Limoges, Nov. 7, 1668, the son of Henry d'Aguesseau, then intendant of the Limoisin, and afterwards counsellor of state. The family was distinguished for having produced many
, a French statesman
of great worth and talents, was born at Limoges, Nov. 7,
1668, the son of Henry d'Aguesseau, then intendant of
the Limoisin, and afterwards counsellor of state. The
family was distinguished for having produced many able
magistrates, among whom was Anthony, the grandfather
of the chancellor, who was first president of the parliament
of Bourdeaux. Henry-Francis, the subject of the present
article, was educated under his father in every species of
knowledge which promised to qualify him for the office of
magistrate. After being admitted, in 1690, an advocate,
he became, a few months after, advocate-general of the
parliament of Paris, at the age of only twenty-two years.
The king, in appointing one so young to an office of very
great consequence, was guided solely by the recommendation of his father. “I know him,
” said his majesty, “to
be incapable of deceiving me, even in the case of his own
son;
” and the young advocate completely justified the confidence reposed in him. The celebrated Denis Talon, who
had obtained great reputation in the same office, declared
that he should have been willing to conclude his career as
that young man had begun his. After having performed
the functions of his office with reputation equal to his commencement, he became procurator-general; and the nature
of his new office furnished him with occasion to display
new talents in the public service. In particular, he introduced a complete system of reformation in the management of the hospitals, by which abuses were prevented
or corrected; and he restored order and discipline in the
tribunals, by which the criminal code was greatly improved.
In questions respecting estates, he discovered much acuteness and knowledge of antiquities.
, an eminent Russian physician, counsellor of state, and member of many academies, was born at Petersburgh
, an eminent Russian physician, counsellor of state, and member of many
academies, was born at Petersburgh of German parents,
in 1729, and died in that city in 1807. He studied in
the university of Gottingen, under Haller, and his reputation is in a great measure owing to the respect he preserved for that celebrated school, and to the princely
contributions he made to it. His fortune enabled him to
make vast collections during his various travels, a part, of
which he regularly sent every year to Gottingen. In particular he enriched the library with a complete collection
of Russian writers, a beautiful Koran, Turkish manuscripts, and many other curious articles and he added to
the museum a great number of valuable articles collected
throughout the Russian empire, curious habits, armour,
instruments, minerals, medals, &c. He was also a liberal
contributor to Blumenbach’s collection. As a writer, he
had a principal part in the Russian Pharmacopoeia, Petersburgh, 1778, 4to, and wrote many essays, in Latin and
German, on different subjects of physiology and medicine,
of which a list may be seen in the “Gelehrtes Deutschland
” of M. Meusel, fourth edition, vol. I. p. 98. What
he published on the plague has been highly valued by
practitioners, and there are two curious papers by him
In No. 171 and 176 of our Philosophical Transactions.
His memory was honoured by Heyne with an elegant
eulogium, “De Obitu Bar. de Asch, ad vivos amantissimos J. Fr. Blumenbach, et J. D. Reuss,
” 4to.
erdinand, who rewarded him amply, and wished to bring him to his court, by the offer of the place of counsellor of state. He left in manuscript, a church history, “Historia
, or Avanzi Giammarie, a
celebrated Italian lawyer, was born Aug. 23, 1564. He
was educated with great care, and discovered so much taste
for polite literature, that Riccoboni, his master, said, he
was the only youth he had ever known who seemed to be
born a poet and orator. His father wished him to study
medicine, but his own inclination led him to study law, in
which he soon became distinguished. At Ferrara he acquired an intimacy with Tasso, Guarini, Cremonini, and
other eminent characters of that time. He afterwards retired to Rovigo, and practised as a lawyer, but was singularly unfortunate in his personal affairs, not only losing a
considerable part of his property by being security for
some persons who violated their engagements, but having
his life attempted by assassins who attacked him one day
and left him for dead with eighteen wounds. He recovered, however, but his brother being soon after assassinated,
and having lost his wife, he retired, in 1606, to Padua,
where he died, March 2, 1622, leaving several children,
of whom Charles, his second son, became a learned physician and botanist. Avanzi wrote a poem “Il Satiro Favola Pastorale,
” Venice, Historia Ecclesiastica a Lutheri apostasia;
” and “Concilia
de rebus civilibus et criminalibus.
”
nd was exposed to the demands of his creditors, when he was relieved by the generosity of le Bret, a counsellor of state. Automne was a man of study, and wrote several works
, advocate of the parliament of
Bourdeaux, was born in 1587, at Agenois. He undertook
an edition of the “Corps du Droit,
” the expence of which
the chancellor had promised to defray, but in this our
author was disappointed, and was exposed to the demands
of his creditors, when he was relieved by the generosity of
le Bret, a counsellor of state. Automne was a man of
study, and wrote several works on professional subjects,
which were much approved. The most celeb rated of these
is his “Commentaire surla Coutume de Bourdeaux,
” the
best edition of which was published by Dupin, in 1728, fol.
with notes. He wrote also a “Conference du Droit Romain avec le Droit Franois y
” Censura Gallica in Jus Civile Romanum,
” Paris,
he obtained from the court was a pension of two thousand livres, with the addition of the titles of counsellor of state and historiographer of France, which he used to call
, a French writer,
Lorn in 1594 at Angouleme. When about seventeen years of
age he went to Holland, where he composed a discourse on
the state of the United Provinces. He accompanied also
the duke d'Epernon to several places. In 1621 he was
taken into the service of the cardinal de la Valette, with
whom he spent eighteen months at Rome. Upon his return he retired to his estate at Balzac, where he remained
for several years, till he was drawn thence by the hopes he
had conceived of raising his fortune under cardinal llichelieu, who had formerly courted his friendship but being
in a few years tired of the dependent state of a court- life,
he went again to his country retirement all he obtained
from the court was a pension of two thousand livres, with
the addition of the titles of counsellor of state and historiographer of France, which he used to call magnificent trifles,
He was much esteemed as a writer, especially for his letters, which went through several editions, but there were
in his own time some critics who started up against him
the chief of these was a young Feuillant, named Andre de
St. Denis, who wrote a piece entitled, “The conformity
of M. de Balzac’s eloquence, with that of the greatest men
in the past and present times.
” Although this piece was
not printed, yet it was circulated very extensively, which
made Balzac wish to have it publicly refuted, which was
accordingly done by prior Ogier in 1627, with the assistance of Balzac himself. Father Goulu, general of the
Feuillants, undertook the cause of brother Andre, and,
under the title of Phyllarchus, wrote two volumes of letters
against Balzac. Several other pieces were also written
against him, but he did not think proper then to answer
his adversaries he did, indeed, write an apology for himself, but this was never made public till it appeared witli
some other pieces of his in 1645. The death of his chief
adversary father Goulu having happened in 1629, put an
end to all his disputes, and restored him to a state of tranquillity for father Andre de St. Denis, who had been the
first aggressor, became heartily reconciled, and went to
pay him a visit at Balzac.
minary. And the duke not only conferred upon Barclay the first professorship, but also appointed him counsellor of state, and master of requests. In 1581, Barclay married Anne
, a learned and eminent Civilian,
was born in Aberdeenshire, in 1541, and descended from
one of the best families in Scotland. He was in favour
with Mary queen of Scots but, after that princess was
dethroned, and detained in captivity in England, finding
that he had no prospect of making his fortune in the court
of her son James, he resolved to retire into France, which.
he did about 1573. He was then more than thirty years
of age, and went to Bourges, in order to study law. He
there took his doctor’s degree in that faculty, and had
applied himself so closely to his books, that he was qualified
to fill a chair. Edmund Hay, the Jesuit, who was his
countryman, and is said to have been related to him, procured him accordingly a professorship in civil law in the
university of Pontamousson, by his interest with the duke
of Lorrain, who had lately founded that seminary. And
the duke not only conferred upon Barclay the first professorship, but also appointed him counsellor of state, and
master of requests. In 1581, Barclay married Anne de
Malleville, a young lady of Lorrain, by whom he had his
son John, who afterwards became a writer of considerable
note, and whom the Jesuits endeavoured to prevail on to
enter into their society. But Barclay opposing their
scheme, the Jesuits resented it so highly, and did him so
many ill offices with the duke, that he was obliged to leave
Lorrain. He then went to London, where king James I.
is said to have offered him a place in his council, with a
considerable pension but he declined these offers, because
it was made a necessary condition of his accepting them,
that he should embrace the protestant religion. In 1604,
he returned into France, and accepted the professorship
of the civil law, which was offered him by the university
of Angers. He taught there with reputation, and is said
to have been fond of making a splendid appearance in his
character of professor. But he did not hold this office
long, dying in 1606. He was buried in the church of the
Franciscans. He appears to have been much prejudiced
against the Protestants and was a zealous advocate for
passive obedience, and the divine right of kings, as appears from his writings, of which the following are “the
principal, 1.
” De Reguo et llegali Potestate ad versus
Buchananum, Brutum, Boucherium, et reliquos Monarchoniachos,“Paris, 1600, dedicated to Henry IV. 2.
” De
Potestate Papse, quatenus in Reges et Principes seculares
Jus et Imperium habeat,“Franco!'. 1609, 1613, 1621, Hannovias, 1612, in 8vo, and Lond. in English, 1611, in 4to,
Mussiponti, 1610, 8vo, and Parisiis, 1600, 4to. In this
he proves that the pope has no power, direct or indirect,
over sovereigns in temporals, and that they who allow him,
any such power, whatever they may intend, do very great
prejudice to the Roman catholic religion. 3.
” A commentary
upon the Title of the Pandects de Rebus creditis et de Jure] urando,“Paris, 1605, 8vo. 4.
” Prcemetia in vitam
Agricolse," Paris, 1599, 2 vols. 8vo. This last is said to
be an excellent commentary on Tacitus. There are two
letters from him to Lipsius in Burman’s Sylloges Epistolarum, and four from Lipsius to him.
, counsellor of state, marquis of Marolles upon the Seine, was ambassador
, counsellor of state, marquis of Marolles upon the Seine, was ambassador from France to Switzerland under the reign of Lewis XIV. He had been chief deputy of monsieur de Chavigni, secretary of state, and assisted at the conferences at Munster, as a minister of the second rank, when endeavours were made to procure him the title of excellency, which did not succeed. He had been already named for the embassy in Switzerland, and served France with great integrity and address, during the whole course of this embassy. He wrote in Latin the History of France from the death of Lewis XIII. to the year 1652. This work was printed in 1671, and well received by the public. The style is excellent; affairs are related without flattery, and with great skill in the intrigues of the cabinet. The author has latinised his name by that of Labardicus. He had made a French translation of this history, which in the opinion of good judges was much inferior to the original Latin. As he was very learned in points of divinity, he wrote a book of Controversy in Latin, against the opinion of protestants concerning the Eucharist, which was not published. It is thought he destroyed it himself. He died in 1692, ninety years of age.
ophy at Leipsic, and in 1756 professor of poetry, and librarian to the university, with the title of counsellor of state. He wrote “De vera origine et epocha Hunnorum,” 1757,
His son Charles Andrew, who died by his own hand,
in 1782, was in 1741 appointed professor extraordinary of
philosophy at Leipsic, and in 1756 professor of poetry, and
librarian to the university, with the title of counsellor of
state. He wrote “De vera origine et epocha Hunnorum,
” Acta eruditorum
” from
, first chaplain to queen Catherine de Medicis, secretary of the cabinet and reader to Henry III. counsellor of state, abbot of Aulnai, and lastly bishop of Seez, was born
, first chaplain to queen Catherine
de Medicis, secretary of the cabinet and reader to Henry
III. counsellor of state, abbot of Aulnai, and lastly bishop
of Seez, was born at Caen in the year 1522, and died the
8th of June 1611, aged fifty-nine. He was the contemporary and friend of Ronsard and Desportes, and was
thought superior to either. Some of his stanzas are written with ease and elegance and have not been excelled
by the best poets of our own times. He has left poems
sacred and profane, canticles, sengs, sonnets, and psalms.
They.re interspersed with several happy thoughts, but
turned in points, a taste which he caught from Seneca.
He seems to have conducted himself with great propriety
after his being advanced to the prelacy, and the bishop
blushed at the gaiety of the courtier, but he had too
much fondness for his early productions to consign them
to oblivion, and he published them with his pious pieces,
“the bane and antidote.
” He left also a translation of
some books of St. Ambrose, several controversial tracts,
imperfect sermons for the principal festivals of the church,
and a funeral discourse on Henry IV. to whose conversion
he had greatly contributed. He was uncle to madame de
Motteville, first woman of the bedchamber to Anne of
Austria, and who published the memoirs of that princess.
His “Oeuvres poetiques
” were printed at Paris,
ouncil; which office he discharged with such reputation, that the king nominated him some time after counsellor of state, and at last advocate general in the parliament. In
Upon his return from his travels, he applied himself to
the practice of the bar with great success. His father procured for him the post of advocate general in the grand
council; which office he discharged with such reputation,
that the king nominated him some time after counsellor of
state, and at last advocate general in the parliament. In
1641 he resolved to confine himself entirely to his business
in the council of state, and therefore resigned his place of
advocate-general to Mr. Briquet his son -in- law,. The year
following he was appointed the king’s librarian. His sonin-law dying in 1645, he was obliged to resume his post
of advocate- general, in order to preserve it for his son.
He had also a considerable share in the ordinance of the
year 1639; and he discharged with great integrity various commissions with which he was intrusted at different
times. Queen Anne of Austria, during her regency, sent
for him to council upon the most important occasions. He
adjusted the differences between Mr. d‘Avaux and Mr.
Servien, plenipotentiaries at Minister and he had a share,
with M. de Brienne and d’ Emery, in making the treaty of
alliance with the states of Holland in 1649. He was appointed, in 1651, to regulate the great affair of the succession of Mantua; and in 1654, to conclude the treaty
with the Hans Towns. Mr. Bignon died, aged 66, on the
7th of April, 1656, of an asthma, with which he waa
seized the autumn before. In 1757, the abbé Perau published Bignon’s life, two parts, 12mo. His grandson,
John Paul Bignon, was librarian to the king, a man of great
erudition, and a writer of great powers of invention, if he
could compose, as we are told he did, four panegyrics on
St. Louis, all different, two of which were pronounced the
same day, one at the French academy, and the other at
the academy of inscriptions. He wrote also “Vie de
Francois Levesque,
” Les Aventures
d‘Abdalla, fils d’Hanif.
”
ment of several negociations with foreign princes. He arrived at the dignity of marshal de camp, and counsellor of state, and had the honour to be appointed mathematical preceptor
, a celebrated French mathematician and military engineer, was born at Ribemond in Picardy, in 1617. While he was yet but young, he was
chosen regius professor of mathematics and architecture
at Paris. Not long after, he was appointed governor to
Lewis-Henry de Lomenix, count de Brienne, whom he
accompanied in his travels from 1652 to 1655, of which
he published an account. He enjoyed many honourable
employments, both in the navy and army; and was entrusted with the management of several negociations with
foreign princes. He arrived at the dignity of marshal de
camp, and counsellor of state, and had the honour to be
appointed mathematical preceptor to the Dauphin. He
was a member of the royal academy of sciences, director
of the academy of architecture, and lecturer to the royal
college in all which he supported his character with dignity and applause. Blondel was no less versed in the
knowledge of the belles lettres than in the mathematical
sciences, as appears by the comparison he published between Pindar and Horace, 1675, 12mo, and afterwards
reprinted in Rapin’s miscellaneous works. He died at
Paris, the 22d of February, 1686, in the sixty-ninth year
of his age. His chief mathematical works were 1. “Cours
d' Architecture,
” Paris, Resolution des
quatre principaux problemes d' Architecture,
” Paris, Histoire du Calendrier Romain,
” Paris, Cours de Mathematiques,
” Paris, L'Art de jetter des Bombes,
” La Haye, New method of fortifying places,
” and other
works. Blondel had also many ingenious pieces inserted
in the memoirs of the French academy of sciences, particularly in the year 1666.
f Narbonne, intendant of Guienne and Languedoc, solicitor general to the parliament of Normandy, and counsellor of state in ordinary. For his services in this last office he
, bishop of Lodeve, and afterwards of Montpellier, was one of the most learned French
prelates in the seventeenth century. He was born at Narbonne, May 28, 1605, and studied atThoulouse. He was
afterwards appointed judge royal of Narbonne, intendant
of Guienne and Languedoc, solicitor general to the parliament of Normandy, and counsellor of state in ordinary.
For his services in this last office he was promoted to the
bishopric of Lodeve, Jan. 1650. When the affair of the
five propositions was agitated at Rome, Bosquet was appointed deputy on the part of the king and clergy of
France, and while there, the cardinal Este appointed him
bishop of Montpellier. He was exemplary for piety, disinterestedness, and charity, and, like the best of his brethren at that time, practised rigorous austerities. He assisted at the general assembly of the clergy held at Paris
in 1670, and was distinguished for his learning and eloquence. An apoplexy carried him off July 24, 1676, and
he was interred in the cathedral, with an epitaph celebrating his many virtues. The first work he published
was “Pselli Synopsis Legum,
” Ecclesiye Gallicanae Historiarum
liber primus,
” Pontificum Romanorum
qui e Gallia oriundi in ea seclerunt, historia, ab anno 1315
ad ann. 1394 ex Mss. edita,
” Paris, 1632, The second
edition of his history of the Gallican Church, the one
above mentioned "in 1636, was much enlarged, but some
passages were omitted that had appeared in the first octavo
edition, which archbishop Usher has transcribed. By
these it appears that Bosquet was of opinion that the
mistaken zeal of the monks was the chief cause of those
fabulous traditions which have destroyed all confidence in
the early history of the Gallican church, and while he
makes some apology for the credulous believers of those
stories, he makes none for those who originally invented
them, a concession of great liberality from a prelate of the
Romish church.
t almoner to the dauphiness, and the year after gave him the bishopric of Meaux. In 1697 he was made counsellor of state, and the year following first almoner to the duchess
, bishop of Meaux, an eminent French
writer and preacher, was born at Dijon, 27th of September 1627. He received the first rudiments of his education
there, and in 1642 was sent to Paris to finish his studies at
the college of Navarre. In 1652 he took his degrees in
divinity, and soon after went to Metz, where he was made
a canon. Whilst he resided here, he applied himself
chiefly to the study of the scriptures, and the reading of
the fathers, especially St. Augustine. In a little time he
became a celebrated preacher, and was invited to Paris,
where he had for his hearers many of the most learned men
of his time, and several persons of the first rank at court.
In 1669 he was created bishop of Condom, and the same
month was appointed preceptor to the dauphin; upon
which occasion, and the applause he gained in the discharge of so delicate an office, pope Innocent XI. congratulated him in a very polite letter. When he had almost finished the education of this prince, he addressed
to him his “Discours surl'Histoire Universelle,
” which was
published in
he vanity of a Frenchwoman, married M. de Flecelles, count de Bregy, lieutenant-general in the army, counsellor of state, envoy extraordinary in Poland, and afterwards embassador
This lady, whose article we have retained from the former edition, principally on account of her character, a tolerable specimen of the vanity of a Frenchwoman, married M. de Flecelles, count de Bregy, lieutenant-general in the army, counsellor of state, envoy extraordinary in Poland, and afterwards embassador in Sweden.
lf so powerfully to Henry III. of France, that this prince first made him his advocate general, then counsellor of state, and in 1580, honoured him with the dignity of president
, president of the parliament of
Paris, and an eminent lawyer, was born at Fontenay in
Poictou, about the middle of the sixteenth century. He
appeared at first with great eclat at the bar of the parliament; and, by his knowledge and skill in the law, recommended himself so powerfully to Henry III. of France,
that this prince first made him his advocate general, then
counsellor of state, and in 1580, honoured him with the
dignity of president of the parliament. Scsevola Sammarthanus relates, that Henry III. declared in his hearing,
that there was not a prince in Christendom, who could
boast of so learned a man as Barnaby Brisson. The king
employed him in several negociations, and sent him ambassador into England. At his return, he employed him to
make a collection of his own ordinances, and of those of
his predecessors; which he performed with wonderful expedition. He wrote some works in law: “De verbormxi,
qua) ad jus pertinent, significatione.
” “De formulis et
solemnibus populi Romani verbis,
” Paris, De
regip Persarum principatu,
” &c. 1580, 1590, 1599, 8voj
1606, 4to; but the best edition is that of Strasburgh, 1710,
8vo, with Sylburgius’ notes. H gave an expectation of
more considerable performances; but his life was shortened
by a very unfortunate accident. Living at Paris when
that rebellious city was besieged by Henry IV. he remonstrated against the treasonable practices of the leaguers,
who, under pretence of the holy union, contemned the
royal authority, which was much more sacred. These religious traitors, being dissatisfied with his loyalty, fell violently upon him, dragged him to prison, and cruelly
strangled him the 15th of Nov. 1591.
, seigneur du Fresne, counsellor of state, was born 1551 at Paris, and carefully educated by
, seigneur du Fresne, counsellor of state, was born 1551 at Paris, and carefully educated
by his father James de la Canaye, an eminent advocate.
At the age of fifteen, having declared himself a Calvinist,
he went into Italy, Germany, and to Constanstinople; and
published an account of his travels to that city, under the
title of “Ephemerides.
” He shone afterwards at the bar,
and was counsellor of state under Henry III. Henry IV.
sent him ambassador into England, Germany, and to Venice. He assisted at the famous conference of Fontainebleau, 1600, between cardinal du Perron and DuplessisMornay, and afterwards turned catholic. The year following he was sent ambassador to Venice, where he contributed greatly to the termination of the disputes between
that republic and pope Paul V. He died at his return to
Paris, February 27, 1610. Three vols. fol. of his embassies
were published in 1635, with his life prefixed to the first.
, a German poet and statesman, and privy counsellor of state, was of an ancient and illustrious family in Brandenburg,
, a German poet and statesman, and privy counsellor of state, was of an ancient and illustrious family in Brandenburg, and born at Berlin in 1654, five months after his father’s death. After his early studies, he travelled to France, Italy, Holland, and England; and upon his return to his country, was charged with important negociations by Frederic II. and Frederic III. Canitz united the statesman with the poet; and was conversant in many languages, dead as well as living. His German poems were published for the tenth time, 1750, in 8vo. He is said to haVe taken Horace for his model, "and to have written purely and delicately; and the French biographers complimented him with the title of the Pope of Germany. He not only cultivated the fine arts himself, but gave all the encouragement he could to them in others. He died at Berlin in 1699, highly praised for the excellence of his private character.
ke, Catherine rewarded his services by creating him a baron of the Russian empire, and appointed him counsellor of state and physician to her imperial majesty, with a pension
In 1764, when the throne of Poland had become vacant by the death of Augustus III. in the October of the preceding year, Catherine displayed her political talents and influence in the advancement of her early favourite count Poiu'atowsky to that dignity. At this time she made a tour through Esthonia, Livonia, and Courland; but during her absence on this expedition, an insurrection broke out in the prison of the dethroned Ivan, which threatened the stability of her own throne. But this was soon quelled by the murder of that unhappy prince. What share the empress had in this affair is not very clear, but the event was certainly in her favour, and she now proceeded in her improvements, and in the establishment of useful institutions, endeavouring to soften the manners of her subjects by instruction. She also seemed determined to be at once both conqueror and legislatrix, and it is certain that the laws of the Russian empire were much simplified under her reign, and the administration of justice rendered milder and more impartial. Her purpose was to form a solid, and not an arbitrary legislation. Her whole plan was directed to prevent all those who governed under her from exercising a capricious and cruel authority, by subjecting them to invariable laws, which no authority should be able to infringe, but in this, when they were at a distance, she was not always successful. She also continued to cultivate and encourage the arts and sciences; to make her empire an asylum to the learned and ingenious and the transit of Vqihis, which happened in 1769, afforded an opportunity of exhibiting as well the munificence of Catherine as the attention she paid to astronomy. About the middle of the year 1767, the empress conceived the useful project of sending several learned men to travel into the interior of her immense territories, for the purpose of determining the geographical position of the principal places, of marking their temperature, and of examining into the nature of their soil, their productions, their wealth, as well as the manners and characters of the several people by whom they are inhabited. The selection of the learned travellers destined for this expedition, the helps that were granted them, and the excellent instructions that were given them, will be a lasting honour to the academy of sciences, by which they were appointed. About this time, viz. in 1768, the court of Catherine became the asylum of the sciences, to which she invited learned men from every part of Europe. She encouraged artists and scholars of all denominations; she granted new privileges to the academy of sciences, and exhorted the members to add the names of several celebrated foreigners to those which already conferred a lustre on their society. Nor was she less attentive to the academy of arts, by increasing the number of its pupils, and adding such regulations as tended more than ever to the attainment of the end for which it was endowed. For the further encouragement of the fine arts in her dominions, the empress assigned an annual sum of 5000 rubles for the translation of foreign works into the Russian language. The improvement of the state of physic was another important object of her concern; and in order to give the highest possible sanction to the salutary practice of inoculating for the small pox, she herself submitted to the operation under the care of an English practitioner, and she persuaded the grand duke to follow her example. In 1768, Dr. T Dimsdale, of Hertford, was invited to Russia for the purpose of introducing inoculation:. upon the recovery of trie grand duke, Catherine rewarded his services by creating him a baron of the Russian empire, and appointed him counsellor of state and physician to her imperial majesty, with a pension of 500l. a year, to be paid him in England; besides 10,000l. sterling, which he immediately received; and she also presented him with a miniatnre picture of herself, and another of the grand duke, as a memorial of his services. Her majesty likewise expressed her approbation of the conduct of his son, by conferring on him the same title, and ordering him to be presented with a superb gold snuff-box, richly set with diamonds. On December 3, 1768, a thanksgiving service was performed in the chapel of the palace on account of her majesty’s recovery and that of the grand duke from the small-pox: and the senate decreed, that this event should be solemnized by an anniversary festival, which has been regularly observed ever since.
attachment to his sovereign gained him the particular esteem of Henry IV. who in 1603 appointed him counsellor of state and privy counsellor. The year after, he resigned his
, in Latin Calventius, president of the Inquests of the parliament of Toulouse, was
born in May 1523. He was brought to Paris in 1539 by
Mr. Lizet his uncle, at that time advocate-general in the
parliament of Paris, who kept him six years to his studies
under Orontius Fineus, Tusan, Buchanan, and some other
learned persons. He went to Toulouse in 1546, to learn
the civil law, and lodged in the same house with Turnebus, Mercerus, and Govea. He travelled into Italy in
1550, in order to pursue his studies, and was Alciat’s disciple at Pavia, and Socinus’s at Bologna. Being returned
to France, he went to Toulouse, and there completed his
course of law-studies, and was associated with Roaldes and
Bodinus, reading law lectures together in the public schools
with reputation. Having taken his doctor’s degree in that
university, he resolved to go to Paris, in order to make his
fortune; but though this resolution of his was strengthened
by some letters he received from Mr. Lizet, yet he chose
rather to settle in Toulouse, where he married, in 1552,
Jane de Bernuy, daughter of the lord de Palficat, baron of
Villeneufve. He was admitted counsellor in the parliament
of that city in 1553, afterwards created judge of French
poesy, and maintainer of the floral sports. He was appointed president of the inquests by the parliament in
1573. Being of a peaceable temper, he retired to his house
in Auvergne, during the first and last furies of the civil
wars, in order that he might not be an eye-witness of the
confusions which he saw would break out in Toulouse. It
was in this retirement he studied and translated Seneca, to
administer some consolation to himself during the wild
havock that was then making, and to employ his leisure to
advantage. His attachment to his sovereign gained him
the particular esteem of Henry IV. who in 1603 appointed
him counsellor of state and privy counsellor. The year
after, he resigned his dignity of president to Francis
Chalvet sieur de Fenouiliet, one of his sons, and retired
from business to spend the remainder of his days in peace
and among his books. He spent two years in this -retirement, with so much satisfaction to himself, that he used
frequently to declare to his relations, that he could not say
he had lived during the previous years of his life. He died
at Toulouse the 20th of June, 1607, being seventy-nine
years of age. Several authors have honoured him with
eulogiums.
His “Translation of Seneca,
” was published at Paris,
De claris interpretibus,
” thinks that his translation of
Seneca is too diffuse.
, was born at Fontenay in Normandy, in 1639. His father, counsellor of state at Rouen, placed him in the college de Navarre at Paris,
, was born at Fontenay in Normandy, in 1639. His father, counsellor of state at Rouen, placed him in the college de Navarre at Paris, where he acquired a profound knowledge of the ancient authors, and contracted an intimacy with the duke de Rochefoucault and the abbé Marsillac, whose patronage he acquired by his lively conversation and his various talents; and while he was countenanced by them, he formed an acquaintance that had a great influence on his poetical efforts. The duchess of Bouillon, a niece of cardinal Mazarin, was about to lay out a large garden, and for that purpose thought it necessary to obtain a piece of ground belonging to the estate of the family of Chaulieu. The poet, with much address, brought the treaty to effect agreeably to the desires of the duchess, and thus acquired the favour of a lady, who afterwards became the inspirer of his sonnets. Her house was a temple of the muses; she encouraged, rewarded, and inspired all such as shewed marks of poetic genius; and evinced a particular regard for Chaulieu. Through her he became known to the duke de Vendome, a great friend of the muses, who, as grand prior of France, presented him with a priorate on the isle of Oleron, with an annual revenue of 28,000 livres. To this were afterwards added the abbacies of Pouliers, Renes, Aumale, and St. Stephen, the profits of which enabled him to pass his life in ease and affluence. The first thing by which Chaulieu became known as a poet was a rondeau on Benserade’s translation of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. He soon found opportunities for appearing frequently before the public; and his acquaintance with Chapelle determined him entirely for jovial poetry. Chaulieu was no poet by profession he sung with the flask in his hand, and we are told that in the circle of genial friends he acquired those delicate sentiments which render his poetry at once so natural and so charming. The muses were the best comforts of his age, as they had frequently been in his younger
in Holland, and afterwards in Sweden, where his merit raised him from the rank of captain to that of counsellor of state, and historiographer of Sweden. Queen Christina also
, grandson of the
preceding Chemnitz, the reformer, was bora at Stettin
May 9, 1605, and after completing his education, served
in the army, first in Holland, and afterwards in Sweden,
where his merit raised him from the rank of captain to that
of counsellor of state, and historiographer of Sweden.
Queen Christina also granted him letters of nobility, with
the estate of Holstaedt in that country, where he died in
1678. He wrote, in six books, an account of the war
carried on by the Swedes in Germany, which was published
in 2 vols. folio, the first at Stettin in 1648, and the second
at Holme in 1653; the whole in the German language:
the second volume is most highly esteemed, owing to the
assistance the author received from count Oxenstiern.
The abbe Lenglet mentions a Latin edition, at least of the
first volume, entitled “Beilum Germanicum ab ejus ortu
anno 1612, ad mortem Gustavi Adolphi anno 1632.
”
Chemnitz is also said to be the author of “De ratione Status Imperii Romano- Germanici,
” which was published at
Stettin in Des Interets des princes d'Allemagne,
”
Friestad, Les vrais interets de
l'Allemagne,
” Hague, with notes and applications to the
then state of German politics.
, counsellor of state, and first physician to the French king, was born at
, counsellor of state, and
first physician to the French king, was born at Montpellier
in 1672. Having obtained his doctor’s degree, though no
more than twenty years old, he was sent to stop the progress of the plague then raging at Marseilles, by the duke
of Orleans, regent of the kingdom. The boldness and
confidence with which he entered that city, where every
one seemed only waiting for death, had a striking effect on
their fears. He encouraged the inhabitants, and quieted
their alarms by his presence; and his success was beyond
expectation. His services were rewarded by marks of
honour and a pension from the king. In 1731 he was
called to court to be physician to the royal children, by
the interest of Chirac, whose daughter he had married;
and after whose death he was made first physician to the
king, counsellor of state, and superintendent of the mineral waters of the kingdom. He died at Versailles in 1752,
aged near 80. The most curious of his works is that
wherein he maintains that the plague is not contagious,
entitled “Observations et reflexions touchant la nature,
les evenements, et le traitement de la Peste de Marseilles,
”
Paris, Traitedes causes, &c. de la Peste,
” Paris,
by Dr. Freind, except the continuation to the sixteenth century. In 1704 he succeeded his father as counsellor of state in the republic of Geneva, after which he practised
, the son of Stephen Le Clerc, a
physician and Greek professor at Geneva, was born Feb. 4,
1652, at that place, and educated in his father’s profession.
After studying at Montpellier and Paris, he took his doctor’s degree at Valentia in 1672, then returned to his own
country, and practised physic with great success. He was
also an excellent Greek and Latin scholar and antiquary,
and distinguished for his knowledge of medals. He published a “Bibliotheque Anatomique
” in conjunction with
Manget, in History of Medicine,
” which extends to the time of
Galen, was published at Geneva in 1696, but the best edition is that of Amsterdam, 1723, 4to. This work is much
praised by Dr. Freind, except the continuation to the sixteenth century. In 1704 he succeeded his father as counsellor of state in the republic of Geneva, after which he
practised very little. In 1715, the king of Sardinia, then
king of Sicily, being at Thonon in Savoy, consulted him
on his own health and that of his queen. The same year
he published his “Historia latorum lumbricorum,
” which
was afterwards published in English, 8vo. He died June
8, 1728.
was her liberal conduct towards Dr. Dimsdale less praiseworthy. He was immediately appointed actual counsellor of state and physician to her imperial majesty, with an annuity
Having fully satisfied himself about the new method of
treating persons under inoculation for the small-pox, he
published his treatise on the subject in 1766, which was
soon circulated over the continent, and translated into all
languages. His particular opinion may be learned from
the conclusion, in which he says that, “although the whole
process may have some share in the success, it consists
chiefly in the method of inoculating with recent fluid matter, and the management of the patients at the time of
eruption.
” This proof of his professional knowledge occasioned his being invited to inoculate the empress Catherine of Russia, and her son, in 1768, of which he gives a
very particular and interesting account in his “Tracts on
Inoculation,
” printed in Thoughts on general and partial Inoculation,
” 8vo;
and two years after, “Observations on the Introduction to
the plan of the Dispensary for general Inoculation,
” 8vo.
This involved him in a controversy with Dr. Lettsom, in
which he opposed the above plan for inoculating the poor
at their own houses; and opened an inoculation-house,
under his own direction, for persons of all ranks in the
neighbourhood of Hertford, which was resorted to with
success. His controversy with Dr. Lettsom was carried on
in the following pamphlets “Dr. Lettsom’s letter on General Inoculation
” “Remarks on Ditto,
” 8vo; “Review
of Dr. Lettsom’s observations on the Baron’s Remarks
”
“Letter to Dr. Lettsom on his Remarks, &c.
” “Answer to
Baron Dimsdale’s Review,
” and “Considerations on the
plan, &c.
” In Tracts on Inoculation,
” already mentioned, which were liberally distributed,
but not sold.
f Penicha, and of Tangiers, counsellor of war, gentleman of the chamber to the infant don Pedro, and counsellor of state. In the midst of these several employments he found
, a
Portuguese writer, was born at Lisbon in 1614. After
having early acquired a taste for literature, he went and
studied the military art in Italy, and on his return to his
native country was successively governor of Penicha, and
of Tangiers, counsellor of war, gentleman of the chamber
to the infant don Pedro, and counsellor of state. In the
midst of these several employments he found time, for study
and composition. On the subject of his numerous publications, the reader may consult the “Journal Etranger
”
of The History of
Tangiers,
” The History of Portugal, from
1640 to 1657,
” in 2 vols. folio. 3. “The Life of John I.
king of Portugal.
”
him into the circles of fashion the second obtained for him a pension of 2000 livres and a brevet of counsellor of state; the third heaped his favours upon him, and consulted
, a French moral writer, was boni at
Beziers in loll, and entered in 1629 into the oratory,
which he quitted five years afterwards to mix again in society; in which, indeed, he -possessed all the qualities
adapted to please sense, wit, and the advantages of a
good figure. The duke de la Rochefoucault, the chancellor
Se'guier, and the prince de Conti, gave him unequivocal
testimonies of their esteem and friendship. The first introduced him into the circles of fashion the second obtained for him a pension of 2000 livres and a brevet of
counsellor of state; the third heaped his favours upon him,
and consulted him upon all occasions. Esprit died in 1678,
at the age of sixty-seven. He was a member of the French
academy, and one of those who shone in the infancy of
that society. His works are: 1. “Paraphrases on some of
the Psalms,
” which cannot be read with much pleasure
since the appearance of those of Masillon. 2. “The fallacy of Human Virtues,
” Paris, Art of knowing mankind.
”
ed “The most high prince and lord Eugene, prince of Savoy and Piedmont, knight of the golden fleece, counsellor of state to his sacred imperial majesty, president of the council
In 1713, though forced to act only defensively on the
Rhine against the French, who now threatened to overrun
the empire, he nevertheless so signalized himself by his
vigilance and conduct, that he obliged them to spend one
whole summer in taking Landau and Friburg. March 6,
1714, he concluded with marshal Villars, at Rastadt, preliminary articles of a general peace between the empire
and France; which were signed by him, as his imperial
majesty’s plenipotentiary, Sept. the 27th following, in a
solemn treaty of peace, at Baden in Ergau: in which
treaty he is entitled “The most high prince and lord
Eugene, prince of Savoy and Piedmont, knight of the
golden fleece, counsellor of state to his sacred imperial
majesty, president of the council of war, lieutenant-general
and marshal of the holy Roman empire.
” Upon his return
to Vienna, he was received with the loudest acclamations
of joy by the people, and with the most cordial affection by
the emperor, who presented him with a fine sword richly
adorned with diamonds. He now seemed to have some
respite from the fatigues of war but neither was this to
last long: for, though peace was concluded with France,
yet war broke out on the side of the Turks, who in 1716
began to make extraordinary preparations. Eugene was
sent with the command of the imperial army into Hungary,
attacked the Turks in their camp, and obtained a complete
victory over them. He took the important fortress of
Temeswaer, after the Turks bad been in possession of it
164 years; and next invested Belgrade, which he also took.
ons Anthony, the eldest, bishop of Lombez, then of Vannes, died February.16, 1742 the second, Lewis, counsellor of state in ordinary, and to the royal council, and intendant
, an eminent French physician in the reign of Louis XIV. was born at Paris, May
11, 1638. He was the son of Henry Fagon, commissioner
in ordinary of war, and of Louisa de la Brosse, niece of
Guy de la Brosse, physician in ordinary to Louis XIII.
and grandson of a physician in ordinary to Henry IV. He
studied first in the Sorbonne, under M. Gillot, an eminent
doctor, with whom he resided as student, and who persuaded him to chuse the medical profession. M. Fagon
never forgot M. Gillot in his highest prosperity; but, if he
met him in the street, alighted from his coach, and conducted him to the house where he was going. This young
physician had scarcely begun to dispute, when he ventured
to maintain, in a thesis, the circulation of the blood, which
was at that time held as a paradox among the old doctors;
and also another on the use of tobacco, published long
afterwards; “An frequens Nicotian ye usus vitam
abbreviet,
” Paris, 1699, 4to. He took his doctor’s degree 1664,
M. Vallot wishing to repair and replenish the royal garden,
M. Fagon offered his services; and going, at his own
expence, to Auvergne, Languedoc, Provence, the Alps,
and the Pyrenees, returned with an ample collection of
curious and useful plants. He had the principal share in
the catalogue of the plants in that garden, puhlished 1665,
entitled “Hortus Regius,
” to which he prefixed a little
Latin poem of his own. M. Fagon was made professor of
botany and chemistry at the royal garden, and began to
have the plants engraved; but there are only forty -five
plates finished, which are very scarce. The king appointed
bim first physician to the dauphiness in 1680, and to the
queen some months after. In 1693 he was made first physician to the king, and superintendant of the royal garden
in 1698, to which he retired after the king’s death, and,
for the improvement of which, he persuaded Louis XIV.
to send M. de Tournfort into Greece, Asia, and Egypt,
which produced the scientific voyage so well known to the
learned world. Fagon died March 11, 1718, aged near
eighty. The academy of sciences had chosen him an
honorary member in 1699. He left “Les Qualités du
Quinquina,
” Paris,
parliament of Paris, where he revived the influence of reason and eloquence. In 1570, he was, made a counsellor of state, and two years afterwards, probably constrained by
, lord of Pibrac, by which name he is
much better known, was born at Toulouse in 1528, and
distinguished himself at the bar in that city. He perfected
his knowledge of jurisprudence in Italy, and then returned
to be advanced to honours in his own country. In 1560 he
was deputed by his native city to the states-general held
at Orleans, and there presented to the king its petition of
grievances, which he had himself drawn up. By Charles
IX. he was sent as one of his ambassadors to the council of
Trent, where he eloquently supported the interests of the
crown, and the liberties of the Gallican church. In 1565
the chancellor de PHopital, appointed him advocate-general in the parliament of Paris, where he revived the influence of reason and eloquence. In 1570, he was, made
a counsellor of state, and two years afterwards, probably
constrained by his superiors, wrote his defence of the massacre of St. Bartholomew, published in 4to, and entitled
“Ornatissimi cujusdam viri, de rebus Gallicis, epistola, et
ad hanc de iisdem rebus responsio
” but this barbarous
measure was too repugnant to the mildness of Pibrac’s character to be approved by him. For this, after the accession of Henry III. he made the best amends in his power,
by proposing and bringing to a conclusion, a treaty of
peace between the court and the protestants. While that
prince was duke of Anjou, and was elected king of Poland, he attended him as minister in that country; but
when the succession to the crown of France, on the death
of his brother, tempted Henry to quit that kingdom
clandestinely, Pibrac was in danger of falling a sacrifice to
the resentment of the people. He afterwards tried in vain
to preserve that crown to his master. His services were
rewarded by being created one of the chief presidents of
the courts of law. He died in 1584, at the age of fifty-six.
The story of his falling in love with Margaret wife of
Henry IV. is supposed to be chiefly owing to the vanity of
that lady, who wished to have the credit of such a conquest. Pibrac published, besides his letter on the massacre, which was in Latin, pleadings and speeches, “Les
plaisirs de la vie rustique,
” Paris, Quatrains,
” or moral
stanzas of four lines, which were first published in 1574.
The last edition we know of, is that of 1746. They have
been extravagantly admired, and translated into almost all
languages, even Greek, Turkish, Arabic, and Persian.
They were rendered into English by Sylvester, the translator of du Bartas, in a manner not likely to give an advantageous notion of the original, which, though now antiquated, stiil preserves graces that recommend it to readers
of taste. Pibrac was a classical scholar; and to the taste
he drew from that source, his “Quatrains
” owe much of
their excellence. The subjects of some of them he took
from the book of Proverbs, which he used to say contained
all the good sense in the world.
was the principal instrument in the conversion of M. de Chanteau, cou sin-german of M. de Caumartin, counsellor of state. The very instructive History he gave of this conversion
, was a priest and canon of St.
Cloud near Paris, whose preaching, those of his communion
say, was zealous, and his doctrine sound. He had acquired a kind of licence to speak with the utmost freedom
to persons of the first rank at court, and reprove their irregularities from whence this verse of the 119th Psalm was
applied to him “I will speak of thy testimonies also, even
before kings, and will not be ashamed.
” Feuillet converted
many sinners, which Boiieau alludes to when he says,
“Laissez a Feuillet reformer Punivers;
” and was the principal instrument in the conversion of M. de Chanteau, cou
sin-german of M. de Caumartin, counsellor of state. The
very instructive History he gave of this conversion was
printed, with some of his other works, 1702, 12mo, and
has been several times reprinted. Feuillet died at Paris,
September 7, 1693, aged seventy-one. He left some
“Letters,
” and a “Funeral Oration
” on Henrietta of England, duchess of Orleans.
2mo. Isaac de Pas, marquis de Keuqu.eres, his son, was also lieutenant-general of the king’s armies, counsellor of state in ordinary, governor of Verdun, and lieutenant-general
, one
of the bravest French officers in the seventeenth century,
was the son of Francis de Pas, head chamberlain to Henry
IV. descended from the ancient house of Pas in Artois, and
of Magdeleine de la Fayette, and was born June I, 1590,
at Saumur. He rose by his merit and birth to the highest
military offices, commanded the king’s forces twice as
chief, conducted the famous siege of Rochelle, where he
was taken prisoner, and contributed greatly to the surrender of that important place, through the intrigues of Mad.
de Noailles, his wife’s mother. Being afterwards sent
into Germany as ambassador extraordinary, he did great
service to the state, was made lieutenant-general of Metz,
Toul, and Verdun at his return, and died at Thionville,
March 14, 1640, of the wounds he had received the precceding year at the siege of that city, during which he was
made prisoner. His “Negociations
” were printed in Germany,
, marquis of Belle-Isle, wag born in 1615. His father was a counsellor of state; his mother, Mary de Meaupeou, was almost canonized
, marquis of Belle-Isle, wag
born in 1615. His father was a counsellor of state; his
mother, Mary de Meaupeou, was almost canonized for her
charities, and lived to the age of 91 (1681). Nicolas
Foucquet was early distinguished for talents, and early
advanced. At the age of twenty he was master of requests,
at thirty-five procurator-general of the parliament of Paris,
and at thirty-eight superintendant of the finances, at a
time when they were much in want of management, in
consequence of wars, and the peculation of Mazarin.
Foucquet, however, was not the proper person to restore
them; for he squandered the public money for his own
use with so little remorse, that he expended near 36 millions of livres (150,000l.) to build and adorn his house at
Vaux. This profusion raised suspicions of dangerous designs; and an attempt to rival his master, Louis XIV. in
the affections of madame de la Valliere, contributed to
irritate that monarch against him. His ruin was completed,
like that of Wolsey, by his magnificence and pride. The
king visited him at Vaux, and there saw a feast more
splendid than he was used to give himself, and a place,
more beautiful than St. Germain, or Fontainbleau. His
motto and device were also offensive: the latter was a,
squirrel pursued by a snake, (coleuvrc, the arms of Colbert), with these words, “Quo non ascendam
” “Whither shall I not rise
” From this moment his disgrace was
fixed. The entertainment was given late in August 1661,
and he was arrested at Nantes early in September. He
was tried after a time by commissaries appointed for the
purpose, and, in 1664, condemned to perpetual banishment; but the sentence was changed to perpetual imprisonment. He was confined in the citadel of Pignerol,
where he is supposed to have died in March 1680, at the
age of 65, a memorable example of the folly and danger
of extravagance and ambition. It has been pretended by
some authors, that he died in private, among his own
family, but in the utmost obscurity. His best quality was
that of liberality, during his elevation, to men of letters,
some of whom he pensioned, who did not forget him, such,
as Fontaine and Pelisson, which last has greatly extolled
his resignation after his disgrace.
nce whom the revolutionary tribunals had spared, when he died Dec. 16, 1809. At this period he was a counsellor of state for life, a count of the empire, a commander of the
In Sept 1793, he obtained the adoption of a project for the regulation of weights and measures, was chosen secretary in October, and in December following president of the Jacobins, who denounced him for his silence in the convention. This he answered by pleading his avocations and chemical labours, by which, he who had been born without any fortune, had been able to maintain his father and sisters. In Sept. 1794, he became a member of the committee of public safety, and was again elected to it in Feb. 1795. Besides proposing some improvements in the equipment of the armies, which were then contending with all the powers of Europe, he was particularly engaged in schools and establishments for education, to which new names, as polytechnic, normal, &c. were given, that they might consign to oblivion as much as possible the ancient instituti&ns of France. The re-election of two thirds of the convention removed him to the council of elders, on$. of the fantastical modes of government established in I?y5, where, in November, he had to refute several charges levelled against him respecting the murder of Lavoisier. He was afterwards nominated professor of chemistry, and a member ofthe institute; and in May 1797, Jeft the council. Dyring the time he could spare from his public employments, he continued to cultivate his more honourable studies, and had attained the highest rank among the men of science whom the revolutionary tribunals had spared, when he died Dec. 16, 1809. At this period he was a counsellor of state for life, a count of the empire, a commander of the legion of honour, directorgeneral of public instruction, a member of the national institute, professor of chemistry in the medical and polytechnic schools, and in the museum of natural history, and a member of most of the learned societies of Europe.
, was proctor- general of the domain of Navarre, counsellor of state, and deeply versed in the knowledge of the royal rights
, was proctor- general of the
domain of Navarre, counsellor of state, and deeply versed
in the knowledge of the royal rights in France, and in the
history qf that country. His works are replete with
curious and profound erudition. They are, 1. “Memoirs
for the History of France and Navarre,
” folio. 2. “Treatises on the Ensigns and Standards of France,
” &c. 3.
“Discourse addressed to the king on the origin and rise
of the City of Rochelle,
” 8vo. 4. “A Treatise against
the Franc -aileu, a claim of exemption from Imposts and
personal Services,
” in 4to. He is supposed to have died
about
, a celebrated Spanish poet, was born of a noble family at Toledo, in 1500 or 1503. His father was a counsellor of state to Ferdinand and Isabella, and employed by them on
, or Garcias Lasso de La Vega, a celebrated Spanish poet, was born of a noble family at Toledo,
in 1500 or 1503. His father was a counsellor of state to
Ferdinand and Isabella, and employed by them on several
important negociations, particularly in an embassy to pope
Alexander VI. Garcilasso was educated near the emperor
Charles V. who had a particular regard for him, and took him
with him in his military expeditions, where he became as renowned for his courage as for his poetry. He accompanied
that emperor into Germany, Africa, and Provence; and
it was in this last expedition, in 1536, that he commanded
a “battalion, when he received a wound, of which he died
at Nice, about three weeks after, aged only thirty -three.
The wound was made by a stone thrown by a countryman
from a turret, and falling upon his head. The Spanish
poetry was greatly obliged to Garcilasso, not only for extending its bounds, but also for introducing new beauties
into it. He had strong natural talents for poetry; and he
did not fail to improve them by culture, studying the best
poets ancient and modern. His poems are full of fire;
have a nobleness and majesty without affectation; and,
what is somewhat singular, there is in them a great deal of
ease, united with much subtilty. Paul Jovius has not
scrupled to say that his odes have all the sweetness of Horace. Though his imitations of the ancients may be traced
throughout almost all his works, yet, as they are conspicuous for good taste and harmonious versification, and were
written amidst many distracting occupations, there can be
no doubt that he would have gained great celebrity if he
had lived longer. The learned grammarian Sanctius has
written commentaries upon all his works, and has illustrated
him every where with very learned and curious notes.
They were all printed at Naples in 1661, with this title,
” Garcilasso de la Vega Obras Poeticas con annotationes
de Franc. Sanchez,“in 8vo. We must not confound this
poet with another person of the same name, a native or
”
Cusco, who wrote in Spanish the History of Florida, and
that of Peru and the Incas.
r to his real deserts, by haranguing in societies of beaux and ladies, was born in 1587. He became a counsellor of state, and died in 1667. His works are, 1. “Notes and Commentaries
, a French minor author, who
while he lived, contrived to establish a fame superior to
his real deserts, by haranguing in societies of beaux and
ladies, was born in 1587. He became a counsellor of
state, and died in 1667. His works are, 1. “Notes and
Commentaries on Psellus, and on Theodore Prodomus.
”
2. “Notes on the Treatise of an anonymous Rabbi, concerning the life and death of Moses,
” Remarks on the false Callisthenes.
” 4. “An edition of the
Romance of Ismenus and Ismenias, in Greek and Latin,
”
Poems, consisting of Epigrams, Odes,
Hymns, and a Tragedy.
” He had a competent knowledge of ancient and modern languages, and is allowed
to, have had some fire in his compositions, though such
as greatly wanted the regulation of judgment. Another
instance of his imprudence occurs in the case of his marriage. His curate having refused to marry him, he declared in his presence that he took that woman for his
wife, and he lived with her afterwards as such. This occasioned an inquiry to be made into the validity of similar
marriages, which were called marriages “A la Gaulmin,
”
and were disallowed by the law.
as born July 17, 1580, at Geneva, and went to Paris in 1602, where he turned Catholic, was appointed counsellor of state 1643, and died Octobers, 1643, at Munster, in which
, eldest son of the preceding,
was born July 17, 1580, at Geneva, and went to Paris in
1602, where he turned Catholic, was appointed counsellor
of state 1643, and died Octobers, 1643, at Munster, in
which city he then resided as counsellor and secretary to
the French embassy for the general peace. He left many
excellent works on law, history, the titles of the kingdom,
&c. the principal of which are, I. “Le Ceremonial de
France,
” 4to, a work much valued reprinted in 2 vols.
fol. by his son Denys Godefroi but this is unfinished
and the 4to edition must be referred to for the funeral ceremonies. 2. “Genealogie des Rois de Portugal issus
en Ligne directe masculine de la Maison de France qui
regne aujourd'huis,
” 4to. 3. “Mem. concernant la Preseance des Rois de France sur les Rois d'Espagne, 4to.
4.
” Entreveue de Charles IV. Empereur, et Charles V,
Roi de France; plus PEntreveue de Charles VII. Roi de
France, et de Ferdinand, Roi de Arragon.“&c. 4to. 5.
” Hist, de Charles VI. par Jean Juvenal des Ursins; de
Louis XII. par Seyssell, et par d'Auton, &c. de Cha.
VIII. par Saligny, et autres du Chevalier Bayard, avec
le Supplement, par Expilly,“1651, 8vo. 6.
” De Jean
le Meinore, dit Boucicaut, Marechal de France,“4to.
7.
” D'Artus III. Due de Bretagne,“4to. 8.
” De
Guillaume Marescot,“4to. 9.
” De la veritable Origine
de la Maison d'Autriche,“4to. 10.
” Genealogie des
Dues de Lorrain,“4to. 11.
” L‘Ordre et les Ceremonies
observers aux Manages de France et d’Espagne,“4to.
12.
” Genealogie des Comptes et Dues de Bar,“<Ko. 13.
” Traite touchant les Droits du Roi tres Chretien, sur
plusieurs Etats et Seigneuries, possedes par plusieurs
Princes Voisins," fol. under the name of Pierre Dupuy.
at Turin, became distinguished for his knowledge of the belles lettres, civil and canon law, and was counsellor of state at the court of Turin. He died in 1613, leaving “Consilia;”
, in Latin Goveanus, a learned
Portuguese, of the fourteenth century, was born at Beja,
and appointed principal of the college of St. Barbe at Paris,
where he educated three nephews, who became celebrated
for their learning. Martial Govea, the eldest, was a
good Latin poet, and published a “Latin Grammar
” at
Paris. Andrew, his next brother, a priest, born in 1498,
succeeded his uncle as principal of St. Barbe, and gained
so great a reputation there, that he was invited to accept
the same office in the college of Guienne, at Bourdeaux.
This invitation he accepted in 1534, and continued at
Bourdeaux till 1547, when John III. king of Portugal, recalled him to his dominions, to establish a college at Coimbra, similar to that of Guienne; and Govea took with him
into Portugal the celebrated Buchanan, Grouchi, Guerenti,
Fabricius, la Costa, and other men of learning, well qualified to instruct youth. He died June 1S48, at Coimbra,
leaving no printed work. Anthony Govea, the youngest
of these three brothers, and the most eminent of all, wrote
several pieces on philosophy and law, and is mentioned
with great encomiums by Thuanus, Ronsard, and all the
learned. He taught with reputation at Bourdeaux, afterwards at Cahors, and Valence in Dauphiny, and died in
1565, aged sixty, at Turin, to which place Philibert had
invited him. His principal works are, an “Apologetical
Discourse
” against Calvin, who had accused him of atheism
in his treatise on scandal; some works on law, fol.; “
Variarum lectionum Libri duo,
” fol. editions of Virgil and
Terence, with notes “Epigrammatum Libri duo,
” and
“Epistolee.
” The whole was printed at Rotterdam, Consilia;
” “Notes
on Julius Florus;
” some “Poetry,
” and a funeral oration
on the death of Philip II. king of Spain.
, historiographer, and librarian, to the king, whom he had taught when a youth. In 1745, he was made counsellor of state, and died March 19, 1748, leaving an elaborate work,
, a learned philologist, antiquary, and
historian of Copenhagen, was born at Aalburg in Jutland,
Oct. 28, 1685. His father, who was a clergyman, carefully
superintended his education until he was fit to go to the
university. He went accordingly in 1703 to Copenhagen,
where he very soon distinguished himself as a classical
scholar and critic. In 1705 he took his bachelor’s degree
with great credit, and in 1707 published the first specimen of his learned researches, entitled “Archytce Tarentini fragmentum ntp vw pafapalucw, cum disquisitione chronologica de aetate Archytse.
” This was followed by other
dissertations, which raised his fame so highly that he was
made professor of Greek at Copenhagen, and was also
appointed counsellor of justice, archivist, historiographer,
and librarian, to the king, whom he had taught when a
youth. In 1745, he was made counsellor of state, and
died March 19, 1748, leaving an elaborate work, “Corpus
diplomatum ad res Danicas facientium.
” This work, which
he undertook by order of Christian VI. is still in ms. and
probably consists of several folio volumes. Gramm laid
the first foundation of the academy at Copenhagen, and
contributed very frequently to the literary journals of his
time. He was a man of very extensive learning, but particularly skilled in Greek and Latin, and in history, and
of such ready memory that he was never consulted on
books or matters of literature without giving immediate
information. He corresponded with many of the literati of
Germany, England, Italy, and France, but was most admired by those who were witnesses of his amiable private
character, his love of literature, and his generous patronage
of young students.
that Grandier was the author of” La Cordonniere de Loudun," he wrote immediately to De Laubardemont, counsellor of state, and his creature, to make a diligent inquiry into
, curate and canon of Loudun in
France, famous for his intrigues and tragical end, was the
son of a notary royal of Sable, and born at Bouvere near
Sable, in the latter part of the fifteenth century, but we
know not in what year. He was a man of reading and
judgment, and a famous preacher; for which the rnonka of
Loudun soon hated him, especially after he had urged the
necessity of confessing sins to the parochial priests at Easter. He was a handsome man, of an agreeable conversation, neat in his dress, and cleanly in his person, which
made him suspected of loving the fair sex, and of being
beloved by them. In 1629, he was accused of having had
a criminal conversation with some women in the very
church of which he was curate on which the official condemned him to resign all his benefices, and to live in
penance. He brought an appeal, this sentence being an
encroachment upon the civil power; and, by a decree of
the parliament of Paris, he was referred to the presidial of
Poitiers, in which he was acquitted. Three years after>
some Ursuline nuns of Loudun were thought, by the vulgar, to he possessed with the devil; and Grandier’s enemies, the capuchins of Loudun, charged him with being
the author of the possession, that is, with witchcraft. They
thought, however, that in order to make the charge succeed
according to their wishes, it was very proper to strengthen
themselves with the authority of cardinal Richlieu. For
this purpose, they wrote to father Joseph, their fellowcapuchin, who had great credit with the cardinal, that
Grandier was the author of the piece entitled “La Cordonnierre de Loudun,
” or “The Woman Shoemaker of
Loudon,' r a severe satire upon the cardinal’s person and
family. This great minister, among many good qualities,
harboured the most bitter resentment against the authors
of libels against him; and father Joseph having persuaded
him that Grandier was the author of
” La Cordonniere de
Loudun," he wrote immediately to De Laubardemont,
counsellor of state, and his creature, to make a diligent inquiry into the affair of the nuns. De Laubardemont
accordingly arrested Grandier in Dec. 1633; and, after he
had thoroughly examined the affair, went to meet the cardinal, and to take proper measures with him. In July
1634, letters patent were drawn up and sealed, to try
Grandier; and were directed to De Laubardemont, and to
twelve judges chosen out of the courts in the neighbourhood of Loudun; all men of honour indeed, but very credulous, and on that account chosen by Grandier’s enemies.
In Aug. 18, upon the evidence of Astaroth, the chief of
possessing devils; of Easas, of Celsus, of Acaos, of Eudon,
&c. that is to say, upon the evidence of the nuns, who asserted that they were possessed with those devils, the commissaries passed judgment, by which Grandier was declared
well and duly attainted, and convicted of the crime of
magic, witchcraft, and possession, which by his means
happened on the bodies of some Ursuline nuns of Loudun,
and of some other lay persons, mentioned in his trial; for
which crimes he was sentenced to make the amende honor'
able, and to be burnt alive with the magical covenants and
characters which were in the register-office, as also with
the ms. written by him against the celibacy of priests;
and his ashes to be thrown up into the air. Grandier heard
this dreadful sentence without any emotion; and, when he
went to the place of execution, suffered his punishment
with great firmness and courage, April 18, 1634.
to gr;i:;t him his dismission, and signified that if he would continue in her service in quality of counsellor of state, and bring his family into Sweden, he should have no
Her majesty had, before his departure from France, asured him that she was extremely satisfied with his services; and she now gave him several audiences, and made him dine with her, and he appeared to be abundantly pleased with the honours he received but as he saw they were in no haste to do any thing for him, and only rewarded him with compliments, he grew uneasy, and asked leave to retire. He was confirmed in this resolution, by finding the court filled up with persons that had conceived a jealousy against him; besides, the air of Sweden did not agree with him. The queen several times refused to gr;i:;t him his dismission, and signified that if he would continue in her service in quality of counsellor of state, and bring his family into Sweden, he should have no reason to repent it: but he excused himself on account of his heahh, which could not bear the cold air of that kingdom. He asked a passport, which they Delaying to grant, he became so uneasy that he resolved to go without it. Leaving
e, was born in 1685, and rose to be a practitioner of eminence. He was first physician to the queen, counsellor of state, and greatly esteemed by the town as well as court.
, son of the above, was
born in 1685, and rose to be a practitioner of eminence.
He was first physician to the queen, counsellor of state,
and greatly esteemed by the town as well as court. He
was, like his father, inspector-general of the military hospitals. He was a member of the academy of sciences at
Paris, of the royal society in London, and of the academies
of Berlin, Florence, and Bologna. He cured Louis XV.
of a dangerous disorder, which attacked him at the age of
seven years, and obtained afterwards the entire confidence
of the queen also. Whenever he attended as a physician,
he was regarded as a friend, such was the goodness and
benevolence of his character. He was particularly attentive to the poor. He died July 17, 1755. He was the author
of, 1 “Idee Generale de J'economie animale, 1722,
” 8vo.
2. “Principia Physico-Medica, in tyronum Medicinae gratiam conscripta,
” 2 vols. 8vo. This latter work, though
drawn up for pupils, may yet be serviceable to masters.
He also published some papers in the Memoirs of the academy of sciences for 1718, 1719, and 1721.
in 1739; professor in the Caroline college at Cassel, with the rank of court-physician, in 1742; and counsellor of state and body-physician to the prince in 1748. He died in
, a celebrated anatomist, was
born at Basle, in 1707. He was a pupil of Haller at
Berne, in 1730, after which he studied at Strasburgh, and
in 1733 took the degree of M. D. at his native place. He
visited Paris in 1735, and in the same year was appointed
physician to the court of Baden Dourlach. At the request
of Haller, he examined the Graubund mountains, in Switzerland, and transmitted to him his collection of plants
found in that district, previous to the publication of Haller’s work on the botany of Switzerland. Haller then invited him to Gottingen in 1738, to be dissector, where,
having acquired considerable reputation, he was made extraordinary professor of anatomy in that city in 1739; professor in the Caroline college at Cassel, with the rank of
court-physician, in 1742; and counsellor of state and
body-physician to the prince in 1748. He died in 1778.
His principal works are entitled, “Commentatio de Medulla Spinali, speciatim de Nervis ab ea provenientibus,
”
cum icon. Goett. Commentatio de Vaginas
Uteri structura rugosa, necnon *de Hymene,
” De cadavere aperto in quo non existit vesica
fellea, et de Sterno gibboso.
”
or, and a widower, Le Jay became an ecclesiastic, was made dean of Vezelai, and obtained a brevet as counsellor of state. He died July 10, 1675. The Polyglott of Le Jay is
, an advocate in the parliament of Paris, very remarkable for his profound knowledge of languages, is celebrated for having printed a Polyglott at his own expence, and thus purchased glory with the loss of his fortune. The whole edition was offered to sale in England, but too great a price being set upon it, the Polyglott of Walton was undertaken in a more commodious form. Le Jay might still have made great profit by his work if he would have suffered it to appear under the name of cardinal Richelieu, who was very desirous to emulate the fame of Ximenes in this respect. Being now poor, and a widower, Le Jay became an ecclesiastic, was made dean of Vezelai, and obtained a brevet as counsellor of state. He died July 10, 1675. The Polyglott of Le Jay is in ten folumes, large folio, a model of beautiful typography, but too bulky to be used with convenience. It is common in France, but of so little demand, that, according to Brunet, it sells at present for (40 francs, not 61. of our money. It has the Syriac and Arabic versions, which are not in the Polyglott of Ximenes. The publication commenced in 1628, and was concluded in 1645. We cannot suppose the editor to have been less than two or three and thirty, when he had finished a volume of this kind, in which case he "must have been near eighty at the time of his death. It is not improbable that he was still older.
of the emperor. For these services he obtained rewards and honours: he was made body-physician aJid counsellor of state to their imperial majesties, with a pension of 600l.
, an eminent physician and
chemist, was born at Breda in 1730. In 1767 he
came to England with a view of obtaining information on
the Suttonian method of inoculation for the small-pox, and
in the following year he went, on the recommendation of
the late sir John Pringle, to Vienna, to inoculate the
archduchess Theresa- Elizabeth, only daughter of Joseph
II. and the archdukes Ferdinand and Maximilian, brothers
of the emperor. For these services he obtained rewards
and honours: he was made body-physician aJid counsellor
of state to their imperial majesties, with a pension of 600l.
per annum. In the following spring he went to Italy, and
inoculated the grand duke of Tuscany. After this he
returned to England, to which he was much attached, where
he spent his time in scientific pursuits. He published a
very valuable work, entitled “Experiments on Vegetables,
discovering their great power of purifying the common air
in sunshine, but injuring it in the shade or night.
” This
work was first published in
rement. M. Languet was a member of the French academy, superior of the royal society of Navarre, and counsellor of state. His works are, three “Advertisements” to the appellants;
, brother of the preceding,
a doctor of the Sorbonne, and bishop of Soisson, to which
see he was promoted in 1715, and afterwards archbishop
of>>ens, was distinguished for his polemical writings, and
published numerous pieces in defence of the bull Unigenitus, in which he was much assisted by M. Tournely,
professor at the Sorbonne; and this celebrated doctor
dying 1729, the appellants then said that Pere de Tournemine directed his pen. M. Languet was appointed
archbishop of Sens, 1731. He was very zealous against
the miracles attributed by the appellants to M. Paris,
and against the famous convulsions. He died May 3,
1753, at Sens, in the midst of his curates, whom he then
kept in retirement. M. Languet was a member of the
French academy, superior of the royal society of Navarre,
and counsellor of state. His works are, three “Advertisements
” to the appellants; several “Pastoral Letters,
Instructions, Mandates, Letters,
” to different persons, and
other writings in favour of the bull Unigenitus, and against
the Anti-Constitutionarians, the miracles ascribed to M.
Paris, and the convulsions, which were impostures then
obtruded on the credulity of the French, but which he
proved to have neither certainty nor evidence. All the
above have been translated into Latin, and printed at Sens,
1753, 2 vols. fol.; but this edition of M. Lang.uet’s “Polemical Works,
” was suppressed by a decree of council.
He published also a translation of the Psalms, 12mo; a
refutation of Dom. Claudius de Vert’s treatise “On the
Church Ceremonies,
” 12mo. Several books of devotion;
and “The Life of Mary Alacoque,
” which made much
noise, and is by no means worthy of this celebrated archbishop, on account of its romantic and fabulous style, the
inaccurate expressions, indecencies, dangerous principles,
and scandalous maxims which it contains. Languet is esteemed by the catholics as among the divines who wrote
best against the Anti-constitutionarians, and is only chargeable with not having always distinguished between dogmas
and opinions, and with not unfrequently advancing as articles of faith, sentiments which are opposed by orthodox
and very learned divines.
at the time of his death, held the appointment of first physician to Louis XVL and his queen; he was counsellor of state, doctor-regent of the faculty of medicine at Paris,
, an eminent French physician, was born at Carpentras, on the 3d of July, 1717. He was removed for education to Paris, but in his early years he was less remarkable for his perseverance in study, than for a propensity which he shewed for the gay pleasures of youth; yet even then he raised the hopes of his friends by some ingenious performances, which merited academic honours. At length he applied with seriousness to study, and devoted himself wholly to the pursuits of anatomy, in which he made such rapid progress, that, at the age of twenty-five, he was received into the academy of sciences as associate-anatomist. An extraordinary event, however, put a period to his anatomical pursuits. In selecting among some dead bodies a proper subject for dissection, he fancied he perceived in one of them some very doubtful signs of death, and endeavoured to re-animate it: his efforts were for a long time vain; but his first persuasion induced him to persist, and he ultimately succeeded in bringing his patient to life, who proved to be a poor peasant. This circumstance impressed so deep a sense of horror on the mind of the anatomist, that he declined these pursuits in future. Natural history succeeded the study of anatomy, and mineralogy becoming a favourite object of his pursuit, he published his observations on the crystallized tree-stones of Fotuainbleau; but chemistry finally became the beloved occupation of M. de Lassone. His numerous memoirs, which were read before the royal academy of sciences, presented a valuable train of new observations, useful both to the progress of that study, and to the art of compounding remedies; and in every part of these he evinced the sagacity of an attentive observer, and of an ingenious experimentalist. After having practised medicine for a long time in the hospitals and cloisters, he was sent for to court; and held the office of first physician at Versailles. He lived in friendship with Fontenelle, Winslow, D'Alembert, Buffon, and other scientific characters; and the affability of his manners, and his ardent zeal for the advancement of knowledge, among the young scholars, whose industry he encouraged, and whose reputation was become one of his most satisfactory enjoyments, gained him general respect. When from a natural delicacy of constitution, M. cle Lassone began to experience the inconveniences of a premature old age, he became sorrowful and fond of solitude; yet, reconciled to his situation, he calmly observed his death approaching, and expired on Dec. 8, 1788. Lassone, at the time of his death, held the appointment of first physician to Louis XVL and his queen; he was counsellor of state, doctor-regent of the faculty of medicine at Paris, and pensionary-veteran of the academy of sciences, member of the academy of medicine at Madrid, and honorary associate of the college of medicine at Nancy.
in 1624. He had the reversion of the secretary of state’s office which his father held, and was made counsellor of state in 1651, when a boy of sixteen, with permission to
,
was born in 1635, the son of that count de Brienne who
was ambassador in England in 1624. He had the reversion of the secretary of state’s office which his father held,
and was made counsellor of state in 1651, when a boy of
sixteen, with permission to exercise this office when he
should attain the age of twenty- five. During this interval,
be travelled over Italy, Germany, and the north, to acquire a knowledge of the countries he was afterward to
treat with, and on his return, although only twenty-three
years old, the king permitted him to act as secretary of
state; but after his wife’s death, in 1665, Louis XIV.
obliged him to resign his post. M. de Lomenie then retired to the fathers of the oratory, and was sub-deacon,
but left them, and went to the court of Christian Louis,
duke of Mecklenburgh, in 1672. His residence at that
court was the origin of all the troubles which he brought
upon himself; for, having entertained a criminal passion
for the princess of Mecklenburg, he had the audacity to
acquaint her with it. She complained of this affront to
Louis XIV. who ordered him to return to Paris, and confined him in the abbey of St. Germain-des-Prez, then at
St. Benolt-sur- Loire, afterwards at St. Lazare, and lastly,
at the abbey of St. Severin, at Chateau Landon, where he
died, April 17, 1698. He left an account of his travels,
in Latin,entitled “Itinerarinm,
” 8vo, written with elegance
and perspicuity. 2. “Recueil de Poesies diverses et Chre
”tiennes,“Paris, 1671, 3 vols. 12mo. 3.
” Remarques
sur les Regies de la Poésie Françoise,“which are at the
end of the
” Nouvelle Methode Latine“of Port Royal,
the seventh edition, 8vo. M. de Châlons has borrowed,
without any acknowledgment, almost the whole of these
remarks, in his treatise
” Des Regies de la Poésie Fransoise.“Lomenie also published a translation of the
” Institutions
of Thanlerus," 8vo and 12mo, &c. and left in ms. memoirs of his life, and some poems. It appears from his
works, that he possessed wit and genius, but that a capricious, fickle, and inconstant disposition, joined to a depraved fancy, rendered them useless to him, ad in some
measure to the world.
hen annexed to the academy; in 1764 he was gratified by the late empress Catherine with the title of counsellor of state; and died April 4 that year, in the fifty-fourth year
, a celebrated Russian poet, the great
refiner of his native tongue, was the son of a person who
trafficked in fish at Kolmogori: he was born in 1711, and
was fortunately taught to read; a rare instance for a person of so low a station in Russia. His natural genius for
poetry was first kindled by the perusal of a metrical translation of the Song of Solomon, by Polotski, whose rude
compositions, perhaps scarcely superior to our version of
the Psalms by Sternhold and Hopkins, inspired him with
such an irresistible passion for the muses, that he fled
from his father, who was desirous of compelling him to
marry, and took refuge in the Kaikonospaski monastery at
Moscow; there he had an opportunity of indulging his
taste for letters, and of studying the Greek and Latin languages. In this seminary he made so considerable a progress in polite literature, as to be noticed and employed
by the Imperial academy of sciences. In 1736 he was
sent at the expence of that society, to the university of
Marburgh in Hesse Cassel, where he became a scholar of
the celebrated Christian Wolf, under whom he studied
universal grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy. He continued at Marburgh four years, during which time he applied himself with indefatigable diligence to chemistry,
which he afterwards pursued with still greater success,
under the famous Henckel, at Freyberg, in Saxony. In
1741 he returned into Russia; was chosen in 1742 adjunct
to the Imperial academy; and in the ensuing year, member
of that society, and professor of chemistry. In 1760 he
was appointed inspector of the seminary, then annexed
to the academy; in 1764 he was gratified by the late empress Catherine with the title of counsellor of state; and
died April 4 that year, in the fifty-fourth year of his age.
Lomonozof excelled in various kinds of composition; but
his chief merit, by which he bears the first rank among the
Russian writers, is derived from his poetical compositions,
the finest of which are his odes. The first was written in
1739, while he studied in Germany, upon the taking of
Kotschin, a fortress of Crim Tartary, by marshal Munich.
The odes of Lomonozof are greatly admired for originality
of invention, sublimity of sentiment, and energy of language; and compensate for the turgid style, which in
some instances have been imputed to them, by that spirit
and fire which are the principal characteristics in this species of composition. Pindar was his great model; and if
we may give credit to Levesque, a gentleman well versed
in the Russian tongue, he has succeeded in this daring attempt to imitate the Theban bard, without incurring the
censure of Horace: “Pindarum quisquis studet emulari,
”
&c. In this, as well as several other species of composition, he enriched his native language with various kinds of
metre, and seems to have merited the appellation bestowed upon him, of the Father of Russian Poetry. A
brief recapitulation of the principal works of Lomonozof,
which were printed in 3 vols. 8vo, will serve to shew the
versatility of his genius, and his extensive knowledge in
various branches of literature.
Atheists, in which his learning and philosophy appear to great advantage. In 169 he was appointed a counsellor of state to the grand duke, who sent him his ambassador into
, a celebrated philosopher
and mathematician, was born at Rome Octqber 23, 1637.
After studying jurisprudence, in which he made a great
and very rapid progress at Pisa, he began to devote his
main attention to mathematics and natural philosophy,
which he cultivated at Florence, during three years, under
the celebrated Vincent Viviani, and was made secretary to
the academy del Cimento, the duties of which office he
discharged with the utmost assiduity and care. Being directed by the prince to draw up an account of the experiments made there, he published it in 1666, when it was
received with universal applause by men of science. While
engaged on this work, he obtained leave from Leopold to
pay a visit to his father at Rome, and with a view to obtain
some ecclesiastical promotion. Having failed in this object, he returned to Florence, and obtained a place at the
court of the grand duke Ferdinand II.; and shortly after a
pension was given him by pope Alexander VII. About
1666 he drew up and published a small volume relative to
the history of China, which was received with great applause; and at the same time he published a small, but
elegant compendium of the Moral Doctrine of Confucius.
Having considerable poetical talents, he was the first person who published a good translation of the Odes of Anacreon in Italian verse. He was very conversant in many
of the modern languages, and could write and speak
French, Spanish, and English, with the correctness and
ease of the natives of those countries. When in England
he became the intimate friend of the illustrious Mr. Robert
Boyle, whom he vainly attempted to convert from the
errors of the protestant faith. After being employed in
several missions to foreign princes, he was in 1674 appointed ambassador to the imperial court, where he acquired the particular favour of the emperor, and formed
connections with the men most eminent for science and
literature; but, finding a very inconvenient delay of the
necessary pecuniary remittances from his court, he determined to return to Florence without waiting the permission
of the duke. Shortly after, that prince recalled him, and
gave him apartments in his palace, with a considerable
pension, but Magalotti preferred retirement, and the quiet
prosecution of his studies. In 1684 he composed fifteen
Italian odes, in which he has drawn the picture of a woman of noble birth and exquisite beauty, distinguished
not only by every personal, but by every mental charm,
and yet rendering herself chiefly the object of admiration
and delight by her manners and conduct, whom, with no
great gallantry, he entitled “The Imaginary Lady.
” His
next work consisted of Letters against Atheists, in which
his learning and philosophy appear to great advantage. In
169 he was appointed a counsellor of state to the grand
duke, who sent him his ambassador into Spain to negotiate a marriage between one of his daughters and king
Charles II.; but soon after he had accomplished the object
of this mission, he sunk into a temporary melancholy. After
recovering in about a year, he resumed his literary labours,
and published works upon various subjects, and left others
which were given to the world after his decease, which
happened in 1712, when he had attained the age of 75.
Magalotti was as eminent for his piety as he was for his
literary talents; unimpeachable in his morals, liberal, beneficent, friendly, polite, and a lively and cheerful, as
well as very instructive companion. His house was the
constant resort of men of letters from all countries, whom
he treated with elegant hospitality. He was deeply conversant with the writings of the ancient philosophers, and
was a follower of the Platonic doctrine in his poems. In his
natural and philosophical investigations he discarded all
authority, and submitted to no other guide but experiment.
Among the moderns he was particularly attached to Galileo. After his death a medal was struck in honour of his
memory, with the figure of Apollo raised on the reverse,
and the inscription Omnia Lustrat.
en, and in this double capacity he answered the most sanguine expectations. In 1771 he was appointed counsellor of state to his royal highness, and in 1773 was sent ambassador
From 1767 to 1781 his farther advancements were so rapid, that we can only slightly glance at them. The celebrated Theatin Paciaudi being directed to new model the university of Parma, he established it on the same plan as that of Turin 1 he invested a committee of secular clergymen with the power of directing all moral and religious concerns in it, and another committee of lay noblemen, under the name of magistracy of reform, with that of superintending all its temporal and economical transactions. Manara was appointed one of these magistrates, with the additional prerogative of being the exclusive director of that branch of the establishment which was called the royal college of noblemen, and in this double capacity he answered the most sanguine expectations. In 1771 he was appointed counsellor of state to his royal highness, and in 1773 was sent ambassador to the court of Turin, for the purpose of felicitating his late Sardinian majesty on his accession to the crown.
f the parliament of Bearn; and going to Paris in 1639, about the affairs of his province, was made a counsellor of state. In 1640 he published “The History of Bearn,” which
, one of the greatest ornaments of
the Gallican church, but a man of great inconsistency of
character, was born in 1594, at Gant, in Bearn, of a very
ancient family in that principality. He went through his
course of philosophy among the Jesuits, and then studied
the law for three years; after which he was received a
counsellor in 1615, in the supreme council at Pau. In
1621 he was made president of the parliament of Bearn;
and going to Paris in 1639, about the affairs of his province, was made a counsellor of state. In 1640 he published “The History of Bearn,
” which confirmed the good
opinion that was conceived of his knowledge and parts.
He was thought, therefore, a very proper person to undertake a delicate and important subject, which offered itself
about that time. The court of France was then at variance
with the court of Rome, and the book which Peter de Puy
published, concerning the liberties of the Gallican church,
greatly alarmed the partisans of the court of Rome; some
of whom endeavoured to persuade the world that they were
the preliminaries of a schism contrived by cardinal Richelieu; as if his eminency had it in his head to erect a patriarchate in that kingdom, in order to render the Gallican
church independent of the pope. A French divine, M.
Hersent (see Hersent), who took the name of Optatus
Gallus, addressed a book to the clergy upon the subject;
and insinuated that the cardinal had brought over to his
party a great personage, who was ready to defend this
conduct of the cardinal; and this great personage was
Peter de Marca. But an insinuation of this nature tending
to make the cardinal odious, as it occasioned a rumour
that he aspired to the patriarchate, the king laid his commands on de Marca to refute Hersent’s work, and at the
same time to preserve the liberties of the Gallican church
on the one hand, and to make it appear on the other that
those liberties did not in the least diminish the reverence
due to the holy see. He accepted of this commission, and
executed it by his book “De Concordia sacerdotii & imperii,
sive, de libertatibus ecclesisæ Gallicæ,
” which he published
in 1641. He declared in his preface, that he did not enter
upon the discussion of right, but confined himself to the
settling of facts: that is, he only attempted to shew what
deference the Western churches had always paid to the
bishop of Rome on the one side; and on the other, what
rights and privileges the Gallican churclh had always possessed. But though he had collected an infinite number
of testimonies in favour of the pope’s power, the work was
of too liberal a cast not to give offence: perhaps even the
very attempt to throw the subject open to discussion was not
very agreeable and accordingly, the court of Rome made
a great many difficulties in dispatching the bulls which
were demanded in favour of de Marca, who had, in the
end of 1641, been presented to the bishopric of Conserans.
That court gave him to understand that it was necessary
he should soften some things he had advanced; and caused
his book to pass a very strict examination. After the
death of Urban VIII. cardinal Bichi warmly solicited Innocent X. to grant the bulls in favour of the bishop of Conserans; but the assessor of the holy office recalled the
remembrance of the complaints which had been made
against his book “De Concordia,
” which occasioned this
pope to order the examination of it anew. De Marca,
despairing of success unless he gave satisfaction to the
court of Rome, published a book in 1646, in which he
explained the design of his “De Coocordia,
” &c. submitted himself to the censure of the apostolic see, and
shewed that kings were not the authors, but the guardians
of the canon laws. “I own,” says he, “that I favoured the
side of my prince too much, and acted the part of a president
rather than that of a bishop. I renounce my errors, and promise for the future to be a strenuous advocate for the authority of the holy see.” Accordingly, in 1647, he wrote
a book entitled “De singulari primatu Petri,” in which he
proved that St. Peter was the only head of the church;
and this he sent to the pope, who was so pleased with it,
that he immediately granted his bulls, and he was made
bishop of Conserans in 1648. This conduct of de Marca
has been noticed by lord Bolingbroke, in his posthumous
works, with becoming indignation. He calls him “a time-serving priest, interested, and a great flatterer, if ever
there was one;” and adds, that, “when he could not get
his bulls dispatched, be made no scruple to explain away
all that he had said in favour of the state, and to limit the
papal power.”
d passed the greater part of his life in the service of the revolted states of the Low Countries, as counsellor of state, and envoy to the foreign potentates. He was employed
, or Meetkercke, or Mekerchus
(Adolphus), a learned writer, was born at Bruges in 1528,
and passed the greater part of his life in the service of the
revolted states of the Low Countries, as counsellor of state,
and envoy to the foreign potentates. He was employed
on an embassy to queen Elizabeth in the latter part of his
life, an office which was probably very agreeable to him, as
he was a protestant, and had resided here for the quiet enjoyment of his religion for some time before he was appointed on the embassy. He appears to have been an ornament and delight of the age in which he lived, second to
none in literary accomplishments, and was a man also of
great benevolence and amiable temper. Grief for the loss
of his son is said to have hastened his death, which took
place at London in 1591, in his sixty-fourth year. He was
buried in the church of St. Botolph, Aldersgate, under a
monument which, when that church was rebuilt, was conveyed to Julians, near Buntingford, in Hertfordshire, the
seat of his descendants who settled in this country, and
where some of them are still living. The present owner
of the estate is in possession, among others, of a folio ms.
of Greek and Latin poetry by his ancestor, the subject of
this article, with additions by his son Adolphus, who died
without issue, and by his son Edward, D. D. of Christchurch, Oxford, professor of Hebrew in that university, and
prebendary of Winchester. He became professor in 1621,
and died in 1660. Foppen asserts that sir Adolphus, as
the ambassador was called, declared in writing, on his
death-bed, that there was no true religion out of the catholic church, and that his daughter was so struck with this
as to return to Bruges, and to the Roman catholic religion.
As far as respects the daughter, this may be true, but her
father certainly died in the protestant faith, as appears by
the inscription on his monument, which Foppen is obliged to confess, is written “stylo acatholico.
” Sir AdoU
phus published in 1565, not a translation of some pieces of
Bion and Moschus, as it has been erroneously called, but
the first edition of “Bion and Moschus,
” printed at Bruges
in Theocriti Epigrammata,
” and published a treatise “De veteri et recta
pronuntiatione linguae Graecas Commentarius,
” Bruges,
Fasti Consulares,
” “Vitae Caesarum,
”
“Magna Grsecia,
” &c. and in his political character published “A Collection of the Proceedings at the Peace of
Cologne, in 1579.
”
commenced, he was more intimately connected with the affairs of the king; and, in 1590, was made his counsellor of state, after having been invested with the government of
In 1572 he went into Flanders, to survey the situation,
the strength, the fortifications, and garrisons, of that country, and afterwards passed, over to England, where he was
graciously received by queen Elizabeth; for, his parts,
his knowledge, his uncommon capacity for the management of great affairs, had spread his name far and wide,
and made him courted, especially by the great. In 1575
he married, and published the same year a treatise “Concerning Life and Death;
” for, though often employed in
civil affairs, and oftener solicited to engage in them, yet
he passed much of his time in reading and writing. Previously to his marriage he had engaged in an unsuccessful
contest with part of the king’s troops; was wounded and
taken prisoner; but after the confinement of a few days,
and by assuming a false name, he was allowed to ransom
himself on easy terms. In 1576, he again took arms, and
now his adherents were so powerful, that the king’s partydeemed it expedient to propose a negociation, which was
accepted. After this, he went to the court of the king of
Navarre, afterwards Henry IV. of France, who received
him very graciously, gave him one of the first places in his
council, and, upon all occasions, paid great deference to
his judgment. Du Plessis, on his part, did the king great
services. He went into England to solicit the assistance
of Elizabeth for him in 1577, into Flanders in 1578, and
to the diet of Augsburg in 1579. In 1578 he published a
treatise “Concerning the Church;
” in which he explained
his motives for leaving the popish, and embracing the protestant religion; and, in 1579, began his book “Upon
the Truth of the Christian Religion.
” But, before he had
made any progress in this, he was seized with an illness,
which was thought to be the efiect of some poison that
had been given him at Antwerp the year before, with a
view of destroying him. He recovered, though
dangeronsly ill, and continued to do service to the king of Navarre and the protestant religion. From 1585, when the
league commenced, he was more intimately connected
with the affairs of the king; and, in 1590, was made his
counsellor of state, after having been invested with the
government of Sauinur the year before. In 1592, the
king appointed him to confer with M. de Villeroy upon
the subject of the king’s religion; but the extravagant
demands of De Villeroy rendered their conference of no
effect. Du Piessis, however, opposed the king’s embracing the popish religion, as long as he could and, when
he could prevent it no longer, withdrew himself gradually
from court, and resumed his studies.
rleans, the king’s brother. He had also conferred on him the titles of historiographer of France and counsellor of state. By his first wife he had an only son, who died in
Having thus failed in obtaining the first situation in which
a man of letters could be placed, he succeeded, in 1647,
in being appointed to what might be considered as the second, that of preceptor to Philip, then duke of Anjou, and
afterwards duke of Orleans, the king’s brother. He had
also conferred on him the titles of historiographer of France
and counsellor of state. By his first wife he had an only
son, who died in 1664, in the thirty-fifth year of his age.
His wife also being dead long before, he is said to have
been so much afflicted at the loss of his son, as to determine to marry again, which he did the same year, 1664, at
the age of seventy-six He died in 1672, aged eightyfour. He was a voluminous writer, and upon all subjects,
ancient, modern, sacred and profane. We cannot, perhaps, to some of our readers, give a better idea of his
works, than by comparing them to those of Bayle. We
find in them the same scepticism and the same indecencies;
and on this account Bayle expatiates on his character with
congenial pleasure. In his private character, he was somewhat of a humourist, but his moral conduct was more
correct than might have been expected from his writings.
He is mentioned hy Guy Patin as a Stoic, who would neither
praise nor be praised, and who followed his own fancies
and caprices without any regard to the opinions of the world,
and his dress and usual demeanour distinguished him from
other men. In the court he lived like a philosopher, immersed in books, simple and regular in his manner of living, and void of ambition and avarice. His treatise which
we have mentioned, “On the Virtue of Pagans/' was
answered by Arnauld. La Mothers bookseller complaining
that his book did not sell,
” I know a secret,“said the
author,
” to quicken the sale:" he procured an order from
government for its suppression, which was the means of
selling the whole edition. His works were collected in
two volumes folio; and there was an edition, we believe the
last, printed at Dresden, in 1756, in 14 vols. 8vo, so lowpriced, in the French catalogues, that there seems now
little value placed on them.
devoted himself entirely to the pursuits of literature, having been previously raised to the rank of counsellor of state, and invested with the order of Wladimir. Mr. Coxe,
, a celebrated German
traveller and writer, was born in 1705, in Herforden, in
Westphalia, and was educated at the age of seventeen at
llinteln and Leipsic, at which last place he so distinguished
himself, that professor Mencke obtained for him the place
of adjunct in the historical class of the academy founded
at Petersburgh by Peter the Great. In tbat city he was
some time employed in teaching Latin, geography, and
history, and as assistant secretary to the institution. In
1728, he was made under-keeper of the imperial library,
and in 1730 he was chosen professor of history. He now
applied for leave of absence, in order to gratify his wish of
seeing foreign countries. In the year 1731 he visited
London, and was elected a fellow of the Royal Society, and
after his return to Petersburgh he was appointed to accompany Gmelin and De l'Isle de la Croyere on their travels through Siberia, which occupied ten years, during
which they travelled 4480 German miles, or more than
three times that number of English miles. An account of
their travels was published by Gmelin, in four volumes,
8vo. After this, Mullef, who was not rewarded in any degree equal to the labours and sufferings which he had undergone, undertook, at the desire of prince Jusupof, “A
Dissertation on the Trade of Siberia,
” which, though written, or at least begun, in He collected during his travels the most ample
materials for the history and geography of this extensive
empire, which was scarcely known to the Russians themselves before his valuable researches were given to the
world in various publications. His principal work is
” A
Collection of Russian Histories,“in nine volumes octavo,
printed at different intervals at the press of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. The first part came out in
1732, and the last in 1764. This storehouse of information
pnd literature in regard to the antiquities, history,
geography, and commerce of Russia, and many of the neighbouring countries, conveys the most indisputable proofs of the
author’s learning, diligence, and fidelity. To this work
the accurate and indefatigable author has successively added
many other valuable performances upon similar subjects,
both in the German and Russian languages, which elucidate
various parts in the history of this empire.
” Mr. Coxe adds,
that he spoke and wrote the German, Russian, French,
and Latin tongues, with surprizing fluency; and read the
English, Dutch, Swedish, Danisn, and Greek, with great
facility His memory was surprising; and his accurate acquaintance with the minutest incidents of the Russian annals almost surpassed belief. His collection of state papers
and manuscripts were all arranged in the exactest order,
and classed into several volumes, distinguished by the
names of those illustrious personages to whom they principally relate; such as Peter L, Catherine I. Menzikof, Osterman, &c."
opric of Rennes, to which the bull was signed gratuitously by the pope. Sept. 1597, he was appointed counsellor of state, on which occasion he took the oath before the duke
Upon Henry the Fourth’s abjuring the Protestant religion in 1593, the papal absolution for him was obtained by D‘Ossat; which was deemed a master-stroke of his abilities. The favour was strongly opposed both by the Spaniards and the princes of the house of Lorrain, and also by the Hugonots, who were naturally averse to their beloved prince’s being reconciled to the see of Rome; but every difficulty was removed by the artful management of D’Ossat, who dissipated all the scruples of Clement VIII. a pope by nature extremely diffident; so that the affair was resolved on before the arrival of James Davy, afterwards cardinal Du Perron, who, indeed, by the figure that he made, quickened the execution . The king, in consideration of this service, nominated D‘Ossat, in 1596, to the bishopric of Rennes, to which the bull was signed gratuitously by the pope. Sept. 1597, he was appointed counsellor of state, on which occasion he took the oath before the duke of Luxemburg, then the French ambassador at Rome; who, having leave to return home in 1598, the superintendency of the French affairs was committed to D’Ossat, till another ambassador should be appointed; and, May the following year, he was created a cardinal. The king had solicited this favour for some time, his low birth being made an objection. Nor indeed was his fortune even now equal to this high station; but he resolved not to lay aside the modesty and temperance he had hitherto observed, and in that spirit refused an equipage and some fine furniture which were sent him three weeks after his promotion, by cardinal de Joyeuse, in whose house he had received the compliments of the cardinals upon his election. The legacy, however, already mentioned, of cardinal d'Este, happened unexpectedly to be paid to him the following year, 1600; and so seasonably, that, as he himself declared, he should otherwise have been almost ruined. Some time after, the pope gave him the abbey of Nant, in Rouerge. Upon cardinal de Joyeuse returning to France this year, he was appointed vice-protector of the French nation; and in that quality was affable, easily accessible, and kind to those who had occasion to apply to him. All these preferments were highly agreeable to Henry IV. who the same year added to them the bishopric of Bayeux, the revenues of which were richer than those of Rennes. This, however, he resigned in 1603, finding the affairs of the court would not permit him to reside in his diocese; and he had scarcely made this sacrifice when he died, March 13, 1604, in his 68th year. His corpse was interred in the church of St. Lewis, at Rome, where there is a monument erected to his memory.
, a learned Fleming, was the son of Adolphus, counsellor of state to the emperor Charles V. and born at Bruges in 1536.
, a learned Fleming, was the son
of Adolphus, counsellor of state to the emperor Charles V.
and born at Bruges in 1536. He was educated at Louvain
and Paris, and became afterwards a learned divine and
critic. Obtaining a canonry in the church of Bruges, he
collected a library, and formed a design of giving good
editions of the fathers; but the civil wars obliged him to
retire to St. Omer’s, of which place the bishop made him
archdeacon. Some time after, Philip II. king of Spain
named him to the provostship of St. Saviour at Utrecht,
and after that to the bishopric of St. Omer’s: but, as he
went to Brussels to take possession of it, he died at Mons
in Huinault, in 1587. He is chiefly known for his critical
labours upon “Tertullian and Cyprian;
” of both which
writers he published editions, and prefixed lives. “The
commentaries of this author upon Tertullian,
” says Dupin,
“are both learned and useful but he digresses too much
from his subject, and brings in things of no use to the understanding of his author:
” and he passes much the same
judgment of his labours upon Cyprian. All the later editors, however, of these two fathers have spoken well of Pamelius, and have transcribed his best notes into their editions.
Paris, who had elected him a member. Soon after he returned to France he was promoted to the rank of counsellor of state; and in 1764 was appointed inspectorgeneral of physic;
, a celebrated French
physician, was born at Dijon, July 5, 1720. After studying medicine, he succeeded M. Dubois in 1746 as protessor of physic in the college de France. He was one of the
first who gave a course of chemical lectures in Paris. In
1757 he was appointed first physic‘an to the French army,
and the year following went to Russia to attend the empress Elizabeth in her illness. He remained two years in
Russia, and assisted at the famous experiment relative to
the congelation of quicksilver, of which he afterwards gave
an account (inserted in their memoirs), to the Academy of
sciences at Paris, who had elected him a member. Soon
after he returned to France he was promoted to the rank of
counsellor of state; and in 1764 was appointed inspectorgeneral of physic; surgery, and pharmacy, in the ports and
colonies of France. His ingenious method of procuring
fresh from sea-water, by distillation, procured him, in 1765,
a pension of 12,000 livres a-year from the French government. In nil, he resigned his chair at the college of
France; but, in conformity ’to an unanimous vote of the
professors, continued to preside at their public meetings
as long as his health would permit. M. Laiande says, that
he did honour to this office “by a grand and striking figure:
by the dignity of his speech the nobleness of his manner and the deservedly high estimation in which he was
held by the public.
” He was, during the reign of terror,
imprisoned, with his whole family, by Robespierre but
was liberated on the death of that monster. He died in
September 1797 or 179S. He is said to have left behind
him a very valuable collection of natural history, medals,
and other curiosities. He wrote several treatises belonging to his profession, viz. on the fever of St. Domingo,
the diseases of seamen, an abridgment of anatomy, &C.
e became preceptor to Alphonso the younger, king of Arragon, to whom he was afterwards secretary and counsellor of state. Having reconciled this prince to his father Ferdinand,
, a very learned Italian,
was born at Cerreto, in Umbria, in 1426, and settled at
Naples, where his merit procured him illustrious friends.
He became preceptor to Alphonso the younger, king of
Arragon, to whom he was afterwards secretary and counsellor of state. Having reconciled this prince to his father
Ferdinand, and not being rewarded by the latter as he
thought he deserved, he aimed against him “A Dialogue
on Ingratitude,
” in which also he launched out into the
praises of Charles VIII. of France, his great enemy. Ferdinand had the magnanimity to despise his censures, and
suffer him to hold his appointments. Pontanus died, according to Moreri, in 1503, at the age of seventy-seven;
according to others two years later. His epitaph is famous,
and, though vain enough in the beginning, concludes with
a fine thought, which seems to have suggested the still
more sublime close of Dr. Foster’s epitaph on himself.
ut 1602. Early in life he studied physic, and practised it for some years. When Mr. De Laubardemont, counsellor of state, and a creature of cardinal Richelieu, was sent to
, an ingenious French writer, whose talent was Latin poetry, was born at Chinon, in Touraine, about 1602. Early in life he studied physic, and practised it for some years. When Mr. De Laubardemont, counsellor of state, and a creature of cardinal Richelieu, was sent to take cognisance of the famous pretended possession of the nuns of Loudun, with secret instructions doubtless to find them real, Quillet was in that town and so everted himself in detecting the imposture, that Laubardemont issued out a warrant against him. On this, as he saw that the whole was a trick carried on by cardinal Richelieu, in order to destroy the unhappy Grandier, and at the same time, as some suppose, to frighten Louis XIII. he thought it not safe to continue at Loudun, or even in France, and therefore immediately retired into Italy. This must have happened about 1634, when Grandier was executed.
at the end of an Abridgment of his History of the World, London, 1700, in 8vo; “A Dialogue between a counsellor of state and a justice of peace,” better known in the printed
His works may be divided into classes, according to
Oldys’s arrangement, 1. “Poetical: including his poems
on Gascoigne’s Steel-Glass; The Excuse; The silent Lover; the Answer to Marloe’s Pastoral; with his poems of
Cynthia, and two more on Spenser’s Fairy-Queen; The
Lover’s Maze; a Farewei to Court; The Advice; which
last three are printed in an old
” Collection of several ingenious Poems and Songs by the wits of the age,“1660,
in 8vo; another little poem, printed in the London Magazine for August 1734; several in the Ashmolean library at
Oxford, namely,
” Erroris Responsio,“and his
” Answer,
to the Lie,“&c. three pieces written just before his death,
viz. his Pilgrim; his
” Epigram in allusion to the Snuff' of
a Candle,“and his Epitaph, printed in his
” Remains.“There is likewise ascribed to him a satirical Elegy upon
the death of the lord treasurer Cecil, earl of Salisbury,
printed by Osborne in his Memoirs of king James, and
said to be our author’s by Shirley in his Life of Ralegh,
p. 179. Of his poems, a beautiful and correct, but limited
edition, has lately been published by sir E. JBrydges, with
a memoir of his life, written with the taste and feeling
which distinguish all the productions of that gentleman’s
pen. 2. Epistolary: viz. Letters, eight-and-twenty of which
Mr. Oldys tells us he has seen in print and manuscript.
3. Military: these discourses relate either to the defence
of England in particular, or contain general arguments
and examples of the causes of war among mankind. On
the former subject he seems to have drawn up several remonstrances, which have but sparingly and slowly come
to light. However, as he had a principal hand in the determinations of the council of war for arming the nation
when it was under immediate apprehensions of the Spanish
invasion, there is reason to believe that he was the author
of a treatise concerning
” Notes of Direction“for such
” Defence of the Kingdom,“written three years before
that invasion. To this treatise was also joined a cc Direction for the best and most orderly retreat of an army,
whether in campaign or straits.
” And these were then
presented in manuscript to the privy-council. One advice
is, that since frontier forces are unlikely to prevent an
enemy from landing, if they should land through the deficiency or absence of our shipping (for this is the force which Ralegh was ever for having first used against such foreign invasions) it were better by driving or clearing the
country of provisions, and temporizing, to endeavour at
growing stronger, and rendering the enemy weaker, than
to hazard all by a confused and disorderly descent of the
populace to oppose the first landing, as their custom was
formerly. But this was one of the chief points, which a
little before the approach of the Spanish armada was opposed by Thomas Digges, esq. muster-master-general of
the queen’s forces in the Low Countries, in a “Discourse
of the best order for repulsing a foreign Force,
” &c. which
he then published. This occasioned an Answer, which
having been found in an old manuscript copy among others
of sir Walter Ralegh’s discourses, and several circumstances agreeing with the orders in the council of war, as
well as some passages in his “History of the World,
” and
his other writings, it was published by Nathaniel Booth, of
Gray’s Inn, esq. at London, 1734, in 8vo, under this title:
“A Military Discourse, whether it be better for England
to give an invader present battle, or to temporize and
defer the same,
” &c. But Ralegh’s opinion upon this
subject is more fully given in his Discourses of the original
and fundamental cause of natural and necessary, arbitrary
and customary, holy and civil wars; which, though published several years after his death, have sufficient marks
of authenticity. 4. Maritimal: viz. his “Discourse of the
invention of shipping,
” &c. printed among his essays in
Observations and Notes concerning
the Royal Navy and Sea-service,
” dedicated to prince
Henry, printed likewise among his essays; his Letter to
that prince concerning the model of a ship, printed among
his Remains; his “Report of the truth of the Fight about
the isles of Azores,
” printed in Memorial touching Dover
Port,
” printed in a pamphlet, entitled “An Essay on
ways and means to maintain the Honour and Safety of
England,
” published by sir Henry Sheers in Observations and
Notes concerningthe Royal Navy and Sea-service,
” men*
tions a “Discourse of a maritimal voyage, with the passages and incidents therein,
” which he bad formerly
written to prince Henry; and in his “History of the World
”
he takes notice of another treatise, written to the same
prince, “Of the art of War by Sea;
” “a subject to my
knowledge,
” says he, “never handled by any man, ancient
or modern; but God has spared me the labour of finishing
it, by the loss of that brave prince; of which, like an
eclipse of the sun, we shall find the effects hereafter.
” 5.
Geographical; viz. several discourses and papers of his
concerning the discovery, planting, and settlement of Virginia, which were formerly in the hands of sir Francis Walsingham “A treatise of the West Indies;
” “Considerations on the Voyage for Guiana,
” a manuscript containing
leaves in 4to, in the library of sir Hans Sloane, bart. and
now in the British Museum “Discovery of the large, rich,
and beautiful empire of Guiana,
” pqblished by himself,
and mentioned above. His “Journal of his second Voyage to Guiana,
” which remains still in manuscript; and his
“Apology
” for the said voyage. 6. Political viz. “The
Seat of Government,
” shewing it to be upheld by the two
great pillars of civil justice and martial policy; “Observations concerning the causes of the magnificency and
o'pulency;
” “The Prince; or Maxims of State,
” printed at
London, Aphorisms of State,
” published by John Milton at London, in The Cabinet-Council, containing the chief arts of Empire, and mysteries of State discabineted,
” &c. published by John Milton, esq. London,
The Arts of Empire and mysteries of State discabineted,
” &c. “The Spaniard’s Cruelties to the English in Havanria
” his “Consultation about the Peace with
Spain
” and our protecting the Netherlands, in manuscript.
“The present state of Spain, with a most accurate account
of his catholic majesty’s power and rights also the names
and worth of the most considerable persons in that kingdom,
” in manuscript; which seems to be a different piece
from “The present state of Things, as they now stand
between the three kingdoms, France, England, and Spain,
”
also in manuscript; “A Discourse on the Match propounded by the Savoyan between the lady Elizabeth and
the prince of Piedmont,
” and another on that “between,
prince Henry of England and a daughter of Savoy,
” both
in manuscript “A Dialogue between a Jesuit and a i\ecusarit shewing how claugv rous their principles are to
Christian Princes,
” published by Philip Ralegh, esq. among
jour author’s genuine Remains, at the end of an Abridgment
of his History of the World, London, 1700, in 8vo; “A
Dialogue between a counsellor of state and a justice of
peace,
” better known in the printed copies by the title of
the “Prerogative of Parliaments,
” dedicated to king James,
and printed at Midelburge, 1628, in 4to, and reprinted in
1643 in 4to A “Discourse of the words Law and Right,
”
jn manuscript in the, Ashmolean library “Observations
touching Trade and Commerce with the Hollander and other
nations, as it was presented to king James; wherein is
prqve.d, that our sea and land commodities serve to enrich
and strengthen other countries against our own
” printed in
A treatise
of the Soul
” in manuscript in the Ashmolean library,
His “Sceptic,
” or Speculations printed among his Remains. “Instructions to his Son and Posterity,
” The dutiful Advice of a
Joving Son to his aged Father:
”. a treatise of “Mines, and
the trial of Minerals;
” and a “Collection of chymical and
medicinal Receipts;
” both which are in manuscript, 8.
Jiistorical: viz. his “History of the World,
” the best edition of which is that by Oldys, Miscellaneous Works,
”
including most of the above,
ent of Copenhagen, and counsellor of justice. He Was ennobled the 18th of January, 1680, and created counsellor of state the 6th of May, 1684. He formed a very fine library,
, probably of the same family as the preceding, a counsellor and professor in Copenhagen, was born there June 17, 1625. His father and his grandfathers, both by the father’s and mother’s side, were bishops of Zealand. He was appointed sub-principal of the college of Copenhagen in 1646; and having quitted that employment the following year, he set out to visit foreign countries. He studied, during four years, polite literature and law in the university of Leyden, after which he went into France, Spain, and Italy. He remained a whole year in Padua, where he applied himself chiefly to the study of the civil law; was elected counsellor of the German nation in that city; and vice-syndic of the university, in which quality he made a speech in the senate of Venice, and obtained a privilege for that university; and before he left Padua he took his doctor’s degree in law, the 11th of September, 1653. He returned to Denmark by the way of Germany, and was appointed professor of moral philosophy in the university of Copenhagen, November 25, 1657, afterwards consul of that city, counsellor of the supreme council; and lastly, president of Copenhagen, and counsellor of justice. He Was ennobled the 18th of January, 1680, and created counsellor of state the 6th of May, 1684. He formed a very fine library, which he left to the university of Copenhagen, the catalogue of which was printed at Copenhagen, 1685, 4to.
s appointed preceptor to the young king, Lewis XIII. with a pension of 3000 livres, and the title of counsellor of state. An insult he received from his royal pupil obliged
, a learned French writer, was born
at Laval, in the province of Perche, about 1571. He wa*
brought up in the family of the count de Laval, and for.
some time followed the military profession, serving in Italy
and in Holland. In 1603, Henry IV. appointed him one
of the gentlemen of his bed-chamber. In 1605 he entered
into tSie service of the emperor against the Turks: but ori
his return he devoted himself to literary and scientific studies and in 1611 he was appointed preceptor to the young
king, Lewis XIII. with a pension of 3000 livres, and the
title of counsellor of state. An insult he received from his
royal pupil obliged him to quit his office for some time.
The king had a favourite dog, who was perpetually jumping on Rivault during his giving lessons, and Rivault one
day gave him a kick. The king was so incensed as to strike
Riv'lult, who retired; but it appears they were soon reconciled, and by the king’s orders Rivault accompanied ma*
dame Elizabeth of France as far as Bayonne, on her way
to be married to the king of Spain. On his return from
that voyage he died at Tours, Jan. 1616, about the age of
forty-five. He is spoken of with high esteem by several
of the most celebrated writers of his time, particularly by
Casaubon, Scaliger, Vossius, Erpenius, and Menage. His
works consist of, 1. “Les Etats,
” or “The States, or a
discourse concerning the privileges of the prince, the nobles, and the Third Estate, &c.
” 2. “Les Elemens d'Artillerie,
” Paris, Archimedis Opera quae extant, Gr. et Lat. novis detnonstrationibus illdstrata,
” &c. Paris,
00, the king made him counsellor of justice, and keeper of the private archives. In 1710 he was made counsellor of state, and, some years after, justiciary of the supreme tribunal.
, a learned Dane, was born
Aug. 30, 1671, at Kraagerop, a country seat belonging to
his lather, whose heir he became in 1684. Great care was
taken of his education by his guardians, and after studying,
some time at the university of Copenhagen, it was recommended to him to visit other universities, where eminent
professors were to be found. He accordingly set out in
1690, and spt-nt ten years in extending hi* knowledge of
the belles lettres, civil law, &c. and had for his masters
Morliof, Gr&vius, Gronovius, &c. While at Leyden in
169.'5, he published “Delicise quorundam poetarnm Danorum,
” 2 vols. 12mo. He passed a considerable time in
England, particularly at Oxford, for the s;>ke of the ms
treasures in the Bodleian library, and employed himself
much in reading and copying Greek Mss. He afterwards
continued the same researches among the libraries of Paris, where he resided for four years, and applied with ardour to the study of the oriental languages. Among the
Mss. which he copied in Paris, were the letters of the celebrated sophist Libanius, a good number of which he had
also found in England, and communicated these for Wolf’s
edition of that author, published at Amsterdam in 1739.
Both in France and Italy, which he next visited, he made
Jprge purchases of valuable Mss. On his return home in
1700, the king made him counsellor of justice, and keeper
of the private archives. In 1710 he was made counsellor
of state, and, some years after, justiciary of the supreme
tribunal. In 1721 he was appointed first secretary of the
Danish chancery, but lost this office in 1725 by the
machinations of some enemies who were jealous of his high
favour at court. Being now obliged to leave Copenhagen,
he sold his fine library, reserving only a few useful books
which might divert his time during his retirement. This
library contained about 5000 printed books, and 1068 manuscripts, as appears by the sale catalogue published at
Copenhagen in 1726. His disgrace, however, did not last
long. Having effectually cleared up his character, the
king, Frederick IV. made him, in 1727, baillie of Anderskow, which post he retained until 1730, He then retired
to his estate at Kraagerop, and employed his time in study.
He was about to put the finishing hand to his “Lexicon
Jinguae Danicae,
” when he died suddenly April 26, 1745.
He was editor of the works of Andrew Bordingius, a much
esteemed Danish poet, which were published in 1735, 4to,
and had the principal hand in the “Enchiridion studiosi,
Arabice conscriptum a Borhaneddino Alzernouchi, &c.
”
published by Adrian Reland at Utrecht in
ecting materials for his “History of Marseilles,” which he published in 1642. In. 1654 he was made a counsellor of state, and next year published a life of Gaspard de Simiane,
, the historian of Marseilles, was
born there in 1607, and bred to the law. Being appointed
counsellor to the seneschalcy of his native place, he practised in that court for some years, and with a scrupulous
integrity rather uncommon; for we are told that on one
occasion when, by his own neglect, a client had lost his
cause, he sent him a sum of money equivalent to that loss.
He was a man of learning, and a good antiquary, and employed much of his time in collecting materials for his
“History of Marseilles,
” which he published in Dissertations Historiques et Critiques sur POrigine des Comtes des Provence,
de Venaissin, de Forcalquier, et des Vicomtes de Marseille
” and in Une Dissertation.
Historique, Chronologique, et Critique sur les Evéques de
Marseille.
” Both these were intended as preludes to more
elaborate works on the subject, which he was prevented
from completing by his death, March 26, 1724, in the
sixty-sixth year of his age.
ior to them. Lewis XIII. settled on him a pension, for the services he had -lone him, and made him a counsellor of state. In 1627, he was made librarian to the king at Fontainebleau;
, in Latin Sammartbanus, is the
name of a family in France, which produced many men of letters. The first, Gaucher de Sainte-Marthe, had a son
Charles, born in 1512, who became physician to Francis II.
and was remarkable for his eloquence. Queen Margaret of
Navarre and the duchess of Vendome honoured him with
their particular esteem; and when they died in 1550, he
testified his grief by a funeral oration upon each, published
the same year. That upon the queen was in Latin, the
o.ther in French. There is also some Latin and French
poetry of his in being. He died in 1555. Scevole, or
Sclevola, the nephew of Charles, was born at Lou dun in
1536, and became very distinguished both in learning and
business. He loved letters from his infancy, attained an
intimate acquaintance with the Latin, Greek, and Hebrew
tongues and became an orator, a lawyer, a poet, and an
historian he is also represented as a good friend, zealous
for his country, and of inviolable fidelity to his prince. He
had, in the reigns of Henry III. and Henry IV. several considerable employments, which he filled with great reputation. In 1579, he was governor of Poitiers, and afterwards
treasurer of France for this district. In 1593 and 1594, he
exercised the office of intendant of the finances, in the
army of Breta^ne, commanded by the duke de Montpensier: and, in the latter of these years, he reduced Poitiers
to the subjection of Henry IV, Some time after, he conceived thoughts of retiring to his own country, and devoting the remainder of his life to contemplation: but was
again made governor of Poitiers, in so honourable a manner that he could not decline it. Upon the expiration of
this office, he went to Paris, and thence to Loudun, where
he passed the rest of his days “in otio cum dignitate.
”
This town had been often protected from ruin in the civil
wars merely by his credit, and therefore regarded hiui as
its protector. He died there in 1623, universally regretted;
and his funeral oration was pronounced by the famous
Urban Graudier. He was the author of “La louange de
la ville de Poitiers,
” 1573; “Opera Poetica,
” consisting
of odes, elegies, epigrams, and sacred poems, in French
and Luiin, 1575; “Gallorum doctrina illustrium elogia,
”
hut ins chief work, and that which keeps his lame
still alive in the republic of letters, is his work called
” Paedotrophia, seu de puerorum eciucatione,“printed in 1584,
and dedicated to Henry III. This poem^vent through ten
editions in the author’s life time, and hath gone through, as
many since. It was neatly printed at London in 1708, in
12mo, together with the
” Calliurfdia“of Quillet. It is
also printed with a complete edition of his and his son
Abel’s works, under the title
” Sammarthanorum patris et
lilii opera Latina et Gallica, turn soluta oratione, turn versa
scnpta,“Paris, 16:33, 4to. Scevole left several sons; of
whom Abel, the eldest, born at Loudun in 1570, applied
himself, like his father, to literature. He cultivated
French and Latin poetry; the latter were printed with
those of his father in the edition just mentioned, but are
inferior to them. Lewis XIII. settled on him a pension,
for the services he had -lone him, and made him a counsellor of state. In 1627, he was made librarian to the
king at Fontainebleau; and had after that other commissions of importance. He died at Poitiers in 1652, where
his
” Opuscula Varia“were printed in 1645, 8vo. This
Abe) had a son of his own name, born in 1630, and afterwards distinguished by his learning. He succeeded his father as librarian at Fontainebleau, and in that quality presented to Lewis XIV. in 1668,
” Un Discours pour le r6tablissement de cette Bibliorheque." He died in 1706.
ry librarian to the duke. In 1651, he was made an lie and ecclesiastical counsellor; and, in 1663, a counsellor of state, first minister, and sovereign director of the consistory.
, a very learned German, was descended from ancient and noble families; and
born at Aurach, a town of Franconia, Dec. 20, 1626. He
made good use of a liberal education, and was not only a
master of the French, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew languages,
but had also some skill in mathematics and the sciences,
The great progress he made in his youth coming to the ears
of Ernest the pious, duke of Saxe-Goth'a, this prince sent
for him from Cobourg, where he then was, to be educated
with his children. After remaining two years at Gotha, he
went, in 1642, to Strasbnrg; but returned to Gotha in.
1646, and was made honorary librarian to the duke. In
1651, he was made an lie and ecclesiastical counsellor;
and, in 1663, a counsellor of state, first minister, and
sovereign director of the consistory. The year after, he
went into the service of Maurice, duke of Saxe-Zeist, as
counsellor of state and chancellor; and was no less regarded
by this new master than he had been by the duke of SaxeGotha. He continued with him till his death, which happened in 1681; and then preferred a life of retirement,
during which he composed a great many works; but Frederic III. elector of Brandenburg, again brought him into
public life, and made him^. counsellor of state and chancellor
of the university of Halle, dignities which he did not enjoy
long, for he died at Halle Dec. 18, 1692, in the sixty-sixth
year of his age. He was twice married, but had only one
son, who survived him. Besides his knowledge of languages,
he was learned in law, history, divinity; and is also said to
have been a tolerable painter and engraver. Of his numerous writings, that in most estimation for its utility, was
published at Francfort, 1692, 2 vols. folio, usually bound
up in one, with the title, “Commentarius Historicus &
Apologeticus de Lutheranisrno, sive de lleformatione Religionis ductu D. Martini Lutberi in magna Germania, aliisque regionibus, & speciatim in Saxonia, recepta & stabilita,
” &c. This work, which is very valuable on many accounts, and particularly curious for several singular pieces
and extracts that are to be found in it, still holds its repu^
tation, and is referred to by all writers on the reformation.
ly advanced: and in 1716 he was invited to Berlin, where he became physician to the king, and even a counsellor of state. He lived in great celebrity to the age of seventy-five,
, a very eminent German chemist, was born in Franconia in 1660, and educated in the
science of medicine, of which he was made professor in
1694, when the university of Hall was founded. His reputation, by means of his lectures, his publications, and
the success of his practice, was soon very highly advanced:
and in 1716 he was invited to Berlin, where he became
physician to the king, and even a counsellor of state. He
lived in great celebrity to the age of seventy-five, when he
died, in 1734. As a chemist, Stahl was unrivalled in his
day, and was the inventor of the doctrine of phlogiston,
which, though it may yield to the newer theory of Lavoisier and the French chemists, was admitted by the best
philosophers for nearly half a century. As a physician he
bad some fancies, and was particularly remarkable for his
doctrine of the absolute power of the soul over the body.
He maintained that every muscular action, whether attended with consciousness or not, proceeds from a
voluntary act of the mind. This theory he, as well as his folJowers, carried too far; but from it he derived many cautions of real importance to physicians, for attending to the
state of the mind in every patient. His works are very
numerous, but the principal of them are these, 1. “Experimenta et observationes Chemicae et Physicoe,
” Berlin,
Dissertationes Medica,
” Hall, 2 vols. 4to.
3. Theoria medica vera,“Hall, 1703, 4to. 4.
” Opusculum chemico-physico-medicum,“Hall, 1715, 8vo. 5.
” Thoughts on Sulphur,“Hall, 1718, 8vo, written in German. 6.
” Negotium otiosum, seu skiamachia adversus
positiones aliquas fundamentales Theorise verae Medicina?,
a viro quodam celeberrimo intenta, sed enervata,“Hall,
1720, 4to. Here he chiefly defends his theory of the soul’s
action on the body. 7.
” Fundamenta chymiae,“Norimb.
1723, 4to. 8. A treatise in German,
” On Salts,“Hall,
1723, 8vo. He was also deeply skilled in metallurgy, and
wrote, 9.
” Commentarium in Metallurgiam Beccheri,“1723, and 10.
” Instructions on Metallurgy," in German,
Leipsic, 1720, 8vo.
of the Russian theatre, and settled upon him a pension of 400l. per annum. Catherine II. created him counsellor of state; conferred upon him the order of St. Anne; and honoured
Besides dramatic writings, Sumorokof attempted every
species of poetry, excepting the epic. He wrotelovesongs, idyllia, fables, satires, anacreontics, elegies, versions
of the Psalms, and Pindaric odes. Superior to Lomonozof
in the compositions of the drama, he yet was inferior to
him in Pindaric writings. Though his odes, adds his biographer, are distinguished by their easy flow of versification, by their harmony, softness, and grace, yet they are
far from reaching that elevation and fire which characterize
those of Lomonozof. These two great poets had each
their peculiar talents: the one displayed in his style all the
majesty, strength, and sublimity of the Russian tongue;
and the other all its harmony, softness, and elegance. The
elegies of Sumorokof are full of tenderness: his idyls give
a true picture of the pastoral life in all the pleasing simplicity of unimproved nature, without descending to vulgarity;
and may serve as models in this species of composition, in
all things excepting in strict morality. His satires are the
best in the Russian language, but are extremely unequal, and
deserve to have been wrought with more plan and regularity. In writing his fables, his pen seems to have been
guided by the Muses and Graces; and his biographer seems
inclined, if not to prefer them, at least to compare them
with those of Fontaine. Sumorokof was also author of a
few short and detached historical pieces. 1. “A Chronicle of Moscow,
” in which he relates the origin of that city;
and abridges the reigns of its monarchs from Ivan Danilovitch to Keodor Alexievitch. 2. “A History of the first
insurrection of the Strelitz in 1682, by which Ivan was appointed joint-sovereign with Peter the Great, and the princess Sophia regent.
” 3. “An account of Stenko Razin’s
rebellion.
” His style in these pieces is said to be clear
and perspicuous, but somewhat too flowery and poetical
for prose. Sumorokof obtained by his merit the favour
and protection of his sovereign. Elizabeth gave him the
rank of brigadier; appointed him director of the Russian
theatre, and settled upon him a pension of 400l. per annum.
Catherine II. created him counsellor of state; conferred
upon him the order of St. Anne; and honoured him with
many instances of munificence and distinction until his
death, which carried him off at Moscow, October 1, 1777,
in the fifty-first year of his age.
y was, however, disturbed by some unfortunate adventures particularly by the death of La Fresnaye, a counsellor of state, who was killed in her apartment. Mademoiselle Tencin
, a
lady of considerable talents, took the habit of a religious
at the monastery of Montfleuri, near Grenoble. Becoming
tired of that mode of life, she went to Paris, where she
lived in the world, and solicited a bull from the pope to
authorize this unusual proceeding. With cardinal Lambertini, afterwards Benedict XIV. she was on good terms,
and he gave her no molestation. Her house at Paris was
the general meeting of all who had wit, or wished to have
the credit of it. The gaiety of her society was, however,
disturbed by some unfortunate adventures particularly by
the death of La Fresnaye, a counsellor of state, who was
killed in her apartment. Mademoiselle Tencin was prosecuted as concerned in the murder, and was confined first
in the Chatelet, and afterwards in the Bastille; but was at
length discharged as innocent. She died at Paris in 1749,
being then a good deal advanced in years. She appeared
as an author in several instances, and produced, 1. “Le
Siege de Calais,
” a romance of considerable delicacy and
genius, though not without faults. 2. “Memoires de Comminges,
” 12mo, another novel which has had its admirers.
A nephew of M. de Tencin, M. Pont-de-veste, had some
share in both these productions. 3. “Les Malheurs de
l'Amour,
” a novel, in which some have supposed that she
describes a part of her own history. 4. “Anecdotes of
Edward II.
” a posthumous work, published in 1776. All
her works were published at Paris in 1786, in seven small
volumes, 12 mo.
ected a member of the academy of Berlin. In 1788 he was appointed Major-general of cavalry and privy counsellor of state. He was placed at the head of the war department, and
The conversation became close and animated. Colonel Thompson, invited, in consequence, to dine with the prince, found there a number of French officers against whom he had fought in America. The conversation turned on the events of that war. The colonel sent for his portfolio, which contained exact plans of all the principal actions, of the strong places, of the sieges, and an excellent collection of maps; every one recognized the places where events interesting to himself had happened. The conversation lasted a great while, and they parted, promising to see one another again. The prince was an enthusiast in his profession, and passionately fond of instruction. He invited the colonel next day. They resumed the conversation of the evening with the same ardour; and when the traveller at last took his leave, the prince engaged him to pass through Munich, and gave him a letter of recommendation to his uncle the elector of Bavaria. The season was far advanced, and he was in haste to arrive in Vienna. He intended to stop at Munich two or three days at most. He remained fifteen, and quitted, not without regret, that city, where the testimonies of the favour of the sovereign, and the partialities of the different classes of society, had been lavished upon him with that cordial frankness, which so eminently distinguishes the Bavarian character. At Vienna, in the same manner he met with the most flattering reception, and was presented at court, and in the first companies, He spent there a part of the winter; and, learning that the war against the Turks would not take place, he yielded to the attraction of the recollections of Munich, and passing through Venice, where he stopped some weeks, and through the Tyrol, he returned to that residence toward the end of the winter of 1784. He now received from the elector a positive invitation to enter into his service; and instead of returning to Vienna, he set out for London with the intention of soliciting permission from the king to accept the offers of the elector palatine. Not only was -that favour granted him, but the king joined to it ah honourable distinction, by creating him a knight. He accordingly returned to Bavaria sir Benjamin Thompson; and was on his arrival appointed colonel of the horse, and general aid-de-camp to the sovereign who wanted to secure his services. Sir Benjamin employed the four first years of his abode at Munich in acquiring the political and statistical knowledge necessary for realizing the plans which his philanthropy suggested to him for improving the condition of the lower orders, he did not neglect in the mean time his favourite studies; and it was in 1786, in a journey to Manheim, that he made his first experiments on heat. Political and literary honours poured in upon him during that interval. In 1785 he was made chamberlain of the elector, and admitted a member of the academies of science of Munich and Manheim. In 178C he received from the kin<4 of Poland the order of St. Stanislaus; in 1787 he made a journey in Prussia, during which he was elected a member of the academy of Berlin. In 1788 he was appointed Major-general of cavalry and privy counsellor of state. He was placed at the head of the war department, and particularly charged with the execution of the plans which he had proposed for improving the state of the Bavarian army.
eir duty; and to make known his intentions of assembling the states. Uponi his return, he was made a counsellor of state.
The plague beginning at Paris in 1580, he retired to Touraine, and took an opportunity of seeing Normandy and Britany; and on his return to Paris, after the plague Stopped, was sent, with other counsellors in parliament, to administer justice in Guyenne. He came again to Paris in 1582, and had the misfortune not to arrive till the day after his father was buried. To make amends*, however, for not being able to pay his last duties to him, he erected a most noble monument to his memory, and adorned it with eulogiums written by the first wits of the age. la 1584 he was made master of the requests; and at that time, late as it may seem, entered upon a new course of study. He took into hix house Bressieu, the professor royal of mathematics; and under his d-rection applied, this year and the following, to read the Greek Euc-lu) with the notes of Proclus. The anvction which the cardinal de Vendome had conceived for him induced him to spend some time at court; but this affection abating, he withdrew from a place he did not at all like, and devoted -himself entirely to the composing his History, which he had begun two years before. In 1587 he took a wife, having first by the official of Paris been thoroughly absolved from all ecclesiastical engagements; for he had taken the four lesser orders. He lost his mother in 158S; and other troubles of a more public kind exercised him this year. The spirit of the league had seized Paris, and obfigef Henry II. to quit the city. Thuanus followed this prince^ and went by his order into Normandy, to sound the governors and magistrates; to acquaint them with what had happened at Paris; to confirm them m their duty; and to make known his intentions of assembling the states. Uponi his return, he was made a counsellor of state.
office recommended him to a superior rank in the administration, and accordingly, after being made a counsellor of state, he was in 1718 promoted to be keeper of the seals,
, a distinguished French statesman, of a very ancient and honourable family, was born at Venice in 1652, where his father then resided as ambassador from France, and was so much respected that the senate gave him and his descendants permission to add the arms of the republic <o his own, with the lion of St. Mark as his crest. The senate also, as sponsor for his son, gave him the additional name of Mark. He was brought up to the law, and after filling the place of master of the requests, was promoted by the king to the place of lieutenant-general of the police of Paris, and conducted himself in this office with so much ability and propriety, that it is said that city never enjoyed more plenty, quiet, and security, than under his administration. In times of scarcity or commotion on any other account, and during fires or other calamities, he displayed the talents of a humane and enlightened magistrate, and by address only, and sharing in every danger, and listening to all reasonable complaints, he succeeded, in preventing or allaying popular tumults, without having recourse to extremities. His ability in this office recommended him to a superior rank in the administration, and accordingly, after being made a counsellor of state, he was in 1718 promoted to be keeper of the seals, president of the council of finance, and in 172() minister of state; but of these offices he was almost immediately deprived, we are not told why, and died May 8, 1721. He was attached to literature, and was a member of the French academy and of that of sciences. His character has been variously represented. We have given the most favourable account, but it must not be concealed that he was accounted by many as a friend to despotic authority, and as meanly subservient to the tyranny of the court or its ministers. He is said to have obliged the Jesuits by persecuting the Jansenists, but neither ioved or hated the one or the other, unless as they might promote or obstruct his ambition. In private life he was a more amiable character. Some of his descendants made a considerable figure in the latter French history.