’s shop, the lettering of a book uncommonly neat; and inquiring who the artist was by whom the letters were made, was thence induced to seek an acquaintance with Mr. Caslon. Not long after, Mr. Bowyer took Mr. Caslon to Mr. James’s foundery, in Bartholomew-close. Caslon had never before that time seen any part of the business; and being asked by his friend if he thought he could undertake to cut types, he requested a single day to consider the matter, and then replied that he had no doubt but he could. Upon this answer, Mr. Bowyer, Mr. Bettenham, and Mr. Watts, then eminent printers, had such a confidence in his abilities, that they lent him 500l. to begin the undertaking, and he applied himself to it with equal assiduity and success. In 1720, the society for promoting Christian knowledge, in consequence of a representation from Mr. Solomon Negri, a native of Damascus, in Syria, who was well skilled in the Oriental tongues, and had been professor of Arabic, in places of note, deemed it expedient to print, for the use of the eastern churches, the NVw Testament and Psalter in the Arabic language. These were intended for the benefit of the poor Christians in Palestine, Syria, Mesopotamia, Arabia, and vEgypt, the constitution of which countries did not permit the exercise of the art of printing. Upon this occasion, Mr. Caslon was pitched upon to cut the fount; in his specimens of which he distinguished it by the name of English Arabic. After he had finished this fount, he cut the letters of his own name in pica Roman, and placed them at the bottom of one of the Arabic specimens. The name being seen by Mr. Palmer (the reputed author of a history of printing, which was, in fact, written by Psalmanaazar), he advised our artist to cut the whole fount of pica. This was accordingly done, and the performance exceeded the letter of the other founders of the time. But Mr. Palmer, whose circumstances required credit with those whose business would have been hurt by Mr. Caslon’s superior execution, repented of the advice he had given him, and endeavoured to discourage him from any farther progress. Mr. Caslon, being justly disgusted at such treatment, applied to Mr. Bowyer, under whose inspection he cut, in 1722, the beautiful fount of English which was used in printing Selden’s works, and the Coptic types that were employed in Dr. Wilkins’s edition of the Pentateuch. Under the farther encouragement of Mr. Bowyer, Mr. Bettenham, and Mr. Watts, he proceeded with vigour in his employment, and Mr. Bowyer was always acknowledged by him to be his master, from whom he had learned his art. In letter-founding he arrived at length to such perfection, that he not only relieved his country from the necessity of importing types from Holland, but in the beauty and elegance of those made by him, he so far exceeded the productions of the best artificers, that his workmanship was frequently exported to the continent. Indeed, it may with great justice and confidence be asserted, that a more? beautiful specimen than his is not to be found in any part of the world. Mr. Caslon’s first foundery was in a small house in Helmet-row, Old-street. He afterwards removed into Ironmonger-row; and about 1735, into Chiswell-street, where his foundery became, in process of time, the most capital one that exists in this or in foreign countries. Having acquired opulence in the course of his employment, he was put into the commission of the peace for the county of Middlesex. Towards the latter end of his life, his eldest son, William, being in partnership with him, he retired in a great measure from the active execution of business. His last country residence was at Bethnal-green, where he died Jan. 23, 1766, aged seventy-four. He was interred in the church-yard of St. Luke, Middlesex, in which parish all his different founderies were situated, and where they are still carried on by one of his descendants, under the firm of Caslon and Cattierwood. Mr. Caslon was universally esteemed as a fist-rate artist, a tender master, and an nonest, friendly, and benevolent man and sir John Hawkins has particularly celebrated his hospitality, his social qualities, and his love of music.
barrassed, and his income as a minister being inadequate to his expences, he engaged in the trade of a bookseller, and kept a shop in the Poultry, London, in partnership
On leaving the academy, he continued his studies at Leyden, and these being finished, he began to preach about July 1714; and being soon distinguished by his talents in the pulpit, he was chosen, in 1716, minister of the presbyterian congregation at Peckham, near London, in which statioji he continued some years. Here he entered into the matrimonial state, and began to have an increasing family, when, by the fatal South-sea scheme of 1720, he unfortunately lost the whole fortune which he had received with his wife. His circumstances being thereby embarrassed, and his income as a minister being inadequate to his expences, he engaged in the trade of a bookseller, and kept a shop in the Poultry, London, in partnership with John Gray, who afterwards became a dissenting minister, but conformed, and had a living in Yorkshire. Mr. Chandler continued this trade for about two or three years, still continuing to discharge the duties of the pastoral office. It may not be improper to observe, that in the earlier part of his life Mr. Chandler was subject to frequent and dangerous fevers; one of which confined him more than three months, and threatened by its effects to disable him for public service. He was, therefore, advised to confine himself to a vegetable diet, which he accordingly did, and adhered to it for twelve years. This produced so happy an alteration in his constitution, that though he afterwards returned to the usual way of living, he enjoyed an uncommon share of spirits and vigour till seventy.
It appears from the letter, that the archbishop did not then know that the author was any other than a bookseller; for he says: “I cannot but own myself to be surprised
While Mr. Chandler was minister of the congregation at
Peckham, some gentlemen of the several denominations
of dissenters in the city, came to a resolution to set up and
support a weekly evening lecture at the Old Jewry, for the
winter half year. The subjects to be treated in this lecture were the evidences of natural and revealed religion,
and answers to the principal objections against them. Two
of the most eminent young ministers among the dissenters
were appointed for the execution of this design, of which
Mr. Chandler was one, and Mr. (afterwards Dr.) Lardner,
who is so justly celebrated for his learned writings, was
another. But after some time this lecture was dropped,
and another of the same kind set up, to be preached by
one person only, it being judged that it might then be
conducted with more consistency of reason and uniformity
of design; and Mr. Chandler was appointed for this service. In the course of this lecture he preached some
sermons on the confirmation which miracles gave to the
divine mission of Christ, and the truth of his religion; and
vindicated the argument against the objections of Collins,
in his “Discourse of the grounds and reasons of the
Christian religion.
” These sermons, by the advice of a
friend, he enlarged, and threw into the form of a continued treatise, and published in 1725, 8vo, under the
following title: “A Vindication of the Christian Religion,
in two parts, I. A discourse on the nature and use of Miracles II. An answer to a late book,entitled a Discourse
on the grounds and reasons of the Christian religion.
”
Having presented a copy of this book to archbishop Wake,
his grace expressed his sense of the value of the favour,
in a letter, which is an honourable testimony to Mr.
Chandler’s merit. It appears from the letter, that the
archbishop did not then know that the author was any other
than a bookseller; for he says: “I cannot but own myself
to be surprised to see so much good learning and just reasoning in a person of your profession; and do think it a
pity you should not rather spend your time in writing books
than in selling them. But I am glad, since your circumstances oblige you to the latter, that you do not wholly
omit the former.
” Besides gaining the archbishop’s
approbation, Mr. Chandler’s performance considerably advanced his reputation in general, and contributed to his
receiving an invitation, about 1726, to settle as a minister
with the congregation in the Old Jewry, which was one of
the most respectable in London. Here he continued, first
as assistant, and afterwards as pastor, for the space of forty
years, and discharged the duties of the ministerial office
with great assiduity and ability, being much esteemed and
regarded by his own congregation, and acquiring a distinguished reputation, both as a preacher and a writer.
s, and in particular, a series of twenty-two small prints for the life of David, with which Giffart, a bookseller at Pans, ornamented a French edition of the Psalms
, the brother of Elizabeth Cheron,
was born at Paris in 1660; and having been taught the
rudiments of the art in his own country, he travelled to
Italy, where his sister supplied him with a competency, to
enable him to prosecute his studies for eighteen years.
During his continuance in Italy, he made the works of Raphael and Julio Romano the principal object of his studies,
by which his future compositions had always a certain air
of the antique, though he had no great portion of grace,
and his figures were frequently too muscular. Two of his
pictures are in the church of Notre Dame, at Paris; the
one, of Herodias holding the charger with the head of St.
John the Baptist; the other, of Agabus foretelling the persecution of St. Paul. On account of his religion, being a
Calvinist, he was compelled to quit his native country,
and settled in London, the happy retreat of all distressed
artists; and there he found many patrons among the nobility and gentry, particularly the duke of Montague, for
whom he painted the Council of the Gods, the Judgment
of Paris, and he was also employed at Burleigh and Chatsworth; but finding himself eclipsed by Baptist, Rousseau,
and La Fosse, he commenced painting small historical
pieces. His most profitable employment, however, was
designing for painters and engraver ^ and his drawings
were by some preferred to his paintings. He etched several
of his own designs, and in particular, a series of twenty-two
small prints for the life of David, with which Giffart, a
bookseller at Pans, ornamented a French edition of the
Psalms published in 1713. Strutt notices also two engravings which he executed from his own designs, of great
taste, “The Death of Ananias and Sapphira,' and
” St.
Paul baptising the Eunuch." His private character was
excellent. He died in 1713, of an apoplexy, at his lodgings in the Piazza, CovenNgarden, and was buried in the
porch of St. Paul’s church in that parish. He had some
time before sold his drawings from Raphael, and his academy figures, to the earl of Derby, for a large sum of
money.
, was once a bookseller in Covent-garden, and many years after prompter at
, was once a bookseller
in Covent-garden, and many years after prompter at Drurylane Theatre, and an instructor of young actors. After
passing through the miserable vicissitudes of inferior dramatic rank, he died poor, March 1766. He wrote some
pieces, long since forgotten, for the stages, and in 1749,
published “A General History of the Stage,
” which although undervalued by the editors of the Biographia Dramatica, is amusing, and contains much of the information
transferred since into compilations of that kind.
, and horn at Wood Eaton near Oxford in March 1624. At sixteen years of age he was put apprentice to a bookseller in Oxford; but soon left that trade, and was employed
, an eminent accomptant and mathematician, was the son of a nonconformist divine, and horn
at Wood Eaton near Oxford in March 1624. At sixteen
years of age he was put apprentice to a bookseller in Oxford; but soon left that trade, and was employed as clerk
under Mr. John Mar, one of the clerks of the kitchen to
prince Charles, afterwards Charles II. This Mar was eminent for his mathematical knowledge, and constructed those
excellent dials with which the gardens of Charles I. were
adorned: and under him Collins made no small progress in
the mathematics. The intestine troubles increasing, he
left that employment and went to sea, where he spent the
greatest part of seven years in an English merchantman,
which became a man of war in the Venetian service against
the Turks. Here having leisure, he applied himself to
merchants accompts, and some parts of the mathematics,
for which he had a natural turn; and on coming home, he
took to the profession of an accomptant, and composed
several useful treatises upon practical subjects. In 1652
he published a work in folio, entitled “An Introduction
to Merchants’ Accompts,
” which was reprinted in with an additional part, entitled
” Supplements to accomptantship and arithmetic.“A part of this work, relating to
interest, was reprinted in 1685, in a small 8vo volume In
1658 he published in 4to, a treatise called
” The Sector
on a Quadrant; containing the description and use of four
several quadrants, each accommodated for the making of
sun-dials, &c. with an appendix concerning reflected dialling, from a glass placed at any inclination.“In 1659,
4to, he published his
” Geometrical dialling;“and also
the same year, his
” Mariner’s plain Scale new plained.“In the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, of
which he was now become a member, he fully explained
and demonstrated the- rule given by the Jesuit De Billy,
for
” finding the number of the Julian period for any year
assigned, the cycles of the sun and moon, with the Roman
indiction for the years being given.“To this he has
added some very neatly-contrived rules for the ready finding on what day of the week any day of the month falls for
ever; and other useful and necessary kalendar rules. In
the same Transactions he has a curious dissertation concerning the resolution of equations in numbers. In No.
69 for March 1671, he has given a most elegant construction of that chorographical problem, namely:
” The distances of three objects in the same plane, and the angles
made at a fourth place in that plane, by observing each
object, being given; to find the distances of those objects
from the place of observation?“In 1680 he published a
small treatise in 4to, entitled
” A Plea for the bringing in
of Irish cattle, and keeping out the fish caught by foreigners; together with an address to the members of parliament of the counties of Cornwall and Devon, about the
advancement of tin, fishery, and divers manufactures.“In
1682 he published in 4to,
” A discourse of Salt and
Fishery;“and in the Philosophical Transactions, No. 159,
for May 1684, is published a letter of his to Dr. JohnWallis,
oh some defects in algebra. Besides these productions of his
own, he was the chief promoter of many other valuable
publications in his time. It is to him that the world is indebted for the publication of Barrow’s
” Optical and geometrical lectures;“his abridgment of
” Archimedes’s works,“and of
” Apollonius’s Conies“Branker’s translation of
” Rhonius’s Algebra, with Pell’s additions“” Kersey’s
Algebra“Wallis’s History of Algebra
” “Strode of Combinations
” and many other excellent works, which were
procured by his unwearied solicitations.
ungeon for nine years, or, as Moreri says, only three years. Having obtained his liberty, he married a bookseller’s widow, and died at Paris the 6th of May, 1712,
, sieur de Sandras, was born
at Paris in 1644. After having been captain in the regiment of Champagne, he went over to Holland in 1683,
ivhere he wrote several works, published under different
names, and with opposite views. Among these are, I.
“The conduct of France since the peace of Nimeguen,
”
An answer to the foregoing,
” in
which he produces the arguments on the other side of the
question. 3. “The new interests of the Princes.
” 4.
“The Life of Coligni,
” Memoirs of Rochfort,
” 12mo. 6. “History of the Dutch War from the
year 1672 to 1677; a work which obliged him for some
time to quit the territories of the republic. 7.
” Political
Testament of Colbert,“12mo. The French clergy were
highly incensed against him, for relating in it an expression of Colbert, that
” the bishops of France were so much
devoted to the will of the king, that if he should think fit
to substitute the koran instead of the gospel, they would
readily subscribe to it.“8.
” Le grand Alcandre frustre,“or the last efforts of love and virtue. 9.
” The Memoirs“of John Baptist cle la Fontaine; those of Artagnan, 3 vols.
12mo; those of Montbrun, 12mo; those of the marchioness
Dufresne, 12mo; those of Bordeaux, 4 vols. 12mo; those
of Saint- Hilaire, 4 vols. 12mo. 10.
” Annals of Paris and
of the Court, for the years 1697 and 1698.“11.
” The
Life of the Vicomte Turenne,“12mo, published under the
name of Dubuisson. On his return to France in 1702, he
was shut up in the Bastille, where he was kept in a dungeon for nine years, or, as Moreri says, only three years.
Having obtained his liberty, he married a bookseller’s
widow, and died at Paris the 6th of May, 1712, at the age
of 68. He is also the author of, 12. Memoirs of Tyrconnel, composed from the verbal accounts of that nobleman,
a close prisoner, like him, in the bastille. 13.
” Historical and political Mercury,“&c. He, besides, left manuscripts sufficient in quantity to make 40 volumes in 12 mo.
” The Memoirs of Vortlac," 2 vols. I 2mo, are unjustly attributed to him but enough was avowed to give us but an
unfavourable opinion of his judgment or consistency.
ving him of a certainty of provision in the church, he desisted from his first intention, and became a bookseller, as the nearest approach he could then prudently
, an ingenious and popular dramatic writer, the daughter of Mr. Philip Parkhouse, of
Tiverton, in Devonshire, was born at that place in 1743.
Her father was educated for holy orders, but a family loss
depriving him of a certainty of provision in the church, he
desisted from his first intention, and became a bookseller,
as the nearest approach he could then prudently make to a
life of some degree of literary enjoyment. He afterwards
rose to be a member of the corporation of Tiverton, and
was very highly respected as a man of talents and probity,
and a good scholar. He was not very distantly related to
the poet Gay, who recordshis visit to his relations in Devonshire in his “Journey to Exeter,
” inscribed to the earl
of Burlington. It was Mr. Parkhouse’s favourite aim to
cultivate the promising talents of his daughter, and he
lived to witness the reputation she acquired almost to the
last period of her literary career. In her twenty -fifth year
she was married to Mr. Cowley, a man of very considerable
talents, who died in 1797, a captain in the East India company’s service. It was when he was with his regiment in
India that she dedicated her comedy of “More Ways than
One
” to him, in the affectionate lines prefixed to it; and
it was to this gentleman’s brother, an eminent merchant
of London, now living, that “The Fate of Sparta
” is dedicated with so much feeling.
or this purpose, he sold either the whole, or a considerable part of them, to Mr. Robert Davis, then a bookseller in Piccadilly. Mr. Davis being told, or having concluded,
Cudworth died at Cambridge, June 26, 1688, and was
interred in the chapel of Christ’s college. He was a man
of very extensive erudition, excellently skilled in the
learned languages and antiquity, a good mathematician, a
subtle philosopher, and a profound metaphysician. The
main design of his celebrated work, “The Intellectual
System,
” is to refute the principles of atheism, and in this
he has successfully employed a vast fund of learning and
reading. But his partiality for the Platonic philosophy, in
judging of which, after the example of his contemporaries,
he paid too much respect to the writings of the modern
Alexandrian Platonists, led him into frequent mistakes.
In physics he adopted the atomic system; but, abandoning
Democritus and Epicurus as the first patrons of impiety,
he added to the doctrine of atoms that of a certain middle
substance between matter and spirit, to which he gave the
appellation of plastic nature, which he supposed to be the
immediate instrument of the divine operation; and this
hypothesis gave rise to the controversy above mentioned
between Bayle and Le Clerc. Cudworth stands at the
head of those divines who, considering the belief in a triune God as a fundamental article of Christian belief, maintain that both the Platonic, and all the other Pagan trinities
are only corruptions and mutilations of certain primaeval
revelations and patriarchal traditions relative to the asserted
distinction in the divine nature; and he has very ably
discussed this important subject in his Intellectual System.
A great number of writers commend Cudworth’s piety
and modesty; and Burnet having observed, that Dr. Henry
More studied to consider religion as a seed of a deiform
nature, and in order to this, set young students much on
reading the ancient philosophers, chiefly Plato, Tully, and
Plotinus, and on considering the Christian religion as a
doctrine sent from God, both to elevate and sweeten human nature, tells us, that “Cudworth carried this on with
a great strength of genius, and a vast compass of learning;
and that he was a man of great conduct and prudence;
upon which his enemies did very falsely accuse him of craft
and dissimulation.
” He left several manuscripts which seem
to be a continuation of his “Intellectual System,
” of which
he had given the world only the first part. One of these
was published by Chandler, bishop of Durham, 1731, in
8vo, under this title, “A Treatise concerning eternal
and immutable Morality.
” This piece was levelled against
the writings of Hobbes and others, who revived the exploded opinions of Protagoras; taking away the essential and eternal differences of moral good and evil, of just
and unjust, and making them all arbitrary productions of
divine or human will. He left also several other Mss.
with the following titles“: 1. A discourse of moral good and
evil.
” 2. Another book of morality, wherein Hobbes’s philosophy is explained. 3. A discourse of liberty and necessity, in which the grounds of the atheistical philosophy
are confuted, and morality vindicated and explained. 4.
Another book “De libero arbitrio.
” 5. Upon Daniel’s
prophecy of the 70 weeks, wherein all the interpretations
of the Jews are considered and confuted, with several of
some learned Christians. 6. Of the verity of the Christian religion, against the Jews. 7. A discourse of the creation of the world, and immortality of the soul. 8. Hebrew
learning. 9. An explanation of Hobbes’s notion of God,
and of the extension of spirits. The history of these Mss.
is somewhat curious. Having been left to the care of his
daughter, lady Masham , they for a long time quietly reposed in the library at Oates, in Essex. But, about the
year 1762, when the late lord Masham married his second
lady, his lordship thought proper to remove a number of
volumes of ancient learning, which had been bequeathed
to the family by Mr. Locke, and the manuscripts of Dr.
Cudworih, to make room for books of polite amusement.
For this purpose, he sold either the whole, or a considerable part of them, to Mr. Robert Davis, then a bookseller
in Piccadilly. Mr. Davis being told, or having concluded,
that the manuscripts were the productions of Mr. Locke,
it became an object of consideration with him, how to convert them, as a tradesman, to the best advantage. They
contained, among other things, sundry notes on scripture.
About the same time, a number of manuscript scriptural
notes by Dr. Waterland came into the possession of the
booksellers. It was therefore projected, by the aid of such
celebrated names as Mr. Locke and Dr. Waterland, to
fabricate a new Bible with annotations. At a consultation,
however, it was suggested, that, though these names were
very important, it would be necessary, to the complete success of the design, to join with them some popular living
character. The unfortunate Dr. Dodd was then in the height
of his reputation as a preacher, and was fixed upon to carry
on the undertaking. This was the origin of Dr. Dodd’s
Bible, and part of the materials put into his hands the
doctor made use of in the “Christian Magazine.
” When
the manuscripts were returned to Mr. Davis, he carried
them down to Barnes in Surry, which was his country retirement, and threw them into a garret, where they lay
exposed to the dangers of such a situation. About the
beginning of the year 1777, a gentleman, who had a
veneration for the name of Mr. Locke, and was concerned
to hear that any of his writings were in danger of being
lost, went to Barnes, to see these manuscript*; and being
positively assured by Mr. Davis, that they were the real
compositions of that eminent man, he immediately purchased them fur forty guineas. He was, however, soon,
convinced, after an examination of them, that the authority
of the bookseller was fallacious, and having remonstrated
against the deception, the vender condescended to take
them again, upon being paid ten guineas for his disappointment in the negociation. In the investigation of the manuscripts, the gentleman having discovered, by many incontestable proofs, that they were the writings of Dr. Cudworth, he recommended them to the curators of the British
Museum, by whom they were purchased; and thus, at last,
after many perils and mutilations, they are safely lodged
in that noble repository.
but even the marriage itself; and have surmised that she was previously married to one John Lesnier, a bookseller of her father’s, and that she ran away from him for
In the midst of all these various publications, so close to
eacli other, she married Dacier, with whom she had been
brought up in her father’s house from her earliest years.
This happened, as we have already observed in our account of that gentleman, in 1683; though some have controverted not only the date, but even the marriage itself;
and have surmised that she was previously married to one
John Lesnier, a bookseller of her father’s, and that she
ran away from him for the sake of Dacier, with whom she
was never married in any regular way. But it is hardly
possible to conceive, that so extraordinary a circumstance
in the history of this celebrated lady must not, if it were
true, have been notorious and incontested. We are therefore apt to admit father Niceron’s solution of this difficulty;
vyho observes, upon this occasion, that “nothing is more
common than for a person, who abandons any party, to be
exposed to the calumies of those whom they have quitted,
”
and to suffer by them. Madame Dacier, soon after her
marriage, declared to the duke of Montausier and the bishop of Meaux, who had been her friends, a design of reconciling herself to the church of Rome; but as M. Dacier
was not yet convinced of the reasonableness of such a
change, they thought proper to retire to Castres in 1684,
in order to examine the controversy between the protestants and papists. They at last determined in favour of
the latter; and, as already noticed, made their public abjuration in Sept. 1685. This, in the opinion of her catholic
admirers, might probably occasion the above-mentioned
rumour, so much to the disadvantage of madame Dacier,
and for which there was probably very little foundation.
After they had become catholics, however, the duke of
Montausier and the bishop of Meaux recommended them
at court; and the king settled a pension of 1500 livres
upon M. Dacier, and another of 500 upon his lady. The
patent was expedited in November; and, upon the advice
which they received of it, they returned to Paris, where
they resumed their studies; but before proceeding in our
account of madame Dacier' s publications, it is necessary
to do justice to the liberality of her patron the duke de
Montausier. We are informed, that in 1682 this lady
having dedicated a book to the king of France, she could
not find any person at court, who would venture to introduce her to his majesty, in order to present it, because
she was at that time a protestant. The duke of Montausier, being informed of this, offered his service to introduce
her to the king, and taking her in his coach, presented
her and her book to his majesty; who told him with an air
of resentment, that he acted wrong in supporting persons
of that lady’s religion; and that for his part he would forbid his name to be prefixed to any book written by Huguenots; for which purpose he would give orders to seize all
the copies of mademoiselle le Fevre’s book. The duke
answered with that freedom with which he always spoke
to the king, and in which no person else would presume to
follow him: “Is it thus, sir, that you favour polite literature? I declare to you frankly, a king ought not to be
a bigot.
” He added then, that he would thank the lady
in his majesty’s name, and make her a present of an hundred pistoles; and that he would leave it to the king to
pay him, or not pay him; and he did as he had said.
In 1688 she published a French translation of Terence’s
comedies, with notes, in 8 vols. 12mo. She is said to
have risen at five o'clock in the morning, during a very
sharp winter, and to have dispatched four of the comedies;
but, upon looking them over some months after, to have
flung them into the fire, being much dissatisfied with them,
and to have begun the translation again. She brought the
work then to the highest perfection; and, in the opinion
of the French critics, even reached the graces and noble
simplicity of the original. It was a circumstance greatly
to her honour, that, having taken the liberty to change the
scenes and acts, her disposition of them was afterwards
confirmed by an excellent ms. in the king of France’s
library. The best and most finished edition of this universally-admired performance, is that of 1717; which, however, was greatly improved afterwards, by adopting the
emendations in Bentley’s edition. She had a hand in the
translation of Marcus Antoninus, which her husband published in 1691, and likewise in the specimen of a translation of Plutarch’s Lives, which he published three years
after; but being now intent on her translation of Homer,
she left her husband to finish that of Plutarch. In 1711
appeared her Homer, translated into French, with notes,
in 3 vols. 12mo and the translation is reckoned elegant
and faithful. In 1714 she published the Causes of the Corruption of Taste. This treatise was written against M. de
la Motte, who, in the preface to his Iliad, had declared
very little esteem for that poem. Madame Dacier, shocked
with the liberty he had taken with her favourite author,
immediately began this defence of him, in which she did
not treat La Motte with the greatest civility. In 1716 she
published a defence of Homer, against the apology of
father Hardouin, or, a sequel of the causes of the corruption of Taste: in which she attempts to shew, that father
Hardouin, in endeavouring to apologize for Homer, has
done him a greater injury than ever he received from his
most declared enemies. Besides these two pieces, she had
prepared a third against La Motte; but suppressed it, after
M. de Valiincourt had procured a reconciliation between
them. The same year also she published the Odyssey of
Homer, translated from the Greek, with notes, in 3 vols.
12mo, and this, as far as we can find, was her last appearance as an author. She was in a very infirm state of
health the last two years of her life; and died, after a very
painful sickness, Aug. 17, 1720, being 69 years of age.
She bad two daughters and a son, of whose education she
took the strictest care; but the son died young: one of
her daughters became a nun; and the other, who is said
to have had united in her all the virtues and accomplishments of her sex, died at 18 years of age. Her mother
has said high things of her, in the preface to her translation of the Iliad.
ent with prudence. Had he been rich, he would have been liberal: Dr. Campbell used to say he was not a bookseller, but a gentleman who dealt in books"
, a man of considerable talents, and
who prided himself on being through life “a companion
of his superiors,
” was born about 1712. In 1728 and
1729 he was at the university of Edinburgh, completing
his education, and became, as Dr. Johnson used to say of
him, “learned enough for a clergyman.
” That, however,
was not his destination, for in 1736 we find him among the
dramatis personae of Lillo’s celebrated tragedy of “Fatal
Curiosity,
” at the theatre in the Hay market, where he
was the original representative of young Wilmot, under
the management of Henry Fielding. He afterwards commenced bookseller in Duke’s court, opposite the church
of St. Martin-in-the-fields, and afterwards in Round
court in the Strand, but met with misfortunes which induced him to return to the theatre. For several years he
belonged to various companies at York, Dublin, and other
places, particularly at Edinburgh, where he appears to
have been at one time the manager of the theatre. At
York he married miss Yarrow, daughter of a performer
there, whose beauty was not more remarkable than the
blamelessness of her conduct and the amiableness of her
manners. In 1753 he returned to London, and with Mrs.
Davies was engaged at Drury-lane, where they remained
for several years in good estimation with the town, and
played many characters, if not with great excellence, at
least with propriety and decency. Churchill, in his indiscriminate satire, has attempted to fix some degree of ridicule on Mr. Davies’s performance, which, just or not, had
the effect of driving him from the stage, which about 1762
he exchanged for a shop in Russel-street, Covent Garden;
but his efforts in trade were not crowned with the success
which his abilities in his profession merited. In 1778 he
became a bankrupt; when, such was the regard enterr
tained for him by his friends, that they readily consented
to his re-establishment; and none of them, as he says himself, were more active to serve him than those who had
suffered most by his misfortunes. Yet, all their efforts
might possibly have been fruitless if his powerful and firm
friend Dr. Johnson had not exerted himself to the utmost
in his behalf. He called upon all over whom he had any
influence to assist Tom Davies; and prevailed on. Mr.
Sheridan, patentee of Drury-lane theatre, to give him a
benefit, which he granted on the most liberal terms. In.
1780, by a well-timed publication, the “Life of David
Garrick,
” which has passed through several editions, Mr.
Davies acquired much fame, and some money. He afterwards published “Dramatic Miscellanies,
” if) 3 yols.
of which a second edition appeared a few days only before
the author’s death. His other works are, 1. “Some Memoirs of Mr. Henderson.
” 2. “A Review of lord Chesterfield’s Characters.
” 3. A “Life of Massinger.
” 4. Lives
of Dr. John Eacharo, sir John Davies, and Mr. Lillo,
prefixed to editions of their works, published by Mr. Davies; and fugitive pieces without number in prose and
verse in the St. James’s Chronicle, and almost all the public newspapers. The compiler of this article in the last
edition of this Dictionary, informs us that he “knew him
well, and has passed many convivial hours in his company
at a social meeting, where his lively sallies of pleasantry
used to set the table in a roar of harmless merriment.
The last time he visited them he wore the appearance of a
spectre; and, sensible of his approaching end, took a solemn valediction of all the company.
” Mr. Davies died
the 5th of May, 1785, and was buried, by his own desire,
in the vault of St. Paul, Covent Garden, close by the side
of his next door neighbour, the late Mr. Grignion, watchmaker. Mrs. Davies died Feb. 9, 1801. Tom Davies, as
he was familiarly called, was a good-natured and conscientious man in business as in private life, but his theatrical bias created a levity not consistent with prudence.
Had he been rich, he would have been liberal: Dr. Campbell used to say he was not a bookseller, but a gentleman
who dealt in books"
pression, the following circumstance deserves some notice: A gentleman one day meeting the doctor in a bookseller’s shop, during the siege of the Havannah, asked him
In the career of this unhappy impression, the following
circumstance deserves some notice: A gentleman one
day meeting the doctor in a bookseller’s shop, during the
siege of the Havannah, asked him whether he could tell
him when the garrison would surrender? “O yes,
” says
e full concurrence of his father, to Paris, in order to complete his studies; that being lodged with a bookseller in the capital, he fell in love at sixteen with a
, an eminent French
dramatic writer, was born at Tours, in 1680, of a reputable
family, which he left early in life, apparently from being
thwarted in his youthful pursuits. This, however, has been
contradicted; and it is said that after having passed through
the rudiments of a literary education at Tours, he went,
with the full concurrence of his father, to Paris, in order to
complete his studies; that being lodged with a bookseller in
the capital, he fell in love at sixteen with a young person,
the relation of his landlord, the consequences of which amour
were such, that young Destouches, afraid to face them, enlisted as a common soldier in a regiment under orders for
Spain; that he was present at the siege of Barcelona, where
he narrowly escaped the fate of almost the whole company
to which he belonged, who were buried under a mine sprung
by the besieged. What became of him afterwards, to the
time of his being noticed by the marquis de Puysieulx, is
not certainly known, but the common opinion was, that he
had appeared as a player on the stage; and having for a
long time dragged his wretchedness from town to town,
was at length manager of a company of comedians at Soleure, when the marquis de Puysieulx, ambassador from
France to Switzerland, obtained some knowledge of him
by means of an harangue which the young actor made him
at the head of his comrades. The marquis, habituated by
his diplomatic function to discern and appreciate characters,
judged that one who could speak so well, was destined by
nature to something better than the representation of
French comedies in the centre of Switzerland. He requested a conference with Destouches, sounded him on
various topics, and attached him to his person. It was in
Switzerland that his talent for theatrical productions first
displayed itself; and his “Curieux Impertinent
” was exhibited there with applause. His dramatic productions
made him known to the regent, who sent him to London
in 1717, to assist, in his political capacity, at the negotiations then on foot, and while resident here, he had a
singular negociation to manage for cardinal Dubois, to
whom, indeed, he was indebted for his post. That minister directed him to engage king George I. to ask for
him the archbishopric of Cambray, from the regent duke
of Orleans. The king, who was treating with the regent
on affairs of great consequence, and whom it was the interest of the latter to oblige, could not help viewing this
request in a ridiculous light. “How!
” said he to Destouches, “would you have a protestant prince interfere
in making a French archbishop? The regent will only
laugh at it, and certainly will pay no regard to such an application.
” “Pardon me, sire,
” replied Destouches, “he
will laugh, indeed, but he will do what you desire.
” He
then presented to the king a very pressing letter, ready
for signature. “With all my heart, then,
” said the king,
and signed the letter; and Dubois became archbishop of
Cambray. He spent seven years in London, married there,
and returned to his country; where the dramatist and
negociator were well received. The regent had a just
sense of his services, and promised him great things; but
dying soon after, left Destouches the meagre comfort of
reflecting how well he should have been provided for if
the regent had lived. Having lost his patron, he retired
to Fortoiseau, near Melun, as the properest situation to
make him forget the caprices of fortune. He purchased
the place; and cultivating agriculture, philosophy, and
the muses, abode there as long as he lived. Cardinal
Fleury would fain have sent him ambassador to Petersburg;
but Destouches chose rather to attend his lands and his
woods, to correct with his pen the manners of his own
countrymen; and to write, which he did with considerable
effect, against the infidels of France. He died in 1754,
leaving a daughter and a son; the latter, by order of
Lewis XV. published at the Louvre an edition of his father’s
works, in 4 vols. 4to. Destouch.es had not the gaiety of
Regnard, nor the strong warm colouring of Moliere; but
he is always polite, tender, and natural, and has been
thought worthy of ranking next to these authors. He deserves more praise by surpassing them in the morality and
decorum of his pieces, and he had also the art of attaining
the pathetic without losing the vis comica, which is the
essential character of this species of composition. In the
various connections of domestic life, he maintained a truly
respectable character, and in early life he gave evidence
of his filial duty, by sending 40,000 livres out of his savings
to his father, who was burthened with a large family.
naturalist and biographer, was born at Paris in the beginning of the last century. He was the son of a bookseller of Paris, and was educated in his native city, but
, a
French naturalist and biographer, was born at Paris in the
beginning of the last century. He was the son of a bookseller of Paris, and was educated in his native city, but a
considerable time after this he spent in foreign countries,
particularly in Italy, where he formed a taste for the fine
arts. He became acquainted with men of science in various parts of Europe, and was elected in 1750 member
of the royal society in London, and of the academy of
sciences at Montpelier. He wrote some considerable articles, particularly those of gardening and hydrography,
in the French Encyclopaedia; and in 1747 he published,
in quarto, “La Theorie et la Pratique du Jardinage;
”
and in Conchyliologie, ou Traite sur la nature des
Coquillages,
” 2 vols. 4to, reprinted 1757, and accounted
his most valuable work. His arrangement is made from
the external form of shells, according to which he classes
them as univalve, bivalve, and multivalve; he then divides
them again into shells of the sea, of fresh water, and of
the lands. He also gave an account of the several genera of animals that inhabit shells. He published also
“L'Orycthologie ou Traite des pierres, des mineraux,
des metaux et autres Fossiles,
” Abreg6 de la
Vie de quelques Peintres celebres,
” 3 vols. 4to, and 4 vols.
8vo, a work of great labour and taste, although not absolutely free from errors. He practised engraving sometimes
himself. He died at Paris in 1766; and his son continued
the biography began by the father by the addition of two
volumes, containing the lives of architects and sculptors.
poems, and the Toy-shop, enabled him to set up in business, and with much judgment he chose that of a bookseller, which liis friends might promote, and which might
Pope accordingly recommended it to Mr. Rich, and
ever after bestowed his “favour and acquaintance
” on the
author. The hint of this excellent satire, for it scarcely
deserves the name of drama, was taken from Randolph’s
“M use’s Looking-glass.
” It was acted at Covent-garden
theatre in Toy-shop;
”
but when he asserted his claim, he became more noticed,
and the theatre more easily accessible to his future dramatic attempts. The profits of his volume of poems, and
the Toy-shop, enabled him to set up in business, and
with much judgment he chose that of a bookseller, which
liis friends might promote, and which might afford him
leisure and opportunity to cultivate his talents. At what
time he quitted service is not known, but he commenced
the bookselling trade at a shop in Pall Mall, in 1735, and
by Pope’s friendly interest, and his own humble and prudent behaviour, soon drew into his little premises such a
society of men of genius, taste, and rank, as have seldom
met. Many of these he afterwards had the honour to
unite together in more than one scheme of literary partnership.
ions on them may be seen in D'Argentre’s “Collectio judiciorum de novis erroribus.” In 1779, M. Nee, a bookseller at Paris, published a curious Life of Dolet, 8vo,
their having been burnt by sentence of the divines of
Paris, whose decisions on them may be seen in D'Argentre’s “Collectio judiciorum de novis erroribus.
” In
comes. 4. Dunton preaching to himself; or every man his own parson. 5. His creed, or the religion of a bookseller, in imitation of Brown’s Religio Medici, which h.is
, bookseller and miscellaneous writer,
was born at Graff bam, in Huntingdonshire, the 14th of May,
1659; the son of John Dunton, fellow of Trinity-college,
Cambridge, and rector of Graft ham, whose works he published in 8vo, embellished with very curious engravings.
Dunton was in business upwards of twenty years, during
which time he traded considerably in the Stationers’ company; but, about the beginning of the last century, he
failed, and commenced author; and in 1701, was amanuensis to the editor of a periodical paper called the “Post
Angel.
” He soon after set up as a writer for the entertainment of the public; and projected and carried on, with
the assistance of others, the “Athenian Mercury,
” or a
scheme to answer a series of questions monthly, the querist
remaining concealed. This work was continued to about
20 volumes; and afterwards reprinted by Bell, under the
title of the “Athenian Oracle,
” 4 vols. 8vo. It forms a
strange jumble of knowledge and ignorance, sense and
nonsense, curiosity and impertinence. In 1710 he published his “Athenianism,
” or the projects of Mr. John
Dunton, author of the “Essay on the hazard of a deathbed repentance.
” This contains, amidst a prodigious variety of matter, six hundred treatises in prose and verse,
by which he appears to have been, with equal facility, a
philosopher, physician, poet, civilian, divine, humourist,
&c. To this work he has prefixed his portrait, engraved
by M. Vander Gucht; and in a preface, which breathes all
the pride of self-consequence, informs his readers he does
not write to flatter, or for hire. As a specimen of this
miscellaneous farrago, the reader may take the following
heads of subjects: 1. The Funeral of Mankind, a paradox,
proving we are all dead and buried. 2. The spiritual
hedge-hog; or, a new and surprising thought. 3. The
double life, or a new way to redeem time, by living over
to-morrow before it comes. 4. Dunton preaching to himself; or every man his own parson. 5. His creed, or the
religion of a bookseller, in imitation of Brown’s Religio
Medici, which h.is some humour and merit. This he dedicated to the Stationers’ company. As a satirist, he
appears to most advantage in his poems entitled the “Beggar
mounted
” the “Dissenting Doctors;
” “Parnassus hoa!
”
or frolics in verse “Dunton’s shadow,
” or the character
of a summer friend but in all his writings he is exceedingly prolix and tedious, and sometimes obscure. His
“Case is altered, or Dunton’s remarriage to his own wife,
”
has some singular notions, but very little merit in the composition. For further particulars of this heterogeneous genius,
see “Dunton’s Life and Errors,
” a work now grown somewhat scarce, or, what will perhaps be more satisfactory, the
account of him in our authority. Dunton died in 1733.
edition was published in 1630. As his name was not to it, Langbaine attributed it to Edward Blount, a bookseller in St. Paul’s Church-yard, who was only the publisher.
Bishop Earle wrote an “Elegy upon Mr. Francis
Beaumont,
” afterwards printed at the end of Beaumont’s Poems,
London, 1640, 4to. He translated also from the English
into Latin, the “Eikon Basilike,
” which he entitled
“Imago regis Caroli, in illis suis Ærumnis et Solitudine,
”
Hague, Microcosmographie, or a Peece of the World discovered,
in essays and characters,
” a work of great humour and
knowledge of the world, and which throws much light on
the manners of the times. It appears to have been in his
life-time uncommonly popular, as a sixth edition was published in 1630. As his name was not to it, Langbaine attributed it to Edward Blount, a bookseller in St. Paul’s
Church-yard, who was only the publisher.
ing sensible of his approaching dissolution, he disposed of the whole of his mathematical library to a bookseller at York, and on May the 26th, 1782, his lingering
, a very eminent mathematician,
was born May 14, 1701, at Hurvvorth, a village about
three miles south of Darlington, on the borders of the
county of Durham, at least it is certain he resided here
from his childhood. His father, Dutlly Emerson, taught
a school, and was a tolerable proficient in the mathematics; and without his books and instructions perhaps his
son’s genius might might never have been unfolded. Besides his father’s instructions, our author was assisted in
the learned languages by a young clergyman, then curate
of Hurworth, who was boarded at his father’s house. In
the early part of his life, he attempted to teach a few
scholars; but whether from his concise method (for he was not happy in expressing his ideas), or the warmth of
his natural temper, he made no progress in his school; he
therefore Sood left it oft', and satisfied with a small paternal estate of about 60l. or 70l. a year, devoted himself to
study, which he closely pursued in his native place through
the course of a long life, being mostly very healthy, till
towards the latter part of his days, when he was much
afflicted with the stone: towards the close of the year 1781,
being sensible of his approaching dissolution, he disposed
of the whole of his mathematical library to a bookseller at
York, and on May the 26th, 1782, his lingering and painful disorder put an end to his life at his native village, in
the eighty-first year of his age. In his person he was rather short, but strong and well-made, with an open countenance and ruddy complexion. He was never known to
ask a favour, or seek the acquaintance of a rich man, unless he possessed some eminent qualities of the mind. He
was a very good classical scholar, and a tolerable physician,
so far as it could be combined with mathematical principles,
according to the plan of Keil and Morton. The latter he
esteemed above all others as a physician the former as
the best anatomist. He was very singular in his behaviour,
dress, and conversation. His manners and appearance
were that of a rude and rather boorish countryman, he wasof very plain conversation, and indeed seemingly rude,
commonly mixing oaths in his sentences. He had strong
natural parts, and could discourse sensibly on any subject;
but was always positive and impatient of any contradiction.
He spent his whole life in close study and writing books;
with the profits of which he redeemed his little patrimony
from some original incumbrance. He had but one coat,
which he always wore open before, except the lower button no waistcoat; his shirt quite the reverse of one in.
common use, no opening before, but buttoned close at the
collar behind; a kind of flaxen wig which had not a crooked
hair in it; and probably had never been tortured with a
comb from the time of its being made. This was his dress
when he went into company. One hat he made to last
him the best part of his lifetime, gradually lessening the
flaps, bit by bit, as it lost its elasticity and hung down, till
little or nothing but the crown remained. He never rode
although he kept a horse, but was frequently seen to lead
the horse, with a kind of wallet stuffed with the provisions he
had bought at the market. He always walked up to London when he had any thing to publish, revising sheet by
sheet himself; trusting no eyes but his own, which was
always a favourite maxim with him. He never advanced
any mathematical proposition that he had not first tried in
practice, constantly making all the different parts himself
on a small scale, so that his house was filled with all kinds
of mechanical instruments together or disjointed. He
would frequently stand up to his middle in water while
fishing; a diversion he was remarkably fond of. He used
to study incessantly for some time, and then for relaxation
take a ramble to any pot ale-house where he could get any
body to drink with and talk to. The duke of Manchester was
highly pleased with his company, and used often to come
to him in the fields and accompany him home, but could
never persuade him to get into a carriage. When he wrote
his sinall treatise on navigation, he and some of his scholars
took a small vessel from Hurworth, and the whole crew
soon gotswampt; when Emerson, smiling and alluding to
his treatise, said “They must not do as I do, but as I say.
”
He was a married man; and his wife used to spin on an
old-fashioned wheel, of which a very accurate drawing is
given in his mechanics. He was deeply skilled in the
science of music, the theory of sounds, and the various
scales both ancient and modern, but was a very poor performer. He carried that singularity which marked all his
actions even into this science. He had, if we may be
allowed the expression, two first strings to his violin,
which, he said, made the E more melodious when they
were drawn up to a perfect unison. His virginal, which is
a species of instrument like the modern spinnet, he had
cut and twisted into various shapes in the keys, by adding
some occasional half-tones in order to regulate the present
scale, and to rectify some fraction of discord that will
always remain in the tuning. He never could get this regulated to his fancy, and generally concluded by saying,
4< It was a bad instrument, and a foolish thing to be vexed
with."
, a bookseller of London, and deserving notice not only for spirit
, a bookseller of London, and deserving notice not only for spirit and integrity in business,
but for considerable literary taste and talents, was born in.
1742, and served his apprenticeship with Mr. Charles
Marsh, a bookseller of reputation in Round-court, Strand,
and at Charing-cross. Mr. Evans soon after his apprenticeship had terminated, set up in business, and by his
acquaintance with English literature, which he had assiduously cultivated, was enabled to strike out many of those
schemes of publication which do credit to the discernment
of the trade, and as far as his own fortune permitted to embark alone in many republications which shewed the correctness of his judgment and his regard for the literary
character of his country. Among these we may enumerate new editions of, 1. “Shakspeare’s Poems,
” Buckingham’s Works,
” Nicolson’s Historical Library,
” Four volumes of Old Ballads, with notes,
” l?7l 1784. Of this his son has lately
published an improved edition. 5. “Cardinal de Retz’s
Memoirs.
” 6. “Savage’s Works,
” Goldsmith’s Works,
” Prior’s Works,
” Rabelais’s Works.
” 10. “History of Wales.
” 11.
“Peck’s Desiderata Curiosa,
” Notitia Monastica
” of bishop Tanner, which has since
been accomplished by Dr. Nasmith. To all these works Mr.
Evans prefixed Dedications written with neatness and elegance, addressed to his literary patrons, Garrick, sir Joshua Reynolds, Mr. Sheridan, &c. He died in the prime
of life, April 30, 1784, leaving a widow and son, the latter
now a bookseller in Pall-mall, and the well-known and successful vendor of the most curious and valuable library ever
sold in this, or perhaps, in some respects, in any other
country, that of the late duke of Roxburgh.
, supplied the place of the recorder on this occasion. He was a sensible conceited man, who had been a bookseller on London Bridge, and whose oratory in the common
In this state of civil discord, the recorder gave his opinion with firmness and understanding; but he could only give his counsel, and passively submit tto the majority of the corporation. At length, a remonstrance to the throne was proposed and carried in a court of common council, which contained such opinions, that the recorder peremptorily refused to exercise his official functions on the occasion. He represented it as enforcing doctrines which he should ever oppose, and expressed in a language unfit for the sovereign to hear. He was therefore determined not to be the organ by which his majesty should receive such an insult. Sir James Hodges, the town clerk, supplied the place of the recorder on this occasion. He was a sensible conceited man, who had been a bookseller on London Bridge, and whose oratory in the common council had raised him to his situation. The office gratified his vanity, and has secured to him a renown, Which few booksellers have derived from works not published by themselves: it has caused his name to be recorded in the Letters of Junius.
, an eminent French officer, was the son of a bookseller at Mentz (author of “Notes sur la Couturhe de Lorraine,”
, an eminent French officer, was
the son of a bookseller at Mentz (author of “Notes sur la Couturhe de Lorraine,
” 1657, fol.) He was educated with
the duke d'Epernon, and saved the royal army at the famous retreat of Mentz; which has been compared by some
authors to that of Xenophon’s 10,000. Being wounded in
the thigh by a musket at the siege of Turin, M. de Turenne, and cardinal de la Valette, to whom he was aid de
camp, intreated him to submit to an amputation, which
was the advice of all the surgeons but he replied, “I
must not die by piece-meal death shall have me intire, or
not at all.
” Having, however, recovered from this wound,
he was afterwards made governor of Sedan; where he
erected strong fortifications, and with so much ceconomy,
that his majesty never had any places better secured at
so little expence. In 1654 he took Stenay, and was appointed marechal of France in 1658. His merit, integrity,
and modesty, gained him the esteem both of his sovereign
and the grandees. He refused the collar of the king’s
orders, saying it should never be worn but by the ancient
nobility; and it happened, that though his family had been
ennobled by Henry IV. he could not produce the qualifications necessary for that dignity, and “would not,
” asi
he said, “have his cloke decorated with a cross, and his
soul disgraced by an imposture.
” Louis XIV. himself answered his letter of thanks in the following terms: “No
person to whom I shall give this collar, will ever receive
more honour from it in the world, than you have gained in
my opinion, by your noble refusal, proceeding from so
generous a principle.
” Marechal Fabert died at Sedan,
May 17, 1662, aged sixty-three. His Life, by father
Barre, regular canon of St. Genevieve, was published at
Paris, 1752, 2 vols. 12mo. There is one older, in one
thin vol. 12ino.
sister of a person who is called “the famous” captain Ground. By her he had two sons, Henry, who was a bookseller, and William, an engraver in mezzotinto.
, a very celebrated engraver,
was born in London in the early part of the seventeenth
century. He was the pupil of Peake, the printer and
printseller, who was afterwards knighted, and worked with
him three or four years. At the breaking out of the civil
war, Peake espoused the cause of Charles I.; and Faithorne,
who accompanied his master, was taken prisoner by the
rebels at Basing-house, whence he was sent to London,
and confined in Aldersgate. In this uncomfortable situation he exercised his graver; and a small head of the first
Villiers, duke of Buckingham, in the style of Mallan, was
one of his first performances. The solicitations of his
friends in his favour at last prevailed; and he was released
from prison, with permission to retire on the continent.
The story of his banishment for refusing to take the oath
to Oliver Cromwell, would have done him no discredit,
had it been properly authenticated, but that does not appear to be the case. Soon after his arrival in France, he
found protection and encouragement from the abbe* de
Marolles, and formed an acquaintance with the celebrated
Nanteuil, from whose instructions he derived very considerable advantages. About 1650, he returned to England, and soon after married the sister of a person who is
called “the famous
” captain Ground. By her he had two
sons, Henry, who was a bookseller, and William, an engraver in mezzotinto.
, nor was it allowed to be printed in France while he lived. It was published, however, by Moetjons, a bookseller, in 1699, though prohibited at Paris; but the first
But the work that has gained him the greatest reputation, and will render his name immortal, is his “Telemachus,
” written, according to some, at court; according to others, in his retreat at Cambray. A servant whom
Fenelon employed to transcribe it, took a copy for himself,
and had proceeded in having it printed, to about 200 pages,
when the king, Louis XIV. who was prejudiced against
the author, ordered the work to be stopped, nor was it
allowed to be printed in France while he lived. It was
published, however, by Moetjons, a bookseller, in 1699,
though prohibited at Paris; but the first correct edition
appeared at the Hague in 1701. This elegant work completely ruined the credit of Fenelon at the court of France.
The king considered it as a satire against his government;
the malignant found in it allusions which the author probably had never intended. Calypso, they said, was madam de Montespan Eucharis, mademoiselle de Fontanges Antiope, the duchess of Burgundy Protesilaus,
Louvois; Idomeneus, king James II. Sesostris, Louis XIV.
The world, however, admired the flowing elegance of the
style, the sublimity of the moral, and the happy adoption
and embellishments of ancient stories; and critics were
long divided, whether it might not be allowed the title of
an epic poem, though written in prose. It is certain that
few works have ever had a greater reputation. Editions
have been multiplied in every country of Europe; but the
most esteemed for correctness is that published from his
papers by his family in 1717, 2 vols. 12mo. Splendid
editions have been published in various places, and translations in all modern languages of Europe, modern Greek
not excepted.
appears to have proceeded from sir John, except the “Cautions,” and the use of his name was perhaps a bookseller’s trick. It is most to the honour of sir John Fielding’s
, was half brother, as abovementioned, to Henry Fielding, and his successor in the
office of justice for Westminster, in which, though blind
from his youth, he acted with great sagacity and activity
for many years. He received the honour of knighthood
for his services in October, 1761, and died at Brompton in
September 1780. He published at various times, the following works: 1. “An account of the Origin and Effects
of a Police, set on foot by his grace the duke of Newcastle,
in the year 1753, upon a Plan presented to his grace by
the late Henry Fielding, esq. To which is added, a Plan
for preserving those deserted Girls in this Town who become Prostitutes from Necessity. 1768.
” This was a small
tract in 8vo. 2. “Extracts from such of the Penal Laws
as particularly relate to the Peace and good Order of the
Metropolis,
” The
Universal Mentor; containing, Essays on the most important Subjects in Life; composed of Observations, Sentiments, and Examples of Virtue, selected from the approved Ethic Writers, Biographers, and Historians, both
ancient and modern,
” A
Charge to the Grand Jury of Westminster,
” Another Charge to the Grand Jury
on a similar occasion,
” A brief Description of the Cities of London and Westminster, &c. To
which are added, some Cautions against the Tricks of
Sharpers,
” &c. Cautions,
”
and the use of his name was perhaps a bookseller’s trick.
It is most to the honour of sir John Fielding’s memory,
that he was a distinguished promoter of the Magdalen hospital, the Asylum, and the Marine Society.
merit. After this period, Camerarius the younger being dead, these blocks were purchased by Goerlin, a bookseller of Ulm, and next served for the “Parnassus medicinalis
Dr. Pulteney’s account of the fate of Gesner’s excellent
figures, forms, as he justly observes, a mortifying anecdote in the literary history of the science of botany. Of
the 1500 figures left by Gesner, prepared for his “History
of Plants,
” at his death, a large share passed into the
“Epitome Matthioli,
” published by Camerarius in German Herbal.
” In Parnassus medicinalis illustratus
” of Becher, printed in that city in Theatrum Botanicum
” of Zwinger, Basil,
e he appears to have made greater proficiency. In about two years he returned to his father, who was a bookseller at Zurich, and, probably encouraged by the men of
, or, as some spell the name, Gessner (Solomon), a distinguished German poet, was born at Zurich in 1730. His youth afforded no remarkable symptoms of his future fame, but his father was assured that the boy had talents, which would one day or other exalt him above his school-fellows. As. these, however, were not perceptible at that time, and the progress he made in school-learning at Zurich was unpromising, he was sent to Berg, and put under the care of a clergyman, where he appears to have made greater proficiency. In about two years he returned to his father, who was a bookseller at Zurich, and, probably encouraged by the men of genius who frequented his father’s shop, our author now began to court the muses. His success, however, not being such as to induce his father to devote him to a literary life, he preferred sending him to Berlin in 1749 to learn the trade of a bookseller. Young poets are not easily confined by the shackles of commercial life, and young Gesner soon eloped from his master, while his father, irritated at this step, discontinued his remittances as the most effectual mode of recalling him ta his duty.
he Greek language. Such was at the same time his avidity of knowledge, that he constantly frequented a bookseller’s shop (which was open only on market-days), where
, D. D. an eminent dissenting divine, and
the most able and learned baptist writer of the last century,
was born at Kettering in Northamptonshire, Nov. 23, 1697,
of parents in humble life. His father was a deacon of the
baptist meeting at Kettering; and having, from various
causes, some of which appear rather imaginary, a strong
impression on his mind that this son would become a
preacher, and an eminent character, exerted his utmost to
give him a suitable education. His first attempts were
crowned with such success as to confirm his father’s hopes.
Being sent to the grammar school, he soon exceeded his
equals in age, and even his seniors. At his eleventh year,
he had not only gone through the common school books,
but had read the principal Latin classics, and made considerable proficiency in the Greek language. Such was at
the same time his avidity of knowledge, that he constantly
frequented a bookseller’s shop (which was open only on market-days), where his acquirements became noticed by
some c.f the neighbouring clergy; and he repaired so regularly to this repository of books, that it became a sort of
asseveration, “such a thing is as sure as John Gill is in
the bookseller’s shop.
” Unfortunately, however, his progress at school was interrupted by an edict of the master,
requiring that all his scholars, without exception, should
attend prayers at the church on week-days. This, of
course, amounted to an expulsion of the children of dissenters, and of young Gill among the rest. His parents
not being able to send him to a distant school, some efforts
were made to get him upon one of the dissenting funds of
London, that he might be sent to one of their seminaries.
In order to procure this favour, his progress in literature
was probably stated as very extraordinary, and the application produced an answer fully as extraordinary namely,
“that he was too young and, should he continue, as it
might be supposed he would, to make such rapid advances
in his studies, he would go through the common circle of
learning before he could be capable of taking care of himself, or of being employed in any public service.
” Notwithstanding this illiberal and absurd repulse, young Gill
went on improving himself in Greek and Latin, by eagerly
studying such books in both languages as he could procure, and added to his stock a knowledge of logic, rhetoric, moral and natural philosophy. Without a master
also, he made such progress in the Hebrew as soon to be
able to read the Bible with facility; and ever after this
language was his favourite study. He read much in the
Latin tongue, and studied various systematic works Oh
divinity; but all this appears to have been done at such
hours as he could spare from assisting his father in his
business. In November 1716, he made a public profession of his religious sentiments before the baptist meeting,
and was baptised according to the usual forms; soon after
which he commenced preacher, and officiated first at
Higham Ferrars, where in 1718 he married; he also
preached occasionally at Kettering until the beginning of
1719, when he was invited to become pastor of the baptist
congregation at Horslydovrn, Southwark, and soon became
very popular in the metropolis.
ng man to devote his time to study, but forced him to choose some business. Goere'e fixed on that of a bookseller, as one which would not wholly exclude him from the
, an eminent and learned bookseller, was born Dec. 11, 1635, at Middleburg. Losing
Jhis father early in life, he was so unfortunate as to have a
harsh father-in-law, who, being no scholar himself, would
not permit the young man to devote his time to study, but
forced him to choose some business. Goere'e fixed on that
of a bookseller, as one which would not wholly exclude
him from the conversation of the learned, nor from the
pursuit of his studies; and he accordingly found time
enough, notwithstanding his necessary occupations, to cultivate his genius, and even to write several valuable books,
in Flemish, on architecture, sculpture, painting, engraving, botany, physic, and antiquities. He died May 3,
1711, at Amsterdam. His principal works are, “Jewish
Antiquities,
” 2 vols. fol. “History of the Jewish Church,
taken from the Writings of Moses,
” 4 vols. fol. “Sacred
and Prophane History,
” 4to “Introduction to the practice of universal Painting,
” 8yo “Of the Knowledge of
Man with respect to his Nature, and Painting,
” 8vo
“Universal Architecture,
” &c.
e they are reposited, together with several of his papers; but many others were sold by his widow to a bookseller, and lost or dispersed.
But the tyrannical violence of the parliamentary visitors
was now above all restraint, and a fresh charge was drawn
up against Greaves. Dr. Walter Pope informs us, that,
considering the violence of the visitors, Greaves saw it
would be of no service to him to make any defence; and,
finding it impossible to keep his professorship, he made it
his business to procure an able and worthy person to succeed him. By the advice of Dr. Charles Scarborough the
physician, having pitched upon Mr. Seth Ward, he opened
the matter to that gentleman, whom he soon met with
there; and at the same time proposed a method of compassing it, by which Ward not only obtained the place,
but the full arrears of the stipend, amounting to 500l. due
to Greaves, and allowed him a considerable part of his
salary. The murder of the king, which happened soon
after, was a shock to Greaves, and lamented by him in
pathetic terms, in a letter to Dr. Pococke: “O my good
friend, my good friend, never was sorrow like our sorrow;
excuse me now, if I am not able to write to you, and to
answer your questions. O Lord God, avert this great sin
and thy judgments from this nation.
” However, he bore
up against his own injuries with admirable fortitude; and,
fixing his residence in London, he married, and, living
upon his patrimonial estate, went on as before, and produced some other curious Arabic and Persic treatises,
translated by him with notes, every year. Besides which,
he had prepared several others for the public view, and was
meditating more when he was seized by a fatal disorder,
which put a period to his life, Octobers, 1652, before he
was full fifty years of age. He was interred in the church
of St. Bennet Sherehog, in London. His loss was much
lamented by his friends, to whom he was particularly endeared by joining the gentleman to the scholar. He was
endowed with great firmness of mind, steadiness in friendship, and ardent zeal in the interest which he espoused,
though, as he declares himself, not at all inclined to
contenlion. He was highly esteemed by the learned in foreign parts, with many of whom he corresponded. Nor
was he less valued at home by all who were judges of his
great worth and abilities. He had no issue by his wife, to
whom he bequeathed his estate for her life; and having
left his cabinet of coins to his friend sir John Marsham,
author of the “Canon Chronicus,
” he appointed the eldest
of his three younger brothers (Dr. Nicolas Greaves),
his executor, who by will bestowed our author’s astronomical instruments on the Savilian library at Oxford, where
they are reposited, together with several of his papers; but
many others were sold by his widow to a bookseller, and
lost or dispersed.
homas Guy, lighterman and coal-dealer in Horseleydown, Southwark. He was put apprentice, in 1660, to a "bookseller, in the porch of Mercers’ chapel, and set up trade
, founder of Guy’s hospital, was the son of Thomas Guy, lighterman and coal-dealer in Horseleydown, Southwark. He was put apprentice, in 1660, to a "bookseller, in the porch of Mercers’ chapel, and set up trade with a stock of about 200l. in the house that forms the angle between Cornhill and Lombard-street. The English Bibles being at that time very badly printed, Mr. Guy engaged with others in a scheme for printing them in Holland, and importing them; but, this being put a stop to, he contracted with the university of Oxford for their privilege of printing then), and carried on a great Bible trade for many years to considerable advantage. Thus he began to accumulate money, and his gains rested in his hands; for, being a single man and very penurious, his expences were very trifling. His custom was to dine on his shop-counter, with no other table,-cloth than an old newspaper; he was also as little nice in regard to his apparel. The bulk of his fortune, however, was acquired by the less reputable purchase of seamen’s tickets during queen Anne’s wars, and by South-sea stock in the memorable year 1720.
obliged to sell (not the whole, as Wood says, but) a part of his valuable library to Cornelius Bee, a bookseller in London, for 700l. which, Walker informs us, and
He continued in his fellowship at Eton, although he refused the covenant, but was ejected upon his refusal to take
the engagement “to be faithful to the Common-wealth of
England, as then established without a king, or a house
of lords.
” His successor, a Mr. Penwarn, or Penwarden,
kindly offered him half the profits of his fellowship; but
Mr. Hales refused to accept it, saying, if he had a right
to any part, he had a right to the whole. Both Wood and
Des Maizeaux have misrepresented this expression, which
we give on the authority of Mr. Montague, one of his
executors. About the same time he refused a liberal offer
from a gentleman of the Sedley family, in Kent, of 100l.
his board, and servants to attend him. In this spirit of independence he retired to the house of a Mrs. Salter, at
Rickings, near Colebrook, accepting of a smaller salary of
50l. with his diet, to instruct her son. Here he also officiated as chaplain, performing the service according-to
the liturgy of the church of England, in company with
Dr. Henry King, the ejected bishop of Chichester, who
was in the same house. But this retirement was soon disturbed by an order from the ruling powers, prohibiting all
persons from harbouring malignants, or royalists; and although Mrs. Salter assured Mr. Hales that she was prepared
to risk the consequences, he would not suffer her to incur
any danger upon his account, but retired to the house of
Hannah Dickenson, in Eton, whose husband had been his
servant, and who administered the humble comforts she
could afford with great care and respect. But being now
destitute of every means of supporting himself, ne was
obliged to sell (not the whole, as Wood says, but) a part
of his valuable library to Cornelius Bee, a bookseller in
London, for 700l. which, Walker informs us, and the fact
seems to be confirmed by Dr. Pearson in his preface to the
“Golden Remains,
” he shared with several ejected clergymen, scholars, and others.
. a son of Bailey, or Bayly, bishop of Bangor. This Dr. Bailey, who was a Roman catholic, sold it to a bookseller, by whom it was printed at London in 1655, under
, a Roman catholic writer, was educated at Christ’s college, Cambridge, which his principles
obliged him to leave about 1572. He then went to Doway,
and thence to Italy, where he resumed his studies and took
his degree of D. D. Returning afterwards to Doway, he
obtained a professorship and some preferment. He died
in 1604-. He wrote some books of controversy; but is
chiefly worthy of notice now, as the author of that “Life
of bishop Fisher
” which goes under the name of Bailey.
He left it in manuscript at his death, and it was long
preserved as a choice rarity in the library of the English Benedictines at Dieuward in Lorraine; but several transcripts
getting abroad, one fell into the hands of Thomas Bailey,
D. D. a son of Bailey, or Bayly, bishop of Bangor. This
Dr. Bailey, who was a Roman catholic, sold it to a bookseller, by whom it was printed at London in 1655, under
the editor’s name. In 1739 another edition was published
at London, 12mo, edited by Coxeter. It is valued as a
narrative of considerable interest and authenticity.
ed what he thought proper in the works he had already published; and then put them into the hands of a bookseller, who undertook to print them faithfully from the
Still persisting in his opinion, in some letters, written to
Mons. Ballanfaux, and printed at Luxemburg in 1700, he
speaks of “an impious faction begun a long while ago,
which still subsists, and which by forging an infinite number of writings, that seem to breathe nothing but piety,
appears to have no other design than to remove God out
of the hearts of mankind, and to overturn all religion.
”
Mr. La Croze refuted his notion concerning the forgery of
the ancient writings, in a Dissertations historiques sur
divers sujets, Rot. 1707;“and in
” Vindiciae veterum
Scriptorum contra J. Harduinum.“La Croze imagined,
that Hardouin advanced his notions in concert with the society of Jesuits, or at least with his superiors, in order to
set aside the ancient Greek and Latin sacred and profane
writers, and so leave all clear to infallibility and tradition
only; but Le Clerc was of opinion, that there was no ground
for this supposition. In 1700 there was published at 4sterdam a volume in folio, entitled
” Joannis Harduini
opera selecta,“consisting of his
” Nummi antiqui populorum et urbium illustrati;“” De Baptismo quaestio triplex;“edition of
” St. Chrysostom’s Letter to Caesarius,“with the dissertation
” De Sacramento Altaris;“” De nummis Herodiadum;“his
” Discourse on the Last Supper,“which had been printed in 1693 a treatise in which he
explains the medals of the age of Constantine
” Chronology of the Old Testament, adjusted by the Vulgate translation, and illustrated by Medals“” Letters to M. de
Ballanfaux“and other pieces. This volume made a great
deal of noise before it was published. The author had
corrected what he thought proper in the works he had already published; and then put them into the hands of a
bookseller, who undertook to print them faithfully from
the copy he had received. He began the impression with
the author’s consent, and was considerably advanced in it,
when the clamour raised against the paradoxes in those
works obliged Hardouin to send an order to the bookseller
to retrench the obnoxious passages. But the bookseller
refused to do it, and wrote an answer to him, alleging the
reasons of his refusal. This immediately produced
” A
Declaration of the father provincial of the Jesuits, and of
the superiors of their houses at Paris, concerning a new
edition of some works of father John Hardouin of the same
society, which has been actually made contrary to their
will hy the Sieur de Lorme, bookseller at Amsterdam,“&c.
At the bottom of this was Hardouin’s recantation, which
runs in these curious terms
” I subscribe sincerely to
every thing contained in the preceding declaration I
heartily condemn in my writings what it condemns in them,
and particularly what I have said concerning an impious
faction, which had forged some ages ago the greatest part
of the ecclesiastical or profane writings, which have hitherto been considered as ancient. I am extremely sorry
that I did not open my eyes before in this point. I think
myself greatly obliged to my superiors in this society, who
have assisted me in divesting myself of my prejudices. I
promise never to advance in word or writing any thing
directly or indirectly contrary to my present recantation.
And if hereafter I shall call in question the antiquity of any
writing, either ecclesiastical or profane, which no person
before shall have charged as supposititious, I will only do
it by proposing my reasons in a writing published under
my name, with the permission of my superiors, and the
approbation of the public censors. In testimony of which
I have signed, this 27th of December, 1708, J. Hardouin,
of the society of Jesus.' 5
des Voyages,” an employment so much beneath his talents, that it was generally considered rather as a bookseller’s job than an effort of literary ambition. In the
About 1779 he undertook an abridgment of the abbe“Prevost’s Histoire des Voyages,
” an employment so much
beneath his talents, that it was generally considered rather
as a bookseller’s job than an effort of literary ambition. In
the same year he printed his “Tangu et Felime,
” in four
cantos, which was reckoned one of the best productions of
the voluptuous kind. But that on which his fame is more
honourably and solidly established, was his “Cour de
Litterature, ancienne et moderne,
” which justly entitles
him to the appellation of the French Quintilian. Being
appointed a professor of literature in the Lyceum, the lectures he had delivered in it during many years were
collected and properly arranged by him, and soon after published under the title of “Lyceum; or, Course of Literature,
” in 12 vols. 8vo. M. Petitot says of this work, that
“he not only labours to give to persons of no great knowledge competent information on the topics of his work, but
arrests the attention of the most learned. In his plans,
the outline of which alone announces an immense stock of
science and learning, he embraces all ages in which literature has flourished. Every celebrated work is analyzed
and discussed. The beauties of the several writers are
happily displayed, and their faults pointed out with all the
ability of the most lively and sound criticism. That which
distinguishes La Harpe from other moderns who have
treated of literature is, that he always assumes the tone of
the work he criticises, a merit which we find in none of the
ancients except Cicero, Quintilian, and Longinus. If
he speaks of the Iliad, we behold him borrow all the rich
colours of the father of poetry to decorate his discourse.
If he treats of Demosthenes and Cicero, all the great interests of Athens and Rome are re-produced under his pen.
If Tacitus is his theme, we are instantly transported to the
age of the emperors; we enter into all the mystery of the
dark policy of Tiberius, and tremble at the sight of Nero.
”
The only regret on this subject is that the author did not
live to finish his course of instruction; only some fragments
have been left of what he purposed as a continuation.
that she was; he then asked her, if any bookseller had been in treaty with her for it? She said that a bookseller had offered her 50l. for it. He then demanded, if
To this character, part of a sketch of his life prefixed to
his “Commentaries, published in 1802, much might be
added. No physician, indeed, was ever more highly or
more deservedly respected. His various and extensive
learning, his modesty in the use of it, his freedom from
jealousy or envy, his independent spirit, his simple yet
dignified manners, and his exemplary discharge of all the
relative duties, are topics on which all who knew him delight to dwell. Mr. Cole, who bestows very high praise
on him, an article in which that gentleman was in general
penurious, gives us the following anecdote of Dr. Heberden, which corresponds with the above account of his
reverence for religion.
” Understanding that Dr. Con.
Middleton had composed a book on the ‘ Inefficacy of
Prayer,’ he called upon his widow soon after the Dr.‘s
death, and asked her if she was not in possession of such
a tract? She answered that she was; he then asked her, if
any bookseller had been in treaty with her for it? She said
that a bookseller had offered her 50l. for it. He then demanded, if there was a duplicate ’ No' upon that he
requested to see it, and she immediately brgught it, and
put it into his hands. The Dr. holding it in one hand,
and giving it a slight perusal, threw it into the fire, and
with the other hand gave her a 50l. note.“This anecdote
Mr. Cole had from Dr. Newton, bishop of Bristol. It is
certain that Dr. Middleton’s widow bequeathed her husband’s remaining Mss. to Dr. Heberden, from which, in,
1761, he obliged the learned world with a curious tract,
entitled
” Dissertations de servili Medicorum conditione
Appendix,“&c. with a short but elegant advertisement
of his own. In 1763, a most valuable edition of the
” Supplices Mulieres“of Euripides, with the notes of Mr. Markland, was printed entirely at the expence of Dr. Heberden; and, in 1763, the same very learned commentator
presented his notes on the two Jphigenix,
” Doctissimo,
& quod longe prastantius est, humanissimo viro Wilhelmo
Heberden, M. D. arbitratu ejus vel cremandtE, vel in publicum emittendae post obiturn scriptoris,“&c. He wrote
the epitaph in Dorking church on Mr. Markland, who had
” bequeathed to him all his books and papers. One of these,
a copy of Mill’s Greek Testament in folio, the margin
filled with notes, was kindly lent by Dr. Heberden, “with
that liberal attention to promote the cause of virtue and
religion which was one of his many well-known excellences,
” to the publisher of the last edition of Mr. Bowyer’s
“Conjectures on the New Testament, 1782,
” 4to. To
Dr. Heberden Mr. Bowyer also bequeathed his “little,
cabinet of coins, a few books specifically, and any others,
which the doctor might chuse to accept.
” To Dr. H.'s
other publications, we may add his “Αντιθηριακα, an
Essay on Mithridatium and Theriaca,
” 1745, 3vo. He
was also a writer in the “Athenian Letters,
” and in his
early life contributed some notes to Grey’s “Hudibras,
” as
acknowledged by that editor in his preface.
blished under the name of Robert Hall, gent, republished with the additions of Christopher Wilkinson a bookseller, but with Heylin’s name in 1670, 8vo. It was again
He was a very voluminous writer, and although few of
his works can be recommended to general perusal, there
are none perhaps of the whole series which may not be
consulted with advantage, by those who have leisure and
inclination to study the history of parties, in the distracted
period in which he lived. Many of his lesser pieces were
published together in 1681, in a folio volume, with a life
of the author by the rev. George Vernon, which having
given offence to his relations, a new life was published by
his son-in-law Dr. Barnard, 1682, 12mo. It is from a
comparison of both (Vernon’s has since been published in 12mo) that a proper judgment can be formed of Dr. Heylin. His other works of most note are, 1. “An Help to
English History,
” &c. Political Index
” may be considered as a continuation of this work. 2. “History of the Sabbath,
”
3636, 4to, intended to reconcile the public to that dreadful error in the conduct of the court, the “Book of Sports,
”
which did incalculable injury to the royal cause. 3. “Theologia Veterum; the Sum of the Christian Theology contained in the creed, according to the Greeks and Latins,
&c. Lond. 1654, fol. reprinted 1673. 4. Ecclesia Vindicata; or the Church of England justified, 1. In the way
and manner of her Reformation, &c. 2. In officiating by
a public Liturgy. 3. In prescribing a set form of Prayer
to be used by preachers before their sermons. 4. In her
right and patrimony of tithes. 5. In retaining the episcopal government, and therewithal the canonical ordination of priests and deacons,
” London Short View of the Life and Reign of King
Charles (the second monarch of Great Britain) from his
birth to his burial,
” London, Reliquiae sacrae Carolina,
” printed
at the Hague, Examen Historicum
or a discovery and examination of the mistakes and defects
in some modern histories, viz. 1. In the Church History
of Britain, by Tho. Fuller. To which is added, an Apology of Dr. Jo. Cosin, dean of Peterborough, in answer to
some passages in the Church History of Britain, in which
he finds himself concerned. 2. In the History of Mary
Queen of Scots, and of her son King James VI,; the
History of King James I. of Great Britain; and the History of
King Charles I. from his cradle to his grave, by Will.
Sanderson, esq. London, 1658, in a large 8vo. To this is
ndded, An Appendix in an answer to some passages in a
scurrilous pamphlet called A Post-haste Reply, &c. by
Will. Sanderson, esq.
” Soon after Dr. Thomas Fuller
published a thin folio, entitled “The Appeal for injured
Innocence,
” which was commonly bound up with the remaining copies of his Church History in quires; and Mr.
Sanderson wrote. a pamphlet, entitled “Peter pursued; or
Dr. Heylin overtaken, arrested, and arraigned upon his
three Appendixes: 1. Respondet Petrus. 2. Answer to
Post-Haste Reply. 3. Advertisements on three Histories.
viz. of Mary Queen of Scots, King James, and King
Charles,
” Historia QuinquArticularis: or a declaration of the Judgment of the Western Churches, and more particularly of the Church of
England, in the five controverted points, reproached in
these last times by the name of Arminianism. Collected
in the way of an Historicall Narration out of the public acts
and monuments, and most approved authors of those scverall churches,
” London, History of
the Reformation of the Church of England from the first
preparations to it made by King Henry VIII. until the legal
settling and establishing of it underQueen Elizabeth,*' &c.
London, 1661, 1670, and 1674, in folio. 9.
” Cyprianus
Anglicus r or the History of the Life and Death of William
(Laud) Archbishop of Canterbury,“&c. London, 1668 and
1671, fol. 10.
” Aerius Redivivus: or the History of the
Presbyterians. Containing the beginning, progress, and
successes of that sect. Their oppositions to monarchical
and episcopal government. Their innovations in the church;
and their inbroylments of the kingdoms and estates of
Christendom in the pursuit of their designes. From the year
1536 to the year 1647," London, 1670 and 1672, in folio.
l of whom he survived except one son and his daughters. One of his sons, Henry, appears to have been a bookseller in London, and was editor of the “Heroologia Anglicana,”
He died Feb. 9, 1636, and was buried in the church of
Coventry. He married a Staffordshire lady, by whom he
had seven sons and three daughters, all of whom he survived except one son and his daughters. One of his sons,
Henry, appears to have been a bookseller in London, and
was editor of the “Heroologia Anglicana,
” a valuable collection of English portraits, with short lives, but the latter
are not very correct, or satisfactory. These portraits were
chiefly engraved by the family of Pass, and many of them
are valued as originals, having never been engraved since
but as copies from these. They are sixty-five in number.
He also published “Monumenta Sepulchralia Ecclesiae S.
Pauli, Lond.
” 4to, and, “A Book of Kings, being a true
and lively effigies of all our English kings from the Conquest,
”
Shakerly’s voyage to the East-Indies, where he died, are said to have remained in the possession of a bookseller, till they were destroyed by the great fire at London
What we have of his writings is sufficient to shew, that
his death was a loss to science. A little before that time
he had finished his “Venus in Sole visa.
” He made his
observations upon this new and extraordinary phenomenon
at Hool near Liverpool; but they did not appear till 1662,
when Hevelius published them at Dantzick, with some
works of his own, under this title, “Mercurius in Sole
visus Gedani anno 1661, Maij 3, cum aliis quibusdam rerum ccelestium observationibus rarisque phienomenis. Cui
annexa est Venus in Sole pariter visa anno 1639, Nov. 24,
&c.
” Besides this work he had begun another, in which
he proposed, first, to refute Lansbergius’s hypotheses, and
to shew, how inconsistent they were with each other and
the heavens; and, secondly, to draw up a new system of
astronomy, agreeably to the heavens, from his own observations and those of others; retaining for the most part
the Keplerian hypotheses, but changing the numbers as,
observations required. Wallis, from whose “Epistola
Nuncupatoria
” we have extracted these memoirs of Horrox, published some of his papers in 1673, under the title
of “Opera Poathuma:
” others were carried into Ireland
by his brother Jonas Horrox, who had pursued the same
studies, and died there, by which means they were lost:
and others came into the hands of Mr. Jeremiah Shakerly,
who, by the assistance of them, formed his “British Tables,
” published at London in
, where his father, Michael Johnson, a native of Derbyshire, of obscure extraction, was at that time a bookseller and stationer. His mother, Sarah Ford, was a native
, one of the most eminent and highly-distinguished writers of the eighteenth century, was born on the 18th of September, 1709, at Lichfield in Staffordshire, where his father, Michael Johnson, a native of Derbyshire, of obscure extraction, was at that time a bookseller and stationer. His mother, Sarah Ford, was a native of Warwickshire, and sister to Dr. Ford, physician, who was father to Cornelius Ford, a clergyman of loose character, whom Hogarth has satirized in the print of Modern Midnight Conversation. Our author was the eldest of two sons. Nathaniel, the youngest, died in 1737 in his twenty-fifth year. The father was a man of robust body and active mind, yet occasionally depressed by melancholy, which Samuel inherited, and, with the aid of a stronger mind, was not always able to shake off. He was also a steady high-churchman, and an adherent of the house of Stuart, a prejudice which his son outlived in the nation at large, without entirely conquering in himself. Mrs. Johnson was a woman of good natural understanding, unimproved by education; and our author acknowledged with gratitude, that she endeavoured to instil sentiments of piety as soon as his mind was capable of any instruction. There is little else in his family history worthy of notice, nor had he much pleasure in tracing his pedigree. He venerated others, however, who could produce a recorded ancestry, and used to say, that in him this was disinterested, for he could scarcely teil who was his grandfather. That he was remarkable in his early years has been supposed, but many proofs have not been advanced by his biographers. He had, indeed, a retentive memory, and soon discovered symptoms of an impetuous temper; but these circumstances are not enough to distinguish him from hundreds of children who never attain eminence. In his infancy he was afflicted with the scrophula, which injured his sight, and he was carried to London to receive the royal touch from the hand of queen Anne, the last of our sovereigns who encouraged that popular superstition. He was first taught to read English by a woman who kept a school for young children at Lichfield; and afterwards by one Brown. Latin he learned at Lichfield school, under Mr. Hunter, a man of severe discipline, but an attentive teacher. Johnson owned that he needed correction, and that his master did not spare him; but this, instead of being the cause of unpleasant recollections in his advanced life, served only to convince him that severity in school-education is necessary; and in all his conversations on the subject, he persisted in pleading for a liberal use of the rod. At this school his superiority was soon acknowledged by his companions, who could not refuse submission to the ascendancy which he acquired. His proficiency, however, as in every part of his life, exceeded his apparent diligence. He could learn more than others in the same allotted time: and he was learning when he seemed to be idle. He betrayed an early aversion to stated tasks, but, if roused, he could recover the time he appeared to have lost with great facility. Yet he seems afterwards to have been conscious that much depends on regularity of study, and we find him often prescribing to himself stated portions of reading, and recommending the same to others. No man perhaps was ever more sensible of his failings, or avowed them with more candour; nor, indeed, would many of them have been known, if he had not exhibited them as warnings. His memory was uncommonly tenacious, and to his last days he prided himself on it, considering a defect of memory as the prelude of total decay. Perhaps be carried this doctrine rather too far when he asserted, that the occasional failure of memory in a man of seventy must imply something radically wrong; but it may be in. general allowed, that the memory is a pretty accurate standard of mental strength. Although his weak sight prevented him from joining in the amusements of his schoolfellows, for which he was otherwise well qualified by personal courage and an ambition to excel, he found an equivalent pleasure in sauntering in the fields, or reading such books as came in his way, particularly old romances. For these he retained a fondness throughout life; but was wise and candid enough to attribute to them, in some degree, that unsettled turn of mind which prevented his fixing in any profession.
upposed during that time to have furnished some periodical essays for a newspaper printed by Warren, a bookseller in Birmingham. Here, too, he abridged and translated
He now (1731) returned to Lichfield, with very gloomy prospects. His father died a few months after his return, and the little he left behind him was barely sufficient for the temporary support of his widow. In the following year he accepted the place of usher of the school of Market Bosworth in Leicestershire, an employment which the pride of Sir Wolstan Dixie, the patron, soon rendered irksome, and he threw it up in a disgust which recurred whenever he recollected this part of his history. For six months after he resided at Birmingham as the guest of Mr. Hector, an eminent surgeon, and is supposed during that time to have furnished some periodical essays for a newspaper printed by Warren, a bookseller in Birmingham. Here, too, he abridged and translated Father Lobo’s Voyage to Abyssinia, which was published in 1735 by Bettesworth and Hitch in Paternoster-row, London. For this, his first literary performance, he received the small sum of five guineas. In the translation there is little that marks the hand of Johnson; but in the preface and dedication are a few passages in the same energetic and manly style which he may be said to have invented, and to have taught to his countrymen.
d the scheme himself, is uncertain, but he Was fortunate in forming a connexion with Mr. John Payne, a bookseller in Paternoster-row, and afterwards chief accountant
In 1750 he commenced a work which raised his fame
higher than it had ever yet reached, and will probably
convey his name to the latest posterity. He appears to
have entered on “The Rambler
” without any communication with his friends, or desire of assistance. Whether he
proposed the scheme himself, is uncertain, but he Was
fortunate in forming a connexion with Mr. John Payne, a
bookseller in Paternoster-row, and afterwards chief accountant in the Bank of England, a man with whom he
lived many years in habits of friendship, and who on the
present occasion treated him with great liberality. He
engaged to pay him two guineas for each paper, or four
guineas per week, which at that time must have been to
Johnson a very considerable sum; and he admitted him to
a share of the future profits of the work, when it should
be collected into volumes; this share Johnson afterwards
sold. As a full history of this paper has been given in
another work *, it may suffice to add, that it began Tuesday, March 20, 1749-50, and closed on Saturday, March
14, 1752. So conscious was Johnson that his fame would
in a great measure rest on this production, that he corrected the first two editions with the most scrupulous care,
of which specimens are given in the volume referred to in
the note.
urred at the capture of Vigo, in 1702. Having joined his comrades in pillaging the town, he selected a bookseller’s shop, in hope of obtaining some valuable plunder;
, an eminent mathematician, was born
in 1680, in the island of Anglesey, North Wales. His
parents were yeomen, or little farmers, in that island, and
gave to their son the best education which their circumstances would allow; but he owed his future fame and fortune to the diligent cultivation of the intellectual powers
by which he was eminently distinguished. Addicted from
early life to the study of mathematics, he commenced his
career of advancement in the humble office of a teacher of
these sciences on board a man of war. In this situation he
attracted the notice, and obtained the friendship of lord
Anson. He appeared as an author in his 22d year; when
his treatise on the art of navigation was much approved.
We may judge of his predominant taste for literature and
science by a trivial circumstance which occurred at the
capture of Vigo, in 1702. Having joined his comrades in
pillaging the town, he selected a bookseller’s shop, in hope
of obtaining some valuable plunder; but, disappointed in
his expectations, he took up a pair of scissars, which was
his only booty, and which he afterwards exhibited' to his
friends as a trophy of his military success. On his return
to England, he established himself as a teacher of mathematics in London; and here, in 1706, he published his
“Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos; or, a new Introduction to the Mathematics,
” a work which has ever since
been held in the highest estimation as a compendious but
comprehensive summary of mathematical science. Mr.
Jones was no less esteemed and respected on account of
his private character and pleasing manners, than for his
natural talents and scientific attainments; so that he reckoned among his friends the most eminent persons of the
period in which he lived. Lord Hardwicke selected him
as a companion on the circuit, when he was chief justice;
and when he afterwards held the great seal, conferred upon
him the office of secretary for the peace, as a testimony of
his friendship and regard. He was also in habits of intimate acquaintance with lord Parker, president of the royal
society, sir Isaac Newton, Halley, Mead, and Samuel Johnson. So highly was his merit appreciated by sir Isaac
Newton, that he prepared, with his permission, and very
much to his satisfaction, a very elegant edition of small
tracts in the higher mathematics. Upon the retirement of
lord Mace lesfi eld to Sherborne castle, Mr. Jones resided
in his family, and instructed his lordship in the sciences.
Whilst he occupied this situation he had the misfortune, by
the failure of a banker, to lose the greatest part of that
property which he had accumulated Uy the most laudable
industry and economy; but the loss was in a great measure
repaired to him by the kind attention of his lordship, who
procured for him a sinecure place of considerable emolument. He was afterwards offered, by the same nobleman, a
more lucrative situation; which, however, he declined, that
he might be more at leisure to devote himself to his favourite
scientific pursuits. In this retreat he formed an acquaintance with miss Mary Nix, the daughter of a cabinet-maker,
who had become eminent in his profession, and whose talents and manners had recommended him to an intimacy
with lord Macclesfield. This acquaintance terminated in
marriage; and the connection proved a source of personal
satisfaction to Mr. Jones himself, and of permanent honour
to his name and family. By this lady Mr. Jones had three
children two sons and a daughter. One son died in infancy the other will be the subject of the next article
and the daughter, who was married to Mr. Rainsford, an
opulent merchant retired from business, perished miserably, in 1802, in consequence of her clothes accidentally
taking fire. The death of Mr. Jones was occasioned by n
polypus in the heart, which, notwithstanding the medical
attention and assistance of Dr. Mead, proved incurable.
He died in July 1749.
Mr. Jones’s papers in the Philosophical Transactions are:
“A compendious disposition of Equations for exhibiting,
the relations of Goniometrical Lines,
” vol. XLIV. “A
Tract on Logarithms,
” vol. LXI. “Account of the person killed by lightning in Tottenham-court-chapel, and its
effects on the building,
” vol. LXII. “Properties of the
Conic Sections, deduced by a compendious method,
” vol.
LXIII. In all these works of Mr. Jones, a remarkable
neatness, brevity, and accuracy, everywhere prevails. He
seemed to delight in a very^ short and comprehensive mode
of expression and arrangement; insomuch that sometimes
what he has contrived to express in two or three pages,
would occupy a little volume in the ordinary style of writing. Mr. Jones, it is said, possessed the best mathematical
library in England; which by will he left to lord Macclesfield. He had collected also a great quantity of manuscript papers and letters of former mathematicians, which
have often proved useful to writers of their lives, &c. After
his death, these were dispersed, and fell into different persons hands many of them, as well as of Mr. Jones’s own
papers, were possessed by the late Mr. John Robertson,
librarian and clerk to the royal society at whose death
Dr. Hutton purchased a considerable quantity of them.
From such collections as these it was that Mr. Jones was
enabled to give that first and elegant edition, 1711, in 4to,
of several of Newton’s papers, that might otherwise have
been lost, entitled “Analysis per quantitatum Series, Fluxiones, ac Differentias: cum Enumeratione Linearum Tertii Ordinis.
”
st was a little book of Erasmus, entitled,” Moriae Encomiumu;“which the tutor was pleased to give to a bookseller in Oxford, who put it in the press while the translator
, an English writer, and bishop of
Peterborough, was the son of the rev. Basil Kennet, rector of Dunchurch, and vicar of Postling, near Hythe, in
Kent, and was born at Dover, Aug. 10, 1660. He was
called White, from his mother’s father, one Mr. Thomas
White, a wealthy magistrate at Dover, who had formerly
been a master shipwright there. When he was a little
grown up, he was sent to Westminster-school, with a view
of getting upon the foundation; but, being seized with
the srnall-pox at the time of the election, it was thought
advisable to take him away. In June 1678 he was entered
of St. Edmund-hall in Oxford, where he was pupil to Mr.
Allam, a very celebrated tutor, who took a particular pleasure in imposing exercises on him, which he would often
read in the common room with great approbation. It was
by Mr. Allam’s advice that he translated Erasmus on Folly,
and some other pieces for the Oxford booksellers. Under
this tutor he applied hard to study, and commenced an
author in politics, even while he was an under-graduate;
for, in 1680, he published “A Letter from a student at
Oxford to a friend in the country, concerning the approaching parliament, in vindication of his majesty, the
church of England, and tfye university:
” with which the
whig party, as it then began to be called, in the House of
Commons, were so much offended, that inquiries were made
after the author, in order to have him punished. In March
1681 he published, in the same spirit of party, “a Poem,
”
that is, “a Ballad,
” addressed “to Mr. E. L. on his majesty’s
dissolving the late parliament at Oxford,
” which was printed
on one side of a sheet of paper, and began, “An atheist
now must a monster be,
” &c. He took his bachelor’s degree in May Morise encomium,
” which he entitled “Wit
against Wisdom, or a Panegyric upon Folly,
” which, as
we have already noticed, his tutor had advised him to
undertake. He proceeded M. A. Jan. 22, 1684; and, the
same year, was presented by sir William Glynne, bart. to
the vicarage of Amersden, or Ambroseden, in Oxfordshire;
which favour was procured him by his patron’s eldest son,
who was his contemporary in the halh To this patron he
dedicated “Pliny’s Panegyric,
” which he translated in
An address of thanks
to a good prince, presented in the Panegyric of Pliny upon
Trajan, the best of the Roman emperors.
” It was reprinted in Postscript
” to the translation
of his “Convocation Sermon,
” in The remarker
says, the doctor dedicated Pliny’s Panegyric to the late
king James: and, what if he did? Only it appears he did
not. This is an idle tale among the party, who, perhaps,
have told it till they believe it: when the truth is, there
was no such dedication, and the translation itself of Pliny
was not designed for any court address. The young translator’s tutor, Mr. Allam, directed his pupil, by way of exercise, to turn some Latin tracts into English. The first
was a little book of Erasmus, entitled,
” Moriae Encomiumu;“which the tutor was pleased to give to a bookseller in Oxford, who put it in the press while the translator was but an
under-graduate. Another sort of task required by his tutor
was this ‘ Panegyric of Pliny upon Trajan,’ which he likewise gave to a bookseller in Oxford, before the translator
was M. A. designing to have it published in the reign, of
king Charles; and a small cut of that prince at full length
was prepared, and afterwards put before several of the
books, though the impression happened to be retarded till
the death of king Charles; and then the same tutor, not
long before his own death, advised a new preface, adapted
to the then received opinion of king James’s being a just
and good prince. However, there was no dedication to
king James, but to a private patron, a worthy baronet, who
came in heartily to the beginning of the late happy revolution. This is the whole truth of that story, that hath
been so often cast at the doctor not that he thinks himself
obliged to defend every thought and expression of his
juvenile studies, when he had possibly been trained up to
some notions, which he afterwards found reason to put
away as childish things.
”
s of learning. It is reported of him, that one day taking up Bayle’s “Commentaire Philosophique,” in a bookseller’s shop, he threw it down, and said, “This is nothing
Kuster’s chief excellence was his skill in the Greek language, to which he devoted himself with an enthusiasm
which undervalued every other pursuit. He thought the
history and chronology of Greek words the most solid entertainment of a man of letters, and despised all other
branches of learning. It is reported of him, that one day
taking up Bayle’s “Commentaire Philosophique,
” in a
bookseller’s shop, he threw it down, and said, “This is
nothing but a book of reasoning; non sic itur ad astra.
”
But many of his characteristic peculiarities will be best understood from the following letter from Joseph Wasse, the
learned editor of Sallust.
born in Oxford July 15, 1656; and after being educatea in grammar-learning, was bound apprentice to a bookseller in St. Paul’s church-yard, London. But he was soon
, son of the preceding, wa; born in Oxford July 15, 1656; and after being educatea in grammar-learning, was bound apprentice to a bookseller in St. Paul’s church-yard, London. But he was soon called thence on the death of an elder brother, and entered a gentleman-commoner of University-college in 1672; where, as Wood informs us, he became idle, a great jockey, married, and spent a considerable part of his property; but afterwards restrained his folly, and lived some years a retired life, near Oxford, employing his time in researches into thejiistory of dramatic poetry. His literature, Mr. Warton says, chiefly consisted in a knowledge of the novels and plays of various languages, and he was a constant and critical attendant of the play-houses for many years. Such a pursuit was at that time neither creditable nor profitable; and accordingly, in 1690 we find him glad to accept the place of yeoman beadle of arts, and soon after he was chosen esquire beadle of law, probably out of respect to his father’s memory.
“Dissertations acaderaiques.” The “Electra” had not much success, and was never reprinted, unless by a bookseller, who blunderingly inserted it among a collection
It does not appear that Larcher published any thing before his translation of the “Electra
” of Euripides, which
appeared in Calendrier perpetuel
” of Electra,
” as well as many other of his publications, appeared without his name, which, indeed, he appended
onJy to his “Memoire sur Venus,
” his “Xenophon,
”
“Herodotus,
” and “Dissertations acaderaiques.
” The
“Electra
” had not much success, and was never reprinted,
unless by a bookseller, who blunderingly inserted it among
a collection of acting plays.
In 1751 Larcher is supposed to have contributed to a
literary journal called “Lettres d'une Societe;
” and afterwards, in the “Melange litteraire,
” he published a translation of Pope’s essay on Pastoral Poetry. He was also a
contributor to other literary journals, but his biographer
has not been able to specify his articles with certainty,
unless those in the “Collection Academique
” for Martinus Scribleru.s
” from Pope’s
works, and Swift’s ironical piece on the abolition of Christianity. Having while in England become acquainted with
sir John Pringle, he published a translation of hi* work
“On the Diseases of the Army,
” of which an enlarged
edition appeared in
perpetually poring over the leaves of old books, that were used as waste paper in his master’s shop. A bookseller who lived in the neighbourhood, and who had often
, one of the most celebrated, and certainly one of the most extraordinary men
of his time, was born at Florence, Oct. 28 or 29, 1633.
His parents, who were of low rank, are said to have been
satisfied when they got him into the service of a man who
sold fruit and herbs. He had never learned to read, and
yet was perpetually poring over the leaves of old books,
that were used as waste paper in his master’s shop. A
bookseller who lived in the neighbourhood, and who had
often observed this, and knew the boy could not read,
asked him one day, “what he meant by staring so much
on printed paper?
” He said, “that he did not know how
it was, but that he loved it; that he was very uneasy in
the business he was in, and should be the happiest creature
in the world, if he could live with him, who had always so
many books about him.
” The bookseller, pleased with
his answer, consented to take him, if his master was willing
to part with him. Young Magliabechi thanked him with
tears in his eyes, and having obtained his master’s leave,
went directly to his new employment, which he had not
followed long before he could find any book that was asked
for, as ready as the bookseller himself. This account of
his early life, which Mr. Spence received from a gentleman of Florence, who was well acquainted with Magliabechi and his family, differs considerably from that given by
Niceron, Tiraboschi, and Fabroni. From the latter, indeed, we learn that he was placed as an apprentice to a
goldsmith, after he had been taught the principles of
drawing, and he had a brother that was educated to the
law, and made a considerable figure in that profession.
His father died while he was an infant, but Fabroni makes
no mention of his poverty. It seems agreed, however, that
after he had learned to read, that became his sole employment, but he never applied himself to any particular study.
He read every book almost indifferently, as they happened
to come into his hands, with a surprizing quickness; and
yet such was his prodigious memory, that he not only retained the sense of what he read, but often all the words,
and the very manner of spelling them, if there was any
thing peculiar of that kind in any author.
bly a native of Paris, and born towards the conclusion of the seventeenth century. He was bred up as a bookseller in that city, a business which always requires some
, an author to whom the curious in literary history are greatly indebted, was probably
a native of Paris, and born towards the conclusion of the
seventeenth century. He was bred up as a bookseller in
that city, a business which always requires some knowledge
of books, but which he carried to an extent very unusual,
and for forty years employed almost the whole of his time
in inspecting the works of eminent authors, inquiring into
their history, their editions, differences, and every species
of information which forms the accurate bibliographer.
During the time that Mr. Bernard published the “Nouvelles de la Republiques des Lettres,
” Marchand was his
constant correspondent, and contributed all the literary
anecdotes from Paris, which appeared in that journal.
Being, however, a conscientious protestant, and suspecting that in consequence of the repeal of the edict of Nantz,
he might be interrupted in the exercise of his religion, he
went to reside in Holland, and carried on the bookselling
trade there for some time, until meeting with some lack of
honesty among his brethren (pen de bonne-foi qiCil avoit trouvej, he relinquished business, and devoted his time entirely to literary history and biography. In both his knowledge was so conspicuous, that the booksellers were always happy to avail themselves of his opinion respecting intended publications, and more happy when they could engage his assistance as an editor. In the latter character, we find that he superintended an edition, 1. of Bayle’s “Dictionary,
” and “Letters,
” both which he illustrated with notes. 2. “Satyre Menippee,
” Ratisbonne (Brussels), Cymbalum mundi,
” by Bonaventure de
Perrieres, Amst. Direction pomla conscience d'un roi,
” Hague, Histoire des Revolutions de Hongrie,
” ibid. Lettres, Memoires, et Negociations du comte d'Estrades,
”
London (Hague)^ Histoire de
Fenelon,
” Hague, Oeuvres de Brantome,
” ibid. Oeuvres de Villon,
”
ibid.
on of the three first books of Simson’s “Conic Sections,” apparently undertaken at the suggestion of a bookseller; and a treatise on the “Preservation of the Health
It is not known that he ever published any literary works
besides an “Essay on Composition,
” when at Edinburgh;
an “Essay on Ambition,
” written also very early in life; a
translation of the three first books of Simson’s “Conic Sections,
” apparently undertaken at the suggestion of a bookseller; and a treatise on the “Preservation of the Health
of Soldiers.
” He had, indeed, meditated a variety of
other publications, principally on physiology and pathology; but, having pursued a subject with great keenness
till he had gained what he wanted, he could not bring himself to be at the trouble of preparing for the eye of the
world what he had acquired, more especially as new objects
of research presented themselves in quick succession. A
paper upon Hernia, illustrated by drawings taken nearly
20 years ago, and another upon the appearances of the
brain in mania, drawn up from dissections made more than
20 years ago, were left in a state fit for publication; and
the latter has just been published under the title of “The
Morbid Anatomy of the Brain, in Mania and Hydrophobia,
”
by Mr. Sawrey, formerly assistant-lecturer to Dr. Marshal.
To this volume, in 8vo, is prefixed a life of Dr. Marshal,
from which the above particulars are taken, but to which
we may refer as containing many more of considerable interest.
eigled up to London; but his father being apprised of it soon after, pursued him, and finding him in a bookseller’s shop, prevailed with him to return to college.
, a very ingenious and witty
English writer, was the son of Mr. Andrew Marvel!, minister and schoolmaster of Kingston upon -Hull, in Yorkshire,
and was born in that town in 1620, His abilities being
very great, his progress in letters was proportionable; so
that, at thirteen, he was admitted of Trinity-college in
Cambridge. But he had not been long there, when he
fell into the hands of the Jesuits; for those busy agents of
the Romish church, under the connivance of this, as well
as the preceding reign, spared no pains to make proselytes; for which purpose several of them were planted in
or near the universities, in order to make conquests among
the young scholars. Marvell fell into their snares, as ChilJingworth had fallen before him, and was inveigled up to
London; but his father being apprised of it soon after,
pursued him, and finding him in a bookseller’s shop, prevailed with him to return to college. He afterwards applied to his studies with great assiduity, and took a bachelor of arts degree in 1639. About this time he lost his
father, who was unfortunately drowned in crossing the
Humber, as he was attending the daughter of aa intimate
female friend; who by this event becoming childless, sent
for young Marvell, and, by way of making all the return
in her power, added considerably to his fortune. Upon
this the plan of his education was enlarged, and he travelled through most of the polite parts of Europe. It appears that he had been at Rome, from his poem entitled
“Flecknoe,
” an English priest at Rome in which he has
described with great humour that wretched poetaster, Mr.
Richard Flecknoe, from whom Dryden gave the name of
Mac- Flecknoe to his satire against Shadwell. During his
travels, another occasion happened for the exercise of
his wit. In France, he found much talk of Lancelot Joseph de Maniban, an abbot; who pretended to understand
the characters of those he had never seen, and to prognosticate their good or bad fortune, from an inspection of their
band-writing. This artist was handsomely lashed by our
author, in a poem written upon the spot, and addressed to
him. We know no more of Marvell for several years,
only that he spent some time at Constantinople, where he
resided as secretary to the English embassy at that court.
t little care of his education. He is said, nevertheless, to have been destined to the occupation of a bookseller, but an insatiable thirst after natural knowledge
, an Italian botanist of
great celebrity, particularly in what is now called the cryptogamic department, was born at Florence, December 11,
1679. His parents were indigent, and took but little care
of his education. He is said, nevertheless, to have been
destined to the occupation of a bookseller, but an insatiable thirst after natural knowledge over-ruled all other objects, and his good character, and distinguished ardour,
soon procured him the notice and favour of the marquis
Cosmo da Castiglione, in whose family a taste for botany
has been almost hereditary, and for whom Micheli in his
early youth made a collection of Umbelliferous plants,
which even then proved his accuracy and discernment.
This gentleman introduced him to the celebrated count
Lawrence Magalotti, by whom he was presented to his sovereign, the grand duke Cosmo III. The “Institutiones
Itei Herbanae
” of Tournefort had just appeared at Paris;
and the first pledge of the grand duke’s favour, was a present of that book, which to Micheli, who had hitherto
found the want of some systematic guide, was a most important and welcome acquisition. He speedily adopted
the tone of his leader, with respect to generic distinctions
and definitions, and improved upon him in a more frequent
adaptation of original specific ones.
entitled “Knowledge, an Ode,” and a “Night Piece,” to a collection of poetry published by Donaldson, a bookseller of Edinburgh; and about the same time published some
About two years after the rev. Mr. Mickle came to reside in Edinburgh, upon the death of a brother-in-law, a
brewer in the neighbourhood of that city, he embarked a
great part of his fortune in the purchase of the brewery,
and continued the business in the name of his eldest son.
Our poet was then taken from school, employed as a clerk
under his father, and upon coming of age in 1755, took
upon him the whole charge and property of the business,
on condition of granting his father a share of the profits
during his life, and paying a certain sum to his brothers
and sisters at, stated periods, after his father’s decease,
which happened in 1758. Young Mickle is said to have
entered into these engagements more from a sense of filial
duty, and the peculiar situation of his family, than from
any inclination to business. He had already contracted
the habits of literary life; he had begun to feel the enthusiasm of a son of the Muses, and while he was storing his
mind with the productions of former poets, and cultivating
those branches of elegant literature not usually taught at
schools at that time, he felt the employment too delightful to admit of much interruption from the concerns of
trade. In 1761, he contributed, but without his name,
two charming compositions, entitled “Knowledge, an
Ode,
” and a “Night Piece,
” to a collection of poetry published by Donaldson, a bookseller of Edinburgh; and about
the same time published some observations on that impious
tract “The History of the Man after God’s own heart,
” but
whether separately, or in any literary journal, is not now
known. He had also finished a dramatic poem of considerable length, entitled “The Death of Socrates,
” and had
begun a poem on “Providence,
” when his studies were interrupted by the importunities of his creditors.
Pope and the” Toilet“to Gay. The publication, however, of these poems, in the name of Pope, by Curl, a bookseller who hesitated at nothing mean or infamous, appears
Mr. Wortley’s negociations at the Porte having failed,
owing to the high demands of the Imperialists, he received
letters of recall, Oct. 28, 1717, but did not commence his
journey till June 1718; in October of the same year he
arrived in England. Soon after, lady Mary was solicited
by Mr. Pope to fix her summer residence at Twickenham,
with which she complied, and mutual admiration seemed
to knit these kindred geniuses in indissoluble bonds. A
short time, however, proved that their friendship was not
superhuman. Jealousy of her talents, and a difference in
political sentiments, appear to have been the primary causes
of that dislike which soon manifested itself without ceremony and without delicacy. Lady Mary was attached to
the Walpole administration and principles. Pope hated
the whigs, and was at no pains to conceal his aversion in
conversation or writing. What was worse, lady Mary had
for some time omitted to consult him upon any new
poetical production, and even when he had been formerly very
free with his emendations, was wont to say, “Come, no
touching, Pope, for what is good, the world will give to
you, and leave the bad for me;
” and she was well aware
that he disingenuously encouraged that idea. But the
more immediate cause of their implacability, was a satire
in the form of a pastoral, entitled “Town Eclogues.
”
These were some of lady Mary’s earliest poetical attempts,
and had been written previously to her leaving England.
After her return, they were communicated to a favoured
few, and no doubt highly relished from their supposed, or
real personal allusions. Both Pope and Gay suggested
many additions and alterations, which were certainly not
adopted by lady Mary; and as copies, including their corrections, were found among the papers of these poets,
their editors have attributed three out of six to them.
“The Basset Table,
” and The Drawing Room,“are
given to Pope and the
” Toilet“to Gay. The publication, however, of these poems, in the name of Pope, by
Curl, a bookseller who hesitated at nothing mean or infamous, appears to have put a final stop to all intercourse
between Pope and lady Mary.
” Irritated,“says her late
biographer,
” by Pope’s ceaseless petulance, and disgusted
by his subterfuge, she now retired totally from his society,
and certainly did not abstain from sarcastic observations,
which were always repeated to him.“The angry bard retaliated in the most gross and public manner against her
and her friend lord Hervey. Of this controversy, which is
admirably detailed by Mr. Dallaway, we shall only add,
that Dr. Warton and Dr. Johnson agree in condemning the
prevarication with which Pope evaded every direct charge
of his ungrateful behaviour to those whose patronage he
had once servilely solicited; and even his panegyrical commentator, Dr. Warburton, confesses that there were allegations against him, which
” he was not quite clear of."
he most valuable is that of Paris, 1681, 5 vols. folio, edited by Francis Pinson. In 1773, Garrigan, a bookseller of Avignon, issued a prospectus for a new edition,
Du Moulin was not only one of the most profound
lawyers, but one of the most learned men of his time, and
his works were long held in the highest estimation, while
the study of law, upon liberal principles, was encouraged
in France. Bernardi, one of the writers in the “Biog.
Universelle,
” published in Ib 14, has ventured to entertain
hopes that the happy event of that year which restored to
France her legitimate sovereign, would also restore to her
that system of laws which had so long been her glory and
happiness; and in that hope (too soon disappointed) he
predicts that the reputation of Du Moulin would revive.
Du Moulin’s works, most of which were published separately, were collected in 1612, in an edition of a vols. folio,
and again, in 1654, in 4 vols.; but the most valuable is
that of Paris, 1681, 5 vols. folio, edited by Francis Pinson.
In 1773, Garrigan, a bookseller of Avignon, issued a prospectus for a new edition, which has not yet appeared.
This prospectus contained an eloge on Du Moulin, which
Henrion de Pensey pronounced in an assembly of the advocates, and had prefixed to his edition of the “Analyse
des Fiefs,
” taken from Du Moulin’s commentary on the
law of Paris. Several other writers have written the life
of this very eminent jurist, particularly Brodeau, 1654, 4to.
His first engagement in Philadelphia was with a bookseller, who employed him as editor of the Philadelphia Magazine,
His first engagement in Philadelphia was with a bookseller, who employed him as editor of the Philadelphia
Magazine, for which he had an annual salary of fifty pounds
currency. When Dr. Rush of that city suggested to Paine
the propriety of preparing the Americans lor a separation
from Great Britain, he seized with avidity the idea, and
immediately beg^n the above mentioned pamphlet, which,
when finished, was shewn in manuscript to Dr. Franklin
and Mr. Samuel Adams, and entitled, after some discussion, “Common Sense,
” at the suggestion of Dr. Rush.
For this he received from the legislature of Pennsylvania,
the sum of 500l.; and soon after this, although devoid of
every thing that could be called literature, he was honoured
with a degree of M. A. from the university of Pennsylvania, and vvas chosen a member of the American Philosophical Society. In the title-page of his “Rights of Man,
”
he styled himself “Secretary for foreign affairs to the
Congress of the United States, in the late war.
” To this
title*, however, he had no pretensions, and so thorough a
republican ought at least to have avoided assuming what he
condemned so vehemently in others. He was merely a
clerk, at a very low salary, to a committee of the congress;
and his business was to copy papers, and number and file
them. From this office, however, insignificant as it was,
he was dismissed for a scandalous breach of trust, and then
hired himself as a clerk to Mr. Owen Biddle of Philadelphia; and early in \1&0, the assembly of Pennsylvania
chose hiii) as cierk. fn 1782 he printed at Philadelphia,
a letter to the abbé Raynal on the affairs of North Amer ca, in which he undertook to clear up the mistakes in
Raynal’s account of the revolution; and in the same yer
he also printed a letter to the earl of Shelburne, on his
speech in parliament, July 10, 1782, in which that nobleman had prophesied that, “When Great Britain shall acknowledge American independence, the sun of Britain’s
glory is set for ever.
” It could not be difficult to answer
such a prediction as this, which affords indeed a humiliating instance of want of political foresight. Great Britain
did acknowledge American independence, and what is
Great Britain now? In 1785, as a compensation for his
revolutionary writings, congress granted him three thousand dollars, after having rejected with great indignation
a motion for appointing him historiographer to the United
States, with a salary. Two only of the states noticed by
gratuities his revolutionary writings. Pennsylvania gave
him, as we have mentioned, 500l. currency; and NewYork gave him an estate of more than three hundred acres,
in high cultivation, which was perhaps the more agreeable
to him, as it was the confiscated property of a royalist. lu
1787 he came to London, and before the end of that year
published a pamphlet on the recent transactions’ between
Great Britain and Holland, entitled “Prospects on the
Rubicon.
” In this, as may be expected, he censured the
Cneasures of the English administration.
ent scholar, and a man of singular modesty. He never took the oaths after the revolution. He married a bookseller’s daughter at Oxford, where he resided with a numerous
It must have been as the last effort of a desperate cause
when he sent a “Discourse
” to James, persuading him to
embrace the protestant religion, with a “Letter
” to the
same purpose, which was printed at London in 1690, 4to.
His works have but few readers at this day; and Swift
observes, that “MarvelPs remarks on Parker continued to
be read when the book which occasioned them was long
ago sunk.
” He left a son of his own name, who was an
excellent scholar, and a man of singular modesty. He
never took the oaths after the revolution. He married a
bookseller’s daughter at Oxford, where he resided with a
numerous family of children to support which he published some books, particularly, 1 “An English Translation of Tully de finibus, 1702,
” 8vo, in the preface to
which he has some animadversions upon Locke’s Essay concerning Human Understanding. 2. “An abridgment of
the Ecclesiastic Histories of Eusebius, Socrates, Sozornen,
and Theotloret,
” Reverendi admodum in Christo
patris Samuelis Parkeri episcopi de rebus sui temporis commentariorum libri quatuor,
” Bibliotheca Biblica,
” printed at Oxford in 5 vols. 4to, the first
of which appeared in two parts in 1720, and the fifth in
1735, with an account of the other writings of the author,
and some particulars of his life, drawn up by Dr. Thomas
Haywood, of St. John’s college, to whom were attributed
most of the dissertations in the work. He describes it as
“being a new Comment upon the five Books of Moses,
extracted from the ancient fathers, and the most famous
critics both ancient and modern, with occasional annotations or dissertations upon particular difficulties, as they
were often called for.
” Mr. Parker died July 14, 1730,
in his fiftieth year, leaving a widow and children. The
metrical paraphrase of Leviticus xi. 13, &c. in vol. Hi.
was written by Mr. Warton, of Magdalen college, father
to the late learned brothers, Joseph and Thomas Warton;
and the “Fragment of Hyppolitus, taken out of two Arabic
Mss. in the Bodleian,
” in the fourth vol. was translated by
the late Dr. Hunt. Mr. Parker never was in orders, as he
could not reconcile his mind to the new government; but
he associated much and was highly respected by many
divines, particularly nonjurors, as Dr. Hickes, Mr. Collier,
Mr. Dodwell, Mr. Leslie, Mr. Nelson, and Dr. Grabe,
whose liberality lessened the difficulties which a very large
family occasioned. He appears to have had a place in the
Bodleian library, as Mr. Wheatly, in a letter to Dr. Rawlinson, dated Dec. 1739, says, “Sam. Parker’s son I had
heard before was apprenticed to Mr. Clements: but the
account you give me of his extraordinary proficiency is
new. If it be true also, I hope some generous patron of
learning will recall him from the bookseller’s shop, and
place him in his father’s seat, the Bodleian library.
” This
son, Sackville Parker, was afterwards for many years an
eminent bookseller at Oxford, and one of the four Octogenarian booksellers, who died in 1795 and 1796, namely,
James Fletcher, at eighty-six; Sackville Parker, at eightynine; Stephen Fletcher, at eighty -two, and Daniel Prince,
at eighty-five. They were all born at Oxford, except
James Fletcher. The present worthy bookseller, Mr. Joseph Parker, is nephew and successor to Mr. Sackville
Parker.
he author to his pupil J. B. Boehmer, upon condition that it should not be published, was printed by a bookseller, Fritsch, into whose hands a copy of it fell eighteen
He left only three different works, the first of which,
entitled “Institutiones Chirurgise Rationalis, turn medicae,
turn manualis,
” Leipsic, Opusculorum Chirurgicorum et Anatomicorum Tomi
duo: Dissertationes et Prolusiones,
” ibid. Ars medendi singulis morbis accommodata,
” ibid.
for the press, an obstruction which appeared very formidable was thrown in his way by Cornelius Bee, a bookseller, who, in a paper or pamphlet called “The case of
With much encouragement he had also some difficulties
to encounter. When the first volume was ready for the
press, an obstruction which appeared very formidable
was thrown in his way by Cornelius Bee, a bookseller,
who, in a paper or pamphlet called “The case of Cornelius
Bee,
” accused Mr. Pool of invading his property. To understand this it is necessary to know that this Mr. Bee, unquestionably a man of an enterprizing spirit, equal perhaps to any instance known in our days among the trade,
had published a very few years before, i. e. in 1660, the
“Critici Sacri,
” or a body of criticisms of the most
learned men in Europe, amounting to ninety, on the Old
and New Testament, given at large from their works, and
extending to nine volumes folio. Bee had a patent for this
work, and unquestionably deserved every encouragement
and protection the law could give, but the language of his
patent seems to have given him a narrow notion of literary
property. It stated that no person should print the Critics
either in whole or in party and therefore he considered
Mr. Pool as prohibited from taking any thing from this vast
collection of criticisms which separately were in every
persons’ hands, or from making any abridgment, or compiling any work that resembled the “Critici Sacri,
” however improved in the plan, or augmented, as Pool’s was,
from a variety authors not used in it. He also complained
that he should sustain a double injury by the “Synopsis:
”
first, in the loss of the sale of the remaining copies of his
own work, for which he did Mr. Pool the honour to think
there would be no longer a demand; and secondly, in being
prevented from publishing an improved edition of the
“Critici Sacri
” which he intended.
ccess. After his failure in this attempt, he subsisted chiefly by writing. He also was for some time a bookseller at Bath, where, and at other places, he occasionally
, a poet and miscellaneous
writer, is said to have been born of a good family, at St.
Ives, in Huntingdonshire, Dec. 25, 1749. He was ed located at Felstead, in Essex, and was originally brought up
to the church. This, however, he appears to have quitted
for the stage, which he attempted in London, in 1774,
with very little success. After his failure in this attempt,
he subsisted chiefly by writing. He also was for some time
a bookseller at Bath, where, and at other places, he occasionally delivered lectures on the English language. For
many years after his appearance on the stage, he assumed
the name of Courtney Melmoth, which likewise is prefixed to
most of his publications. As. an author, he was very prolific.
The first of his productions which attracted the notice of the
public, was “The Tears of Genius, occasioned by the Death
of Dr. Goldsmith, 1774,
” whose poetical works he endeavoured, and not always unsuccessfully, to make the model of
his own. His poem of “Sympathy
” was perhaps his best, and
has passed through many editions, and is characterized by
feeling, energy, and beauty. His first novel, entitled
“Liberal Opinions upon Animals, Man, and Providence,
”
Shenstone Green,
” “Emma Corbett,
” “The Pupil of Pleasure, or the New System (Lord Chesterfield’s) illustrated,
”
had likewise a temporary popularity. His other novel of
any note was entitled “Family Secrets,
” The Fair Circassian,
”
taken from Hawkesworth’s “Almoran and Harriet,
” which
required all the support of himself and friends, in the
newspapers, to render it palatable for a few nights. His
other dramatic pieces, enumerated in the Biog. Dram,
were so little successful as to be soon forgot.
of Sweden to that of France, in order to have it printed in that kingdom. His brother offered it to a bookseller, who gave it Mezeray to peruse. Mezeray thought it
We have already mentioned his first work his second
was, 2. “De Statu Germanici Imperii liber unus,
” which
he published in Severini di
Mozambano,
” with a dedication to his brother Isaac Puffendorf, whom he styles “Laelio Signor de Trezolani.
”
Puffendorf sent it the year before to his brother, then ambassador from the court of Sweden to that of France, in
order to have it printed in that kingdom. His brother
offered it to a bookseller, who gave it Mezeray to peruse.
Mezeray thought it worth printing, yet refused his approbation, on account of some passages opposite to the interests of France, and of others in which the pritfsts and
monks were severely treated. Isaac Puffendorf then sent
it to Geneva, where it was printed in 12mo. The design
of the author was to prove that Germany was a kind of republic, the constituent members of which being ill-proportioned, formed a monstrous whole. The book and its doctrine, therefore, met with great opposition; it was condemned, prohibited, and seized in many parts of Germany;
and written against immediately by several learned civilians. It underwent many editions, and was translated into
many languages and, among the rest, into English by
Mr. Bohun, 1696, in 12mo. 3. “De Jure Naturae &
Gentium,
” Leyden, De Jure
Belli & Pacis,
” since the same subjects are treated in a
more extensive manner, und with greater order. It was
translated into French by Barbeyrac, who wrote large notes
and an introductory discourse, in 1706; and into English,
with Barbeyrac’s notes, by Dr. Basil Kennet and others,
in 1708. The fourth and fifth edition of the English translation have Mr. Barbeyrac’s introductory discourse, which
is not in the three former. In the mean time Puffendorf
was obliged to defend this work against several censurers
the most enraged of whom was Nicholas Beckman, his
colleague in the university of Lunden. This writer, in.
order to give the greater weight to his objections, endeavoured to draw the divines into his party, by bringing religion into the dispute, and accusing the author of heterodoxy. His design in this was, to exasperate the clergy
of Sweden against Puffendorf; but the senators of that
kingdom prevented this, by enjoining his enemies silence,
and suppressing Beckman’s book by the king’s authority.
It was reprinted at Giessen; and, being brought to Sweden, was burned in 1675 by the hands of the executioner:
and Beckman, the author, banished from the king’s dominions for having disobeyed orders in republishing it,
Beckman now gave his fury full scope, and not only wrote
virulently and maliciously against Puffendorf, but likewise
challenged him to fight a duel he wrote to him from Copenhagen in that style, and threatened to pursue him
wherever he should go, in case he did not meet him at the
place appointed. Puffendorf took no notice of the letter, but
sent, it to the consistory of the university yet thought it
necessary to reply to the satirical pieces of that writer,
which he did in several publications. Niceron gives a
good account of this controversy in the 18th vol.- of his
“Memoires.
”
he completed, after the labour of thirty years. He was still unable to publish it, nor could he find a bookseller who would run the hazard of assisting him. At length
He was apprenticed to a shoemaker, who, like the master of George Fox, mentioned in this work, employed his
apprentice in keeping sheep. This gave our young student leisure for reading; and he occupied it in the indis-.
criminate perusal of such books as came into his hands
but the Scriptures had the preference in his mind.
Among other books which came'in his way, was one written
by Samuel Fisher, a Quaker, entitled “Rusticus ad Academicos,
” in which some inaccuracies in the translation of
the Bible being pointed out, Purver determined to examine
for himself; and, with the assistance of a Jew, soon acquired a knowledge of the Hebrew language. About the
20th year of his age he kept a school in his native country;
but afterwards, for the sake of more easily acquiring the
means of prosecuting his studies, he came to London,
where he probably resided when he published, in 1727, a
book called “The Youth’s Delight.
” The same year he
returned to his native place, and a second time opened a
school there; but previous to this, in London, he had embraced the principles, and adopted the profession of the
Quakers. He is said to have been convinced of the truth
of their tenets at a meeting held at the Bull and Mouth in
Aldersgate-street; whether by means of the preaching of
any of their ministers, we are not informed; but on the
day month ensuing, he himself appeared as a minister
among them, at the same meeting*house. On his second
settling at Husborn, he began to translate the books of the
Old Testament and applied himself also to the study of
medicine and botany but, believing it his duty to travel
in his ministerial function, he again quitted his school and
his native place; not, however, probably, until after he
had resided there some years; for his course was to London, Essex, and through several counties to Bristol; near
which city, at Hambrook, he was in the latter part of
1738. At this place he took up his abode, at the house of
one Josiah Butcher, a maltster, whose son he instructed
in the classics, and there he translated some of the minor
prophets, having before completed the book of Esther,
and Solomon’s Song. Here he became acquainted with
Rachael Cotterel, who, with a sister, kept a boardingschool for girls, at Frenchay, Gloucestershire; and whom,
in 1738, he married, and soon after himself opened a
boarding-school for boys at Frenchay. During his residence in Gloucestershire, (which was not at Frenchay all the time) he attempted to publish his translation of the
Old Testament in numbers at Bristol; but he did not meet
with sufficient encouragement; and only two or three numbers were published.
In 1758, he removed to Andover, in Hampshire; and
here, in 1764, he completed his translation of all the books
of the Old and New Testament, a work which has not
often been accomplished before by -the labour of a single
individual. It consists of two volumes, folio, published in
1764, at the price of four guineas. It appears, that this
work was originally intended to be printed in occasional
numbers; for, in 1746, the late Dr. Fothergill wrote a
letter to the Gentleman’s Magazine, in which he strongly
recommended the author of a work then under publication,
which was to be continued in numbers if it should meet
with encouragement. This was a translation of the Scriptures, under the title of “Opus in sacra Biblia elaboratum.
” Purver is not named, but that he was intended is
known by private testimony. After speaking in high terms
of his learning, Dr. Fothergill says, “As to his personal
character, he is a man of great simplicity of manners,
regular conduct, and a modest reserve; he is steadily attentive to truth, hates falsehood, and has an unconquerable aversion to vice; and to crown the portrait, he is not
only greatly benevolent to mankind, but has a lively sense
of the divine attributes, and a profound reverence of, and
submission to the Supreme Being.
” The mode of publication in numbers was probably unsuccessful, and soon
dropped; yet he went on with his translation, which he
completed, after the labour of thirty years. He was still
unable to publish it, nor could he find a bookseller who
would run the hazard of assisting him. At length his
friend Dr. Fothergill generously interfered gave him a
thousand pounds for the copy, and published it at his own
expence. Purver afterwards revised the whole, and made
considerable alterations and corrections for a second edition, which has not yet appeared but the ms. remains in
the hands of his grandson. Purver appears, in this great
work, a strenuous advocate for the antiquity, and even the
divine authority, of the Hebrew vowel points. He is also
a warm assertor of the purity and integrity of the Hebrew
text, and treats those who hold the contrary opinion with
great contempt; particularly Dr. Kennicott, of whom,
and his publication on the state of the Hebrew text, he
never speaks but with the greatest asperity. He has taken
very considerable pains with the scriptural chronology, and
furnishes his reader with a variety of chronological tables.
He prefers the Hebrew chronology in all cases, to the
Samaritan and Greek, and has throughout endeavoured to
connect sacred and profane history. His version is very
literal, but does not always prove the judgment or good
taste of the author. Thus, he says, that “The Spirit of
God hovered a top of the waters
” and instead of the majestic simplicity and unaffected grandeur of “Let there be
light, and there was light,
” he gives us, “Let there be
light, which, there was accordingly
” Thus his translation,
though a prodigious work for an individual, will rather be
used for occasional consultation than regular perusal; and
though it may afford many useful hints, will not supply the
place of the established translation.
and which he filled for twenty years, until the derangement of the prince’s affairs made him inform a bookseller that he intended to part with his library. This came
, perpetual secretary of the academy of
inscriptions and belles lettres, was born at Bugey, Nov. 23,
1709, of an ancient family that had lost its titles and property during the wars of the league. Although the eldest
of twelve children, his father destined him for the church,
and he studied with great approbation and success at the
college of Lyons, and had so much distinguished himself
that when the tim'e came that he should study theology,
two seminaries disputed which should have him. His own.
determination was in favour of that of the Jesuits, in consequence of the superior having promised to remit a part of
his expences in order that he might be able to purchase
books. At the age of twenty-six he went to Paris to the
seminary of Trente-Trois, where he became successively
master of the conferences, librarian, and second superior.
When he had finished his studies, he wanted the necessary
supplies to enable him to travel from one diocese to another; and the archbishop of Lyons having t refused this, from
a wish to keep him in his own diocese, Du Puy resolved to
give up all thoughts of the church, and devote himself to
the sciences and belles-lettres. He now sought the acquaintance of men of polite literature, and particularly obtained a steady friend in the academician Fourmont, whose
house was the rendezvous of men of learning and learned
foreigners. It was Fourmont who procured him the editorship of the “Journal cles Savans,
” which he accordingly
conducted for thirty years, and contributed many valuable
papers and criticisms of his own. His knowledge was very
various; he knew Hebrew, Greek, and mathematics, so as
to have been able to make a figure in either, had he devoted himself wholly to one pursuit; but his reading and
study were desultory, and it was said of him in mathematical
language, that he was the mean proportional between the
academy of sciences and that of inscriptions. In 1768 the
prince de Soubise made him his librarian, a situation of
course much to his liking, and which he filled for twenty
years, until the derangement of the prince’s affairs made
him inform a bookseller that he intended to part with his
library. This came like a clap of thunder to poor Du Puy,
and brought on a strangury, of which, after seven years of
suffering, he died April 10, 1795.
ns of being rewarded by an ill-paid salary of one hundred dollars a year. In the autumn of that year a bookseller at Leyden agreed with him for a publication of Abulfeda’s
After some stay at his native place Zorbig, where he
could find no opportunity of settling advantageously, he
was obliged to return to Leipsic. In 1747, he tells us he
was made professor for the publication of a tract, entitled
“De principibus Mahummedanis literarum laude claris.
”
From this time he lived, during many years, in want and
obscurity, frequently not knowing where to get bread to
eat. What he did get, he says, was hardly earned, by
private instruction, writing books, correcting for the press,
translations, and working for reviews; and thus he went
on from 1746 to 1758.
In the mean time, in 1748, he wrote his “Prograrmna
de epocha Arabum, &c.
” for which he was made Arabic
professor, but in tins office he complains of being rewarded
by an ill-paid salary of one hundred dollars a year. In the
autumn of that year a bookseller at Leyden agreed with
him for a publication of Abulfeda’s History in Latin and
Arabic: the first sheet was accordingly printed, and made
him known in France and England; and the whole, he
says, would have followed, if it had not been for his quarrel
with Schultens. Reiske appears to have had an extraordinary propensity to quarrelling, and being a reviewer, vva&
not sparing of the means, by reviewing in an arrogant and
petulant style the works of those persons with whom he
was living in apparent friendship. He even unblushingly
avows that a sort of revenge led him to speak ill of the
works of some of his friends. He speaks at the same time
of the bitter remorse with which he reflected on his treatment of Schultens, who “had been a father to him,
” acknowledges the acid of youthful pride which mixed with
his criticisms, and yet talks of being influenced by the
“conscience and duty
” of a reviewer
to my happiness.” The work at length appeared in 1770. His “Theocritus,” published in 1765, he calls a bookseller’s job, and it certainly is not the best of his critical
About 1763 he translated Demosthenes and Thucydides
into German, and married Mrs. Reiske, a woman of great
literary accomplishments. In 1768 he issued proposals for
his edition of Demosthenes, which forms the first two volumes of his “Oratores Graeci.
” On this occasion we have
an interesting note from Mrs. Reiske. “When the work
went to press, only twenty thalers of the subscription
money had come in. The good man was quite struck down
with this, and seemed to have thrown away all hope. His
grief went to my soul, and I comforted him as well as I
could, and persuaded him to sell mv jewels, which he at
length came into, after I had convinced him that a few
shining stones were not necessary to my happiness.
” The
work at length appeared in 1770. His “Theocritus,
” published in Plutarch
” and
“Dionysius Halicarnassensis
” were also edited by him for
the booksellers but the “Oratores Graeci
” was the work
of his choice, and one on which his reputation may safely
rest.
business; and some years after he was appointed printer to the university along with James Davidson, a bookseller. In 1718, he became one of the founders of the first
After having been so long accustomed to superintend the
press, Ruddiman was led to form the plan of erecting a
printing-office himself. Accordingly, in 1715, be
commenced printer, in partnership with his brother Walter,
who had been regularly bred to the business; and some
years after he was appointed printer to the university along
with James Davidson, a bookseller. In 1718, he became
one of the founders of the first literary society in Scotland.
In 1725, he published the first part of his “Grammatical
Latinae Institutiones,
” which treats of etymology; and the
second part, which explains the nature and principles of
syntax, appeared in 1732. He also wrote a third part on
prosody, which is said to be more copious and correct than
any other publication on the subject, but, for want of encouragement, he published only an abridgment of it. He
next engaged in the management of a newspaper, “The
Caledonian Mercury,
” from which he derived more profit
than fame, it being a mere dry record of occurrences.
This paper continued in his family until 1772, when it was
sold to Mr. Robertson, and still exists.
r to have risen to any eminence, as Wood speaks of him as living, in his latter days in the house of a bookseller in St. Paul’s church-yard. His principal object appears
, a Welsh
antiquary, was born of an ancient family in Denbighshire,
and studied for some time at Oxford, whence he removed
to Thaives-lnn, London. Here he applied to the law, but
does not appear to have risen to any eminence, as Wood
speaks of him as living, in his latter days in the house of
a bookseller in St. Paul’s church-yard. His principal object appears to have been the cultivation of the Welsh
Janguage, and the translation into it of the Bible, &c. It
would appear that queen Elizabeth gave him a patent, for
seven years, for printing in Welsh the Bible, CommonPrayer, and “Administration of tjie Sacraments.
” “He
compiled
” A Dictionary in English and Welsh,“Lond.
1547, 4to.
” A Little Treatise of the English pronunciation of the Letters.“” A plain and familiar introduction“to the same, Lond. 1550, 4to.
” 'Battery of the Pope’s
Bottereulx, commonly called the High-Altar,“ibid. 1550,
8vo.
” The Laws of Howell Dha.“” A Welsh Rhetorick," revised, enlarged, &c. by Henry Perry, B. D.
The period of his death is uncertain, but he was living in
1567.
anny. Sancho left a widow, who is, we believe, since dead; and a son, who carried on the business of a bookseller for some years, and died very lately.
Such was the man whose species philosophers and anatomists have endeavoured to degrade as a deterioration of
the human; and such was the man whom Fuller, with a
benevolence and quaintness of phrase peculiarly his own,
accounted “God’s image, though cut in ebony.
” To the
harsh definition of the naturalist, oppressions political and
legislative were once added, but the abolition of the slave
trade has now swept away every engine of that tyranny.
Sancho left a widow, who is, we believe, since dead; and
a son, who carried on the business of a bookseller for some
years, and died very lately.
mpression of the second volume was suppressed as soon as completed, and remained in the warehouse of a bookseller at Brussels until 1695, in which year that city was
1644, 2 vols. fol. a most superb book, well known to the
collectors of foreign history and topography. There is an
edition published at the Hague in 1730, 3 vols. fol. but the
original is preferred on account of the superior beauty of
the engravings. 14. “Chorographia sacra Brabantia, sive
celebrium aliquot in ea provincia ecclesiarum et ccenobiorum descriptio,
” Brussels and Antwerp,
t his departure from Basil he left a manuscript, entitled “De Trinitatis Erroribus,” in the bands of a bookseller, who sent it afterwards to Haguenau, whither Servetus
, a famous Anti-trinitarian, and
the great martyr of the Socinian sect, was born in 1509, at
Villaneuva in Arragon, or at Tudela in Navarre, in 1511.
His father, who was a notary, sent him to the university of
Toulouse, to study the civil law: and there, or as some
say, when in Italy, he imbibed his peculiar notions
respecting the doctrine of the Trinity. After he had been
two or three years at Toulouse he resolved to remove into
Germany, and propagate his opinions. He went to Basil,
by way of Lyons and Geneva; and, having had some conferences at Basil with Oecolampadius, set out for Strasburg, to converse with Bucer and Capito, two celebrated reformers of that city., At his departure from Basil he left a
manuscript, entitled “De Trinitatis Erroribus,
” in the
bands of a bookseller, who sent it afterwards to Haguenau,
whither Servetus went, and had it printed in 1531. The
next year, he printed likewise at Haguenau another book,
with this title, “Dialogorum de Trinitate libri duo:
” in
an advertisement to which he retracts v/hat he had written
in his former book against the Trinity, not as it was false,
but because it was written imperfectly and confusedly^
He then resolved to return to France, because he was
poor, and did not understandthe German language; as he
alleged upon his trial to the judges, when they asked him
why he left Germany. He went accordingly to Basil,
thence to Lyons, where he lived two or three years, and
afterwards to Paris, where, having studied physic under
Sylvius, Fernelius., and other professors, he took his degree
of master of arts, and was admitted doctor of physic in the
university. He now settled as a practitioner for two or
three years in a town near Lyons, and then at Vienne in
Dauphiny, for the space of ten or twelve. In the mean
time, his writings against the Trinity had excited the indignation of the German divines, and spread his name throughout all Europe. In 1533, before he had left Lyons, Melancthon wrote a letter to Camerarius, in which he allowed
that Servetus was evidently an acute and crafty disputant,
but confused and indigested in his thoughts, and certainly
wanting in point of gravity. While Servetus was at Paris,
his books being dispersed in Italy, were very much approved by many who had thoughts of forsaking the church
of Rome: which, in 1539, excited Melancthon to write a
letter to the senate of Venice, importing, that “a book of
Servetus, who had revived the error of Paulus Samosatenus,
was handed about in their country, and beseeching them
to take care, that the impious error of that man may be
avoided, rejected, and abhorred.
” Servetus was at Lyons
in 1542, before he settled in Vienne; and corrected the
proofs of a Latin Bible that was printing there, to which
he added a preface and some marginal notes, under
the name of Villanovanus, from the town where he was
born.
omfort he had in this dreary solitude, and relieve his indigent parishioners with the money. Watson, a bookseller in Dublin, who had advertised then: for sale without
In 1757 a remarkable dearth prevailed in Ireland, and no where more than in Mr. Skelton’s parish. The scenes of distress which he witnessed would now appear scarcely credible. He immediately set himself to alleviate the wants of his flock, by purchases of meal, &c. at other markets, until he had exhausted all his money, and then he had recourse to a sacrifice which every man of learning will duly appreciate. He resolved to sell his books, almost the only comfort he had in this dreary solitude, and relieve his indigent parishioners with the money. Watson, a bookseller in Dublin, who had advertised then: for sale without success, at last bought them himself for 80l. and immediately paid the money. Soon after they were advertised, two ladies, lady Barrymore and a Miss Leslie, who guessed at Skelton’s reason for selling his hooks, sent him So/, requesting him to keep his books, and relieve his poor with the money; but Skelton, with many expressions of gratitude, told them he had dedicated his books to God, and he must sell them; and accordingly both sums were applied to the relief of his parishioners. Every heart warms at the recital of such an act of benevolence, and all reflections on it would lessen the impression. One other circumstance may be added. The bookseller sold only a part of the books in the course of trade, and those that remained, Mr. Skelton, when he could allord it, took from him at the price he sold them for, but insisted on paying interest for the sum they amounted to, for the time Mr. Watson had them in his possession.
The publication alluded to, was the “Universal Visitor and Memorialist,” published by Gardner, a bookseller in the Strand. Smart, and Holt, a political writer,
The publication alluded to, was the “Universal Visitor
and Memorialist,
” published by Gardner, a bookseller in
the Strand. Smart, and Holt, a political writer, are said
to have entered into an engagement to write for this
magazine, and for no other work whatever; for this they
were to have a third of the profits, and the contract was to
be binding for ninety-nine years. In Boswt-Il’s Life of
Johnson, we find this contract discussed with more gravity
than it seems to deserve. It was probably a contrivance of
Gardner’s to secure the services of two irregular men for a
certain period. Johnson, however, wrote a few papers for
our poet, “not then,
” he added, “knowing the terms on
which Smart was engaged to write, and thinking I was doing him good. I hoped his wits would soon return to him.
Mine returned to me, and I wrote in the Universal Visitor
no longer.
” The publication ceased in about two years
from its commencement.
is” Second Defence of the Rights of the Christian Church, occasioned by two late indictments against a bookseller and his servant for selling one of thf said books.
The lower house of convocation, in queen Anne’s reign,
thought that such a character of “The Rights of the Christian Church,
” &c. from a man of Le Clerc’s reputation for
parts and learning, must have no small influence in
recommending the book, and in suggesting favourable notions of
the principles advanced in it; and therefore, in their representation of the present state of religion, they judged
it expedient to give it this turn, namely, “that those infidels
” (meaning Tindal and others) “have procured abstracts and commendations of their own profane writings,
and probably drawn up by themselves, to be inserted in
foreign journals, and that they have translated them into
the English tongue, and published them here at home, in
order to add the greater weight to their wicked opinions.
”
Hence a notion prevailed in England, that Le Clerc had
been paid for the favourable account he gave of Tindal’s
book; upon which he took occasion to declare, in a subsequent journal, that there never was a greater falsehood, and
protests as an honest man before God, “that, for making
mention of that or any other hook, he had never had either
promise or reward.*' It will easily be imagined that, in
the course of this controversy, Dr. Tindal’s antagonists
would object to him his variableness and mutability in matters of religion, and insult him not a little upon his Hrst
apostatizing to the chjirch of Rome, upon the prospect of
a national conversion to Popery, and then, at the revolution, reverting to Protestantism. To <his he replied, that
” Coming, as most boys do, a rasa tabula to the university,
and believing (his country education teaching him no better) that all human and divine knowledge was to be had
there, he quickly fell into the then prevailing notions of
the high and independent powers of the clergy; and meeting with none, during his long stay there, who questioned
the truth of them, they by degrees became so fixed and
riveted in him, that he no more doubted of them than of
his own being: and he perceived not the consequence of
them, till the Roman emissaries (who were busy in making proselytes in the university in king James*s time, and knew how to turn the weapons of high church against them)
caused him to see, that, upon these notions, a separation
from the church of Rome could not be justified; and that
they who pretended to answer them as to those points, did
only shuffle, or talk backward and forward. This made
him, fur some small time, go to the Popish mass-house;
till meeting, upon his going into the world, with people
who treated that notion of the independent power as it deserved, and finding the absurdities of Popery to be much
greater at hand than they appeared at a distance, he began
to examine the whole matter with all the attention he was
capable of; and then he quickly found, and was surprised
at the discovery, that all his till then undoubted maxims
were so far from having any solid foundation, that they
were built on as great a contradiction as can be, that of
two independent powers in the same society. Upon this
he returned, as he had good reason, to the church of England, which he found, by examining into her constitution,
disclaimed all that independent power he had been bred
up in the belief of; Candlemas 1687-8 being the last time
he saw any of the Popish tricks, the very next opportunity
(namely, Easter) he publicly received the sacrament (the warden giving it him first) in his college chapel, &c. And
thus having made his escape from errors which prejudice
of education had drawn him into, he resolved to take nothing on trust for the future; and, consequently, his notions concerning our civil, as well as religious liberties,
became very different from those in which he was educated.“What Dr. Tindal says here may be true; yet it is observable, that his conversion to Popery, and re-conversion to
Protestantism, lay between February 1685, and February
1688, that is, between the twenty-seventh and thirtieth,
year of his age; and many will be ready to suspect, that a
man of his reasoning and inquiring turn must, before then,
have been too much fixed and settled in his principles,
either to be a dupe of Popish missionaries, or then to discover first the absurdity and falsehood of fundamental principles. In the mean time he endeavoured to defend his
work, in a
” Defence of the Rights of the Christian Church
against a late visitation sermon, entitled The Rights of the
Clergy in the Christian Church asserted, preached at Newport- Pagnell in the county of Bucks by W. Wotton, B. D.
and made public at the command and desire of the bishop
of Lincoln, and the clergy of the deaneries of Buckingham
and Newport,“London, 1707, in 8vo, and in his
” Second
Defence of the Rights of the Christian Church, occasioned
by two late indictments against a bookseller and his servant
for selling one of thf said books. In a Letter from a- gentleman in London to a clergyman in the country. To which
are added two tracts of Hugo Grotius on these questions;
I. Whether the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper may be
administered where there are no pastors? II. Whether it
be necessary at all times to communicate with the Symbols?
As also some tracts of Mr. John Hales of Eaton, viz. Of
the Lord’s Supper, the Power of the Keys, of Schism,
&c.“London, 1707, in 8vo. In 1709 he published at
London in 8vo, a pamphlet entitled,
” New High Church
turned old Presbyterian“and in 1710 several pamphlets,
viz.
” An High Church Catechism;“” The jacobitism,
perjury, and popery of High Church Priests;“”The
merciful judgments of 'High Church-triumphant on offending clergymen and others in the reign of Charles I.“In
1711 and 1712 he published at London in 8vo,
” The Nation vindicated from the aspersions cast on it in a late
pamphlet entitled, A representation of the present State of
Religion, with regard to the late excessive growth of infidelity, heresy, and profaneness, as it passed the Lower
House of convocation,“in two parts. In 1713, and some
following years he published several other pamphlets,
mostly political, which attracted more or less attention,
but are now forgotten. He had hitherto passed for an
enemy to the church of England, but was soon determined
to show himself equally hostile to revealed religion, and in
1730, published in 4to, his
” Christianity as old as the
Creation, or the Gospel a Republication of the Religion of
Nature.“It might have been expected from the title of
this book, that his purpose was to prove the Gospel perfectly agreeable to the law of nature; to prove, that it has
set the principles of natural religion in the clearest light, and
was intended to publish and confirm it anew, after it had been
very much obscured and defaced through the corruption ct
mankind. We should be further confirmed in this supposition from his acknowledging, that
” Christianity itself,
stripped of the additions which policy, mistake, and the
circumstances of time, have made to it, is a most holy religion, and that all its doctrines plainly speak themselves
to be the will of an infinitely wise and good God:“for
this, and several declarations of a similar nature, he makes
in his work; and accordingly distinguishes himself and his
friends with the title of
” Christian Deists.“Yet whoever
examines his book attentively will find, that this is only
plausible appearance, intended to cover his real design;
which was to set aside all revealed religion, by showing,
that there neither is, nor can be, any external revelation
at all, distinct from what he calls
” the external revelation
of the law of nature in the hearts of all mankind;“and
accordingly his refuters, the most considerable of whom
was Dr. Conybeare, afterwards bishop of Bristol, Foster,
and Leland, have very justly treated him as a Deist. It
appears from a letter written by the rev. Mr. Jonas Proast
to Dr. Hickes, and printed in Hickes’s
” Preliminary Discourse“cited above, that Tindal espoused this principle
very early in life; and that he was known to espouse it
long before even his
” Rights of the Christian Church" was
published. The letter bears date the 2d of July, 1708,
and is in the following terms:
al Society. In 1723, several thousand pounds were left him by his elder brother, Mr. Benjamin Tooke, a bookseller in Fleet-street; yet, notwithstanding this addition
, a learned English schoolmaster, was the second of five sons of Benjamin Tooke, citizen and stationer of London, and born in 1673. He was educated at the Charterhouse-school, and in 1690 sent to Clare-hall in Cambridge, where he took both the degrees in arts, that of B. A. in 1693, and of M.A. in 1697. In 1695, he was chosen usher of the Charterhouse-school; and, in 1704, professor of geometry in Gresham college, in the room of Dr. Hooke; being recommended by a testimonial from the master, Dr. Burnet, and other officers of the Charterhouse. In Nov. following, he was chosen a fellow of the Royal Society. In 1723, several thousand pounds were left him by his elder brother, Mr. Benjamin Tooke, a bookseller in Fleet-street; yet, notwithstanding this addition to his fortune, he still held his place of usher in the Charterhouse-school, and was preferred to the mastership of the school in 1728; and, the year after, married the widow of Dr. Henry Levett, physician to the Charterhouse. He then, as he was obliged by the statutes, resigned his professorship of Gresham, and from that time attended no other business but his school. This began to be too much for him, for he had some years before declined in his health, till at length he fell into a dropsy, which carried him off, Jan. 20, 1731, in his fifty-eighth year. He was buried in the Charter-house*chapel, in the middle of which is placed a white marble monument, in the form of a shield, against a pillar, with a Latin inscription upon it; to his memory. He had taken deacon’s orders, and sometimes preached, but devoted himself principally to the instruction of youth, for which he was no less fitted by his temper than learning.
About this time he acquired some property by marriage, and laid it out partly in furnishing a bookseller’s shop in Fore-street. Here he carried on trade for
About this time he acquired some property by marriage,
and laid it out partly in furnishing a bookseller’s shop in
Fore-street. Here he carried on trade for about nine
years, but with no great success. During this time he
published various pamphlets on the political topics of the
day, and always in opposition to the measures and supporters of administration. In 1774 he resigned his business, and was ordained a preacher among the dissenters,
and soon after chosen pastor of a congregation at Highgate. In 1778 he exchanged this situation for the office
of forenoon preacher at Newington Green, where Dr. Price
preached in the afternoon. When Dr. Kippis was employed by the London booksellers on a new edition of the
“Biographia Britannica,
” he recommended Mr. Towers
as his assistant; and he wrote several lives, but, as already
noticed, under the influence of prejudices which did no
credit to the work. It seems indeed rather surprising that
a work in which the lives of the eminent men of the church
of England must necessarily be expected to form a large,
if not the largest share, should be entrusted to one who had
no sympathy with the constitution or doctrines of that
church, and who, while he probably exerted as much impartiality as he was capable of, could not, in the nature of
things, divest himself of a degree of prejudice which must
damp his praise, if it did not dispose him to censure.
acter of “a man of wonderful moderation, and of, great piety,” and adds, what it is very natural for a, bookseller to praise, that “he was very generous, and would
, a pious English divine, was a
native of Flintshire, and born near Broadoak, in that county,
but in what year we have not discovered. Our particulars
indeed of this gentleman are extremely scanty, he having
been omitted by Wood. Previously to his going to Oxford, he was for some time an inmate in the house of the
celebrated Philip Henry, partly as a pupil, and partly as
an assistant in the education of Mr. Henry’s children, one
of whom, Matthew, the commentator, was first initiated in
grammar-learning by Mr. Turner. This was in 1668, after
which Mr. Turner entered of Edmund hall, Oxford, where
he took his degree of M.A.June 8, 1675. He became
afterwards vicar of Walberton, in Sussex, and resided there
in 1697, at the time he published his principal work, but
the date of his death we have not been able to ascertain.
In 1695 he published a “History of all Religions,
” Lond.
8vo; but the work by which he is best known is his “Cornpleat history of the most remarkable Providences, both of
Judgment and Mercy, &c. to which is added, whatever,
is curious in the works of nature and art. The whole digested into one volume, under proper heads; being a work
set on foot thirty years ago, by the rev. Mr. Pool, author of the ‘ Synopsis Criticorum;’ and since undertaken
and finished by William Turner,
” &c. History of the Little World,
”
but is superior, perhaps, to both in selection and conciseness. Dunton, in his “Life,
” gives Mr. Turner the
character of “a man of wonderful moderation, and of,
great piety,
” and adds, what it is very natural for a, bookseller to praise, that “he was very generous, and would
not receive a farthing for his copy till the success was
known.
”
ing two sons, one of whom, Rodolphus, was professor of divinity at Basil, and the other, John Henry, a bookseller at Amsterdam. He had published, in 1673, with notes,
, mentioned above as one of
the tutors to John James Wetstein, was born September
1, 1647, at Basil, and was grandson of John Rodolphus
Wetstein, burgomaster of that city, a man of great merit,
who rendered important services to his country at the peace
of Munster, in the Imperial court, and in his native place.
John Rodolphus, the subject of this article, succeeded his
father as professor of Greek, and afterwards of divinity,
and died at Basil April 21, 1711, leaving two sons, one
of whom, Rodolphus, was professor of divinity at Basil,
and the other, John Henry, a bookseller at Amsterdam.
He had published, in 1673, with notes, Origen’s “Dialogue against the Marcionites,
” with the “Exhortation to
Martyrdom,
” and the letter to Africanus concerning the
“History of-Susanna,
” which he first took from the Greek
Mss. We have several other valuable discourses or dissertations of his. Henry Wetstein, one of his brothers,
also well acquainted with Greek and Latin, settled in Holland, where he followed the business of a bookseller, became a celebrated printer, and died April 4, 1726. His
descendants long remained in Holland.
ed. The worthy Dr. Prideaux, dean of Norwich, being offered some Arabic manuscripts in parchment, by a bookseller of that city, thinking, perhaps, that the price demanded
, a tailor, who, from an extraordinary love of study, became a professor of the Oriental languages, was born in the city of Norwich about 1684, where he was educated at a grammar-school till he was almost qualified for the university; but his friends, wanting fortune and interest to maintain him there, bound him apprentice to a tailor, with whom he served seven years, and afterwards worked seven years more as a journeyman. About the end of the last seven years, he was seized with a fever and ague, which continued with him two or three years, and at last reduced him so low as to disable him from working at his trade. In this situation he amused himself with some old books of controversial divinity, in which he found great stress laid on the Hebrew original of several texts of scripture; and, though he had almost lost the learning he had obtained at school, his strong desire of knowledge excited him to attempt to make himself master of that language. He was at first obliged to make use of an English Hebrew grammar and lexicon; but, by degrees, recovered the knowledge of the Latin tongue, which he had learned at school. On the recovery of his health, he divided his time between his business and his studies, xvhich last employed the greatest part of his nights. Thus, self-taught, and assisted only by his great genius, he, "by dint of continual application, added to the knowledge of the Hebrew that of all or most of the oriental Ianguages, but still laboured in obscurity, till at length he was accidentally discovered. The worthy Dr. Prideaux, dean of Norwich, being offered some Arabic manuscripts in parchment, by a bookseller of that city, thinking, perhaps, that the price demanded for them was too great, declined buying them; but, soon after, Mr. Wild hearing of them, purchased them; and the dean, on calling at the shop and inquiring for the manuscripts, was informed of their being sold. Chagrined at this disappointment, he asked of the bookseller the name and profession of the person who had bought them; and, being told he was a tailor, he bad him instantly to run and fetch them, if they were riot cut in pieces to make measures: but he was soon relieved from his fears by Mr. Wild’s appearance with the manuscripts, though, on the dean’s inquiring whether he would part with them, he answered in the negative. The dean then asked hastily what he did with them: he replied, that he read them. He was desired to read them, which he did. He was then bid to render a passage or two into English, which he readily performed, and with great exactness. Amazed at this, the dean, partly at his own expence, and partly by a subscription raised among persons whose inclinations led them to this kind of knowledge, sent him to Oxford; where, though he was never a member of the university, he was by the dean’s interest admitted into the Bodleian library, and employed for some, years in translating or making extracts out of Oriental manuscripts, and thus bad adieu to his needle. This appears to have been some time before 1718. At Oxford, he was known by the name of the Arabian tailor. He constantly attended the library all the hours it was open, and, when it was shut, employed most of his leisure-time in teaching the Oriental languages to young gentlemen, at the moderate price of half a guinea a lesson, except for the Arabic, for which he had a guinea, and his subscriptions for teaching amounted to no more than 20 or 30l. a year. Unhappily for him, the branch of learning in which he excelled was cultivated but by few; and the reverend Mr. Gagnier, a Frenchman, skilled in the Oriental tongues, was in possession of all the favours the university could Bestow in this way, being recommended by the heads of colleges to instruct young gentlemen, and employed by the professors of these languages to read public lectures in their absence.
le was the contempt of riches. Upon his first arrival in Athens, going accidentally into the shop of a bookseller, he took up a volume of the Commentaries of Xenophon,
, the founder of the Stoic sect (a branch from the Cynic, ad a far as respected morals, differing from it in words more than in reality), was a native of Cittius, a
maritime town of Cyprus, and as this place was originally
peopled by a colony of Phenicians, he is sometimes called
a Phenician. His father, a merchant, encouraged him in
the study of philosophy, and bought for him several of the
writings of v the most eminent Socratic philosophers, which
he read with great avidity and when he was about thirty
years of age, determined to take a voyage to Athens, which
was so celebrated both as a mart of trade and of science.
Whether this voyage was in part mercantile, or wholly undertaken for the sake of conversing with those philosophers
whose writings Zeno had long admired, is uncertain. If
it be true, as some writers relate, that he brought with him
a valuable cargo of Phenician purple, which was lost by
shipwreck upon the coast of Pira3us, this circumstance will
account for the facility with which he at first attached himself to a sect whose leading principle was the contempt of
riches. Upon his first arrival in Athens, going accidentally
into the shop of a bookseller, he took up a volume of the
Commentaries of Xenophon, and formed so high an idea of
the author, that he asked the bookseller, where he might
meet with such men. Crates, the Cynic philosopher, happening at that instant to be passing by, the bookseller
pointed to him, and said, “Follow that man,
” which he did,
and was so well pleased with his doctrine, that he became
one of his disciples. But though he highly admired the
general principles and spirit of the Cynic school, he could
not easily reconcile himself to their peculiar manners; nor
would his inquisitive turn of mind allow him to adopt their
indifference to scientific inquiry. He therefore attended
upon other masters, who professed to instruct their disciples in the nature and causes of things, and when Crates,
displeased at this, attempted to drag him by force out of
the school of Stilpo, Zeno said to him, “You may seize my
body, but Stilpo has laid hold of my mind.
” After continuing to attend upon the lectures of Stilpo several years,
he passed over to other schools, particularly those of Xenocrates and Diodorus Cronus. By the latter he was instructed
in dialectics; and at last, after attending almost every other
master, he offered himself as a disciple of Polemo, who suspected that his design was to collect materials for a new
system: nor was he mistaken. The place which Zeno
chose for his school was called 2/rea, or the Porch, and hence
the name of Stoics. Zeno had advantages as the founder
of a new sect; he excelled in that kind of subtle reasoning
which was at that time popular, and while he taught a system of moral doctrine, his own morals were unexceptionable. He therefore soon became much followed, and on
account of his integrity the Athenians deposited the keys of
their citadel in his hands, and honoured him with a golden
crown and a statue of brass.
In his person Zeno was tall and slender; his aspect was
severe, and his brow contracted. His constitution was
feeble; but he preserved his health by great abstemiousness. The supplies of his table consisted of figs, bread,
and honey; notwithstanding which, he was frequently honoured with the company of great men. It was a singular
proof of, his moderation, mixed indeed with that high
spirit of independence which afterwards distinguished his
sect, that when Democharis, son of Laches, offered to
procure him some gratuity from* Antigonus, he was so
offended, that from that time he declined all intercourse
with him. In public company, to avoid every appearance
of an assuming temper, he commonly took the lowest place.
Indeed, so great was his modesty, that he seldom chose to
mingle with a crowd, or wished for the company of more
than two or three friends at once. He paid more attention
to neatness and decorum in external appearance, than the
Cynic philosophers. In his dress indeed he was plain, and
in all his expences frugal, which arose from a contempt of
external magnificence. He showed as much respect to
the poor as to the rich; and conversed freely with persons
of the meanest occupations. He had only one servant, or,
according to Seneca, none. Yet with all these virtues,
several philosophers of great ability and eloquence employed their talents against him, and Arcesilaus and Carneades, the founders of the middle and new academy, were
his professed opponents. Towards the latter end of his
life he found another powerful adversary in Epicurus, whose
temper and doctrines were alike inimical to the severe
gravity and philosophical pride of the Stoic sect. Hence
mutual invectives passed between the Stoics and other
sects, to which little credit is due. At least it may be
fairly presumed that Zeno, whose personal character was
so exemplary, never countenanced gross immorality in his
doctrine.