elfth century. His birth-place is much contested; but it appears most probable that he was a Norman, of a noble family; and as Normandy was at that time subject to
, bishop of Avranches in Normandy, usually
surnamed St. Victor, flourished in the twelfth century.
His birth-place is much contested; but it appears most
probable that he was a Norman, of a noble family; and as
Normandy was at that time subject to the King of England,
it was supposed he was an Englishman. He was, however, a Canon-regular of the order of St. Augustine, and
second abbot of St. Victor at Paris. He was preferred to
the bishoprick of Avranches in 1162 by the interest of
King Henry II. of England, with whom he appears to
have been a favourite, as he stood god-father to Eleanor,
daughter to that prince, and afterwards wife of Alphonso
Jx. king of Castile. He died March 29, 1172, and was
interred in the church of the Holy Trinity, belonging to
the abbey of Luzerne, in the diocese of Avranches. His
epitaph, which, the authors of the General Dictionary say,
is still remaining, speaks his character: “Here lies bishop
Achard, by whose charity our poverty was enriched.
” He
was a person of great eminence for piety and learning.
His younger years he spent in the study of polite literature and philosophy, and the latter part of his life in
intense application. His works were: “De Tentatione
Christi,
” a ms. in the library of St. Victor at Paris.
“De divisione Animae & Spiritus,
” in the same library;
copies of which are in the public library at Cambridge,
and in that of Bene't. His “Sermons
” are in the library of
Clairvaux. He likewise wrote “The Life of St. Geselin,
”
which was published at Douay, 12mo,
, bishop of Utrecht, was born about the end of the tenth century, of a noble family in the bishoprick of Liege, where, and at Rheims,
, bishop of Utrecht, was born about the
end of the tenth century, of a noble family in the bishoprick of Liege, where, and at Rheims, he was educated,
and acquired so much reputation, that Henry II. of Germany invited him to his court, admitted him in his council,
made him chancellor, and at last bishop of Utrecht. These
promotions appear to have inspired him with an ambition unbecoming his office, and some of his years were
spent in a kind of plundering war on account of certain
possessions which he claimed as his right. His latter days
were more honourably employed in promoting learning,
and in founding churches in his diocese. He erected the
cathedral of Utrecht, of which a part still remains, and dedicated it in the presence of the Emperor. His activity in
advancing the prosperity of the bishoprick ended only with
his life, Nov. 27, 1027. His chief literary work was a life
of his benefactor Henry II. with a judicious preface on the
qualifications of an historian; and from his fidelity and exactness, it has been regretted that a part only of this work
was completed. It was published first in the “Lives of
the Saints of Bamberg,
” by Gretser, Script, rer. Brunswic.
” He wrote also a
treatise “de ratione inveniendi crassitudinem Spherae,
”
printed by B. Fez, in the third volume of his “Thesaurus
Anecdotoram.
” His life of St. Walburgh, and some other
works, are still in manuscript. His style is clear, easy,
and even elegant, and entitles him to rank among the best
writers of his age.
eatest reason to return thanks to Almighty God, who has given me a wife after my own heart, a virgin of a noble family, well behaved, young, beautiful, and so conformable
Agrippa had been twice married. Speaking of his first
wife, lib. II. ep. 19. “I have (says he), the greatest reason
to return thanks to Almighty God, who has given me a
wife after my own heart, a virgin of a noble family, well behaved, young, beautiful, and so conformable to my disposition, that we never have a harsh word with each other;
and what completes my happiness is, that in whatever situation my affairs are, whether prosperous or adverse, she still
continues the same, equally kind, affable, constant, sincere,
and prudent, always easy, and mistress of herself.
” This
wife died in I am
not ignorant (says he), by what arts this affair was carried
on in the Sorbonne at Paris, who by their rashness have
given sanction to an example of such wickedness. When
I consider it, I can scarce contain myself from exclaiming,
in imitation of Perseus, Say, ye Sorbonnists, what has gold
to do with divinity What piety and faith shall we imagine
to be in their breasts, whose consciences are more venal
than sincere, and who have sold their judgments and decisions, which ought to be revered by all the Christian world,
and have now sullied the reputation they had established
for faith and sincerity, by infamous avarice.
” Agrippa was
accused of having been a magician and sorcerer, and in.
compact with the devil; but it is unnecessary to clear him,
from this imputation. Bayle justly says, that if he was a
conjuror, his art availed him little, as he was often in want
of bread.
, an eminent Italian poet, was born of a noble family at Florence, in 1475, and passed the early part
, an eminent Italian poet, was born of a noble family at Florence, in 1475, and passed the early part of his life in habits of friendship with Bernardo and Cosimo Rucellai, Trissino, and other scholars who had devoted themselves more particularly to the study of classical literature. Of the satires and lyric poems of Alamanni, several were produced under the pontificate of LeoX. In the year 1516, he married Alessandra Serristori, a lady of great beauty, by whom he had a numerous offspring. The rank and talents of Alamanni recommended him to the notice and friendship of the cardinal Julio de Medici, who, during the latter part of the pontificate of Leo X. governed on the behalf of that pontiff the city of Florence. The rigid restrictions imposed by the cardinal on the inhabitants, by which they were, among other marks of subordination, prohibited from carrying arms under severe penalties, excited the indignation of many of the younger citizens of noble families, who could ill brook the loss of their independence; and among the rest, of Alamanni, who, forgetting the friend in the patriot, not only joined in a conspiracy against the cardinal, immediately after the death of Leo X. but is said to have undertaken to assassinate him with his own hand. His associates were Zanobio Buondelmonti, Jacopa da Diaceto, Antonio Brueioli, and several other persons of distinguished talents, who appear to have been desirous of restoring the ancient liberty of the republic, without sufficiently reflecting on the mode by which it was to be accomplished. The designs of the conspirators, however, were discovered, and Alamanni was under the necessity of saving himself by flight. After many adventures and vicissitudes, in the course of which he returned to Florence, and took an active part in the commotions that agitated his country, he finally withdrew to France, where he met with a kind and honourable reception from Francis I. who was a great admirer of Italian poetry, and not only conferred on him the order of St. Michael, but employed him in many important missions.
, of a noble family at Brussels, was born about the beginning of
, of a noble family at Brussels, was
born about the beginning of the sixteenth century. His
father William Alard de Centier, a zealous convert to
popery, obliged him to enter the order of Dominican friars,
where he was much admired for his talents as a preacher.
While thus employed, a Hamburgh merchant, who was
pleased with his preaching, procured him privately the
works of Luther, which Alard read with conviction, and
the same merchant having assisted him in escaping from
his convent, he studied divinity at Jena and Wittemberg.
But the death of this faithful friend having deprived him of
resources, he ventured to return to Brussels and solicit assistance from his father. Before, however, he could obtain
a private interview with him, he was discovered in one of
the streets of Brussels by his mother, a violent bigot, who,
after some reproaches, denounced him to the Inquisition;
and when no persuasions could induce him to return into
the bosom of the church which he had left, his mother was
so irritated, as to call forth the rigour of the law, and even
offered to furnish the wood to burn him. Sentence of death
being pronounced, he was conducted to prison, but on the
night previous to the appointed execution, he is said to
have heard a voice saying, “Francis, arise and depart:
”
how far this and other particulars of his escape are true, we
know not; but it is certain he cleared the prison, and after
some hardships and difficulties, arrived in safety at Oldenburgh, where he became almoner to the prince. Here he
remained until hearing that freedom of religion was granted
at Antwerp, his affection for his native country induced
him to return, which he did twice, notwithstanding the
persecutions of the duke of Alba a.nd the dangers to which
he was exposed; and when his father came to see him at
Antwerp, in hopes of bringing him back to popery, he argued with so much power, as to make a sincere convert of
this bigotted parent. At length, when it was not longer
safe for him to remain in the Netherlands, Christian IV.
king of Denmark, gave him the curacy of Wilster in Hoistein, at which asylum he died July 10, 1578. His works,
which are In Flemish or German, consist of, 1. “The Confession of Antwerp.
” 2. “Exhortation of the Ministers
of Antwerp.
” 3. “Agenda, or Discipline of Antwerp.
”
4. “Catechism.
” 5. “Treatise on original Sin,
” &c.
ologist, who was his contemporary, to have been uncle to Sigismond, king of Poland. He certainly was of a noble family in Poland, which took its name from Lasco, Latzki,
A Lasco, or Lasco, or Laski (John), usually styled the Polish reformer, a man of high rank, talents, and pious zeal, is said by Fox, the martyrologist, who was his contemporary, to have been uncle to Sigismond, king of Poland. He certainly was of a noble family in Poland, which took its name from Lasco, Latzki, or Latzeo, and subsisted under one of those titles long after his time. He was born, according to Saxius, in 1499, but we have no particulars respecting his family, unless that his brother Jerome was an able politician, and employed by the emperor Ferdinand, as his ambassador to the Turkish government. He had also an uncle, of the same name, who was archbishop of Gnesua, to whom Erasmus dedicated his edition of the works of St. Ambrose, and whom Le Clerc mistakes for our John Alasco. Erasmus in one of his epistles (ep. 862) mentions two others of the same illustrious family, Hieroslaus, and Stanislaus Alasco (usually written à Lasco); and in ep. 1167, he speaks of a John à Lasco (Joannes Lascanus), a young man, who died in Germany.
m, was promoted to that see in the year 990, being the twelfth of the reign of king Ethelred. He was of a noble family; but, according to Simeon of Durham, more ennobled
, the first bishop of Durham, was promoted to that see in the year 990, being the twelfth of the reign of king Ethelred. He was of a noble family; but, according to Simeon of Durham, more ennobled by his virtues and religious deportment. He sat about six years in the see of Lindisfarne, or Holy Island in Northumberland, during which time that island was frequently exposed to the incursions of the Danish pirates. This made him think of removing from thence; though Simeon of Durham says, he was persuaded by an admonition from heaven. However, taking with him the body of St. Cuthbert, which had been buried there about 113 years, and accompanied by all the monks and the rest of the people, he went away from Holy Island; and after wandering about some time, at last settled with his followers at Dunelm, now called Durham, where he gave rise both to the city and cathedral church. Before his arrival, Dunelm consisted only of a few scattered huts or cottages. The spot of ground was covered with a very thick wood, which the bishop, with the assistance of the people that followed him, made a shift to cut down, and clear away. After he had assigned the people their respective habitations by lot, he began to build a church of stone; which he finished in three years time, and dedicated to St. Cuthbert, placing in it the body of that saint. From that time the episcopal see, which had been placed at Lindisfarne by bishop Aidan (see Aidan), remained fixed at Durham; and the cathedral church was soon endowed with considerable benefactions by king Ethelred, and other great men.
the most laborious naturalists of the sixteenth century, and professor at Bologna, was born in 1527, of a noble family in that city, which still exists. He employed
, one of the most laborious naturalists of the sixteenth century, and professor at Bologna, was born in 1527, of a noble family in that city, which still exists. He employed the greater part of his long life, and all his fortune, in travelling into the most distant countries, and collecting every thing curious in their natural productions. Minerals, metals, plants, and animals, were the objects of his curious researches; but he applied himself chiefly to birds, and was at great expence in having figures of them drawn from the life. Aubert le Mire says, that he gave a certain painter, famous in that art, a yearly salary of 200 crowns, for 30 years and upwards; and that he employed at his own expence Lorenzo Bennini and Cornelius Swintus, as well as the famous engraver Christopher Coriolanus. These expences ruined his fortune, and at length reduced him to the utmost necessity; and it is said that he died blind in an hospital at Bologna, May 4, 1605. Mr. Bayle observes, that antiquity does not furnish us with an instance of a design so extensive and so laborious as that of Aldrovandus, with regard to natural history; that Pliny indeed has treated of more subjects, but only touches them lightly, whereas Aldrovandus has collected all he could find.
French, and printed several times with additions. In the preface Alexis informs us, that he was born of a noble family; that he had from his most early years applied
, a Piedmontese, the reputed author of a book
of “Secrets,
” which was printed at Basil
, a priest of the oratory, was born at Brescia, of a noble family, Nov. 2, 1714, and studied theology, and the
, a priest of the oratory, was
born at Brescia, of a noble family, Nov. 2, 1714, and
studied theology, and the Greek and Hebrew languages,
in both which he became an excellent scholar. He applied himself chiefly to an investigation of the text of the
sacred scriptures, and read with great care the Greek and
Latin fathers. His studies were also diversified by an acquaintance with chronology, history both sacred and profane, antiquities, criticism, and whatever belongs to the
character of a general scholar. In his own country, he
obtained such fame that his advice was thought to be oracular. He died Dec. 30, 1779, in his sixty-fifth year. He
published “Critical Reflexions
” on Febronius’s work, entitled “De Statu Ecclesiae, et legitima potestate Romani
Pontificis;
” some dissertations and other works, particularly one on the “manner of writing the lives of illustrious
characters,
” with an appendix on that peculiar species of
biography, writing one’s own life. He left also some unpublished works, and among them “a comparison between
the Italians and French,
” and “Thoughts on the life and
writings of father Paul Sarpi.
”
, an associate of Luther in the reformation, was born in 1483, near Wurtzen in Misnia, of a noble family. After studying divinity, he became one of the
, an associate of Luther in the
reformation, was born in 1483, near Wurtzen in Misnia,
of a noble family. After studying divinity, he became
one of the clergy of Wittemberg, and preached also at
Magdeburgh and Naumburgh. In 1527, he accompanied
Luther, to whose doctrines he was zealously attached, to
the diet of Worms, and on his return, was in the same
carriage with that reformer, when he was seized by order
f the elector of Saxony, and conducted to Wartburgh. In
1573, he concurred in drawing up the articles of Smalcalde, and was, in 1542, appointed bishop of Naumburgh
by the elector John Frederick, who disapproved of the
choice which the chapter had made of Julius de Pflug.
But, five years after, when his patron was taken prisoner
by Charles V. he was obliged to surrender the bishopric
to Pflug, and retire to Magdeburgh. He afterwards assisted
in founding the university of Jena, which was intended as
a rival to that of Wirtemberg, and died at Eisenach,
May 14, 1565. The principal thing objected to him by
the popish writers, and by some of his biographers, is,
that in a dispute with G. Major, he maintained that good
works were hurtful to salvation: but however improper
this expression in the heat of debate, it is evident from his
writings, that he meant that good works impeded salvation
by being relied on as the cause of it, and that they were
the fruit and effect of that faith to which pardon is promised. He was one of the boldest in his time in asserting
the impiety and absurdity of the principal popish doctrines,
but from his bigotted adherence to Lutheran principles,
had too little respect for the other reformers who were of
different sentiments in some points. Moreri is wrong in
asserting that he formed a sect called by his name. Thesame principles were held by many of the Lutheran
divinos. He wrote on the “Lord’s Supper,
” and some
other controversial pieces enumerated by JVlelchior Adam,
Joecher, and Adelung.
, a miscellaneous French writer, was born at Paris, Sept. 15, 1716, of a noble family originally from the comtat Venaissin. He had
, a miscellaneous French writer, was born at Paris, Sept. 15, 1716, of a noble family originally from the comtat Venaissin. He had his education among the Jesuits at Paris, and discovered early symptoms of genius, having written some tolerable verses at the age of nine. He composed also in his youth three tragedies, none of which were acted; but one, on the subject of admiral Coligni’s murder on St. Bartholomew’s day, was printed in 1740. These works recommended him to Voltaire, who gave him advice and pecuniary assistance in his studies. Some of his early productions were also favourably noticed by Frederick, king of Prussia, who invited him to Berlin, and in some verses, called him his Ovid. This compliment, however, excited only the ridicule of the wits; and after residing about a year at Berlin, he went to Dresden, where he was appointed counsellor of legation. A wish to revisit his country, and an invitation from the nephew of marshal Saxe, determined him to return to Paris, where he lived many years, enjoying a large circle of acquaintance, from whom he retired by degrees to have leisure for the composition of his numerous works. During the reign of terror he was sent to prison, and on his liberation was exposed to great distresses from want of oecouomy, although not illiberally supplied by government, and by the profits of his works. He died Nov. 8, 1805. His writings, which are very numerous, consist of novels, poems, and plays, of which there are two editions, one in 24 vols. 12 mo, and one in 1-2 vols. 8vo, 1803, neither very complete, nor do his countrymen seem to consider this writer as likely to enjoy a permanent reputation.
, of a noble family of Mantua, flourished about the year 1546. Enjoying
, of a noble family of
Mantua, flourished about the year 1546. Enjoying much
intimacy with Possevin and Franco, he imbibed their taste
for poetry, and composed “Maritime Eclogues,
” which
were printed with the “Maritime Dialogues
” of Botazzo,
at Mantua, in
esteemed equal, if not superior to Aristotle himself, was born about the middle of the 12th centufy, of a noble family at Corduba, the capital of the Saracen dominions
, a very celebrated Arabian philosopher, and whom Christians as well as Arabians esteemed equal, if not superior to Aristotle himself, was born about the middle of the 12th centufy, of a noble family at Corduba, the capital of the Saracen dominions in Spain. He was early instructed in the Islamitic law, and, after the usual manner of the Arabian schools, united with the study of Mahometan theology that of the Aristotelian philosophy. These studies he pursued under Thophail, and became a follower of the sect of the Asharites. Under Avenzoar he studied the science of medicine, and under Ibnu-Saig he made himself master of the mathematical sciences. Thus qualified, he was chosen, upon his father’s demise, to the chief magistracy of Corduba. The fame of his extraordinary erudition and talents soon afterwards reached the caliph Jacob Al-Mansor, king of Mauritania, the third of the Almohadean dynasty, who had built a magnificent school at Morocco and that prince appointed him supreme magistrate and priest of Morocco and all Mauritania, allowing him still to retain his former honours. Having left a temporary substitute at Corduba, he went to Morocco, and remained there till he had appointed, through the kingdom, judges well skilled in the Mahometan law, and settled the whole plan of administration after which he returned home, and resumed his offices.
lian, highly praised by Paul Jovius, and as much condemned by Scaliger, was born in 1441, at Rimini, of a noble family. He studied at Padua, and was professor of belles
, an Italian, highly
praised by Paul Jovius, and as much condemned by Scaliger, was born in 1441, at Rimini, of a noble family. He
studied at Padua, and was professor of belles lettres in several universities, particularly Venice and Trevisa in the
latter place he obtained the rank of citizen, and died there
in 1524. His principal poem, “Chrysopoeia,
” or the art
of making, gold, occasioned his being supposed attached to
alchymy but there is no foundation for this, unless his
employing 'the technicals of the art in the manner of a
didactic poet, who studies imagination more than utility.
Leo X. to whom he dedicated the work, is said to have rewarded him by an empty purse, the only article he thought
necessary to a man who could make gold. This poem
was first printed at Venice, with, another on old age, entitled “Geronticon,
” Theatrum Chemicum,
” Strasburgh, Bibl. Chemica.
” His
other Latin poems, consisting of odes, satires, and epigrams, were published under the title “Carmina,
” Verona,
, commonly called Navarre (doctor Navarrus), was born of a noble family, Dec. 13, 1491, at Varasayn, near Pampeluna in
, commonly called Navarre (doctor Navarrus), was born of a noble family, Dec. 13, 1491, at Varasayn, near Pampeluna in Navarre. He was first educated, and took the habit, in the monastery of regular canons at Roncevaux, and afterwards studied at Alcala and at Ferrara, where he made such progress in law, as to be employed in teaching that science at Toulouse and Cahors. Some time after, he returned to Spain, and was appointed first professor of canon law at Salamanca, an office he filled with high reputation for fourteen years, at the end of which John III. king of Portugal, chose him law-professor of his new-founded university at Coimbra, and gave him a larger salary than had ever been enjoyed by any French or Spanish professor. After filling this chair also, with increasing reputation, for sixteen years, he was permitted to resign, and went first into Castile, and afterwards to Rome, on purpose, although in his eightieth year, to plead the cause of Bartholomew de Caranza, archbishop of Toledo, who was accused of heresy before the inquisition, and whose cause, first argued in Spain, was by the pope’s order removed to Rome. Azpilcueta exerted himself to the utmost, but without success, which we cannot be surprised at when we consider that the inquisitors were his opponents and although they could prove nothing against Caranza, they contrived that he should die in prison. Azpilcueta, however, was honourably received at Rome pope Pius V. appointed him assistant to cardinal Francis Alciat, his vice-penitentiary, and Gregory XIII. never passed his door without a visit, or met him in the street, without enjoying some conversation with him. He was much consulted, and universally esteemed for learning, probity, piety, and chanty. Antonio informs us that he used to ride on a mule through the city, and relieve every poor person he met, and that the creature of itself would stop at the sight of a poor person until its master relieved him. He died June 21, 1586, then in his ninetyfourth year. His works, which are either on morals or common law, were published, Rome, 1590, 3 vols. Lyons, 1591, Venice, 1602.
was born at Rimini, March 25, 1645, of a noble family, and studied at Cesena, under the most celebrated
was born at Rimini, March 25,
1645, of a noble family, and studied at Cesena, under the
most celebrated professors, and such was his proficiency,
that he was honoured with a doctor’s degree at the age of
sixteen. He next went to Rome, where Caspar de Carpegna, then auditor of the Rota, wished him to accept an
office in that tribunal, and employed him in some negotiations, but the air of Rome proving unfavourable to his
health, he removed to Ancona, where for five years he
filled the office of civil lieutenant of that city. He was
afterwards governor of various towns, the last of which was
Fabriano. In 1690, pope Alexander VIII. appointed him
bishop of Nocera, and in 1703 Clement XL commissioned
him to visit several dioceses. After being employed in
this for two years, the pope made him assistant prelate,
and gave him the abbey of St. Benedict of Gualdo. In
1716 he was translated to the see of Cesena, which he enjoyed but a short time, dying at St. Mauro, Sept. 19, 1717.
He wrote in Italian, 1. “II Legista Filosofo,
” Rome,
1680, 4to. 2. “Istoria universale di tutti i Concili Geiierali,
” Venice, Annali del
Sacerdozio,
” 4 vols. fol. Venice, 1701, 1704, 1709, 1711He wrote, also, some devotional tracts.
, was born at Bologna in 1502, of a noble family. Having gone through a course of study at Padua,
, was born at Bologna in 1502,
of a noble family. Having gone through a course of study
at Padua, he applied himself to business, without however entirely quitting literature. He attachedhimself to
cardinal Pole, whom he followed in the legation to Spain,
and was soon appointed himself to those of Venice and
Augsburg, after having assisted at the council of Trent,
and the archbishopric of Ragusa was the reward of his labours. Cosmo I. grand duke of Tuscany, having entrusted him in 1563 with the education of his son, prince
Ferdinand, he gave up his archbishopric, in the hope that
was held out to him of obtaining that of Pisa; but, being
deceived in his expectations, he was obliged to content
himself with the provostship of the cathedral of Prato,
where he ended his days in 1572. His principal works
are: “The life of cardinal Pole,
” in Italian, translated
by Duditius into Latin, and thence by Maucroix into
French; and that of Petrarch, in Italian, more exact than
any that had appeared before. This prelate was in correspondence with almost all the learned, his contemporaries,
Sadolet, Bembo, the Manuciuses, Varchi, &c. It remains
to be noticed that his life of cardinal Pole was published
in 1766, in English, by the Rev. Benjamin Pye, LL. B.
Of this, and other lives of that celebrated cardinal, notice
will be taken in his article.
tician of the fifteenth century, was born at Nuremberg, an imperial city in the circle of Franconia, of a noble family, not yet extinct. He had the best education which
, otherwise Behaim, Bœhm, or Behenira, an eminent geographer and mathematician of the fifteenth century, was born at Nuremberg, an imperial city in the circle of Franconia, of a noble family, not yet extinct. He had the best education which the darkness of that age permitted, and his early studies were principally directed to geography, astronomy, and navigation. As he advanced in life, he often thought of the existence of the antipodes, and of a western continent, of which he was ambitious to make the discovery.
, bishop of Marseilles. This illustrious prelate was of a noble family in Guienne, had been of the order of Jesuits,
, bishop of
Marseilles. This illustrious prelate was of a noble family in
Guienne, had been of the order of Jesuits, and was made bishop of Marseilles in 1709. The assistance he gave his flock
during the plague of 1720, that desolated the city of Marseilles, deserves to be commemorated. He was seen every
where during that terrible calamity, as the magistrate, the
physician, the almoner, the spiritual director of his flock. In
the town-house of Marseilles there is a picture representing
him giving his benediction to some poor wretches who are
dying at his feet; in this he is distinguished from the rest
of his attendants by a golden cross on his breast. Louis
the XVth, in 1723, in consideration of his exemplary behaviour during the plague, made him an offer of the bishopric of Laon, in Picardy, a see of greater value and of higher
rank than his own. Of this, however, he would not accept, saying, that he refused this very honourable translation that he might not leave a church already endeared to
him by the sacrifices of life and property which he had
offered. The pope honoured him with the pallium (a mark of distinction in dress worn only by archbishops), and Louis
XV. insisted upon his acceptance of a patent, by which,
even in the first instance, any law-suit he might be so unfortunate as to have, either for temporal or spiritual matters, was permitted to be brought before the parliament of
Paris. He died in 1755, closing a life of the most active
benevolence with the utmost devotion and resignation. He
founded at Marseilles a college, which still bears his name.
He wrote “L'histoire des Eveques de Marseille;
” “Des
Instructions Pastorales;
” and in La vie de Mademoiselle de Foix
andale,
” a relation of his, who had been eminent for her
piety. A particular account of the exertions of this benevolent prelate during the terrible calamity that afflicted
Marseilles is to be found in the *' Relation de la Peste de
Marseilles, par J. Bertrand,“12mo, and in
” Oratio funebris illust. domini de Belsunce Massiliensium episcopi,"
with the translation by the abbe Lanfant, 1756, 8vo.
, a famous abbot in the seventh century, was born of a noble family among the English Saxons, and flourished under
, a famous abbot in
the seventh century, was born of a noble family among
the English Saxons, and flourished under Oswi and Egfrid
kings of Northumberland. In the twenty-fifth year of his
age, he abandoned all temporal views and possessions, to
devote himself wholly to religion, and for this purpose travelled to Rome in the year 653, where he acquired a
knowledge of ecclesiastical discipline, which, upon his return home, he laboured to establish in Britain. In the
year 665, he took a second journey to Rome; and after
some months stay in that city, he received the tonsure in.
the monastery of Lerins, where he continued about two
years in a strict observance of the monastic discipline. He
was sent back by pope Vitalian, and upon his return, took
upon himself the government of the monastery of Canterbury, to which he had been elected in his absence. Two
years after, he resigned the abbey to Adrian, an abbot,
and went a third time to Rome, and returned with a very
large collection of the most valuable books. Then he went
to the court of Egfrid, king of Northumberland, who had
succeeded Oswi. That prince, with whom he was highly
in favour, gave him a tract of land on the east side of the
mouth of the river Were; where he built a large monastery, called, from its situation, Weremouth; in which, it
is said, he placed three hundred Benedictine monks.
The church of this convent was built of stone after the
Roman architecture, and the windows glazed by artificers
brought from France, in the year of Christ 674, and the
fourth of king Egfrid; and both the monastery and the
church were dedicated to St. Peter. In the year 678,
Benedict took a fourth journey to Rome, and was kindly
received by pope Agatho. From this expedition he returned loaded with books, relics of the apostles and
martyrs, images, and pictures, when, with the pope’s consent, he brought over with him John, arch-chanter of St.
Peter’s, and abbot of St. Martin’s, who introduced the
Roman manner of singing mass. In the year 682 kingEgfrid gave him another piece of ground, on the banks of
the Tyne, four miles from Newcastle where he built
another monastery called Girwy or Jarrow, dedicated to
St. Paul, and placed therein seventeen monks under an
abbot named Ceolfrid. About the same time he appointed
a Presbyter named Easterwinus to be a joint abbot with
himself of the monastery of Weremouth soou after which,
he took his fifth and last journey to Rome, and, as before,
came back enriched with a farther supply of ecclesiastical
books and pictures. He had not been long at home before he was seized with the palsy, which put an end to his
life on the 12th of January, 690. His behaviour during
his sickness appears to have been truly Christian and exemplary. He was buried in his own monastery of Weremouth. He wrote some pieces, but Leland ascribes to
him only a treatise on the Agreement of the rule of the
Monastic life. Bale and Pits give this book N the title of
“Concordia Regularum,
” and the last-mentioned author
informs us, that the design of this book was to prove, that
the rules of all the holy fathers tallied exactly with that of
St. Benedict, founder of the Benedictines. He wrote
likewise “Exhortationes ad Monachos;
” “De suo Privilegio.
” And “De celebratione Festorum totius anni.
”
Mr. Warton, in his History of Poetry, mentions Benedict
Biscop as one of the most distinguished of the Saxon ecclesiastics. The library which he added to his monastery,
was stored with Greek and Latin volumes. Bede has
thought it worthy to be recorded, that Ceolfrid, his successor in the government of Weremouth abbey, augmented
this collection with three volumes of Pandects, and a book
of cosmography, wonderfully enriched with curious workmanship, and bought at Rome. The historian Bede, who
wrote the lives of four of the abbots of Weremouth and
Jarrow, was one of the monks in those convents, and pronounced a homily on the death of Benedict. His body
was deposited in the monastery of Thorney, in Cambridgeshire.
Pamier, the son of a miller, or of an obscure person; but some are of opinion that he was descended of a noble family. He embraced a religious Hie when young, among
, whose name was James
Fournier, was a native of Saverdun, in the diocese of Pamier, the son of a miller, or of an obscure person; but
some are of opinion that he was descended of a noble family. He embraced a religious Hie when young, among
the Cistertians, and having afterwards received the degree
of master of divinity in the university of Paris, he was
made abbot of Fontfroide, in Narbonne, and when he had
governed that monastery for six years, with great applause,
he was made first bishop of Pamiers, and nine years after
translated to Mirepoix. In December 1327, pope John
XXII. created him cardinal presbyter of St. Prisca, and in
1334, he was elected pope, contrary to all expectation.
The conclave had chosen Comminge, cardinal bishop of
Porto, as the most proper person, but the French cardinal
insisting that he should promise never to go to Rome, he
refused to accept the office on a condition so prejudicial to
the church. In this dilemma, the cardinals being at a loss
whom to nominate, some of them proposed James Fournier, the most inconsiderable of the whole college, “omnium infimus,
” and he was unanimously elected: this
unexpected turn gave occasion to some of the writers of
his days to attribute the whole to divine inspiration, with
as good reason, no doubt, as in the case of any of his predecessors or successors.
, a celebrated Maronite, was born at Gusta in Phenicia, 1663, of a noble family, and sent to the Maronite college at Rome when
, a celebrated Maronite, was born at Gusta in Phenicia, 1663, of a noble family, and sent to the Maronite college at Rome when but nine years old, where he made a great progress in the oriental languages, returned afterwards to the east, and applied himself to preaching the gospel there. The Maronites of Antioch sent him back to Rome, as a deputy from their church. Cosmo III. grand duke of Tuscany, invited Benedict to his court; heaped many honours and favours upon him, and made him professor of Hebrew at Pisa, and Clement XI. appointed him one of the correctors of the Greek press. He entered among the Jesuits at the age of forty: his amiable temper, integrity, and profound skill in the oriental languages, procured him the esteem of all the learned. He died September 22, 1742, at Rome, aged 80. He published the first volumes of that excellent edition of St. Ephraim, which has been continued and finished by M. Assemani.
orary favourite. The earl of Albemarle had been in his majesty’s service from a youth, was descended of a noble family in Guelderland, attended king William into England
, earl of Portland, &c. one of the greatest statesmen of his time, and
the first that advanced his family to the dignity of the
English peerage, was a native of Holland, of an ancient
and noble family in the province of Guelderland. After a
liberal education, he was promoted to be page of honour
to William, then prince of Orange (afterwards king William III. of England), in which station his behaviour and
address so recommended him to the favour of his master,
that he preferred him to the post of gentleman of his bedchamber. In this capacity he accompanied the prince into
England, in the year 1670, where, going to visit the university of Oxford, he was, together with the prince, created
doctor of civil law. In 1672, the prince of Orange being
made captain-general of the Dutch forces, and soon after
Stadtholder, M. Bentinck was promoted, and had a share
in his good fortune, being made colonel and captain of the
Dutch regiment of guards, afterwards esteemed one of the
finest in king William’s service, and which behaved with
the greatest gallantry in the wars both in Flanders and
Ireland. In 1675, the prince falling ill of the small-pox,
M. Bentinck had an opportunity of signalizing his love and
affection for his master in an extraordinary manner, and
thereby of obtaining his esteem and friendship, by one of
the most generous actions imaginable: for the small-pox
not rising kindly upon the prince, his physicians judged it
necessary that some young person should lie in the same
bed with him, imagining that the natural heat of another
would expel the disease. M. Bentinck, though he had
never had the small-pox, resolved to run this risque, and
accordingly attended the prince during the whole course
of his illness, both day and night, and his highness said
afterwards, that he believed M. Bentinck never slept; for
in sixteen days and nights, he never called once that he
was not answered by him. M. Bentinck, however, upon
the prince’s recovery, was immediately seized with the
same distemper, attended with a great deal of danger, but
recovered soon enough to attend his highness into the field,
where he was always next his person; and his courage and
abilities answered the great opinion his highness had formed of him, and from this time he employed him in his most
secret and important affairs. In 1677, M. Bentinck was
sent by the prince of Orange into England, to solicit a
match with the princess Mary, eldest daughter of James,
at that time duke of York (afterwards king James II.) which
was soon after concluded. And in 1685, upon the duke
of Monmouth’s invasion of this kingdom, he was sent over
to king James to offer him his master’s assistance, both of
his troops and person, to head them against the rebels,
but, through a misconstruction put on his message, his
highness’s offer was rejected by the king. In the year
1688, when the prince of Orange intended an expedition
into England, he sent M. Bentinck, on the elector of Brandenburgh'a death, to the new elector, to communicate to
him his design upon England, and to solicit his assistance.
In this negociation M. Bentinck was so successful as to
bring back a more favourable and satisfactory answer than
the prince had expected; the elector having generously
granted even more than was asked of him. M. Bentincfc
had also a great share in the revolution; and in this difficult and important affair, shewed all the prudence and sagacity of the most consummate statesman. It was he that
was applied to, as the person in the greatest confidence
with the prince, to manage the negociations that were set
on foot, betwixt his highness and the English nobility and
gentry, who had recourse to him to rescue them from the
danger they were in. He was also two months constantly
at the Hague, giving the necessary orders for the prince’s
expedition, which was managed by him with such secrecy,
that nothing was suspected, nor was there ever so great a
design executed in so short a time, a transport fleet of
500 vessels having been hired in three days. M. Bentinck
accompanied the prince to England, and after king James’s
abdication, during the interregnum, he held the first place
among those who composed the prince’s cabinet at that
critical time, and that, in such a degree of super-eminence,
as scarcely left room for a second: and we may presume
he was not wanting in his endeavours to procure the crown
for the prince his master; who, when he had obtained it,
was as forward on his part, in rewarding the faithful and
signal services of M. Bentinck, whom he appointed groom
of the stole, privy purse, first gentleman of the royal bedchamber, and first commoner upon the list of privy counsellors. He was afterwards naturalised by act of parliament; and, by letters patent bearing date the 9th of April
1689, two clays before the king and queen’s coronation, he
was created baron of Cirencester, viscount Woodstock,
and earl of Portland. In 1690, the earl of Portland,
with many others of the English nobility, attended king
William to Holland, where the earl acted as envoy for his majesty, at the grand congress held at the
Hague the same year. In 1695, king William made this
nobleman a grant of the lordships of Denbigh, Bromtield,
Yale, and other lands, containing many thousand acres, in
the principality of Wales, but these being part of the
demesne thereof, the grant was opposed, and the house
of commons addressed the king to put a stop to the passing
it, which his majesty accordingly complied with, and recalled the grant, promising, however, to find some other
way of shewing his favour to lord Portland, who, he said,
had deserved it by long and faithful services. It was to
this nobleman that the plot for assassinating king William
in 1695 was first discovered; and his lordship, by his indefatigable zeal, was very instrumental in bringing to light
the whole of that execrable scheme. The same year another affair happened, in which he gave such a shining proof
of the strictest honour and integrity, as has done immortal
honour to his memory. The parliament having taken into
consideration the affairs of the East India company, who,
through mismanagement and corrupt dealings, were in
danger of losing their charter, strong interest was made
with the members of both houses, and large sums distributed, to procure a new establishment of their company by
act of parliament. Among those noblemen whose interest
was necessary to bring about this affair, lord Portland’s was
particularly courted, and an extraordinary value put upon
it, much beyond that of any other peer; for he was offered no less than the sum of 50,000l. for his vote, and his
endeavours with the king to favour the design. But his
lordship treated this offer with all the contempt it deserved, telling the person employed in it, that if he ever
so much as mentioned such a thing to him again, he would
for ever be the company’s enemy, and give them all the
opposition in his power. This is an instance of public
spirit not often mst with, and did not pass unregarded;
for we find it recorded in an eloquent speech of a member
of parliament, who related this noble action to the house
of commons, much to the honour of lord Portland. It was
owing to this nobleman, also, that the Banquetting-house at
Whitehall was saved, when the rest of the Palace was destroyed by fire. In February 1696, he was created a knight
of the garter, at a chapter held at Kensington, and was installed at Windsor on the 25th of March, 1697, at which
time he was also lieutenant-general of his majesty’s forces:
for his lordship’s services were not confined to the cabinet;
he likewise distinguished himself in the field on several
occasions, particularly at the battle of the Boyne, battle of
Landen, where he was wounded, siege of Limerick, Namur, &c. As his lordship thus attended his royal master
in his wars both in Ireland and Flanders, and bore a principal command there, so he was honoured by his majesty
with the chief management of the famous peace of Ryswick; having, in some conferences with the marshal
BoufHers, settled the most difficult and tender point, and
which might greatly have retarded the conclusion of the
peace. This was concerning the disposal of king James;
the king of France having solemnly promised, in an open
declaration to all Europe, that he would never lay down his
arms tilt he had restored the abdicated king to his throne,
and consequently could not own king William, without
abandoning him. Not long after the conclusion of the
peace, king William nominated the earl of Portland to be
his ambassador extraordinary to the court of France; an,
honour justly due to him, for the share he had in bringing
about the treaty of Hysvvick; and the king could not have
fixed upon a person better qualified to support his high
character with dignity and magnificence. The French
likewise had a great opinion of his lordship’s capacity and
merit; and no ambassador was ever so respected and caressed in France as his lordship was, who, on his part, filled
his employment with equal honour to the king, the British
nation, and himself. According to Prior, however, the
earl of Portland went on this embassy with reluctance, having been for some time alarmed with the growing favour of
a rival in king William’s affection, namely, Keppel, afterwards created earl of Albermarle, a DutchmLin, who had
also been page to his majesty. “And,
” according to Prior,
“his jealousy was not ill-grounded for Albemarle so prevailed in lord Portland’s absence, that he obliged him, by
several little affronts, to lay down all his employments,
after which he was never more in favour, though the king
always shewed an esteem for him.
” Bishop Burnet says
“That the earl of Portland observed the progress of the
king’s favour to the lord Albemaiie with great uneasiness
they grew to be not only incompatible, as all rivals for favour must be, but to hate and oppose one another in every
thing; the one (lord Portland) had more of the confidence,
the other more of the favour. Lord Portland, upon his
return from his embassy to France, could not bear the visible superiority in favour that the other was growing up to;
so he took occasion, from a small preference given lord
Albemarle in prejudice of his own post, as groom of the
stole, to withdraw from court, and lay down all his employments. The king used all possible means to divert
him from this resolution, but could not prevail on him to
alter it: he, indeed, consented to serve his majesty still in
his state affairs, but would not return to any post in the
household.
” This change, says bishop Kennet, did at first
please the English and Dutch, the earl of Albermarle having cunningly made several powerful friends in both nations, who, out of envy to lord Portland, were glad to see
another in his place; and it is said that lord Albemarle was
supported by the earl of Sutherland and Mrs. Villiers to
pull down lord Portland: however, though the first became
now the reigning favourite, yet the latter, says bishop
Kennet, did ever preserve the esteem and affection of king
William. But king William was not one of those princes
who are governed by favourites. He was his own minister
in all the greater parts of government, as those of war and
peace, forming alliances and treaties, and he appreciated
justly the merit of those whom he employed in his service.
It is highly probable, therefore, that lord Portland never
Jost the king’s favourable opinion, although he might
be obliged to give way to a temporary favourite. The
earl of Albemarle had been in his majesty’s service from
a youth, was descended of a noble family in Guelderland, attended king William into England as his page of
honour, and being a young lord of address and temper,
with a due mixture of heroism, it is no wonder his majesty took pleasure in his conversation in the intervals of
state business, and in making his fortune, who had so
long followed his own. Bishop Burnet says, it is a difficult matter to account for the reasons of the favour shewn
by the king, in the highest degree, to these two lords,
they being in all respects, not only of different, but of
quite opposite characters; secrecy and fidelity being the
only qualities in which they did in any sort agree. Lord
Albetnarle was very cheerful and gay, had all the arts of
a court, was civil to all, and procured favours for many;
but was so addicted to his pleasures that he could scarcely
submit to attend on business, and had never yet distinguished himself in any thing. On the other hand, lord
Portland was of a grave and sedate disposition, and indeed,
adds the bishop, was thought rather too cold and dry, and
had not the art of creating friends; but was indefatigable
in business, and had distinguished himself on many occasions. With another author, Mackey, his lordship has the
character of carrying himself with a very lofty mien, yet
was not proud, nor much beloved nor hated by the people.
But it is no wonder if the earl of Portland was not acceptable to the English nation. His lordship had been for ten
years entirely trusted by the king, was his chief favourite
and bosom-friend, and the favourites of kings are seldom
favourites of the people, and it must be owned king William was immoderately lavish to those he personally loved.
But as long as history has not charged his memory with
failings that might deservedly render him obnoxious to the
public, there can be no partiality in attributing this nobleman’s unpopularity partly to the above reasons, and partly
to his being a foreigner, for which he suffered not a little
from the envy and malice of his enemies, in their speeches,
libels, &c. of which there were some levelled as well
against the king as against his lordship. The same avereion, however, to foreign favourites, soon after shewed itself
against lord Albemarle, who, as he grew into power and
favour, like lord Portland, began to be looked upon with
the same jealousy; and when the king gave him the order
of the garter, in the year 1700, we are told it was generally disliked, and his majesty, to make it pass the better,
at the same time conferred the like honour on Jord Pembroke (an English nobleman of illustrious birth). Yet it
was observed, that few of the nobility graced the ceremony
of their installation with their presence, and that many
severe reflections were then made on his majesty, for giving the garter to his favourite. The king had for a long
time given the earl of Portland the entire and absolute government of Scotland; and his lordship was also employed,
in the year 1698, in the new negociation set on foot for
the succession of the Crown of Spain, called by the name
of the partition treaty > the intention of which being frustrated by the treachery of the French king, the treaty itself fell under severe censure, and was looked upon as a
fatal slip in the politics of that reign; and lord Portland
was impeached by the house of commons, in the year
1700, for advising and transacting it, as were also the
other lords concerned with him in it. This same year,
lord Portland was a second time attacked, together with
lord Albemarle, by the house of commons, when the affair of the disposal of the forfeited estates in Ireland was
under their consideration; it appearing upon inquiry, that
the king had, among many other grants, made one to lord
Woodstock (the earl of Portland’s son) of 135,820 acres of
land, and to lord Albemarle two grants, of 108,633 acres
in possession and reversion; the parliament came to a resolution to resume these grants; and also resolved, that
the advising and passing them was highly reflecting on the
king’s honour; and that the officers and instruments concerned in the procuring and passing those grants, had
highly failed in the performance of their trust and duty;
and also, that the procuring or passing exorbitant grants,
by any member now of the privy-council, or by any other
that had been a privy -counsellor, in this, or any former
reign, to his use or benefit, was a high crime and misdemeanour. To carry their resentment still farther, the
commons, immediately impeached the earls of Portland and
Albemarle, for procuring for themselves exorbitant grants.
This impeachment, however, did not succeed, and then
the commons voted an address to his majesty, that no person who was not a native of his dominions, excepting his
royal highness prince George of Denmark, should be admitted to his majesty’s councils in England or Ireland, but
this was evaded by the king’s going the very next day to
the house of lords, passing the bills that were ready, and
putting an end to the session. The partition treaty was
the last public transaction we find lord Portland engaged
in, the next year after his impeachment, 1701, having
put a period to the life of his royal and munificent master,
king William III.; but not without having shewn, even in
his last moments, that his esteem and affection for lord
Portland ended but with his life: for when his majesty
was just expiring, he asked, though with a faint voice, for
the earl of Portland, but before his lordship could come,
the king’s voice quite failed him. The earl, however,
placing his ear as near his majesty’s mouth as could be, his
lips were observed to move, but without strength to express his mind to his lordship; but, as the last testimony
of the cordial affection he bore him, he took him by the
hand, and carried it to his heart with great tenderness,
and expired soon after. His lordship had before been a
witness to, and signed his majesty’s last will and testament,
made at the Hague in 1695; and it is said, that king
William, the winter before he died, told lord Portland, as
they were walking together in the garden at Hampton
court, that he found his health declining very fast, and
that he could not live another summer, but charged his
lordship not to mention this till after his majesty’s death.
We are told, that at the time of the king’s death, lord
Portland was keeper of Windsor great park, and was displaced upon queen Anne’s accession to the throne: we are
not, however, made acquainted with the time when his
lordship became first possessed of that post. After king
William’s death, the earl did not, at least openly, concern
himself with public affairs, but betook himself to a retired
life, in a most exemplary way, at his seat at Bulstrode in
the county of Bucks, where he erected and plentifully
endowed a free-school; and did many other charities.
His lordship had an admirable taste for gardening, and
took great delight in improving and beautifying his own
gardens, which he made very elegant and curious. At
length, being taken ill of a pleurisy and malignant fever,
after about a week’s illness he died, November 23, 1709,
in the sixty-first year of his age, leaving behind him a very
plentiful fortune, being at that time reputed one of the
richest subjects in Europe. His corpse being conveyed to
London, was, on the third of December, carried with,
great funeral pomp, from his house in St. James’s square
to Westminster-abbey, and there interred in the vault
under the east window of Henry the Seventh’s chapel.
, an Italian antiquary of the last century, was born of a noble family, at Mereto inthe Frioul, March 13, 1676, and
, an Italian antiquary of
the last century, was born of a noble family, at Mereto inthe Frioul, March 13, 1676, and after studying at Venice,
was ordained a priest in 1700. The same year he became
canon -coadjutor of the patriarchal church of Aquileia, and
soon after titular. He had already acquired a decided taste
for the study of antiquities, and was in a country abounding with objects to gratify it, most of which, however, had
been greatly neglected, and even destroyed by the ignorant
inhabitants, who converted every remains of antiquity in
stone to the common purposes of building. To prevent
this for the future, Bertoli formed a society of men of
learning and similar taste, who began with purchasing
every valuable relic they could find, and placed the collection in the portico of the canons’ house, where it soon
became an object of curiosity, not only to travellers, but
to the Aquileians themselves. At the same time he copied,
or caused to be copied, all the monuments in the town, and
in the whole province, and entered into an extensive correspondence with many eminent characters, particularly
Fontanini, to whom he liberally communicated his discoveries, in hopes they might be useful to that learned prelate; but he having deceased in 1736, Bertoli resolved to
take upon himself what he had expected from him, and
was encouraged in this design by Muratori and Apostolo
Zeno. Accordingly he began to publish a series of memoirs and dissertations on subjects of antiquity, which he
wrote at his native place, Mereto, where he resided for
such periods as his official duties at Aquileia permitted.
In 1747 he was elected a member of the Columbarian society of Florence, and next year of that of Cortona, and
died a few years afterwards, but the date is not ascertained
in either of our authorities. His principal publication is
entitled “Le Aritichita di Aquileja profane e sacre,
” Venice
, an eminent cardinal, was born in 1575, at the chateau de Serilli, near Troyesin Champagne, of a noble family, and. having embraced the ecclesiastical state,
, an eminent cardinal, was born in
1575, at the chateau de Serilli, near Troyesin Champagne,
of a noble family, and. having embraced the ecclesiastical
state, distinguished himself early in life by his piety and
his learning. He got great reputation in the famous conference of Fontainbleau, where du Perron contended with
du Plessis-Mornay, called the pope of the Huguenots. He
was sent by Henry IV. to whom he was chaplain, into
Spain, for the purpose of bringing some Carmelites to
Paris, and it was by his means that this order flourished so
much in France. Some time afterwards he founded the
Congregation of the Oratory of France, of which he was the
first general. This new institution was approved by a bull
of pope Paul V. in 1613, and has always been reckoned by
the catholics a great service done to the church. In that
gregation, according to the expression of Bossuet, the
members obey without dependance, and govern without
commanding; their whole time is divided between study
and prayer. Their piety is liberal and enlightened, their
knowledge useful, and almost always modest. Urban VIII.
rewarded the merit of Berulle by a cardinal’s hat. Henry
IV. and Louis XIII. vainly strove to make him accept of
considerable bishoprics on Louis’s telling him that he
should employ the solicitation of a more powerful advocate
than himself (meaning the pope) to prevail upon him to
accept the bishopric of Leon, he said, “that if his majesty continued to press him, he should be obliged to quit
his kingdom.
” This cardinal came over with Henrietta
Maria, queen of Charles I. to England, as her confessor,
to the court of which he endeared himself by the sanctity
of his morals, and the extreme propriety of his behaviour,
although his errand had afterwards its weight in encreasing
the fatal unpopularity of the royal family. He died suddenly, Oct. 2, 1629, aged fifty-five, while he was celebrating the sacrament, and had just repeated the words,
“bane igitur obiationem,
” which gave occasion to the following distich:
, in Latin Beverlacius, archbishop of York in the eighth century, was born of a noble family among the English Saxons, at Harpham, a small
, in Latin Beverlacius, archbishop of York in the eighth century, was born of a noble
family among the English Saxons, at Harpham, a small
town in Northumberland. He was first a monk, and afterwards abbot of the monastery of St. Hilda. He was instructed in the learned languages by Theodore, archbishop
of Canterbury, and was justly esteemed one of the best
scholars of his time. Alfred of Beverly, who wrote his
life, pretends that he studied at Oxford, and took there
the degree of master of arts; but bishop Godwin assures
us this cannot be true, because such distinction of degrees
was not then known at Oxford, nor any where else. Our
abbot’s merit recommended him to the favour of Alfred,
king of Northumberland, who, in the year 685, advanced
him to the see of Hagustald, or Hexham, and, upon the
death of archbishop Bosa in 687, translated him to that of
York. This prelate was tutor to the famous Bede, and
lived in the strictest friendship with Acca, and other AngloSaxon doctors, several of whom he put upon writing comments on the scriptures. He likewise founded, in 704, a
college at Beverly for secular priests. After he had governed the see of York thirty-four years, being tired with
the tumults and confusions of the church, he divested himself of the episcopal character, and retired to Beverly;
and four years after died May 7, 721. The day of his
death was appointed a festival by a synod held at London
in 1416. Bede, and other monkish writers, ascribe several miracles to him. Between three and four hundred years
after his death, his body was taken up by Alfric, archbishop of York, and placed in a shrine richly adorned with
silver, gold, and precious stones. Bromton relates, that
William the conqueror, when he ravaged Northumberland
with a numerous army, spared Beverly alone, out of a religious veneration for St. John of that place. This prelate
wrote some pieces, 1. “Pro Luca exponendo;
” an essay
towards an exposition of St. Luke, addressed to Bede.
2. “Homiliee in Evangelia.
” 3. Epistolae ad Hildara Abbatissam.“4.
” Epistolse ad Herebaldum, Andenum, et
Bertinum.“- -Pits mentions another John of Beverly, so
called from the place of his nativity, who was a Carmelite
monk in the fourteenth century, and a very learned man,
and doctor and professor of divinity at Oxford. He flourished about 1390, in the reign of Richard II. and wrote,
1.
” Questiones in magistrum sententiarum“in four
books. 2.
” Disputationes ordinariae" in one book.
, in Latin Beverovicius, was born at Dort, Sept. 17, 1594, of a noble family. He was brought up from his infancy under the
, in Latin Beverovicius, was
born at Dort, Sept. 17, 1594, of a noble family. He
was brought up from his infancy under the eyes of Gerard
John Vossius, and visited several universities for acquiring
knowledge in the art of medicine, and took his doctor’s
degree at Padua. He practised in the place of his nativity, where he likewise filled several civic posts with distinction. He died Jan. 19, 1647, aged 51 and though
his course was not remarkably long, yet Daniel Heinsius,
in the epitaph he made Oil him, calls him “ViUe artifex,
mortis fugator.
” His principal works are: 1. “De terra i no vitse, fatali an mobili
” Rotterdam, De excellentia
sexus Fceminei,
” Dordrecht, Decalculo,
”
Leyden, Introductio ad Medicinam
indigenam,
” Leyden,
n under the tuition of Wolmar. Here he contracted an attachment to a young woman, who, some say, was of a noble family, others, of inferior birth, to whom he secretly
On his return to Paris he was presented to the priory of Longjumeau, and another benefice; and one of his uncles, who possessed a rich abbey, had an intention to resign in his favour. Beza thus enjoying an ample revenue, with the prospect of an easy increase, joined too freely in the amusements and dissipations of youth, notwithstanding the remonstrances of his parents and friends: and although in the actual possession of benefices, had not yet taken orders, nor for some years did he associate with persons of the reformed religion, although he could not forget the progress that it had made in his mind when under the tuition of Wolmar. Here he contracted an attachment to a young woman, who, some say, was of a noble family, others, of inferior birth, to whom he secretly promised marriage, but was prevented from accomplishing this, through fear of losing his promotions. At leng:h, however, in 1548, when recovering from a severe illness, he resigned his priory, and went to Geneva, and married the lady to whom he had now been engaged about four years. At the same time he abjured popery, and alter a short stay at Geneva, went to Tubingen, to his old master, Wolmar, for whom he always had the sincerest esteem.
ave occasion to name him [for it is thus he gives his own name in his “Roman des Oiseaux”], was born of a noble family of the diocese of Bayeux, about 1428. He was
, and not de la Vigne, as he is
generally called by writers who have occasion to name him
[for it is thus he gives his own name in his “Roman des
Oiseaux
”], was born of a noble family of the diocese of
Bayeux, about 1428. He was chaplain to king John, and
followed that prince into England after the battle of Poletiers. Being at Rochefort in 1459, he began a poem on
the chace, entitled “Le Roman des Oiseaux,
” which he
finished on his return to France. This he did at the command of the king for the instruction of his son Philip duke
of Burgundy. The abbé Goujet attributes this poem to
Gaston de Foix, from its being printed at the end of the
“Miroir de la Chasse
” by that prince, but greatly different from the manuscripts. Gaston’s work printed by
Trepperel at Paris, fol. without a date, and again in 1520,
consists of two parts, the first Gaston’s, and the second
by Bigne. Bigne is supposed, from some passages in his
work, to have been alive in 1475. The personages in this
poem, or romance, are allegorical, and dispute which
species of the chace has the pre-eminence, appealing to
the king, who, after having advised with his counsellors,
wisdom, reason, and truth, (not very usually called in)
sends away the disputants perfectly satisfied. The style is
easy, and the author’s quaintness will be agreeable to the
lovers of early poetry.
, a classical editor, was born at Leyden, of a noble family, Dec. 11, 1625, and was educated under Boxhorn
, a classical editor, was born at Leyden, of a noble family, Dec.
11, 1625, and was educated under Boxhorn and Golius.
He had scarcely arrived at his twentieth year, when he
was invited to become professor of history at Steinfurth.
This he resigned in 1650 for the chair of history and antiquities at Middleburgh,but this school falling into decay,
Blancard removed to Heeren-veen in Friseland, where he
practised physic. In November 1669, he was appointed
Greek professor at Franeker. At these different places he
published, 1. an edition of “Quintus Curtius,
” with notes,
Leyden, Florus,
” with his own added to
the Variorum,“ibid. 1650, 8vo; Franeker, 1690, 4-to. 3.
” Arrian’s Alexander,“not in much estimation, Amsterdam, 1668, 8vo. 4.
” Arriani Tactica, Periplus, de Venatione Epicteti Enchiridion,“&c. Amst. 1683, 8vo.
5.
” Harpoerationis Lexicon,'“' Leyden, 1683, 4to. 6.
” Ptiilippi CypriiChronicon ecclesiae Grseciae,“Franc.1679,
4to, the first edition, which Blancard copied from a manuscript brought from Constantinople, and translated it
into Latin. 7.
” Thomoe Magistri dictionum Atticarum.
eclogae,“Fran. 1690, 8vo, reprinted 1698, with notes by
Lambert Bos. In the fine edition of Thomas-published by
Bernard in 1757, this text of Blancard is adopted as well
as Bos’s notes. In Burmann’s
” Sylloge," are three letters of Blancard’s. He had begun to prepare an edition of
Thucydides, but owing to his age and infirmities was
obliged, about the year 1690, to give up his literary labours. He died May 15, 1703.
, an eminent Italian scholar, was born at Bologna in 1488, of a noble family. In his studies he made uncommon proficiency,
, an eminent Italian scholar, was
born at Bologna in 1488, of a noble family. In his studies
he made uncommon proficiency, and had distinguished
himself at the early age of twenty by his very learned
work on Plautus. According to the custom of the age, he
attached himself to various princes, but at first to the celebrated Albert Pio, count of Carpi. Having become imperial orator at the court of Rome, he obtained by his
talents and knowledge of business, the titles of chevalier
and count Palatine, and was intrusted with some important
functions, such as that of bestowing the degree of doctor,
of creating notaries, and even legitimizing natural children. At Bologna he was professor of Greek and Latin,
rhetoric and poetry, and was chosen one of the Auziani in
1522. Having acquired a handsome fortune, he built a
palace, and in 1546 founded an academy in it, named from
himself Academia Bocchiana, or Bocchiale. It was also
called Ermatena, agreeable to its device, on which was
engraven the two figures of Mercury and Minerva. He
also established a printing-office in his house, and he and
his academicians employed themselves in correcting the
many beautiful editions which they printed. Bocchi was
a good Hebrew scholar, and well versed in antiquities and
history, particularly that of his own country. The senate
of Bologna employed him on writing the history of that
city, and bestowed on him the title of Historiographer.
Cardinal Sadolet, the two Flaminio’s, John Phil. Achillini,
and Lcl. Greg. Giraldi, were among his particular friends,
who have all spoken very favourably of him in their works.
This last was much attached to him, and it is supposed
that he meant to express this attachment by giving him
the name of Phileros (loving friend), or Philerote, which
is on the title of some of his works. Bocchi died at Bologna, Nov. 6, 1562. He wrote, 1. “Apologia in Plautum,
cui accedit vita Ciceronis authore Plutarcho,
” Bologn.
everal derotional pieces, was born the 19th of October, 1609, at Mondovi, a little city in Piedmont, of a noble family. Having finished his first studies with great
, an eminent cardinal of the church of
Rome, and author of several derotional pieces, was born
the 19th of October, 1609, at Mondovi, a little city in
Piedmont, of a noble family. Having finished his first
studies with great success, he entered himself in a monastery of the order of St. Bernard near Pignerol in July 1625,
when he was but fifteen years of age, and was professed
there the 2d of August the year following, according to
Bertolot, who wrote his Life; though Moroti, in “Cistercii
reflorescentis Historia,
” places this. in
, of a noble family, was born at Gorcum, in Holland, in 1604. After
, of a noble family, was
born at Gorcum, in Holland, in 1604. After taking his
degree of doctor in medicine, he came to England, and was
in such estimation for his skill in his profession, that he
was made physician to king Charles I. On the death of
that prince he settled in Dublin, but died soon after, viz.
in 1650. In 1630 he published “Heures de Recreation,
”
4to, in the Dutch language; and in Philosophia
Naturalis reformata,
” which are not, however, much esteemed. His brother Arnold, likewise a physician, was well
versed in the Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and Syriac languages.
After taking his degree of doctor in medicine, he came also
to London; but on the breaking out of the troubles here,
he removed to Ireland, where he practised with success
and reputation for some years. Tired at length with the
hurry and confusion incident to civil commotions, and having experienced some losses, he went to Paris, and there
passed the remainder of his life in retirement and study.
He died in 1653. He published, in 1649, “Observationes
Medicae de affcctibus a veteribus omissis,
” 12mo. Haller
gives a particular account of this volume, which contains
many interesting and curious observations.
, was born at Florence in 1515 of a noble family, and became a Benedictine monk in 1531. He was
, was born at Florence in 1515
of a noble family, and became a Benedictine monk in 1531.
He was one of the persons appointed to correct the
Decameron of Boccace, by order of the council of Trent, and
performed this curious task for the edition of Florence,
1573, 8vo. But the best known of his works, and which
did him the most honour, is that entitled, “Discovsi di
M. Vincenzo Borghini,
” printed at Florence Riposo della Pittura, e della Scukura,
” published at
Florence in
, a learned Roman cardinal, was born of a noble family at Velletri, in 1731; and as the second son of
, a learned Roman cardinal, was
born of a noble family at Velletri, in 1731; and as the second son of the family, was from his birth destined for the
clerical dignities. In youth he appears to have been studious, and particularly attentive to historic and diplomatic
science, and modern and ancient languages. In 1770, he
was appointed secretary to the congregation of Propaganda, the purposes of which are to furnish missionaries to
propagate Christianity, on popish principles; and into this
college children are admitted from Asia and Africa, in
order to be instructed in religion, and to diffuse itj on
their return, through their native countries. A more fit
person could not be selected than Borgia, as he had both
zeal and learning. In 1771, the abbe Amaduzzi, director
of the printing-house of the college, procured the casting
of the Malabar types, and published some works in that
language, as well as in those of the Indians of Ava and of
Pegu. By the care of this new secretary also, an Etruscan
alphabet was published, which soon proved of the highest
benefit to Passeri: for, by its means, this celebrated antiquary, in the latter part of his life, could better explain
than he had ever done some Etruscan monuments of the
highest interest. About this time he began to lay the
foundation of the family museum at Velletri, which, before 1780, exhibited no less than eighty ancient Egyptian
statues in bronze or marble, many Etruscan and Greek
idols, numerous coins, inscriptions, &c. To form some
idea of the total of this museum, it may be observed that
only a small part of it, relative to Arabic antiquity, was the
subject of the description which, in 1782, was published
under the title of “Musaeum Cusicum.
” He had long
before this published “Monumento di Giovanni XVI.
summo Pontifice illustrate,
” Rome, 1750, 8vo. “Breve
Istoria dell‘ antica citta di Tadino nell’ Umbria, &c.
” ibid.
Dissertatione sopra un‘ antica Iscrizione
rinuentanelP Isoladi Malta nell’ anno 1749,
”Fermo, Dissertatione FUologica sopra un' antica gemma in
tagliata.
”
, Baron, an eminent mineralogist, was born of a noble family at Carlsburg, in Transylvania, Dec. 26, 1742.
, Baron, an eminent mineralogist, was
born of a noble family at Carlsburg, in Transylvania, Dec.
26, 1742. He came early in life to Vienna, and studied
under the Jesuits, who, perceiving his abilities, prevailed
on him to enter into their society, but he remained a member only about a year and a half. He then went to Prague,
where, as it is the custom in Germany, he studied law, and
having completed his course, made a tour through a part
of Germany, Holland, the Netherlands, and France, and
returning to Prague, he engaged in the studies of natural
history, mining, and their connected branches, and in,
1770, he was received into the department of the mines
and mint at Prague. The same year he visited the principal mines of Hungary and Transylvania, and during this
tour kept up a correspondence with the celebrated Ferber,
who, in 1774, published his letters. It was in this town,
also that he so nearly lost his life, and where he was struck
with the disease which embittered the rest of his days. It
appears from his eighteenth letter to Mr. Ferber that, when
at Felso-Banya, he descended into a mine, where fire was
used to detach the ore, to observe the efficacy of this means,
but too soon after the fire had been extinguished, and while
the mine was full of arsenical vapours raised by the heat.
How greatly he suffered in his health by this accident appears from his letter, in which he complained that he could
hardly bear the motion of his carriage. After this he was
appointed at Prague counsellor of the mines. In 1771, he
published a small work of the Jesuit Poda, on the machinery
used about mines, and the next year his “Lithophylacium
Borneanum,
” a catalogue of that collection of fossils, which
he afterward disposed of to the lion. Mr. Greville. This
work drew on him the attention of mineralogists, and
brought him into correspondence with the first men in that
study. He was now made a member of the royal societies
of Stockholm, Sienna, and Padua; and in 1774, the same
honour was conferred on him by the royal society of
London.
, a Spanish poet, of a noble family, was born at Barcelona, about the end of the
, a Spanish poet, of a
noble family, was born at Barcelona, about the end of the
fifteenth century, and is supposed to have died about 1543.
He was bred to arms, and, having served with distinction,
was afterwards a great traveller. From the few accounts
we have of him, as well as from what appears in his works,
he seems to have been a very good classical scholar; and
he is said to have been highly successful in the education
of Ferdinand, the great duke of Alba, whose singular qualities were probably the fruit of our poet’s attention to him.
He married Donna Anna Giron di Rebolledo, an amiable
woman, of a noble family, by whom he had a very numerous offspring. Garcilaso was his coadjutor in his poetical
labours, and their works were published together, under
the title “Obras de Boscan y Garcilaso,
” Medina, Collecion de Poesias, &c.
” or collection of
Spanish poems translated into Italian verse, has given as
specimens of Boscan, two canzoni, six sonnets, and a
familiar epistle to Don Hurtado de Mendoza.
, of a noble family of Florence, in the fifteenth century, was surnamed
, of a noble family of Florence, in the fifteenth century, was surnamed Lippus, on
account of the loss of his sight, which did not, however,
prevent his becoming a scholar of much reputation, and
an orator, musician, and poet. His fame procured him
an invitation from Matthias Corvinus, king of Hungary,
to teach oratory, which he accepted, and taught at the
university of fiada. After returning to Florence, he took
the habit of the friars of St. Augustin, was made priest
some time after, and preached to numerous auditories.
He died of the plague at Rome, in 1497. Wonders are
told of his powers of extempore versification, and he is
classed among the first of the improvisator!. As to his
preaching, Bosso says that those who heard him might
fancy they listened to a Plato, an Aristotle, and a Theopfcrastus; he is yet more extravagant in noticing his extempore effusions. The circumstance, says he, which
placed him above all other poets, is, that the verses they
compose with so much labour, he composed and sang impromptu, displaying all the perfections of memory, style,
and genius. At Verona, on one occasion, before a numerous assemblage of persons of rank, he took up his lyre,
and handled every subject proposed in verse of every measure, and being asked to exert his improvisitation on the
illustrious men of Verona, without a moment’s consideration
or hesitation, he sang the praises, in beautiful poetry, of
Catullus, Cornelius Nepos, and Pliny the elder; nay, he
delivered in the same extempore manner all the subjects
in Pliny’s thirty-seven books of natural historj r without
omitting any one circumstance worthy of notice. Whatever credit may be given to these prodigies, his works
prove him to have been a man of real learning. The principal of these are: 1. “Libri duo paradoxorum Chris tianorum,
” Basil, Dialogus de humanae vitae conditione
et toleranda corporis aegritudine,
” Basil, De ratione scribendi Epistolas,
”
Basil, de laudibus musicae.
” Julius Niger mentions also some
works of his on the laws commentaries on St. Paul’s
epistles, and the Bible histories, in heroic verse, but,
whether printed, does not appear.
, a famous physician, was born at Ferrara, in 1500, of a noble family. His knowledge was not confined to medicine.
, a famous physician,
was born at Ferrara, in 1500, of a noble family. His
knowledge was not confined to medicine. In consequence
of his having maintained at Paris, for three days successively, theses “de omni scibile,
” the surname of Musa
was given him by Francis I. He was physician to that
prince, who made him chevalier of the order of St. Michael; to the emperor Charles V. who bestowed on him
the title of count palatine; and to Henry VIII. of England. He was not of less consequence in his own country.
Successively first physician to the popes Paul III. Leo X.
Clement VII. and Julius III. cherished and favoured by
all the other princes of Italy, and particularly the dukes
of Ferrara, he was proceeding in this brilliant career,
when he died at Ferrara in 1555, at the age of 55, after
having long been a professor of medicine there with universal applause; leaving a great number of works, principally on medicine, and among others, 1. “Commentaries
on the aphorisms of Hippocrates and Galen,
” printed at
Basle, in Index refertissimus in Galeni
libros,
” Venice, opus indefessse elucubrationis & utilitatis
inexplicabilis.
”
, founder of the society of the priests, or fathers, of the Christian doctrine, was born of a noble family at Cavaillon, Feb. 3, 1544. He at first cultivated
, founder of the society of the priests,
or fathers, of the Christian doctrine, was born of a noble
family at Cavaillon, Feb. 3, 1544. He at first cultivated
poetry, and gave himself up to a life of pleasure, but afterwards reformed, lived in a most exemplary manner,
went into holy orders, and travelled from place to place,
confessing and catechising. His zeal having procured him
many disciples, he formed them into a society, whose principal duty was to teach what they called the Christian
doctrine. He was appointed general of this society in 1598,
the institution having been first approved by pope Clement VIII. in
the preceding year. That which goes by the
same name in Italy was founded by Mark Cusani, a Milanese knight, and was established by the approbation and
authority of Pius V. and Gregory XIII. Caesar de Bus had
also some concern in establishing the Ursulines of France.
He lost his sight about fourteen years before his death,
which happened at Avignon, April 15, 1607. He left only
a book of instructions, drawn up for his society, called
“Instructions familieres sur les quatre parties de la Doctrine Chretienne,
”
In his early days, as he was of a noble family, he disdained to accept pay for his productions,
In his early days, as he was of a noble family, he disdained to accept pay for his productions, declaring that he
worked for fame and practice, and that he considered himself as yet so imperfect in his art, that he could not in
conscience admit of any recompence. As he advanced,
however, he had no scruple in accepting the just reward of
his merit; and the following anecdote, related by Mr. Cumberland, will show his spirit in asserting what was his due.
A counsellor of Grenada having refused to pay the sum of
one hundred pistoles for an image of St. Antony of Padua,
which Cano had made for him, he dashed the saint into
pieces on the pavement of his academy, while the counsellor was reckoning up how many pistoles per day Cano
had earned whilst the work was in hand. “You have been
twenty-five days carving this image of St. Antony,
” said
the counsellor, “and the purchase-money demanded being
one hundred, you have rated your labour at the exorbitant
price of four pistoles per day, whilst I, who am a counseller, and your superior, do not make half your profits
by my talents.
” “Wretch
” cried the enraged artist,
“to talk to me of your talents I have been fifty years
learning to make this statue in twenty-five days
” and so
saying, flung it with the utmost violence upon the pavement. The affrighted counsellor escaped out of the house
in terror. For this profanation, however, of the image
of a saint, he was suspended from his function by the
chapter of Grenada, and was not restored by the king until
he had finished a magnificent crucifix, which the queen
had ordered, but which he had long neglected.
sixteenth century, by his poetical compositions in Latin and Italian, was born at Feltri about 1480, of a noble family. He studied philosophy ai>d the arts at Padua,
, a lawyer of Italy, who acquired considerable reputation in the sixteenth century,
by his poetical compositions in Latin and Italian, was born
at Feltri about 1480, of a noble family. He studied philosophy ai>d the arts at Padua, where he received his doctor’s degree in 1503. He afterwards studied law, and
amidst the fatigues of his profession, found leisure to
cultivate the muses. The town of Feltri employed him as
their agent at Venice, where, as well as at Padua, he
formed an intimacy with many eminent scholars and persons of rank. He died in 1537, lamented by his friends
and by his country, to which he had rendered important
services. Both during his life and after his death, he was
celebrated by the contemporary poets, and a medal was
struck to his memory. He was married, but having no
children, he founded a college or academy at Padua, with
three scholarships, one of civil and canon law, another of
medicine, and the third of arts; and whoever enjoyed these
was obliged to teach poor scholars gratis for a certain
period. His poetical works remained unpublished, and
indeed unknown until 1757, when they were printed in a
small quarto volume, “Poesi volgari e Latine di Cornelio
Castaldi,
” &c. with his life by Thomas Joseph Farsetti, a
patrician of Venice. His Italian poems are written with
ease, and abound in imagery, and in his Latin ' efforts he
has imitated the ancients with success. M. Conti was the
editor of the collection.
, an eminent Italian antiquary, was born at Palermo, Feb. 18, 1727, of a noble family, and was placed under a private tutor, with a
, an eminent Italian
antiquary, was born at Palermo, Feb. 18, 1727, of a noble
family, and was placed under a private tutor, with a view
to study botany, chemistry, &c. but an accident gave. a
new and decided turn to his pursuits. Not far from Motta
where he lived, stood the ancient Halesa, or Alesa (Tosa),
a colony of Nicosia, celebrated by the Greek and Latin
poets, which was swallowed up by an earthquake in the
year 828, leaving scarcely a \estige of its former state.
One day a ploughman dug up a quantity of coins, which,
he brought to Castello, who conceived an uncommon desire to decypher them, that he might not seem a stranger
to the ancient history of his own country: and applying
himself for instructions to the literati of Palermo, they recommended the study of antiquities as found in the Greek
and Roman authors; and Castello engaged in this pursuit
with such avidity and success, as within three years to be
able to draw up a very learned paper on the subject of a statue which had been dug up, which he published under the
title of “Dissertazione sopra una statua cli marmo trovata
nelle campagne di Alesa,
” Palermo, Osservazioni critiche
sopra un libro stampato in Catania nel 1747, esposta in
una lettera da un Pastor Arcade acl un Accademico Etrnsco,
” Rome, Storia di Alesa antica citta di
Sicilia col rapporto de' suoi pin insigni monumenti, ike.
”
Palermo, Inscrizioni Palermitane,
” Palermo, Sicilise et objacentium Insularum
veterum inscriptionum nova collectio, cum prolegomenis
et notis illustrata,
” ibid. Sicilian Populorum et
Urbium, Regum quoque et Tyrannorum veteres nummi
Saracenorum epocham antecedentes,
” Palermo, Storia
Letteraria della Sicilia,
” and other works. There was
another of the same name, Ignatius Paterno Castello, a
contemporary, and likewise an able antiquary, who died in
1776, and published among other works, “Descrizione
del terribile Terremoto de' 5. Febraro 1783, che afflisse la
Sicilia, distrtisse Messina, e gran parte della Calabria, diretta alle Reale Accademia di Bordeaux, Poesia del Pensante Peloritano,
” Naples,
, the descendant of a noble family, was born at Bourges in 1655, and came to Paris
, the descendant of a noble
family, was born at Bourges in 1655, and came to Paris in
his youth, where he was trained up to business, and obtained the place of receiver-general of the finances at
Rochelle. During this employment he found leisure to
indulge his taste for polite literature, and the prince of
Conti having heard of his merits made him one of his secretaries in 1687. The prince also sent him into Svvisserland on political business, and the king being afterwards
informed of his talents, employed him in the same capacity. La Chapelle disclosed his knowledge of the politics
of Europe in a work printed at Paris in 1703, under the
disguise of Basil, in 8 vols. 12mo, entitled “Lettres d'un
Suisse a un Francois,
” explaining the relative interest of
the powers at war. He wrote also “Memoires historiques
sur la Vie d'Armand de Bourbon, prince de Conti,
” 16$9,
4to, and, if we are not mistaken, translated and published
in English in 1711, 8vo. He also wrote poetry, and some
dramas, in which last he was an unsuccessful imitator of
Racine. In 1688 he was admitted a member of the French
academy. He died at Paris in 1723.
, one of the most learned and eloquent of the fathers, was born at Antioch, of a noble family, about the year 354. His father, Secundus, dying
, one of the most learned and
eloquent of the fathers, was born at Antioch, of a noble family, about the year 354. His father, Secundus, dying when
he was very young, the care of his education was left to
his mother, Anthusa. He was designed at first for the bar,
and was sent to learn rhetoric under Libanius; who had
such an opinion of his eloquence, that when asked who
would be capable of succeeding him in the school, he answered, “John, if the Christians had not stolen him from
us.
” He soon, however, quitted all thoughts of the bar,
and being instructed in the principles of the Christian religion, was afterwards baptized by Meletius, and ordained
by that bishop to be a reader in the church of Antioch,
where he converted his two friends, Theodorus and Maximus. While he was yet young, he formed a resolution of
entering ugon a monastic life, and in spite of all remonstrances from his mother, about the year 374, he betook
himself to the neighbouring mountains, where he lived four
years with an ancient hermit; then retired to a more secret part of the desert, and shut himself up in a cave, in which
situation he spent two whole years more; till at length,
worn out almost by continual watchings, fastings, and other
severities, he was forced to return to Antioch, to his old
way of living.
orn at Florence in 1240, and was the first who revived the art of painting in Italy. Being descended of a noble family, and of sprightly parts, he was sent to school
, another renowned painter, was
born at Florence in 1240, and was the first who revived the
art of painting in Italy. Being descended of a noble family, and of sprightly parts, he was sent to school to study
the belles lettres, but he generally betrayed his natural
bias by drawing figures upon paper, or on his books. The
fine arts having been extinct in Italy, ever since the irruption of the barbarians, the senate of Florence had sent at
that time for painters out of Greece. Cimabue was their
first disciple, and used to elope from school and pass whole
days in viewing their work. His father, therefore, agreed
with these Greeks to take him under their care, and he
soon surpassed them both in design and colouring. Though
he wanted the art of managing his lights and shadows,
was but little acquainted with the rules of perspective, and
in other particulars but indifferently accomplished, yet the
foundation which he laid for future improvement, entitled
him to the name of the “father of the first age, or infancy
of modern painting.
”
, or Commines, Lat. Cominæus (Philip de), an excellent French historian, was born of a noble family in Flanders, 1446. He was a man of great abilities,
, or Commines, Lat. Cominæus (Philip de), an excellent French historian, was born of a noble
family in Flanders, 1446. He was a man of great abilities,
which, added to his illustrious birth, soon recommended
him to the notice of Charles the Bold, duke of Burgundy,
with whom he lived in intimacy for about eight years. He
was afterwards 'invited to the court of France by Louis XI.
and became a man of consequence, not only from the
countenance which was given him by the monarch, but
from other great connections also, which he formed by marrying into a noble family. Louis made him his chamberlain, and seneschal or chief magistrate of the province of
Poictou. He also employed him in several negotiations,
which he executed in a satisfactory manner, and enjoyed
the high favour of his prince. But after the death of
Louis, when his successor Charles VIII. came to the throne,
the envy of his adversaries prevailed so far, that he was
imprisoned at Loches, in the county of Berry, and treated
with great severity; but by the application of his wife, he
was removed at length to Paris. After some time he was
convened before the parliament, in which he pleaded his
own cause with such effect, that, after a speech of two
hours, he was discharged. In this harangue he insisted
much upon what he had done both for the king and kingdom, and the favour and bounty of his master Louis XI.
He remonstrated to them, that he had done nothing either
through avarice or ambition; and that if his designs had
been only to have enriched himself, he had as fair an opportunity of doing it as any man of his condition in France.
He died in a house of his own called Argenton, Oct.
17, 1509; and his body, being carried to Paris, was interred in the church belonging to the Augustines, in a
chapel which he had built for himself. In his prosperity
he had the following saying frequently in his mouth: “He
that will not work, let him not eat:
” in his adversity he
used to say, “I committed myself to the sea, and am
overwhelmed in a storm.
”
, a French historian, was born at Paris, of a noble family, originally of Auvergne, and having studied law,
, a French historian, was
born at Paris, of a noble family, originally of Auvergne,
and having studied law, was admitted to the bar, which he
quitted for the philosophy of Descartes. Bossuet, who
was no less an admirer of that philosopher, procured him
the appointment of reader to the dauphin, which office he
filled with success and zeal, and died the 8th of October
1684, member of the French academy, at an advanced age.
We are indebted to his pen for, 1. “The general History of
France during the two first races of its kings,
” CEuvres de feu M. de Cordemoi.
”
They contain useful investigations, judicious thoughts,
and sensible reflections on the method of writing history.
He had adopted in philosophy, as we before observed, the
sentiments of Descartes, but without servility; he even
sometimes differs from them. In the latter part of his life,
he was assisted in his literary labours by his son Lewis, who
was born in 1651, and who became successively a licentiate
of Sorbonne, and an abbot in the diocese of Clermont.
He was a voluminous writer, chiefly on theological subjects; and was considered among the catholics as an able
advocate of their cause against the attacks of the defenders
of protestantism. He was, however, of considerable service to his father in the latter part-of his “General History
of France;
” and, it is believed, wrote the whole of that
part which extends from about the conclusion of the reign
of Lewis V. to the end of the work. By order of Lewis
XIV. he continued that history from the time of Hugh
Capet until the year 1660, which he did not live to finish.
He died at the age of seventy-one, in the year 1722.
, a Minime friar, eminent for his writings and his piety, was born September 6, 1595, at Paris, of a noble family, originally of Dauphiny. He died at
, a Minime friar, eminent for his writings and his piety, was born September 6, 1595, at Paris, of a noble family, originally of Dauphiny. He died at
, of Piemont, was born at San Chirico, in 1503, of a noble family, and cultivated philosophy, and made several
, of Piemont, was born at
San Chirico, in 1503, of a noble family, and cultivated
philosophy, and made several journies in Germany and
Italy. Having abjured the religion of Rome to embrace
the doctrines of Luther, he was thrown into prison, and
confined for several months, but without this making any
impression on his sentiments; and he was no sooner released than he played a very bold trick. Having access to
the relics of the monastery of St. Benigno, he executed
the plan of carrying away the holy shrine, and leaving in
its place what to him was more holy and estimable, the
Bible, inscribed with these words, “Haec est area foederis, ex qua vera sciscitari oracula liceat, et in qua veroe
sunt sanctorum reliquiae.
” As, however, he was aware
the fury of the populace would not permit him to escape
with his life, if he were suspected, he thought it prudent to
retire, and we find him afterwards at Milan, where he
married in 1530, and began to preach. Having-fixed his
abode near Casal, he one day heard a Dominican declaiming loudly against Luther, and charging him with
criminal acts and heretical notions, of which he was not
guilty; he asked permission to give an answer to the outrageous preacher. This being granted: “My father,
”
said he to the monk, “you have attributed to Luther a
number of terrible declarations; but where does he say
them? Can you point me out the book where he has delivered such a doctrine?
” — The monk replied that he could
not immediately shew him the passage; but that, if he
would go with him to Turin, he would point it out to
him. “And I,
” said Curio, “will shew you this moment
that what you advance cannot be true.
” Then pulling out
of his pocket Luther’s Commentary on the epistle to the
Galatians, he refuted the Dominican with so much strength
of argument, that the crowd fell upon him, and it was
with great difficulty that he escaped out of their hands.
The inquisition and the bishop of Turin being informed of
this quarrel, Curio was arrested; but the bishop, perceiving
that he was supported by a considerable party, went to
Rome, to receive advice from the pope in what manner he
should proceed. In the mean time, Curio was carried in
irons to a private prison, and kept under a constant guard;
but, notwithstanding these precautions, found means to
escape during the night. He fled to Salo, in the duchy
of Milan, and from thence to Pavia; whence, three years
afterwards, he was obliged to take refuge at Venice, because the pope had threatened to excommunicate the senate of Pavia, if they did not put him under an arrest.
From Venice Curio went successively to Ferrara, to Lucca,
to Lausanne, in Switzerland, where he was made principal
of the college, and lastly to Bale, in 1547. Here he became professor of eloquence and the belles-lettres, which
situation he held until his death, which happened in 1569,
at the age of sixty-seven. There is a singular work by
him, entitled “De amplitudine bead regni Dei,
” Bale,
Opuscula,
” Bale, Letters,
” Bale, Calvinus Judaisans,
” 1544, 2 parts in 1 vol. 8vo.
What has led the critics to think him the editor of this
collection, is, that he is indeed the author of the two editions of
” Pasquillus extaticus,“8vo, the one without
date, the other of Geneva, 1544. The second was reprinted with
” Pasquillus theologaster,“Geneva, 1667,
12mo. These are satires, which petulance on one side,
and the desire of suppressing them on the other, have occasioned to be sought after. The book-collectors add to
these, two volumes, the works of a certain German, named
” Pasquillus merus.“This makes a third volume, which
has scarcely any relation to the former, nor is either of
much value. 5. A Latin translation of Guicciardini’s history, 1566, 2 vols. fol. 6.
” De Bello Melitense, anno
8vo, inserted in Muratori. 7.
” Vita et doctrina
Davidis Georgii haeresiarchse,“Bale, 1599, 4to. 8.
” Forum Romanum,“a Latin dictionary, Bale, 1576, 3 vols.
fol. 9.
” Historia Francisci Spirae,“8vo, &c. Of a very
scarce work of his,
” Paraphrasis in principium Evangelii
S. Johannis,“but which, if we mistake not, was originally
published among his
” Opuscula,“an extract may be seen
in the
” New Memoirs of Literature," vol. XIII.
, born in 1497, at Paris, of a noble family, studied at the college of Navarre, and was the
, born in 1497, at Paris, of a noble
family, studied at the college of Navarre, and was the
pupil of Budeus and of John Lascaris. Being appointed
by Francis I. to open the Greek school at the college-royal,
he was professor there for five years, and had scholars that
afterwards signalized themselves. He next became preceptor and confessor to the dauphin, afterwards Francis If.
He was sent to the council of Trent, where he delivered a
very celebrated speech in 1546, which was afterwards published; and during the session of this council he was made
bishop of Lavaur. Sponde and de Thou have handed down
to us an ingenious answer of this prelate. Nicholas
Pseaume, bishop of Verdun, speaking very freely one day
in the council, the bishop of Orvietta looking at the
French, said to them with a sarcastic smile, “Gallus cantat,
” (the cock crows), “Utinam,
” replied Danes, “ad
istud Gallicinium Petrus resipisceret!
” (I wish that Peter would repent at this cock’s crowing.) This prelate died at
Paris the 23d of April, 1577, at the age of 80. He had
been married. When news was brought him of the death
of his only son, he retired for a moment into his closet;
and, on rejoining the company, “Let us be comforted,
”
said he, “the poor have gained their cause,
” alluding to
his being wont to distribute a part of his revenues among
the poor, which he now thought he might increase. With
the erudition of a true scholar he had the talent of speaking
well, integrity of character, and a great simplicity of manners. His custom was to write much, and almost always
to conceal his name. It has been suspected by some
critics that the tenth book of the history of France, by
Paulus Æmilius, is his. At least it was Danes who sent it
from Venice to the printer Vascosan. His “Opuscula
”
were collected and printed in Disquisitiones Pliniani,
” is to be found amongour author’s
“Opuscula.
” This edition is so rare on the continent that
Rezzonicus was able to find only two copies of it in Spain,
and not a single one in Italy; and Ernesti pronounces it
as valuable as it is rare.
, a very eminent divine, descended of a noble family of Lucca, was born June 6, 1576; but of his early
, a very eminent divine, descended
of a noble family of Lucca, was born June 6, 1576; but
of his early years we have no information. When, however, he was only nineteen years of age, we find him appointed professor of Hebrew at Geneva. In 1619 the
church of Geneva sent him to the synod of Dort, with his
colleague Theodore Tronchin. Diodati gained so much
reputation in this synod, that he was chosen, with five
other divines, to prepare the Belgic confession of faith.
He was esteemed an excellent divine, and a good preacher.
His death happened at Geneva, Oct. 3, 1649, in his seventy-third year, and was considered as a public loss. He
has rendered himself noticed by some works which he
published, but particularly by his translation of the whole
Bible into Italian, the first edition of which he published,
with notes, in 1607, at Geneva, and reprinted in 16 n.
The New Testament was printed separately at Geneva in
1608, and at Amsterdam and Haerlem in 1665. M. Simon
observes, that his method is rather that of a divine and a
preacher, than of a critic, by which he means only, that
his work is more of a practical than a critical kind. He
translated the Bible also into French, but not being so intimate with that language, he is not thought to have succeeded so well as in the Italian. This translation was
printed in folio, at Geneva, in 1664. He was also the
first who translated into French father Paul’s “History of
the Council of Trent,
” and many have esteemed this a
more faithful translation than de la Houssaye’s, although
less elegant in language. He also is said to have translated sir Edwin Sandys’ book on the “State of Religion in
the West.
” But the work by which he is best known in
this country is his Annotations on the Bible, translated into
English, of which the third and best edition was published
in 1651, fol. He is said to have begun writing these annotations in 1606, at which time it was expected that
Venice would have shaken off the popish yoke, a measure to which he was favourable; and he went on improving them in his editions of the Italian and French
translations. This work was at one time time very popular
in England, and many of the notes of the Bible, called the
“Assembly of Divines’ Annotations,
” were taken from Diodati literally. Diodati was at onetime in England, as we
learn from the life of bishop Bedell, whom he was desirous
to become acquainted with, and introduced him to Dr. Morton, bishop of Durham. From Morrice’s “State Letters
of the right hon. the earl of Orrery,
” we learn that when
invited to preach at Venice, he was obliged to equip himself in a trooper’s habit, a scarlet cloak with a sword, and
in that garb he mounted the pulpit; but was obliged to
escape again to Geneva, from the wrath of a Venetian
nobleman, whose mistress, affected by one of Diqdati'a
sermons, had refused to continue her connection with her
keeper. The celebrated Milton, also, contracted a friendship for Diodati, when on his travels; and some of his
Latin elegies are addressed to Charles Diodati, the nepheiv
of the divine. This diaries was one of Milton’s most intimate friends, and was the son of Theodore Diodati, who,
although originally of Lucca, as well as his brother, married an English lady, and his son in every respect became
an Englishman. He was also an excellent scholar, and
being educated to his father’s profession, practised physic
in Cheshire. He was at St. Paul’s school, with Milton,
and afterwards, in 1621, entered of Trinity-college, Oxford. He died in 1638.
, an eminent botanist, was born at Padua in 1717, of a noble family, but addicted himself to science, and under the
, an eminent botanist, was born
at Padua in 1717, of a noble family, but addicted himself
to science, and under the ablest professors of the university of his native city, studied medicine, natural history,
botany, and mathematics. After taking his doctor’s degree
in medicine, he more particularly cultivated natural history,
and frequently went to Dalmatia in pursuit of curious specimens. In 1750 he published a small folio, with plates,
entitled “Delia Storia Naturale Marina dell' Adriatico,
”
to which his friend Sesler subjoined the botanical history
of a plant named after him Vitaliana. This work was afterwards translated into several languages. The same year,
he was appointed professor of natural history and botany
at Turin. After having travelled several times over the
maritime Alps, he undertook, by order of the king, an
expedition to the East Indies. Arriving at Alexandria, he
went thence to Cairo, and after visiting a considerable part
of Egypt, penetrated into those countries that were then
unknown to European travellers. On his return he died at
Bassora, of a putrid fever, in 1763. He had previously
packed up two cases of collections of natural history, and
two large volumes of observations made during his travels,
which were to be conveyed to Turin by the way of Lisbon;
but at the latter place, it is said, they were kept a long
time, not without some suspicion of their having been
opened, &c. It is certain, however, that both the collections and the manuscripts were lost by some means or
other. Ferber, who gives some account of Donati in his
“Letters on Mineralogy,
” thinks he was not very
remarkable for his botanical knowledge, but a first-rate connoisseur in petrifactions, corals, zoophytes, and, in general,
in the knowledge of all marine bodies. He adds that his
enemies were zealous in their endeavours to injure his reputation; affirming that he was still alive in Persia, where
he resided in disguise, and appropriated to his own use
the remittances that had been granted for the purposes of
his voyage, all which Ferber considers as a ridiculous fable.
After his death, was published his “Dissertation sur le
corail noir.
”
, was born in 1596, of a noble family, originally of Florence, and entered himself
, was born in 1596, of a
noble family, originally of Florence, and entered himself
of the Minims. Cardinal Richelieu, who became acquainted with him during his retirement at Avignon, was
so struck with his modesty and learning, that he gave him
the bishopric of Itiez, in which diocese he did much good.
From the see of Uiez he was translated to that of Autun,
and died in 1664, at the age of sixty-eight. He published,
1. “A History of the Minims,
” 4to.' 2. “The Life of
queen Joan, foundress of the Annonciades,
” 8vo. 3. “The
Life of cardinal de Berulle,
” in Latin, 8vo. 4. “The History of the Cardinals,
” in Latin,
, a French divine, was born of a noble family at Issoudun, and educated in the seminary de
, a French divine, was born of a noble family at Issoudun, and educated in the seminary de St. Magloire, at Paris, where he took a doctor’s degree, 1695. After being official at Chalons, he became canon of the church at Paris, and successively archdeacon, grand chanter, and official. Dorsane always opposed the bull Unigenitus, and retired when he found that M. de Noailles was about to issue his mandate for its acceptance. He died November 13, 1728, leaving an historical journal of all that had passed respecting the bull Unigenitus, which extends to 1728, 6 vols. 12mo, or 1756, 2 vols. 4to, which last is reckoned the best edition.
, a very learned man, was born of a noble family at Nortwick in Holland, 1545. He lost his parents
, a very learned man, was born of a
noble family at Nortwick in Holland, 1545. He lost his
parents when very young, and was sent to several schools;
and to one at Paris among the rest, where he made a great
progress in Greek and Latin. When he had finished his
education, he returned to his own country, and married;
and though he was scarcely grown up, he applied himself
to affairs of state, and was soon made a curator of the
banks and ditches, which post he held above twenty years,
and then resigned it. But Dousa was not only a scholar
and a statesman, but likewise a soldier; and he behaved
himself so well in that capacity at the siege of Leyden in
1574, that the prince of Orange thought he could commit
the government of the town to none so properly as to him.
In 1575 the university was founded there, and Dousa made
first curator of it; for which place he was well fitted, as
well on account of his learning as by his other deserts.
His learning was indeed prodigious and he had such a
memory, that he could at once give an answer to any
thing that was asked him, relating to ancient or modern
history, or, in short, to any branch of literature. He was,
says Melchior Adam, and, after him, Thuanus, a kind of
living library; the Varro of Holland, and the oracle of the
university of Leyden. His genius lay principally towards
poetry, and his various productions in verse were numerous: he even composed the annals of his own country,
which he had collected from the public archives, in verse,
which was published at Leyden 1601, 4to, and reprinted
in 1617 with a commentary by Grotius. He wrote also
critical notes upon Horace, Sallust, Plautus, Petronius,
Catullus, Tibullus, &c. His moral qualities are said to
have been no less meritorious than his intellectual and
literary; for he was modest, humane, benevolentj and
affable. He was admitted into the supreme assembly of the
nation, where he kept his seat, and discharged his office
worthily, for the last thirteen years of his life. He died
Oct. 12, 1604, and his funeral oration was made by Daniel
Heinsius. Of his works, we have seen, 1. “Couiin. in
Catullum, Tibullum, et Horatium,
” Antwerp, Libri tres Prascidaneorum in Petronium Arbitrmn,
”
Leyden, Epodon ex puris lambis,
” Ant.
Plautinae Explicationes,
” Leyden, Poemata,
” ibid. Odarum
Britannicarum liber, ad Elizabetham reginam, et Jani
Dousae filii Britannicorum carminum silva,
” Leyden,
t ecclesiastical historian of the last century, was the son of a father of the same names, descended of a noble family in Normandy, by Mary Vitart, of a family in Champagne.
, an eminent ecclesiastical historian of the last century, was the son of a father of the
same names, descended of a noble family in Normandy,
by Mary Vitart, of a family in Champagne. He was born
at Paris, June 17, 1657, and after being instructed in the
rudiments of grammar by his father, and private tutors,
was entered, at the age of ten, of the college of Harcourt,
where, under professor Lair, he imbibed that thirst for general knowledge which he indulged during the whole of
his studious life. In 1672 he was admitted to the degree of
master of arts. Having made choice of the church as a
profession, he went through the usual course of studies at
the Soi bonne, and employed much of his time in perusing
the fathers and ecclesiastical historians, but had no other
view in this than to gratify his curiosity, while preparing
himself for his licentiateship in divinity, which he was then
too young to obtain. In 1680, he took the degree of
bachelor of divinity, and in July 16S4, that of doctor. He
soon after undertook to publish the work which has made
him most known, his Universal Library of Ecclesiastical
Writers, containing their lives, and a catalogue, critical
account, and analysis of their works: a design of vast extent, which might have done credit to the labours of a society, yet was successfully accomplished by an individual,
who was not only interrupted by professional duties, but
wrote and published a great many other works. The first
volume of his “Bibliotheque
” was printed at Paris, containing several propositions that
are false, rash, scandalous, capable of offending pious ears,
tending to weaken the arguments, xvhich are brought from
tradition to prove the authority of the canonical books of
holy scripture, and of several other articles of faith, injurious to general councils, to the holy apostolic see, and to
the fathers of the church; erroneous, and leading to heresy.
”
This sentence upon the work, however, will prove its
highest recommendation to the protestant reader, who will
probably, as he may very justly infer, that it means no
more than that Dupin was too impartial and candid for his
judges. With the above decree was published Dupin’s
retractation, both of which were translated and printed at
London in 1703, folio, by William Wotton, B. D. who
observes that in Dupin’s retractation, “dread of farther
mischief seems to be far more visible, in almost every article, than real conviction arising from an inward sense of
the author’s having been in an error; at least, that it is so
written, as to have that appearance.
” Dupin, however,
went on with his work, and by some means obtained a permission to print, with some small alteration in the title,
from “Bibliotheque universelle
” to “Bibliotheque nouvelle,
”
and the addition of the ecclesiastical history to the ecclesiastical biography. He thus went on, concluding with
the beginning of the eighteenth century, the whole making
47 vols. 8vo, which were reprinted at Amsterdam, in 19
vols. 4to; but as most of these volumes were printed from
the first editions, this edition is imperfect. It was also
begun to be translated into Lathy, and the first three volumes printed at Amsterdam; but no farther progress was
made. Monsieur Dupin was engaged at his death in a
Latin translation, to which he intended to make considerable additions. This Bibliotheque was likewise translated
into English, and printed at London in several volumes in
folio, usually bound in seven. A much finer edition was
printed in 3 vols. folio, by Grierson of Dublin. The
translation appears to have been executed partly by Digby
Cotes, and revised by Wotton. Dupin’s Bibliotheque was
attacked by M.Simon in a book printed at Paris in 1730,
in four volumes 8vo, under the following title “Critique
cle la Bibliotheque des Auteurs Ecclesiastiques & de Prolegomenes de la Bible publiez par M. Elies Dupin. Avec
des eclaircissemens & des supplemens aux endroits, ou
on les a juge necessaires, par feu M. Richard Simon, avec
des remarques.
” Simon has pointed out a considerable
number of errors in Dupin, but when all deductions of this
kind are made, it must be allowed that we have no book
more generally valuable as a repository of ecclesiastical
history and biography, making allowance for the author’s
attachment to the principles of his church.
, a French historian, was born at Condom in 1569, of a noble family originally from Languedoc. His father had served
, a French historian, was born at
Condom in 1569, of a noble family originally from Languedoc. His father had served with distinction under
marshal de Montluc. Scipio having attracted notice at
the court of queen Margaret, then at Nerac, came to Paris
in 1605 with that princess, who afterwards made him her
master of requests. His next appointment was to the post
of historiographer of France, and he employed himself for
a long time on the history of that kingdom. In his old
age he compiled a work on the liberties of the Gallican.
church; but the chancellor Seguier having caused the
manuscript, for which he came to apply for a privilege, to
be burnt before his face, he died of vexation not long
after, at Condom, in 1661, at the age of ninety-two, the
greater part of which time he had passed without sicknesses
or infirmities. The principal of his works are, 1. “Memoirs of the Gauls,
” History of France,
” in 5, afterwards in 6 vols. fol. The narration of Dupleix is unpleasant, as well from the language having become obsolete,
as from his frequent antitheses and puerile attempts at
wit. Cardinal Richelieu is much flattered by the author,
because he was living at the time; and queen Margaret,
though his benefactress, is described like a Messalina, because she was dead, and the author had nothing farther to
expect from her. Matthew de Morgues, and marshal
Bassompierre both convicted him of ignorance and insincerity. Dupleix endeavoured to answer them, and after
the death of the cardinal he wished to recompose a part of
his history, but was presented by declining age. 3. “Roman History,
” 3 vols. fol. an enormous mass, without spirit
or life. 4. “A course of Philosophy,
” 3 vols. 12mo. 5.
“Natural Curiosity reduced to questions,
” Lyons, Liberte de la Langue Francaise,
” against Vaugelas,
does him still less credit; and upon the whole he appears
to be one of those authors whose fame it would be impossible to revive, or perhaps to account for.
, a celebrated French cardinal, sprung of a noble family of Issoire, in Auvergne, appeared first at the
, a celebrated French cardinal,
sprung of a noble family of Issoire, in Auvergne, appeared
first at the bar of Paris. he was afterwards made lieutenant-general of the bailiwic of JMontferrant, then attoiv
ney-general at the parliament of Toulouse. Rising from
one post to another, he came to be first president of the
parliament of Paris in 1507, and chancellor of France in
1515. He set out, it is said, by being solicitor at Cognac
for the countess of Angouleme, mother of Francis I. This
princess entrusted to him the education of her son, whose
confidence he happily gained. Some historians pretend
that Duprat owed his fortune and his fame to a bold and
singular stroke. Perceiving that the count d'Angouleme,
his pupil, was smitten with the charms of Mary, sister of
Henry VIII. king of England, the young and beautiful
wife of Louis XII. an infirm husband, who was childless;
and finding that the queen had made an appointment with
the young prince, who stole to her apartment during the
night, by a back staircase; just as he was entering the
chamber of Mary, he was seized all at once by a stout
man, who carried him off confounded and dumb. The
man immediately made himself known it was Duprat.
“What!
” said he sharply to the count, “you want to give
yourself a master! and you are going to sacrifice a throne
to the pleasure of a moment!
” The count d'Angouleme,
far from taking this lesson amiss, presently recollected
himself; and, on coming to the crown, gave him marks
of his gratitude. To settle himself in the good graces of
this prince, who was continually in quest of money, and
did not always find it, he suggested to him many illegal
and tyrannical expedients, such as selling the offices of the
judicature, and of creating a new chamber to the parliament of Paris, which, composed of twenty counsellors,
formed what was called la Tournelle. By his influence
also the taxes were augmented, and new imposts established, contrary to the ancient constitution of the kingdom, all which measures he pursued without fear or restraint Having attended Francis I. into Italy, he
persuaded that prince to abolish the Pragmatic Sanction, and
to make the Concordat, by which the pope bestowed on
the king the right of nominating to the benefices of France,
and the king granted to the pope the annates of the grand
benefices on the footing of current revenue. While this
concordat, which was signed Dec. 16, 1515, rendered him
odious to the magistrates and ecclesiastics, he soon reaped
the fruits of his devotion to the court of Rome; for, having
embraced the ecclesiastical profession, he was successively
raised to the bishoprics of Meaux, of Albi, of Valence,
of Die, of Gap, to the archbishopric of Sens, and at last to
the purple, in 1527. Being appointed legate a latere in
France, he performed the coronation of queen Eleonora of
Austria. He is said to have aspired to the papacy in 1534,
upon the death of Clement VII.; but his biographers are
inclined to doubt this fact, as he was now in years and very
infirm. He retired, as the end of his days approached, to
the chateau de Nantouillet, where he died July 9, 1535,
corroded by remorse, and consumed by diseases. His own
interests were almost always his only law. He sacrificed
every thing to them; he separated the interests of the king
from the good of the public, and sowed discord between
the council and the parliament; while he did nothing for
the dioceses committed to his charge. He was a long time
archbishop of Sens, without ever appearing there once.
Accordingly his death excited no regret, not even among
his servile dependents. However, he built, at the HotelDieu of Paris, the hall still called the legate’s-hall. “It
would have been much larger,
” said the king, “if it could
contain all the poor he has made.
”
, born of a noble family at Beaug6-laville, in Brescia, then belonging
, born of a noble family at Beaug6-laville, in Brescia, then belonging to the duke of Savoy, in
1527, was among the most famous physicians of his time,
and practised his art at Paris with great reputation, during
the reigns of Charles IX. and Henry III. to whom he was
physician in ordinary. He came to Paris very young,
without money or friends, yet soon acquired distinction in
his studies of the belles Jettres and medicine, and when
he had taken his doctor’s degree in the latter faculty, acquired great practice; a very advantageous marriage served
to introduce him at court, and to the appointment of
professor of medicine. Henry Til who had a singular esteem
and affection for him, granted him a pension of four hundred crowns of gold, with survivance to his five sons; and,
as a mark of his condescension, was present at the marriage of his daughter, to whom he made presents to a considerable amount. Duret died Jan. 22, 1586, at the age
of fifty-nine. He was firmly attached to the doctrine of
Hippocrates, and treated medicine in the manner of the
ancients. Of several books that he left, the most esteemed
is a “Commentaire sur les Coaques d'Hippocrate,
” Paris,
Hippocratis
magni Coacte praenotiones: opus admirabile, in tres libros
distributum, interprete et enarratore L. Dureto.
” John
Duret followed his father’s profession with great success,
and died in 1629., aged sixty-six.
, a numismatical writer of considerable reputation in the sixteenth century, was of a noble family in Venice, where he was born in 1530. After a
, a numismatical writer of considerable reputation in the sixteenth century, was of a noble
family in Venice, where he was born in 1530. After a
very liberal education, he passed some time in political
employment, but at last devoted himself entirely to literary
pursuits. In the course of his various studies he published
a treatise on the money of the ancients’; an explanation of
Aristotle’s ethics; and translated into Italian the TimeUs of
Plato, and wrote some other philosophical pieces. At the
age of forty he was again employed in the affairs of the
republic, and managed what was entrusted to him with
great reputation. He died in 1585. His work on money
was esteemed so much superior to that of Eneas Vieo, who
preceded him, that he was considered in his own country
as the father of the numismatic science. It was published
tinder the title of “Discorso sopra la Medaglie degli antichi, con la dichiarazione delle Monete Consolari, e deJle
Medaglie degl' Imperatori,
” Venice, 4to, without date, but
some copies have the date of 1471. His other works were,
1. “Le Sei Giornati, mandate in luce da Ludovico Dolce,'
”
Venice,Esposizioue delle tre Canzoni di
Francesco Petrarca chiamate le tve Sorelle,
” Venice, Trattato dello strumento, e della via inventrice
degli antichi,
” ibid.
, a very learned antiquary of Italy, was born at Urbino, of a noble family, in 1619. After he had passed through his first
, a very learned antiquary of Italy, was born at Urbino, of a noble family, in 1619. After he had passed through his first studies at Cagli, he returned to Urbino to finish himself in the law, in which he was admitted doctor at eighteen. Having an elder brother at Rome, who was an eminent advocate, he also went thither, and applied himself to the bar; where he soon distinguished himself to such advantage, that he was likely to advance his fortune. Cardinal Imperiali entertained so great an esteem for him, that he sent him into Spain, to negociate several important and difficult affairs; which he did with such success, that the office of the procurator fiscal of that kingdom falling vacant, the cardinal procured it for him. Fabretti continued thirteen years in Spain, where he was for some time auditor general of the Nunciature. These employments, however, did not engage him so much, but that he found time to read the ancients, and apply himself to polite literature. He returned to Rome with cardinal Bonelli, who had been nuncio in Spain; and from his domestic became his most intimate friend. He was appointed judge of the appeals to the Capitol; which post he afterwards quitted for that of auditor of the legation of Urbino, under the cardinal legate Cerri. His residence in his own country gave him an opportunity of settling his own private affairs, which had been greatly disordered during his absence. He continued there three years, which appeared very long to him, because his inclination to study and antiquities made him wish to settle at Rome, where he might easily gratify those desires to the utmost. He readily accepted, therefore, the invitation of cardinal Corpegna, the pope’s vicar, who employed him in drawing up the apostolical briefs, and other dispatches belonging to his office, and gave him the inspection of the reliques found at Rome and parts adjacent. Alexander VIII. whom Fabretti had served as auditor when cardinal, made him secretary of the memorials, when he was advanced to the pontificate; and had so great a value and affection for him, that he would certainly have raised him to higher dignities, if he had lived a little longer.
, a celebrated professor of astronomy and natural history at Padua, was born in 1650, of a noble family, at Tripani in Sicily. He entered the third order
, a celebrated professor of astronomy and natural history at Padua, was born in
1650, of a noble family, at Tripani in Sicily. He entered
the third order of St. Francis; taught mathematics at Messina, and theology at Rome, where he had taken a doctor’s’
degree in the college della Sapienza. Francis II. duke of
Modena made him professor of philosophy and geometry
in his capital; but he gave up that situation to go to Venice, where he quitted the Franciscan habit in 1693, by
permission of the pope, and took that of a secular priest.
He was afterwards appointed professor of astronomy and
physic in the university of Padua, and died at Naples, from
a second attack of an apoplexy, January 2, 1718. Fardella had a lively genius and fertile imagination, but became 50 absent, by a habit of profound thought, that he
sometimes appeared to have lost his senses. He left sereral works on literature, philosophy, and mathematics;
some in Latin, others in Italian. The principal are, “Universae Philosophise Systema,
” Venice, 16iU, 12mo; “Universae Usualis Mathematics Theoria,
” 12mo; “Animoe
humanae Natura ab Augustino detecta,
”
his nation in the seventeenth century, was born March 18, 1590, at Sonto near Caravilla in Portugal, of a noble family, both by his father’s and mother’s side. His
, one of the most celebrated historians and poets of his nation in the seventeenth
century, was born March 18, 1590, at Sonto near Caravilla in Portugal, of a noble family, both by his father’s
and mother’s side. His father’s name was Arnador Perez
d'Eiro, and his mother’s Louisa Faria, but authors are not
agreed in their conjectures why he did not take his father’s
name, but preferred Faria, that of his mother, and Sousa,
which is thought to have been his grandmother’s name.
In his infancy he was very infirm, yet made considerable
progress, even when a puny child, in writing, drawing, and
painting. At the age of ten, his father sent him to school
to learn Latin, in which his proficiency by no means answered his expectations, owing to the boy’s giving the preference to the Portuguese and Spanish poets. These he
read incessantly, and composed several pieces in verse and
prose in both languages, but he had afterwards the good
sense to destroy his premature effusions, as well as to perceive that the Greek and Roman classics are the foundation
of a true style, and accordingly he endeavoured to repair
his error by a careful study of them. In 1604, when only
in his fourteenth year, he was received in the Tank of gentleman into the household of don Gonzalez de Moraes,
bishop of Porto, who was his relation, and afterwards made
him his secretary; and during his residence with this prelate, which lasted ten years, he applied himself indefatigably to his studies, and composed some works, the best
of which was an abridgment of the historians of Portugal,
“Epitome de las historias Portuguesas, desde il diluyio
hasta el anno 1628,
” Madrid, Noches claras,
” a collection of moral and political discourses, Madrid, 1623 and 1626, 2 vols. 12mo. 2.
“Fuente de Aganipr, o Rimes varias,
” a collection of his
poems, in 7 vols. Madrid, 1644, &c. 3. “Commentarios
sobra las Lusiadas de Luis de Camoens,
” an immense
commentary on the Lusiad, ibid. Madrid, 1640 or 1645, folio. 5.
” Imperio de la China, &e.“and an account of the propagation of religion by the Jeuits, written by Semedo: Faria was only editor of this
work, Madrid, 1643, 4to. 6.
” Nobiliario del Concle D.
Petro de Barcelos,“&c. a translation from the Portuguese,
with notes, ibid. 1646, folio. 7.
” A Life of Don Martin
Bapt. de Lanuza,“grand justiciary of Arragon,
” ibid. 1650,
4to. 8. “Asia Portuguesa,
” Lisbon, Europa Portuguesa,
” ibid. Africa Portuguesa,
” ibid. America Portuguesa.
” All these" historical and geographical works have been considered as correct and valuable. Faria appears to have published some
other pieces of less importance, noticed by Antonio.
, an Italian author, was born of a noble family at Milan in 1518. After he had studied polite
, an Italian author, was born of a noble family at Milan in 1518. After he had studied polite learning, philosophy, and physic, in the universities of Italy, he was chosen professor of ethics and politics, in the college founded by Paul Canobio at his instigation; and held this place eighteen years. The senate of Venice engaged him afterwards to remove to Padua, where he explained the philosophy of Aristotle, with so much skill and elegance, that Vimerat, who was professor at Paris under Francis I. returning to Italy upon the death of that king, fixed upon him, preferably to all others, for the publication of his works. He continued at Padua four years, and then returned to Milan; where he continued to teach philosophy till his death, which happened in 1586. Though he was excellently skilled in polite literature, yet he was principally famous for philosophy, being esteemed a second Aristotle, nor was he less illustrious for his probity than for his learning.
, Or Giudo Fabricius Boderianus, was born of a noble family in the territory of Boderie, in Lower Normandy,
, Or Giudo Fabricius Boderianus, was born of a noble family in the
territory of Boderie, in Lower Normandy, in 1541. He
acquired great knowledge in the Oriental languages, and
had, with his brother Nicholas, the principal part in the
edition of the Polyglott of Antwerp, though that honour is
usually given to the learned Arias Montanus. Le Fevre
was secretary to the duke d'Alengon, brother of king
Henry 111. and composed several works in French, verse
and prose, but in a style so vulgar and confused, that none
of them are read. He died 1598. Nicholas le Fevre de
la Boderie, his brother, was also very ingenious; he died
after 1605. Anthony le Fevre de la Boderie, another
brother, distinguished himself in the reigns of Henry IV.
and Louis XIII. by his skill in negociations, and his embassies to Rome, the Low Countries, and England, where
he was loaded with presents. He discovered the marechal
de Biron’s correspondence at Brussels, and rendered important services to Henry IV. He died 1615, aged sixty,
and left “Traitc de la Noblesse, traduit de Tltalien de
Jean-Baptiste Nenna,
” printed Letters
on Negociations
” were published Catholicon.
” He married the sister of the marquis de
Feuquieres, governor of Verdun, by whom he had two
daughters; one died very young, the other married M.
Arnauld d'Andilli 1613, who by her obtained the estate of
Pomponne, and la Briotte.
, a celebrated Italian poet, was born December 30, 1642, of a noble family at Florence. He studied philosophy, law, and
, a celebrated Italian poet, was
born December 30, 1642, of a noble family at Florence.
He studied philosophy, law, and divinity five years at
Pisa, and took a doctor of law’s degree there. He then
returned to Florence, where, after several years spent in
his closet, with no other employment than poetry and the
belles-lettres, the grand duke appointed him senator. He
died September 27, 1707, aged sixty-five. Filicaia was
member or the academies della Crusca, and degli Arcadi.
His poems are much admired for their delicacy and noble
sentiments. They have been published together by Scipio
Filicaia, his son, under the title of “Poesie Toscane di
Vincenzo da Filicaia,
” &c.
, more known by his assumed name of Merlin Coccaio, was born Nov. 8, 1491, of a noble family at Mantua studied the languages under Virago
, more known by his assumed
name of Merlin Coccaio, was born Nov. 8, 1491, of a
noble family at Mantua studied the languages under
Virago Coccaio and then went to Bologna, where he
cultivated philosophy under Peter Pomponatius. His preceptor, Coceaio, accompanied him there, but his taste
and vivacity of genius led him to poetry, and defeated the
endeavours of ins master to fix him to serious studies. His
first work was a poem, entitled, “Orlandino,
” in which
he took the name of Limerno Pictoco. It displays considerable vigour of imagination, and may be read with pleasure. He afierwards was obliged, as well as his master,
to quit Bologna precipitately, to avoid being apprehended,
but what was the subject of the proceeding against him is
not known. His father not leceiving him kindly, he entered into the army, but grew tired of it, and became a
Benedictine in the monastery of St. Euphemia, where
healready had a brother. Folengo here indulged his vein for
satire and burlesque, by which he attracted the enmity of
his brethren, who would have made him feel their resentment had he not been very powerfully protected. He died
in 1544, aged fifty-one, at his priory, della Santa Croc e,
near Bassano. The most known among his works is, 1.
the “Opus Macaronicum,
” printed at Venice in Caos del Tri per uno;
” a poem on the three ages of
man, and including much of his own history, but in a style
more extravagant than his “Orlandino, 1527. 3.
” La
Humanita del Figlio di Dio, in ottava rima," Vinegia,
1533. This was written as some atonement for the licentiousness of his former writings, but probably had fewer
readers. Many other works by him are mentioned by his,
biographers, which are now confined to the libraries of the
curious.
, a French writer, was born of a noble family at Paris in 1666. His first studies were under
, a French writer, was
born of a noble family at Paris in 1666. His first studies
were under the Jesuits; and father La Baune had the
forming of his taste to polite literature. He was also a
v disciple of the fathers Rapin, Jouvenci, La Rue, and
Commire; and the affection he had for them induced him
to admit himself of their order in 1683. After his noviciate, and when he had finished his course of philosophy
at Paris, he was sent to Caen to teach the belles lettres,
where he contracted a friendship with Huet and Segrais,
and much improved himself under their instructions. The
former advised him to spend one part of the day upon the
Greek authors, and another upon the Latin: by pursuing
which method, he became an adept in both languages.
Four years being passed here, he was recalled to Paris,
where he spent other four years in the study of divinity.
At the end of this course, he was shortly to take upon
him the occupation of either preaching, or teaching; but
finding in himself no inclination for either, he quitted his
order in 1694, though he still retained his usual attachment to it. Being now at liberty to indulge his own
wishes, he devoted himself solely to improve and polish
his understanding. He soon after assisted the abbé Bignon, under whose direction the “Journal des Scavans
”
was conducted; and he had all the qualifications necessary
for such a work, a profound knowledge of antiquity, a
skill not only in the Greek and Latin, but also Italian,
Spanish, and English tongues, a soundjudgment, an exact taste, and a very impartial and candid temper. He
afterwacds formed a plan of translating the works of Plato;
thinking, very justly, that the versions of Ficinus and Serranus had left room enough for correction and amendments.
He had begun this work, but was obliged to discontinue it
by a misfortune which befel him in 1709. He had borrowed, as we are told, of his friend father Hardouin, a
manuscript commentary of his upon the New Testament,
in order to make some extracts from it; and was busy at
work upon it one summer evening, with the window half
open, and himself inconsiderately almost undressed. The
cold air had so unhappy an efiect in relaxing the muscles
of his neck, that he could never afterwards hold his head
in its natural situation. The winter increased his malady;
and he was troubled with involuntary convulsive motions
of the head, and with pains which often hindered him from
sleeping; yet he lived nineteen years after; and though
he could not undertake any literary work, constantly received visits from the learned, and conversed with them
not without pleasure. He died suddenly of an apoplexy,
1728, in his sixty-second year. He had been made a
member of the academy of inscriptions in 1705, and of the
French academy in 1708.
His works consist of Latin poems, and a great number
of very excellent dissertations in the Memoirs of the
French academy . His poems were published at Paris in
1729, in 12mo, with the poems of Huet, under the care
of the abbé d'Olivet, who prefixed an eulogy of Fraguier;
and at the end of them are three Latin dissertations concerning Socrates, which is all that remains of the Prolegomena he had prepared for his intended translation of
Plato. These dissertations, with many others upon curious and interesting subjects, are printed in the Memoirs
above-mentioned.
born at Naumburg, in Upper Saxony, May 3, 1643. His father, although living as a simple peasant, was of a noble family. After going through his school education, George
, an eminent German physician, was born at Naumburg, in Upper Saxony, May 3, 1643. His father, although living as a simple peasant, was of a noble family. After going through his school education, George went to Jena at the age of eighteen, and was crowned a poet by count palatine llichter, in consequence of his extraordinary talent for writing verses in the German, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew Jauguages. But he exhibited still greater talents during his course of medical studies, and the canons of Naumburg, who recognized his merits, afforded him liberal means of subsistence while he applied himself to this science. Before he took his doctor’s degree^(in 1666), he was deemed eligible to give lectures in botany, chemistry, and anatomv, and acquired great reputation. In 1672, the elector palatine appointed him to the vacant professorship of medicine at Heidelberg, and a few years afterwards nominated him his own physician. But the troubles occasioned by the war obliged him in 1688, to retire to Francfort on the Main. John George III. elector of Saxony, then received him into his service, and appointed him professor of medicine at Wittemberg; an office which he filled with so much eclat, that the principal professorship, and the title of dean of the faculty at Leipsic, were soon offered to him. This, however, he refused, by the instigation of his friends, who sought to retain him at Wittemberg. The two succeeding electors likewise loaded this physician with so many favours, that it was supposed he could never dream of quitting Heidelberg. Nevertheless, he was induced by the offers of Christian V. king of Denmark, to remove to Copenhagen, where he was received most graciously by the royal family, and was honoured with the title of Aulic counsellor, which was continued to him by Frederick IV. the successor of Christian. Death, however, terminated his brilliant career on the 16th of June, 1704, in the six-" tieth year of his age.
f the celebrated Iveteaux, and the first who wrote satires in French, and an Art of Poetry, was born of a noble family at Fresnaye, near Falaise, iiv 1534-. He was
, an early poet of
France, father of the celebrated Iveteaux, and the first
who wrote satires in French, and an Art of Poetry, was
born of a noble family at Fresnaye, near Falaise, iiv
1534-. He was bred a lawyer, and became the king’s advocate for the bailliage of Caen, and afterwards lieutenantgeneral and president of that city, where he died at the
age of seventy-two, in 1606. He wrote, 1. “Satires,
”
which though esteemed less strong than those of Regnier,
and less witty than those of Boileau, have truth and nature, and contain simple narratives, the style of which has,
something pleasing. 2. “The Art of Poetry.
” Copious
specimens of this performance may be seen in the notes
of St. Marc, on Boileau’s Art of Poetry. It has
considerable merit, but a merit which haa been superseded by later
efforts. 3. Two books of Idyllia, and three of epigrams,
epitaphs, and sonnets. 4. A poem on the monarchy. All
these were collected by himself in an edition of poems,
published at Caen in 1605.
, an Italian poet, was born November 21, 1692, at Genoa, of a noble family, which ended in him. He was persuaded by his
, an Italian poet, was born November 21, 1692, at Genoa, of a noble family, which ended in him. He was persuaded by his tutors to enter the order of regular clerks of Somasquo; but that confined life was so contrary to his gay temper, and fondness for pleasure, that he obtained leave from the pope to quit the order, and remain a secular priest. Frugoni then settled at Parma, where the different sovereigns procured him all the conveniences of life; but the infant don Philip showed yet greater attention to him than the rest. He gave him the titles of court poet, inspector of the theatres, and secretary of the fine arts. He died at Parma, December 20, 1768. His poems are much esteemed by the Italians, and his songs, in particular, were the delight of his contemporaries. An edition of this author’s works was published at Parma in 1779, in 10 vols. 8vo. They consist of every species of minor poems.
, an Italian cardinal and antiquary, the descendant of a noble family of Bergamo, was born there in 1685, He studied
, an Italian cardinal
and antiquary, the descendant of a noble family of Bergamo, was born there in 1685, He studied at Milan
and Pavja, and made considerable progress in the knowledge of the civil and canon law. He went afterwards
to Rome, where he held several ecclesiastical preferments,
and in each was admired as much for his integrity as knowledge. Benedict XIV. who well knew his merit, was yet
averse to raising him to the purple, on account of some
disputes between them which took place in 1750. Yet it
is said that Furietti might have received this high honour at
that time, if he would have parted with his two superb
centaurs, of Egyptian marble, which he found in 1736
among the ruins of the ancient town of Adrian in Tivoli,
and which the pope very much wanted to place in the museum Capitolinum. Furietti, however, did not ehuse to
give them up, and assigned as a reason: “I can, if I please,
be honoured with the purple, but I know the court of
Rome, and I do not wish to be called cardinal Centaur /
”
In
, an eminent prelate, the descendant of a noble family in Westphalia, was born at Bilstein in 1626.
, an eminent prelate,
the descendant of a noble family in Westphalia, was born
at Bilstein in 1626. He studied at Cologne, where he
contracted an intimate friendship with Chigi, who was
then nuncio, and afterwards pope. During the cardinalate of Chigi, he invited f urstemberg to reside with him,
whom he raised to the bishopric of Paderborn in 1661,
when he himself was seated in the papal chair, under the
title of Alexander VII. The high reputation of the bishop
attracted the notice of Vat) Galer:, who appointed him his,
coadjutor, and whom he succeeded in 1678, when he. was
declared by the pope apostolical vicar of all the north of
Kurope. He was. a zealous catholic, and anxious for the
conversion of those who were not already within the pale
of the church; but at the same time he did not neglect
the cultivation of the belles lettres, eitper by his own
efforts or those of many learned men whom he patronized.
He died in 1683, As an author he collected a number of
Mss. and monuments of antiquity, and gave to the world
valuable work relative to those subjects, entitled “Momimenta Paderbornensia.
” He al*o printed at Rome a.
collection of Latin poems, entitled “Septem Virorutn.
illusirium Poemata.
” In this work there were many poems
of his own, written witU much purity. A magnificent
edition of these poems was published in the same year in
which he died, at the Louvre, at the expence of the king
of France.
, an Italian wit, was born in Naples, about 1720. He was descended of a noble family, his father being a marquis, and his uncle archbishop
, an Italian wit, was born in Naples, about 1720. He was descended of a noble family, his father being a marquis, and his uncle archbishop and great almoner to the king, who is celebrated in the History of the two Sicilies, for hating been the chief author and promoter of the famous concordate of 1741, which happily terminated the jurisdictional disputes between the court of Naples and the holy see. To the high preferments and care of this uncle, Galiani was indebted for a liberal education, and it is said that he displayed very early an extraordinary genius in every study. At the age of sixteen, he had mastered the Latin and Greek languages, and was equally acquainted with classical literature, the mathematics, philosophy, and with the civil and canon law.
, or Garcias Lasso de La Vega, a celebrated Spanish poet, was born of a noble family at Toledo, in 1500 or 1503. His father was a
, or Garcias Lasso de La Vega, a celebrated Spanish poet, was born of a noble family at Toledo,
in 1500 or 1503. His father was a counsellor of state to
Ferdinand and Isabella, and employed by them on several
important negociations, particularly in an embassy to pope
Alexander VI. Garcilasso was educated near the emperor
Charles V. who had a particular regard for him, and took him
with him in his military expeditions, where he became as renowned for his courage as for his poetry. He accompanied
that emperor into Germany, Africa, and Provence; and
it was in this last expedition, in 1536, that he commanded
a “battalion, when he received a wound, of which he died
at Nice, about three weeks after, aged only thirty -three.
The wound was made by a stone thrown by a countryman
from a turret, and falling upon his head. The Spanish
poetry was greatly obliged to Garcilasso, not only for extending its bounds, but also for introducing new beauties
into it. He had strong natural talents for poetry; and he
did not fail to improve them by culture, studying the best
poets ancient and modern. His poems are full of fire;
have a nobleness and majesty without affectation; and,
what is somewhat singular, there is in them a great deal of
ease, united with much subtilty. Paul Jovius has not
scrupled to say that his odes have all the sweetness of Horace. Though his imitations of the ancients may be traced
throughout almost all his works, yet, as they are conspicuous for good taste and harmonious versification, and were
written amidst many distracting occupations, there can be
no doubt that he would have gained great celebrity if he
had lived longer. The learned grammarian Sanctius has
written commentaries upon all his works, and has illustrated
him every where with very learned and curious notes.
They were all printed at Naples in 1661, with this title,
” Garcilasso de la Vega Obras Poeticas con annotationes
de Franc. Sanchez,“in 8vo. We must not confound this
poet with another person of the same name, a native or
”
Cusco, who wrote in Spanish the History of Florida, and
that of Peru and the Incas.
, chief justice of the king’s bench in the reign of Henry IV. was descended of a noble family, originally from Normandy, and born at Gawthorp
, chief justice of the king’s bench in the reign of Henry IV. was descended of a noble family, originally from Normandy, and born at Gawthorp in Yorkshire, about 1350. Being designed for the law, he became a student either at Gray’s-inn or the Inner Temple; and growing eminent in his profession, was made one of the king’s Serjeants at law, Sept. 1398. In October following, he was appointed one of the attornies to Henry IV. then duke of Hereford, on his going into banishment: and upon the accession of that prince to the throne, in 1399, sat as judge in the court of common-pleas. In Nov. 1401, he was made chief justice of the king’s bench; and how much he distinguished himself in that office, appears from the several abstracts of his opinions, arguments, distinctions, and decisions, which occur in our old hooks of law-reports.
, was born about 1685, of a noble family, at Louviers. His refusing to sign the Formulary
, was born about 1685, of a noble family, at Louviers. His refusing to sign the Formulary having put a stop to his degrees in the Sorbonne, he retired to the seminary of St. Magloir, and devoted himself to the study of theology. On his return home, he was appointed subdeacon of Evreux, but opposing the bull Unigenitus, was obliged to quit that diocese, upon which de Langle, bishop of Boulogne, gladly received him into his house, and ordained him priest; from that time Gaultier was the prelate’s counsellor, proctor, grand vicar, friend, and secretary. De Langle dying in 1724, Colbert bishop of Montpellier, took Gaultier to be his librarian, as was supposed, but in fact to be his adviser, confessor, and secretary; while he was looked upon at Montpellier merely as a quiet inoffensive man, with just abilities sufficient to take down the bishop’s books and put them in order again. Colbert died in 1738, and Gaultier went the same year to Paris, where he lived as retired as at Montpellier, only visiting his native place once a year for relaxation. In the last of these journies, returning to Paris with a friend, their post-chaise was overset, and Gaultier being dangerously hurt by his fall, was carried to Gaillon as the nearest place, where he died five days after, October 30, 1755. Besides what he wrote for messrs. Langle and Colbert, he left various works on the affairs of his time, all anonymous except the largest, which has been published since his death, and is entitled
s Cé1ebres,” in twenty volumes duodecimo, than for any merit as a writer, was born at Lyons in 1673, of a noble family of the robe, and was educated at Paris, but seemed
, a French author, remarkable rather for the magnitude of his work entitled
“Causes Cé1ebres,
” in twenty volumes duodecimo, than
for any merit as a writer, was born at Lyons in 1673, of a
noble family of the robe, and was educated at Paris, but
seemed destined to fail in every walk of life. He began
by taking orders, and became an abbé; he then quitted
the church for the army, where he obtained no distinction,
and at the age of fifty, became an advocate. Not succeeding in this occupation, he applied himself diligently to
his pen; in which employment he rather proved his assiduity than his powers. His great work, though interesting in its subject, is rendered intolerable by the heaviness
and badness of the style, with the puerilities and bad
verses interspersed. It has been two or three times,
abridged. His other works are not more admired. They
are, 1. “An Account of the Campaigns of 1713 and
1714;
” a compilation from the Memoirs of Vilbart 2.
“The Art of adorning and improving the Mind,
” a foolish
collection of witticisms and 3. A compilation entitled
“Bibliotheque des Gens de Cour.
” He died in
an eminent civilian at Oxford, was the son of Matthew Gentilis, an Italian physician, the descendant of a noble family of the Marcbe of Ancona, who left his country
, an eminent civilian at Oxford,
was the son of Matthew Gentilis, an Italian physician, the
descendant of a noble family of the Marcbe of Ancona, who
left his country about the end of the sixteenth century, on
account of his having embraced the protestant religion.
Taking with him his sons Albericus and Scipio, he went
into the province of Carniola, where he received his doctor’s degree, and then into England, after his eldest son
Albericus, who was born in 1550. He was educated chiefly
in the university of Perugia, where, in 1572, he was made
doctor of civil law. He came into England probably about
1580, as in that year he appears to have been kindly received by several persons here; and among others, by
Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester, then chancellor of the
university of Oxford, who gave him letters of recommendation to the university, stating that he had left his country
for the sake of his religion, and that it was his desire to
bestow some time in reading, and other exercises of his
profession, at the university, &c. He accordingly went
to Oxford, and by favour of Dr. Donne, principal of New
inn Hall, had rooms allowed him there, and at first was
maintained by contributions from several colleges, but afterwards had an allowance from the common funds of the
university. In the latter end of the same year, 1580, he
was incorporated LL. D. and for some years employed his
time on his writings, most of which were published at
London or Oxford. He resided also some time either in.
Corpus or Christ Church, and, as Wood says, “became
the flower of the university for his profession.
” In 1587
queen Elizabeth gave him the professorship of civil law,
on which he lectured for twenty-four years with great xeputation. Hre he died, in the latter end of March or the
beginning of April 1611, although others say at London,
June 19, 1608, and was buried near his father, who also
died in England, but where is uncertain. Wood’s account
seems most probable. He left a widow, who died at Rickmansworth in 1648, and two sons, one of which will be
noticed in the next article. Wood enumerates twentyseven volumes or tracts written by him, all in Latin, and
mostly on points of jurisprudence, on which, at that time,
his opinion appears to have had great weight. Grotius
praises and acknowledges his obligations to his three books
“De Jure Belli
” and his “Lectiones Virgilianae,
” addressed to his son, prove that he had cultivated polite literature with success.
, a Portuguese writer of the sixteenth century, was born at Alanquar near Lisbon, of a noble family, in 1501, and brought upas a domestic in, the
, a Portuguese writer of the sixteenth century, was born at Alanquar near Lisbon, of a
noble family, in 1501, and brought upas a domestic in,
the court of king Emanuel, where he was considered both
as a man of letters and of business. Having a strong passion for travelling, he contrived to get a public commission;
and travelled through almost all the countries of Europe,
contracting as he went an acquaintance with all the learned. At Dantzic he became intimate with the brothers
John and Olaus Magnus; and he spent five months at Friburg with Erasmus. He afterwards went to Padua, in
1534, where he resided four years, studying under Lazarus Bonamicus; not, however, without making frequent
excursions into different parts of Italy. Here he obtained
the esteem of Peter, afterwards cardinal Bembus, of Christopher Maclrucius, cardinal of Trent, and of James Sadolet. On his return to Lou vain in 1538, he had recourse
to Conrad Goclenius and Peter Nannius, whose instructions were of great use to him, and applied himself to
music and poetry; in the former of which he made so
happy a progress, that he was qualified to compose for the
churches. He married at Louvain, and his design was to
settle in this city, in order to enjoy a little repose after
fourteen years travelling; but a war breaking out between
Charles V. and Henry II. of France, Louvain was besieged
in 1542, and Goez, who has written the history of this
siege, put himself at the head of the soldiers, and contributed much to the defence of the town against the French,
when the other officers had abandoned it. When he was
old, John III. of Portugal, recalled him into his country,
in order to write the history of it; but as it became first
necessary to arrange the archives of the kingdom, which
he found in the greatest confusion, he had little leisure to
accomplish his work. The favours also which the king
bestowed upon him created him so much envy, that his
tranquillity was at an end, and he came to be accused;
and, though he cleared himself from all imputations, was
confined to the town of Lisbon. Here, it is said that he
was one day found dead in his own house; and in such a
manner as to make it doubted whether he was strangled by
his enemies, or died of an apoplexy; but other accounts
inform us, with more probability, that he fell into the fire
in a fit, and was dead before the accident was discovered.
This happened in 1560, and he was interred in the cburck
of Notre Dame, at Alanquar. Rewrote “Fides, Religio,
Moresque Æthiopum
” “De Imperio et Rebus Lusitanorum
” “Hispania;
” “Urbis OlissiponensisDescriptio;
”
“Chronica do Rey Dom Emanuel
” “Historia do Principe Dom Juao
” and other works, which have been often
printed, and are much esteemed. Antonio says, that,
though he is an exact writer, yet he has not written the
Portuguese language in its purity; which, however, is not
to be wondered at, considering how much time he spent
out of his own country.
, an Italian scholar and poet of considerable eminence, was born at Florence March 22, 1503, of a noble family, which can be traced as far as the thirteenth
, an Italian scholar and
poet of considerable eminence, was born at Florence
March 22, 1503, of a noble family, which can be traced as
far as the thirteenth century, but was now decayed, as we
find that Grazzini in his youth was brought up as an apothecary. He had, however, studied philosophy and the
belles lettres, and from the timetliathe acquired some reputation in the literary world, gave up his medical business. In 1540 he became one of the founders of the
academy of Florence, which was first called the academy
of the Humides, and each member distinguishing himself
by some appellation relative to the water, Grazzini adopting that of Lasca, which signifies a roach. From the first
establishment of this academy, he was appointed chancellor,
and when, some months after, the grand duke changed its
name to that of the academy of Florence, he was chosen
overseer, or superintendant, an office which he afterwards
filled three times. As the number of members, however,
increased, the juniors began to make new regulations without consulting the founders, and a schism broke out, attended with so many unpleasant circumstances, that Grazzini withdrew, and became the founder of a new academy,
known still by the name of La Crusca. The object of this
society was to polish the Italian language, to fix a standard
for it, to point out such authors as might be always models
for those who chose to improve their style, to oppose the
progress of false taste; and to sift the flour from the bran
of literature, crusca signifying bran. Grazzini was well
qualified to assist an academy instituted for these purposes.
He hail enriched the language with several choice phrases
and new modes of expression, and the academicians have
very justly ranked him among those authors to whom they
have been obliged for examples, in correcting their great
vocabulary. In the mean time his growing fame induced
his friend Leonard Salviati to endeavour his re-introduction
into the academy of Florence, which was successfully accomplished in 1566, twenty years after he had left it; in
return for which he procured admission for Salviati among
the Cruscanti. Grazzini died at Florence in February
1583. He was a man of unquestionable genius, spirit, and
humour, and wrote with great elegance, and although
there are some indelicate passages in his poems, which
was the vice of the times, he was a man of strict morals,
and even, says his biographer, very religious. Many of
his works are lost, and among these some prose tales, and
many pieces of poetry. There remain, however, twentyone tales, six comedies, a great number of capitoli, or
satirical chapters, and various poems, of which the best
edition is that of Florence, 1741, 2 vols. 8vo. His Tales
or Novels were printed at Paris, 1756, 8vo, from which
some copies have been printed in 4to, under the title of
London. An excellent French translation of them appeared
in 1775, 2 vols. 8vo, in which nine histories wanting in the
third evening are said to be inserted from an old French
translation in ms. He wrote also “La guerra di Mostri,
Poema giocoso,
” Florence, Tutti i trionfi, carri, mascherate o canti carnasciaj^schi
dal tempo di Lorenzo de Medici a questoanno 1559,
” 8vo;
, an Italian historian, was born 1606, of a noble family at Vincenza. He was historiographer to the emperor,
, an Italian historian, was born 1606, of a noble family at Vincenza. He
was historiographer to the emperor, and distinguished himself in the seventeenth century by his historical works,
written, in a very pleasing style, in Italian; the principal
are, “History of the Wars of Ferdinand II. and Ferdinand
III.
” from 1630 to 1640, fol. “History of Leopold,
” from
from 1648 to 1654. The authors of the
” Journal des
Savans,“March 16, 1665, said they had found as many
errors as words in this work. But Gualdo, not discouraged
by that censure, continued his History to the peace of the
Pyrenees, and reprinted it with that addition at Cologn,
1670. His
” History of cardinal Mazarine’s Administration“is much esteemed, and has been translated into
French, 1671, 3 vols. 12mo;
” The Life and Qualities“of
the same cardinal, a valuable work, which appeared in
French, 1662, 4to
” An account of the Peace of the
Pyrenees" the most ample edition is, Cologn, 1667, 12mo.
This work is likewise much esteemed, and has been translated into Latin, and inserted in the fourth volume of the
Public Law of the Empire, published at Francfort, 1710.
It has been also translated into French. Gualdo died at
Vincenza in 1678.
perty, which was very considerable. Battista married himself about this time Taddea Bendedei, a lady of a noble family of Ferrara.
Guarino had the misfortune to be early involved in family law-suits, and had to apply for the heritage of his grandfather and grand- uncle in opposition to francis Guahuo, his father, who has left no other character than that of a keen sportsman, and who was the only one of the family that had no taste for literature. Having lost his first wife, he married again to injure his son’s interest; hut the duke Hercules II. interposed, and assigned to our poet a proportion of the family property, which was very considerable. Battista married himself about this time Taddea Bendedei, a lady of a noble family of Ferrara.
city of heart, and regularity of manners, but of an enthusiastic and unsettled temper, was descended of a noble family, and born atMontargis, April 13, 1648. At the
, a
French lady of fashion, remarkable for simplicity of heart,
and regularity of manners, but of an enthusiastic and unsettled temper, was descended of a noble family, and born
atMontargis, April 13, 1648. At the age of seven she was
sent to the convent of the Ursulines, where one of her
sisters by half-blood took care of her. She had afforded
proofs of an enthusiastic species of devotion from her
earliest infancy, and bad made so great a progress in what her
biographers call “the spiritual course
” at eight years of age,
as surprized the confessor of the queen mother of England,
widow of Charles I. who presented her to that princess, by
whom she would have been retained, had not her parents opposed it, and sent her back to the Ursulines. She wished
then to take the habit; but they having promised her to a
gentleman in the country, obliged her to marry him. At
twenty-eight years of age she became a widow, being left
with two infant sons and a daughter, of whom she was constituted guardian; and their education, with the management of her fortune, became her only employment. She
had put her domestic affairs into such order, as shewed an
uncommon capacity; when of a sudden she was struck with
an impulse to abandon every worldly care, and give herself
up to serious meditation, in which she thought the whole
of religion was comprised.
, or Atto Vercellensis, bishop of Vercelli, in Italy, of a noble family, was born in Piedmont iri the beginning of the
, or Atto Vercellensis, bishop of Vercelli, in Italy, of a noble family, was born in Piedmont iri
the beginning of the tenth century, and was esteemed a
learned divine and canonist. He was promoted to the
bishopric of Vercelli in the year 945, and by knowledge
and amiable manners proved himself worthy of this rank,
It is not mentioned when he died. His works are, I. “Libeilus de pressuris Ecclesiasticis,
” in three parts, inserted
in D'Achery’s “Spicilegium.
” This treatise on the sufferings and grievances of the church, Mosheim says, shews
in their true colours the spirit and complexion of the times.
2. “Epistolae.
” 3. “Canones statutaque Vercellensis Ecclesiae,
” both in the same collection. In the Vatican, and
among the archives of Vercelli, are many other productions of this author, all of which were collected by Baronzio, and published as the “Complete works of Hatto,
” in.
, a physician, was born of a noble family in the principality of Atihalt,about 1625. He
, a physician, was born
of a noble family in the principality of Atihalt,about 1625.
He obtained at an early age a considerable reputation for
his knowledge of medicine and chemistry; and having settled in Holland about 1649, he practised at the Hague with
so much success, that he was appointed first physician to
the States-general, and to the prince of Orange, he died
August 20, 1709. His works serve, however, rather to
prove his devotion to the absurdities of the alchemists,
physiognomists, and such visionaries of his time, than his
advancement in true science; and therefore it may be sufficient to refer for their titles to our authorities His son
Adrian [Helveticus], who was born in 1656, journeyed to Paris, without any design of fixing there, and only to see that new
world, and sell some medicines, but accident detained
him very unexpectedly. The dysentery then prevailed in
that city-, and all who applied to him are said to have
been infallibly cured. His success was celebrated; and
Louis XIV. ordered him to publish the remedy which produced such certain and surprising effects. He declared it
to be Ipecacuanha, and received 1000 louis-d'ors for the
discovery. He settled in Paris, became physician to the
duke of Orleans, and was also made inspector-general of
the military hospitals. He died in 1721, leaving some
works behind him, of little value; the principal of which
is, “Traité des Maladies de plus frequentes, & des Remedies specifiques pour les guerir,
” 2 vols. 8vo.
genious member of the academy at Soissons, and that of ^the Ricovrati at Padua, was born at Soissons of a noble family; and the meetings held at his hoTise gave rise
, an ingenious member of
the academy at Soissons, and that of ^the Ricovrati at Padua, was born at Soissons of a noble family; and the meetings held at his hoTise gave rise to the academy afterwards
established in that place. He was entrusted with some important commissions by the French court, and wrote a history of the academy of Soissons, in Latin, printed at Montauban, 1688, 8vo. He died 1704. M. Lewis de Hericourt, an eminent advocate at Paris, his grandson, who
died 1753, was author of “Traite
” des Loix Ecclesiastiques,
mises dans leur ordre naturel,“1771,fol. an abridgement
of pere Thomassins’s
” Discipline de PEglise,“with remarks, 4to;
” Traite de la Vente des Immeubles," 4to;
and some posthumous works, 4 vols. 4to.
, chancellor of Bavaria at the beginning of the seventeenth century, and of a noble family in Augsburg, published some works in which his
, chancellor of Bavaria at the beginning of the seventeenth century, and of a noble family in Augsburg, published some
works in which his learning was more displayed than his
judgment, in supporting the most extravagant systems.
These are, 1. “Chronoiogia nova et vera,
” two parts, Admiranda Ethicae Theologicae Mysteria propalata, de antiquissima veterum nationum superstitione, qua lapis Magnes pro Deo habitus colebatur,
”
Monach. An Apology for the Emperor Louis of
Bavaria, against the falsehoods of Bzovius.
”
, of a noble family at Vienna, was born Feb. 24, 1580. After being
, of a noble family at
Vienna, was born Feb. 24, 1580. After being eight years
superintendant of Plaven in Saxony, he took holy orders
at Prague in 1611. In 1613 he left Prague, and was appointed principal preacher to the elector of Saxony at
Dresden, where he died March 4, 1645. He was a strenuous Lutheran, and wrote with as much zeal against
Calvinists as Papists. His works, which are very numerous
both in Latin and German, are not at this day much
esteemed, or indeed known. Their titles, however, are
given by the writers of his life, and among them we find,
“Solida. detestatio Papas et Calvinistarum,
” 4to. “Apologia pro B. Luthero contra Lampadium,
” Leipsic, Philosophise Aristotelicse, partes tres.
” “Septem
verborum Christi explicatio.
” The greater part of his
tracts appear evidently, from their titles, to be controversial.
poet, a contemporary and friend of Dante, whose true name was Jacopo de' Benedetti, was born at Todi of a noble family. Late in life he became a widower, upon which
, an ancient Italian poet, a contemporary and friend of Dante, whose true name was
Jacopo de' Benedetti, was born at Todi of a noble family.
Late in life he became a widower, upon which he distributed his wealth to the poor, and entered into the order of
minors, where, through humility, he remained always in
the class of servitors. He died, at a very advanced age,
in 1306; and the reputation of sanctity he had acquired
procured him the title of The happy. He composed
sacred canticles, full of fire and zeal; which are still admired in Italy, notwithstanding their uncultivated style,
which abounds with barbarous words, from the Calabrian,
Sicilian, and Neapolitan dialects. He wrote also some
poems of the same stamp in Latin, and was the author of
the “Stabat Mater.
” The completest edition of his canticles is that of Venice, printed in 1617, in quarto, with
notes.
, a man of a noble family, with the title of chevalier, who preferred study
, a man of a noble family, with
the title of chevalier, who preferred study and literary
labour, in which he was indefatigable, to the advantages of
birth, which in his time were very highly estimated, was
born in 1704. His disinterestedness and his virtues were
conspicuous, and his knowledge extended to medicine,
antiquities, manners, morals, and general literature; in all
which branches he has furnished articles that are reckoned
to do honour to the French Encyclopedic. The abbe
Barruel says, that D' Alembert and Diderot artfully engaged
a few such men of unblemished character to engage in
that undertaking; and Jaucourt’s name alone, they knew,
would be thought a sufficient guarantee against the bad
principles of the work. Jaucourt likewise conducted the
“Bibliotheque Raisounee,
” a journal greatly esteemed,
from its origin to the year 1740. In conjunction with the
professors Gaubius, Musschenbroek, and Dr. Massuet, he
published the “-Musaeuin Sebaeanum,
” in 1734, a book
greatly esteemed, and of high price. He had also composed
a “Lexicon Medicum universale,
” but his manuscript,
which was just about to be printed in Holland, in 6 vols.
folio, was lost with the vessel in which it was sent to that
country. Some other works by him are also extant, on
subjects of medicine and natural philosophy. He was a
member of the royal society of London, elected in 1756,,
and of the academies of Berlin and Stockholm; and having
been a pupil of the illustrious Boerhaave, was, by his
interest, strongly invited into the service of the stadtholder,
on very advantageous terms. But promises had no effect
upon a man who was, as he paints himself, “a man without
necessities, and without desires, without ambition, withotit
intrigues; bold enough to offer his compliments to the
great, but sufficiently prudent not to force his company
upon them; and one who sought a studious obscurity, for
the sake of preserving his tranquillity.
” He died in February 1780.
, a celebrated French poet, was born of a noble family at Paris, in 1532. He was esteemed by Henry II.
, a celebrated French poet, was born of a noble family at Paris, in 1532. He was esteemed by Henry II. and Charles IX. but so entirely devoted to poetry and luxury, that he reaped no advantage from their patronage, but lived in poverty. He was one of the earliest tragic poets of France, but abused the uncommon facility he had in writing verses; so that though his French poems were much admired when their author was living, it now requires great patience to read them. The same cannot, however, be said of his Latin poetry, which is written in a more pure and easy style, and in a better taste. Jodelle was well acquainted with Greek and Latin, had a genius for the arts, and is said to have understood architecture, painting, and sculpture he was one of the poets in the Pleiades fancied by Ronsard, and is considered as the inventor of the Vers rapportes. This author died very poor, July 1573. The collection of his poems was published at Paris, 1574, 4to, and at Lyons, 1597, 12mo. It contains two tragedies, Cleopatra, and Dido; Eugene, a comedy; sonnets, songs, odes, elegies, &c. Cardinal du Perron valued this poet’s talents so little, that he used to say Jodelle’s verses were but pois piles.
, or Du Jon (Francis), professor of divinity at Leyden, was descended of a noble family, and born at Bourges in 1545. At the age of thirteen
, or Du Jon (Francis), professor of divinity at Leyden, was descended of a noble family, and born at Bourges in 1545. At the age of thirteen he began to study the law, and afterwards went to Geneva, to study the languages; but being restrained in his pursuits for want of a proper support from his family, he resolved to get his bread by teaching school, which he pursued till 1565, when he was made minister of the Walloon church at Antwerp. But as this was both a troublesome and dangerous post, on account of the tumultuous conflicts between the papists and protestants at that time, he was soon obliged to withdraw into Germany. He went first to Heidelberg, where the elector, Frederic III. received him very graciously. He then made a visit to his mother, who was still living at Bourges; after which, returning to the Palatinate, he was made minister of the church of Schoon there. This was hut a small congregation; and, while he held it, he was sent by the elector to the prince of Orange’s army, during the unsuccessful expedition of 1568. He continued chaplain to that prince till the troops returned into Germany; when he resumed his church in the Palatine, and resided upon it till 1579. This year his patron, the elector, appointed him to translate the Old Testament jointly with Tremellius, which employment brought him to Heidelberg. He afterwards read public lectures at Neustadt, till prince Casimir, administrator of the electorate, gave him the divinity-professor’s chair at Heidelberg. He returned into France with the duke de Bouillon; and paying his respects to Henry IV. that prince sent him upon some mission into Germany. Returning to give an account of his success, and passing through Holland, he was invited to be divinity-professor at Leyden; and, obtaining the permission of the French ambassador, he accepted the offer in 1592. He had passed through many scenes of life, and he wrote an account of them himself this year: after which, he filled the chair at Leyden with great reputation for the space of ten years, when he died of the plague in 1602.
, the first patriarch of Venice, was descended of a noble family, and born there, 1381. He took the monk’s habit
, the first patriarch of Venice, was descended of a noble family, and born there, 1381. He took the monk’s habit in the monastery of St. George, in Alga, before he was a deacon; and in 1424 became general of that congregation, to whom he gave an excellent set of rules, which were afterwards observed, and made him esteemed as one of their founders. Pope Eugenius IV. gave him the bishopric of Venice, of which he was the first patriarch, from 1451. This prelate died Jan. 8, 1455, and was canonized in 1690 by Alexander VIII. He left several works of piety, which were printed together at Brescia, 1506, 2 vols. folio; and again at Venice, 1755, folio; to which is prefixed his life, by his nephew.
, a very famous genealogist, born of a noble family at Nuremberg, in 1651, was a lawyer in that city,
, a very famous genealogist, born of a noble family
at Nuremberg, in 1651, was a lawyer in that city, and one
of its senators. He was considered as having a profound
knowledge of the interests of princes, the revolutions of
states, and the history of the principal families in Europe.
He died in 1728. His works were, L “Genealogies excellentium in GaHia familiarum,
” Norimb. Genealogise familiarum Bellomaneriae,
” &c. Norimb.
Historia Genealogica Regum Magnae
Britanniae,
” Norimb. Notitia procerum
5. R. imperil,
” Tubingen, Historia
Italiae et Hispaniae genealogica,
” Norimb. Corpus Historic genealogicae Italiae et Hispaniae,
”
Norimb. Recherches Historiques et Genealogiques des Grands d'Espagne,
” Amst. Stemma regium Lusitanicum,
” Amst. Genealogiae 20 illustrium in Hispama famiharum,
”
Leipsic,
, an eminent grammarian of Florence, in the thirteenth century, was of a noble family in that city, and during the party contests between
, an eminent grammarian of Florence, in the thirteenth century, was of a noble family in
that city, and during the party contests between the
Guelphs and Ghibelins, took part with the former. When
the Ghibelins had obtained assistance from Mainfroy, king
of-Sicily, the Guelphs sent Bninetto to obtain similar aid
from Alphonso king of Castillo; but on his return, hearing
that the Ghibelins had defeated his party and got possession of Florence, he fled to France, where he resided
several years. At length he was enabled to return to his
own country, in which he was appointed to some honourable offices. He died in 1294. The historian Villani attributes to him the merit of having first introduced a degree of refinement among his countrymen, and of having
reformed their language, and the general conduct of public
affairs. The work which has contributed most to his celebrity, was one which he entitled “Tresor,
” and wrote
when in France, and in the French language, which he
says he chose because it was the most agreeable language
and the most common in Europe. This work is a kind of
abridgment of the Bible, of Pliny the naturalist, Solinus,
and other writers who have treated on different sciences,
and may be called an Encyclopaedia of the knowledge of
his time. It was translated into Italian about the same
period, and this translation only was printed; but there
are about a dozen transcripts of the original in the royal
library at Paris, and there is a fine ms. of it in the Vatican, bound in crimson velvet, with manuscript notes, by
Petrarch. After his return to Florence, Latini wrote his
u Tesoretto,“or little treasure, which, however, is not
as some have reported, an abridgment of the
” Tresor,“but a collection of moral precepts in verse. He also
translated into the Italian language part of Cicero
” de Inventione.“His greatest honour seems to have been that
he was the tutor of Dante, not however in poetry, for his
” Tesoretto" affords no ground to consider him as a master
of that art.
, a French theorist of some note, was born in 1659, of a noble family in Lorraine. At the age of thirty-three he was
, a French theorist of some note, was born in 1659, of a noble family in Lorraine. At the age of thirty-three he was appointed consul-general of Egypt, and held that situation with great credit for sixteen years. Having strenuously supported the interests of his sovereign, he was at length rewarded by being removed to Leghorn, which was esteemed the chief of the Frencb consulships. In 1715 he was employed to visit and inspect the other consulships of Barbary and the Levant, and fulfilled this commission so much to the satisfaction of his court, that he obtained leave to retire, with a considerable pension, to Marseilles, where he died in 1738, at the age of seventy-nine. De Maillet did not publish any thing himself, but left behind him papers and memoirs, from which some publications were formed. The first of these was published in 8vo, by the abbe Mascrier, under the feigned name of Telliamed, which is De Maillet reversed. The subject is the origin of our globe, and the editor has thrown the sentiments of his author into the form of dialogues between an Indian philosopher and a French missionary. The philosopher maintained that all the land of this earth, and its vegetable and animal inhabitants, rose from the bosom of the sea, on the successive contractions of the waters: that men had originally been tritons with tails; and that they, as well as other animals, had lost their marine, and acquired terrestrial forms by their agitations when left on dry ground. This extravagance had its day in France. The same editor also drew from the papers of this author, a description of Egypt, published in 1743, in 4to, and afterwards in two volumes 12mo.
, commonly called the marquis Malvezzi, an Italian writer of eminence, was born of a noble family at Bologna, in 1599. After having finished his
, commonly called the marquis
Malvezzi, an Italian writer of eminence, was born of a
noble family at Bologna, in 1599. After having finished
his classical and philosophical studies, he applied to the
law, and became a doctor in that faculty in 1616, although
not quite seventeen years of age. After this he cultivated
other sciences, and spent some time and pains upon physic, mathematics, and divinity. He even did not neglect
astrology; in favour of which he always entertained high
prejudices, although he affected outwardly to despise it.
Music and painting were also among the arts in which he
exercised himself for his amusement. He afterwards became a soldier, and served under the duke Feria, governor
of the Milanese. Philip the Fourth of Spain employed
him in several affairs, and admitted him into his council
of war. Letters, however, occupied a good part of his
time, and he was member of the academy of the Gelati at
Bologna. He was the author of several works in Spanish
and Italian: among the latter were, “Discourses upon
the first book of Tacitus’s Annals,
” which he composed at
the age of twenty-three, and dedicated to Ferdinand II.
great duke of Tuscany. There is a great shew of learning in it; too much, indeed, for there are many quotations
from the fathers and scripture, which have but little to do
with Tacitus and modern politics. There are also in it
certain logical distinctions, and subtile reasonings, which
savour of pedantry, and had better become a professor of
philosophy, than a writer upon government and stateaffairs. He died at Bologna, Aug. 11, 1654. His discourses upon Tacitus were translated and published in
English, by sir R. Baker, Lond. 1642, folio. His “Davide
perseguitato
” was translated by Robert Ashley, Romulus and Tarquin,
” by lord H. Gary,
Successi della monarchia di Spagna
”
by Robert Gentilis,
his writings, and the active part he took in bringing about the French revolution, was born in 1749, of a noble family. Throughout life he displayed a spirit averse
, well
known both by his writings, and the active part he took in
bringing about the French revolution, was born in 1749,
of a noble family. Throughout life he displayed a spirit
averse to every restraint, and was one of those unhappy
geniuses in whom the most brilliant talents serve only as a
scourge to themselves and all around them. It is told by
his democratical panegyrists, as a wonderful proof of family tyranny, under the old government, that not less thau
sixty- seven lettres de cachet had been obtained by Mirabeau the father against this son, and others of his rela-'
tives. It proves at least as much, what many anecdotes
confirm, that, for his share of them, the son was not less
indebted to his own ungovernable disposition, than to the
severity of his parent. The whole Course of his youth was
passed in this manner. Extravagance kept him always
poor; and this species of paternal interference placed him
very frequently in prison. It may be supposed also, that
the part taken by the government in these unpleasant admonitions, did not tend to attach young Mirabeau to that
system. The talents of Mirabeau led him frequently to
employ his pen, and his publications form the chief epochas
of his life. His first publication was, 1. “Essai sur le
Despotisme,
” “An Essay on Despotism,
” in 8vo. Next,
in one of his confinements, he wrote, 2. a work “On
Lettres de Cachet,
” 2 vols. 8vo. 3. “Considerations sur
Pordre de Cincinnatus,
” 8vo; a remonstrance against the
order of Cincinnatus, proposed atone time to be established
in America. The public opinion in America favoured this
remonstrance, and it proved effectual. 4. His next work
was in favour of the Dutch, when Joseph II. demanded the
opening of the Scheld, in behalf of the Brabanons. It is
entitled, “Doutes sur la liberte* de PEscaut,
” 8vo. 5.
“Lettre a Pempereur Joseph II. sur son reglement concernant P Emigration,
” a pamphlet of forty pages, in 8vo.
6. “De la Caisse d'Escompte,
” a volume in 8vo, written
against that establishment. 7. “De la Banque d'Espagne,
”
8vo a remonstrance against establishing a French bank in
Spain. A controversy arising on this subject, he wrote
again upon it. 8. Two pamphlets on the monopoly of the
water company in Paris, Soon after writing these hewent to Berlin, which was in 1786, and was there when
Frederic II. died. On this occasion also he took up his
pen, and addressed to his successor a tract entitled, 9.
“Lettre remise a Frederic Guillaume II. roi regnant de
Prusse, le jour de son avenement au trone.
” This contained, says his panegyrist, “non pas des eloges de lui,
mais des eloges du peuple; non pas des voeux pour lui,
mais des vceux pour le peuple; non pas des conseils pour
Jui, mais des conseils pour le bonheur du peuple.
”
, born of a noble family at Cuenca, entered the Jesuits’ order, 1553,
, born of a noble family at Cuenca,
entered the Jesuits’ order, 1553, at the age of eighteen,
and taught theology with reputation during twenty years in
the university of Ebora. He died October 12, 1660, at
Madrid, aged sixty-five. His principal works are, Commentaries on the first part of the Summary of St. Thomas,
in Latin, a large treatise “De Justitia et Jure,
” a book on
“The Concordance of Grace and Free-will,
” printed at
Lisbon,
, an eminent Italian and Latin poet, was born of a noble family at Modena, in 1489; and, after being educated
, an eminent Italian and Latin poet, was born of a noble family at Modena, in 1489; and, after being educated at Rome, where he made extraordinary proficiency in the Greek and Latin languages, and even in the Hebrew, he was recalled to Modena, where, in 1512, he married, and intended to settle. The fame, however, of Leo X's court, led him about four years after, back to Rome, where he formed an acquaintance with many eminent scholars; but appears to have paid more attention to the cultivation of his taste than his morals, as he formed a licentious connexion with a Roman lady, in consequence of which he received a wound from the hand of an unknown assassin, which had nearly cost him his life. Even when, on the death of Leo X. he left Rome, he did not return to his family, but went to Bologna, where he became enamoured of Camilla Gonzaga, a lady of rank and beauty, and a warm admirer of Italian poetry. His life after this appears to have been wholly divided between poetry and dissipation; and he died of the consequences of the latter, in 1544. His Italian and Latin poems were for many years published in detached forms until 1749, when Serassi produced an entire edition at Bergamo.
, an eminent French historian, was descended of a noble family, but the names of his parents, and the period
, an eminent French
historian, was descended of a noble family, but the names
of his parents, and the period of his birth have not been
discovered. The place of his birth was probably Picardy,
and the time, prior to the close of the fourteenth century.
No particulars of his 'early years are known, except that
he evinced, when young, a love for application, and a
dislike to indolence. The quotations also from Sallust,
Livy, Vegetius, and other ancient authors, that occur in
his Chronicles, shew that he must have made some progress
in Latin literature. He appears to have been resident in
Cambray when he composed his history, and passed there
the remainder of his life. In 1436 he was nominated to
the office of lieutenant du Gavenier of the Cambresis; the
gavenier was the collector or receiver of the annual dues
payable to the duke of Burgundy, by the subjects of the
church in the Cambresis, for the protection of them as
earl of Flanders. Monstrelet also held the office of bailiff
to the chapter of Cambray from 1436 to 1440, when another was appointed. The respect and consideration which
he had now acquired, gained him the dignity of governor
of Cambray in 1444, and in the following year he was nominated bailiff of Wallaincourt. He retained both of those
places until his death, which happened about the middle
of July, in 1453. His character in the register of the Cordeliers, and by the abbot of St. Aubert, was that of “a
very honourable and peaceable man;
” expressions, says his
biographer, that appear simple at first sight, but which
contain a real eulogium, if we consider the troublesome
times in which Monstrelet lived, the places he held, the
interest he must have had sometimes to betray the truth in
favour of one of the factions which then divided France,
and caused the revolutions the history of which he has published during the life of the principal actors.
, an illustrious German divine, was born at Lubeck, in 1695, of a noble family, which might seem to open to his ambition a fair
, an illustrious German
divine, was born at Lubeck, in 1695, of a noble family,
which might seem to open to his ambition a fair path to
civil promotion; but his zeal for the interests of religion,
his thirst after knowledge, and particularly his taste for
sacred literature, induced him to consecrate his talents to
the service of the church. Where he was educated we have
Dot learned; fcut he is said to have given early indications
of a promising capacity, and of a strong desire of mental
and literary improvement; and, when his parents proposed
to him the choice of a profession, the church suggested
itself to him as a proper department for the exercise of that
zeal which disposed him to be useful to society. Being
ordained a minister in the Lutheran church, he soon distinguished himself as an eloquent and useful preacher.
His reputation in this character, however, was local and
confined, but the fame of his literary ability diffused itself
among all the nations of Christendom. The German universities loaded him with literary honours the king of
Denmark invited him to settle at Copenhagen the duke
of Brunswick called him thence to Helmstadt, where he
filled the academical chair was honoured with the character of ecclesiastical counsellor to the court an,d presided over the seminaries of learning in the duchy of Wolfembuttle and the principality of Blakenburg. When a
design was formed of giving an uncommon degree of lustre
to the university of Gottingen, by filling it with men of
the first rank in letters, king George II. considered Dr.
Mosheim as worthy to appear at the head of it, in quality
of chancellor; and he discharged the duties of that station
with zeal and propriety, and his conduct gave general satisfaction. Here he died, universally lamented, in 1755.
In depth of judgment, in extent of learning, in purity of
taste, in the powers of eloquence, and in a laborious application to all the various branches of erudition and philosophy, he is said to have had very few superiors. His
Latin translation of Cud worth’s “Intellectual System,
”
enriched with large annotations, discovered a profound
acquaintance with ancient learning and philosophy. His
illustrations of the Scriptures, his labours in defence of
Christianity, and the light he cast upon religion and philosophy, appear in many volumes of sacred and prophane
literature. He wrote, in Latin, 1. “Observationes sacra?,
et historico- critic^,
” Amst. Vindicise antiquae Cnristianorum discipline, adv. J, Tolandi Nazarenum,
” Hamb. De aetate apologetici Tertulliani et initio persecutionis Christianorum sub Severo,
commentatio,
” Helm. Gallus glorias J.
Christi, Spiritusque Sancti obtrectator, publicae contemtioni expositus,
” Helm. Historia Tartarorum ecclesiastica,
” Helm. De rebus
Christianorum ante Constantinum Magnum commentarii,
”
ibid. 1753, 4to. 7. “Historia Mich. Served,
” &c. But
that by which he is best known in this country is his
church-history. This was at first a small work, which appeared under the title of “Institutiones Historic Christiana?,
” and passed through several editions. He was repeatedly urged by his learned friends to extend a work
which they represented as too meagre for the importance
of the subject. He acknowledged the objection, but alleged various avocations as an excuse for non-compliance.
At length, however, he acceded to the wish of the public,
and having employed two years in the augmentation and
improvement of his history, he published it in 1755, before the end of which year he died. This was soon after
translated into English by Dr. Maclaine, of whom we have
recently given some account, and is now a standard book
in our libraries. The best edition, as we have noticed in
Maclaine’s article, is that of which Dr. Charles Coote was
the editor and contimlator, in 1811, 6 vols. 8vo. This
edition is also enriched by a masterly dissertation from the
pen of Dr. Gteig, of Stirling, on the primitive form of the
church, calculated to obviate certain prejudices which
Mosheim had discovered in various parts of his otherwise
Valuable history.
, an Italian historian, was born of a noble family of Florence, in 1476. Having espoused the cause
, an Italian historian, was born of a noble family of Florence, in 1476. Having espoused the
cause of the liberties of his country, when the Medici family gained the ascendancy, he was banished, and his property confiscated. He then went to Venice, where he
passed the rest of his days in composing his various works,
particularly his history of Florence, “L'Istorie de Firenze,
dal 1494 sino al 1531,
” &c.
, an Italian lawyer, who flourished about the middle of the sixteenth century, was born of a noble family, at Asti, and studied law at Pavia. He made so
, an Italian lawyer, who flourished about the middle of the sixteenth century, was born
of a noble family, at Asti, and studied law at Pavia. He
made so great progress in literature, as to receive the
academical honours of his profession before he had reached
his twenty-fourth year, and was at the same time advanced
to be senator at Casal. Pavia offered him the professorship of civil law, but he preferred his studious retirement at Genoa, where he probably died. His principal
works are “De Pulchro
” “De Deo,
” in fifteen books“”De immortalitateAnimi“”De Passione Domini." Each
of these makes a folio, printed 1553 1587.
, founder of the congregation of priests of the Oratory in Italy, was born July 23, 1515, of a noble family at Florence. His piety and zeal acquired him
, founder of the congregation of priests of the Oratory in Italy, was born July 23, 1515, of a noble family at Florence. His piety and zeal acquired him uncommon reputation. He died at Rome, 1595, aged eighty, and was canonized by pope Gregory XV. 1622. The congregation founded by St. Philip de Neri was confirmed, 1574, by pope Gregory XIII. and took the name of the Oratory, because the original assemblies, which gave rise to its establishment, were held in an oratory of St. Jerome’s church at Rome but it differs from the congregation of the Oratory founded by cardinal de Berulle, in France. Its members take no vows; their general governs but three years; their office is to deliver such instructions every day in their church as are suited to all capacities. Each institution has produced great numbers of men who have been celebrated for their learning, and services to the Romish church. It was at St. Philip de Neri’s solicitation that cardinal Baronius, who had entered his congregation, wrote his Ecclesiastical Annals.
, a celebrated bishop of Salisbury, in the eleventh century, was born of a noble family in Normandy. He possessed great learning, joined
, a celebrated bishop of Salisbury, in
the eleventh century, was born of a noble family in Normandy. He possessed great learning, joined to great prudence, and accompanied with talents for military affairs;
and his life, says Butler, was that of a saint, in all the difficult states of a courtier, soldier, and magistrate. In
his early years he succeeded his father in the earldom of
Séez, but distributed the greatest part of his revenues to
the church and poor, and followed William the Conqueror
into England in 1066. This prince rewarded Osmund by
making him earl of Dorset, then chancellor, and afterwards bishop of Salisbury. With a view of pleasing the
king, he was weak enough to desert the cause of Anselm,
his archbishop; but, repenting almost immediately, he requested absolution from him, and obtained it. He built,
or rather completed, the first cathedral of Salisbury, begun
by his predecessor, and dedicated it in 1092; and it being
destroyed by lightning, he rebuilt it in 1099, and furnished
it with a library. To regulate the divine service, he compiled for his church the breviary, missal, and ritual, since
called “The Use of Sarum,
” which was afterwards adopted
in most dioceses in England, until queen Mary’s time,
when several of the clergy obtained particular licences to
say the Roman breviary, but many of them were printed
even in her reign. The first Salisbury missal is dated
1494, and was printed abroad. The last was printed at
London in 1557. Osmund died Dec. 3, 1099. In 1457,
his remains were removed to our lady’s chapel in the present cathedral, where they are covered with a marble slab,
with only the inscription of the year 1099. His sumptuous
shrine was destroyed in the reign of Henry VIII.
, seigneur de Bigot, a French poet, was born in May 1650, at Toulouse, of a noble family. He was a member of the academy of the Jeux Floraux,
, seigneur de Bigot, a French poet,
was born in May 1650, at Toulouse, of a noble family.
He was a member of the academy of the Jeux Floraux,
became chief magistrate of Toulouse in 1675, when scarcely
twenty-five years of age and was made head of the consistory 1684, in which othce he acquitted himself with great
integrity. He went to Rome two years after, and at
length to Paris, in which city he chiefly resided from that
time, and where M. de Vendome fixed him in his service
in 1691, as one of his secretaries. He died October 23,
1721, at Paris, aged 71, leaving some “Comedies,
” and
a small collection of miscellaneous “Poems,
” most of
them addressed to M. de Vendome. M. Palaprat wrote for
the stage with his friend Brueis, and their works have been
collected in five small volumes 12mo, of which his is the
least part. His style is gay and lively, but he discovers
little genius or fancy, and he seems to have been indebted
for his literary reputation to his private character, which
was that of a man of great candour and simplicity.
, a learned antiquary, was born of a noble family at Mantua, in 1646. He entered himself among
, a learned antiquary, was born of a noble family at Mantua, in 1646. He
entered himself among the Jesuits, and became distinguished for his deep knowledge of history and antiquities.
His private character too was such as made him beloved by
every person who knew him. He was chosen by Hannuncio,
duke of Parma, to arrange his rich and curious cabinet of
medals, of which, in 1694, he began to publish an account
under the title of “I Cassari in oro raccolti nel Farnese
Musaeo o publicati colle loro congrue interpretazioni;
” and
be continued his labours till his death, Jan. 20, 1721. This
work, in its complete form, consists of ten vols. folio, and
bears the title of “Museo Farnese
” but is not held in so
much estimation on the continent as to bear a high price.
, an eminent prelate of the fifth century, and called Chrysologus from his eloquence, was descended of a noble family, and born at Imola, then called Forum Cornelii.
, an eminent prelate of
the fifth century, and called Chrysologus from his eloquence, was descended of a noble family, and born at
Imola, then called Forum Cornelii. After a suitable education, he was elected archbishop of Ravenna, about the
year 433, and was much celebrated for his virtue and his
eloquence. He died about the year 451. There are 126
sermons or homilies of his in the library of the fathers, in
which he unites perspicuity with brevity; their style is
concise and elegant, but not unmixed with quaintnesses.
Father d'Acheri has published in his “Spicilegium,
” five
other sermons written by him; and in St. Peter’s works, is
his answer to Eutyches, who had written to him in the year
449, complaining of St. Flavianus of Constantinople, in
which he defends the orthodox faith, and refers Eutyches
to the excellent letter sent by St. Leo to Flavianus, which
teaches what is to be believed concerning the mystery of
the incarnation. The best edition of St. Peter Chrysologus
is that printed at Augsburg, 1758, folio.
ublic life; and which led to those preferments and opulence, which enabled him to become the founder of a noble family.
Hitherto he had devoted his time to literature, and Lad no other view than to rise in his profession; but being noticed by lord Cromwell, while in the Wiltshire family, as a young man of talents, he was introduced by him at court, and appeared to so much advantage, that Henry VIII. recommended the farther improvement that travelling might contribute, and allowed him a handsome pension for his expenses. His manners and accomplishments, on his return, appear to have fulfilled the expectations of his patrons, and he was appointed Latin secretary in the secretary of state’s office, the first step in his public life; and which led to those preferments and opulence, which enabled him to become the founder of a noble family.
, an ancient Greek writer, and of a noble family among the Jews, flourished at Alexandria in the
, an ancient Greek writer, and of a noble family among the Jews, flourished at Alexandria in the reign of Caligula. He was the chief person of an embassy which was sent to Rome about the year 42, to plead the cause of his nation against Apion, who was commissioned by the Alexandrians to charge it with neglecting the honours due to Caesar; but that emperor would not suffer him to speak, and behaved to him with such anger, that Philo was in no small danger of losing his life. He went a second time to Rome, in the reign of Claudius; and then, according to Eusebius and Jerome, became acquainted, and upon terms of friendship, with St. Peter. Photius says further, that he was baptized into the Christian religion, and afterwards, from some motive of resentment, renounced it; but there is much uncertainty in all this, and few believe that St. Peter was at Rome so early as the reign of Claudius, if he was there at all.
, a learned Spaniard, was born at Seville, of a noble family, and entered into the society of Jesuits in 1572.
, a learned Spaniard, was born at Seville, of a noble family, and entered into the society of
Jesuits in 1572. He taught philosophy and theology in
several colleges, and was skilled in the oriental languages.
He wrote, among other things, 1. Two volumes folio, of
“Commentaries on Job.
” 2. The same on Ecclesiastes.
3. A book “De rebus Salomonis,
” folio, curious and
learned, but not always correct. 4. “An universal History of the Church,
” in Spanish, 4 vols. folio. 5. “A
History of Ferdinand Hi.
” in the same language. He died
in 1637, much regretted.
, an ingenious mathematician, descended of a noble family of Languedoc, was born in 1695. In his early
, an ingenious mathematician, descended of a noble family of Languedoc, was born in 1695.
In his early mathematical studies, he appears to have had
no instructor; but going, in his twenty-third year, to Paris,
he formed an acquaintance with Reaumur. In 1724 he
was received into the academy of sciences, in the Memoirs
of which he wrote a great many papers, He wrote a valuable work, entitled “The Theory of working Ships,
”
, an Italian poet and a man of letters, was born of a noble family at Verona in 1731. He became an early proficient
, an Italian poet and a man of letters, was born of a noble family at Verona in 1731. He
became an early proficient in classical literature, particularly the Greek, of which he was enthusiastically fond, and
attained an excellent style. At this period the marquis
Maffei and other eminent literary characters were resident
at Verpna, in whose society the talents of Pompei received
the most advantageous cultivation. He was first known as
an author by “Canzoni Pastorali,
” in two vols. 8vo. Able
critics spoke in the highest terms of these pieces, on account of their sweetness and elegance it was thought by
some good judges that they were never surpassed by any
productions of the kind. He next translated some of the
Idylls of Theocritus and Moschus, in which he exhibited a
very happy selection of Italian words, corresponding with
the Greek. The next object of his attention was dramatic
poetry, in the higher departments of which the Italians
were at that time very deficient, and he published in 1763
and 1770, his tragedies of “Hypermestra
” and “Callirhoe,
” which were represented with great success in several
cities of the Venetian state. He now employed several
years on a translation of “Plutarch’s Lives,
” which appeared in Nuove
Canzoni Pastorali
” he also published poetical versions of
the “Hero and Leander of Musjeus
” of the “Hymns of
Callimachus;
” “A hundred Greek Epigrams
” and the
“Epistles of Ovid.
” He was a member of some of the
academies, and he served his native city in the capacities
of secretary to the tribunal of public safety, and to the
academy of painting. He died at Verona in 1790, at the
age of fifty-nine, and his memory was honoured by various
public testimonies, and by the erection of his bust in one
of the squares of the city. He was highly respected and
esteemed, as well for his morals as for his literary talents,
and his fame was not limited to the confines of Italy. An
edition of his works was published after his death in six
vols. 8vo.
, one of the most famous Italian poets, was born at Florence, Decembers, 1431. He was of a noble family, and was the most poetical of three brothers
, one of the most famous Italian poets,
was born at Florence, Decembers, 1431. He was of a
noble family, and was the most poetical of three brothers
who all assiduously courted the Muses. His two elder
brothers, Bernardo and Luca, appeared as poets earlier
than himself. The first production of the family is probably the Elegy of Bernardo addressed to Lorenzo de'
Jiedici, on the death of his grandfather Cosmo. He also
wrote an elegy on the untimely death of the beautiful Simonetta, mistress of Giuliano de' Medici, the brother of
Lorenzo, which was published at Florence in 1494, though
written much earlier. He produced the first Italian translation of the Eclogues of Virgil, which appears to have
been finished about 1470 and was published in 1481 and
a poem on the Passion of Christ. Luca wrote a celebrated
poem on a tournament held at Florence in which Lorenzo
was victor, in 1468, entitled “Giostra di Lorenzo de'
Medici
” as Politian celebrated the success of Giuliano,
in his “Giostra di. Giuliano de' Medici.
” It is confessed,
however, that the poem of Luca Pulci derives its merit
rather from the minute information it gives respecting the
exhibition, than from its poetical excellence. He produced also “II Ciriffo Calvaneo,
” an epic romance, probably the first that appeared in Italy, being certainly prior
to the Morgante of his brother, and the Orlando Innamorato of Bojardo and the “Driadeo d'Amore,
” a pastoral
romance in ottava rima. There are also eighteen heroic
epistles by him in terza rima, the first from LucretiaDonati to
Lorenzo de Medici, the rest on Greek and Roman subjects.
These were printed in 1481, and do credit to their author.
Luigi appeaps, from many circumstances, to have lived
on terms of the utmost friendship with Lorenzo de Medici,
who, in his poem entitled “La Caccia col Falcone,
” mentions him with great freedom and jocularity. His principal work is the “Morgante maggiore,
” an epic romance.
Whether this or the Orlando Innamorato of Bojardo was
first written, has been a subject of doubt. Certain it is that
the Morgante had the priority in publication, having been
printed at Venice in 1488, after a Florentine edition of
uncertain date whereas Bojardo' s poem did not appear till
1496, and, from some of the concluding lines, appears not
to have been finished in 1494. The Morgante may therefore be justly, as it is generally, regarded as the prototype of the Orlando Furioso of Ariosto. It has been said
without foundation that Ficinus and Politian had a share in
this composition. It was first written at the particular request of Lucretia, mother of Lorenzo de Medici, but it
was not finished till after her death, which happened in
1482. It is said by Crescimbeni that Pulci was accustomed
to recite this poem at the table of Lorenzo, in the manner
of the ancient rhapsodists. This singular offspring of the
wayward genius of Pulci has been as immoderately
commended by its admirers, as it has been unreasonably condemned and degraded by its opponents: and while some
have not scrupled to prefer it to the productions of Ariosto
and Tasso, others have decried it as vulgar, absurd, and
profane. From the solemnity and devotion with which
every canto is introduced, some have judged that the author meant to give a serious narrative, but the improbability of the relation, and the burlesque nature of the incidents, destroy all ideas of this kind. M. de la Monnoye
says that the author, whom he conceives to have been ignorant of rules, has confounded the comic and serious styles,
and made the giant, his hero, die a burlesque death, by
the bite of a sea-crab in his heel, in the twentieth book,
so that in the eight which remain he is not mentioned.
The native simplicity of the narration, he adds, covers all
faults: and the lovers of the Florentine dialect still read it
with delight, especially when they can procure the edition
of Venice, in 1546 or 1550, with the explanations of his
nephew John Pulci. These, however, are no more than
a glossary of a few words subjoined to each canto. There
are also sonnets by Luigi Pulci, published with those of
Matteo Franco, in which the two authors satirize each
other without mercy or delicacy yet it is supposed that
they were very good friends, and only took these liberties
with each other for the sake of amusing the public. They
were published about the fifteenth century, entitled “Sonetti di Misere Mattheo Franco et di Luigi Pulci jocosi et
faceti, cioe da ridere.
” No other poem of this author is
mentioned by Mr. Roscoe, who has given the best account
of him, except “La Beca di Dicomano,
” written in imitatation and emulation of “La Nencio da Barberino,
” by
Lorenzo de Medici, ajid published with it. It is a poem
in the rustic style and language, but instead of the more
chastised and delicate humour of Lorenzo, the poem of
Pulci, says Mr. Roscoe, partakes of the character of his
Morgante, and wanders into the burlesque and extravagant. It has been supposed that this poet died about 1-487,
but it was probably something later. The exact time id
not known.
, lieutenant-general under Louis XIII. and XIV. was of a noble family in Armagnac, and was born in the year 1600. He
, lieutenant-general under Louis XIII. and XIV. was of a noble
family in Armagnac, and was born in the year 1600. He
is one of those Frenchmen of distinction who have written
memoirs of their own time, from which so abundant materials are supplied to their history, more than are generally
found in other countries. His memoirs extend from 1617 to
1658. - They were first published at Paris, and at Amsterdam in 1690, under the inspection of Du Chene, historiographer of France, in 2 vols. 12mo, and are now republished in the general collection of memoirs. The life of
iPuy-Segur was that of a very active soldier. He entered
into the army in 1617, and served forty-three years without intermission, rising gradually to the rank of lieutenantgeneral. In 1636, the Spaniards having attempted to pass
the Somme, in order to march to Pans, Puy-Segur was
ordered to oppose them with a small body of troops. The
general, the count de Soissons, fearing afterwards that he
would be cut off, which was but too probable, sent his aidde-camp to tell him that he might retire if he thought proper. “Sir,
”“replied this brave officer,
” a man ordered
upon a dangerous service, like the present, has no opinion
to form about it. I came here by the count’s command,
and shall not retire upon his permission only. If he would
have me return, he must command it." This gallant man
is said to have been at one hundred and twenty sieges, in
which there was an actual cannonade, and in more than
thirty battles or skirmishes, yet never received a wound.
He died in 1682, at his own castle of Bernouille, near
Guise. His memoirs are written with boldness and truth;
contain many remarkable occurrences, in which he was
personally concerned; and conclude with some very useful
military instructions.
, a brave French officer, was born in 1610, of a noble family in Normandy. He was trained up to the marine
, a brave French officer, was
born in 1610, of a noble family in Normandy. He was
trained up to the marine service under his father, who was
an experienced captain, and distinguished himself from the
age of seventeen. He went into Sweden in 1644, and was
there made major-general of the fleet, and afterwards viceadmiral. In this last character, he engaged in the famous
battle, when the Danes were entirely defeated, and took
their admiral’s ship, called the Patience, in which the
Danish admiral was killed. Being recalled to France in
1647, he commanded one of the squadrons sent on the
Neapolitan expedition; and, in 1650, when the French
navy was reduced to a very low state, fitted out several
vessels, at his own expence, at the first commotions at
Bourdeaux. The Spaniards arrived in the river at the same
time, but be entered notwithstanding, to which circumstance the surrender of the town was principally owing
and equal success attended him in the last wars of Sicily.
He defeated the Dutch in three different engagements, in
the last of which the famous Ruyter was killed by a cannon
ball; and he disabled the Tripoli ships so as to compel that
republic to conclude a peace very glorious for France.
Some years after this he forced Algiers and Genoa to implore his majesty’s mercy, and set at liberty a great number of Christian slaves. In short, Asia, Africa, and Europe, were Witness to his valour, and resound still with his
exploits. Though a protestant, the king rewarded his services by giving the territory of Bouchet, near d'Etampes,
(one of the finest in the kingdom) to him and his heirs for
ever, and raised it to a marquisate on condition that it
should be called Du Quesne, to perpetuate this great man’s
memory. He died February 2, 1688, aged 73, leaving
four sons, who have all distinguished themselves. Henry,
the eldest, published “Reflections on the Eucharist,
”
, an ancient Italian scholar and physician, was born of a noble family at Arezzo, in 1626. He studied at Padua, where
, an ancient Italian scholar and physician, was born of a noble family at Arezzo, in 1626. He
studied at Padua, where he took the degree of doctor in
philosophy and physic: and very soon afterwards rendered
himself so conspicuous by his talents and acquirements in
these sciences, that he was appointed first physician to the
grand dukes Ferdinand II. and Cosmo III. At this time
the academy del Cimento was occupied in a series of philosophical experiments which gave full scope and employment to Redi’s genius; and at the desire of his noble patron, he undertook the investigation of the salts which are
obtainable from different vegetables. With what success
these experiments were conducted, may be seen by referring to his works. His principal attention, however, was
directed to two more important subjects: viz. the prison of
the viper, and the generation and properties of insects. In
the first of these inquiries he shewed the surprising difference there is between swallowing the viperine poison, and
having it applied to the surface of the body by a wound.
He also proved that, contrary to the assertion of Charas,
the virulence of the poison does not depend upon the rage
or exasperation of the animal, since the poison collected
from a viper killed without being previously irritated, and
dropped into a wound produces the same fatal effects, as
that which is infused into a wound made by the animal
when purposely teazed until it bites. On the subject of
insects, he refuted the doctrine, maintained by all the ancients and by many moderns, of putrefaction being the
cause of their generation; a doctrine which had, indeed,
been attacked some years before by an Italian author named
Aromatari, but not with that weight of facts and force of
argument which are so conspicuous in this treatise and the
rest of Redi’s writings. His observations on various natural
productions brought from the Indies, and on animals that
live within other living animals, “osservazioni intorno agli
animali viventi che si trovano negli animali viventi,
” exhibit
many curious experiments and discoveries. But while he
was thus engaged in philosophical pursuits, he did not neglect the duties of his profession, as a physician. His
letters contain numerous histories of diseases and of their
treatment; for he kept a register of all remarkable cases
and consultations. He was particularly diligent in noticing
the operation of remedies, and in many disorders enjoined
a very abstemious diet. Kedi’s merits, however, were not
confined to philosophy and medicine. He was also an excellent philologist and an elegant poet. His “Bacco in
Toscana
” has lately been edited by Mr. Mathias. All his
writings possess the attraction of a pure and polished style;
and the Academy della Crusca justly regarded him as one
of the best authorities, in the composition of their celebrated
Dictionary. This indefatigable philosopher and amiable
man died at Pisa in 1698, having previously suffered much
from epileptic attacks. After his death, a medal was struck
in honour of his name, by order of Cosmo III. His works
have gone through various editions; but that which was
printed at Naples in 7 vols. 4to, is esteemed the best.
, a French poet, of a noble family, was born in Vendomois, the same year that Francis
, a French poet, of a noble family, was born in Vendomois, the same year that Francis I. was taken prisoner before Pavia that is, in 1524. This circumstance is what he himself affixes to the time of his birth; though from other passages in his works it might be concluded that he was not born till 1526. He was brought up at Paris, in the college of Navarre; but, taking some disgust to his studies, became a page of the duke of Orleans. This duke resigned him to the king of Scotland, James V. whom he attended from Paris into Scotland in 1537, and continued there two years, after which he resided about half a year in England. But the duke of Orleans took him again, and employed him in several negotiations. Ronsard accompanied Lazarus de Baif to the diet of Spire; and, in his conversations with that learned man, conceived a passion for letters. He learned Greek under Dorat with Antony de Baif, the son of Lazarus; and afterwards devoted himself entirely to poetry, in which he acquired great reputation. The kings Henry II. Francis
, a French moral and political writer, was born in 1658, of a noble family, at Saint-Pierre in Normandy. He studied at the
, a French
moral and political writer, was born in 1658, of a noble
family, at Saint-Pierre in Normandy. He studied at the
college of Caen, and was brought up to the church, and
obtained some preferment; but was more distinguished for
his political knowledge. Previous to his appearing in political life, he wrote some observations on philosophical
grammar, in consequence of which he was admitted a member of the academy in 1695. His political fame induced
the cardinal Polignac to take him with him to the conferences for the peace of Utrecht; and here he appears to
have announced one of his favourite projects, the establishment of a kind of European diet, in order to secure a perpetual peace, which cardinal Fleury received with good
humour, but saw at once its practical difficulties. Such
indeed was the case with most of the schemes he published
in his works, which are now nearly forgotten. He certainly, however, had the merit of discovering the defects
of the government of Louis XIV. and pleaded the cause of
a more free constitution with much boldness. One of his
best works was “A Memorial on the establishment of a
proportional Taille,
” which is said to have meliorated the
state of taxation in France. He d,ied in 1743, aged eightyfive. After the death of Louis XIV. he published some of
his spirited sentiments of that monarch in a pamphlet entitled “La Polysvnodie,
” or the plurality of councils, for
which he was excelled the French academy, Fontenelle
only giving a vote in his favour. An edition of his works
was published in H-.li md, 1744. 18 vols. 12mo.
, in Latin Sarravius, a learned French lawyer, was born towards the close of the sixteenth century, of a noble family, and educated by his father, who was a man of
, in Latin Sarravius, a learned
French lawyer, was born towards the close of the sixteenth
century, of a noble family, and educated by his father,
who was a man of letters, with the greatest care. To the
study of the law, he joined a taste for polite literature,
philosophy, and criticism, wrote elegantly in Latin, and
was an excellent Greek scholar. He had perused the
classics with great attention; and some Latin and French
verses which he wrote, show that he had formed his taste
on the best models. He practised at the bar at Rouen,
but was an enemy to litigious suits, and always endeavoured
to prevent his clients from corning into court, while reconciliation was possible. He lived in intimacy and correspondence with the most learned men of his time, particularly Salmasius, Grotius, and our archbishop Usher. It
is not much praise to add after this, that he had Christina
queen of Sweden for a correspondent. He was of the protestant religion, and appears to have been displeased with
some symptoms of what he thought lukewarm ness in his
friend Grotius, and wished him to be more decided. Sarrau died May 30, 1651, advanced in years, and was lamented in poems and eloges by many learned contemporaries. He published the collection of Grotius’s correspondence entitled “Grotii epistolsc ad Gallos,
” and his own
Latin letters were published in Sylloge.
” They
contain many particulars of the literary history of the times.
He appears to have been an exceeding admirer of Salmasius.
, a distinguished general, was descended of a noble family in Germany, and waa the son of count Schomberg,
, a distinguished general, was descended of a noble family in Germany, and waa the son of count Schomberg, by his first wife, an English lady, daughter of the lord Dudley; which count was killed at the battle of Prague in Bohemia in 1620, together with several of his sons. The duke was born in 1608. He served first in the army of the United Provinces, and afterwards became the particular confident of William II. prince of Orange; in whose last violent actions he had so great a share, and particularly in the attempt upon Amsterdam, that, on the prince’s death in 1650, he retired into France. Here he gained so high a reputation, that, next to the prince of Conde, and Turenne, he was esteemed the best general in that kingdom; though, on account of his firm adherence to the Protestant religion, he was not for a considerable time raised to the dignity of a marshal. In Nov. 1659 he offered his service to Charles II. for his restoration to the throne of England; and, the year following, the court of France being greatly solicitous for the interest of Portugal against the Spaniards, he was sent to Lisbon; and in his way thither passed through England, in order to concert measures with king Charles for the suppoxt of Portugal. Among other discourse which he had with, that prince, he advised his majesty to set up for the head of the Protestant religion; which would give him a vast ascendant among the princes of Germany, make him umpire of all their affairs, procure him great credit with the protestants of France, and keep that crown in perpetual fear of him. He urged him likewise not to part with Dunkirk, the sale of which was then in agitation; since, considering the naval power of England, it could not be taken, and the possession of it would keep both France and Spain in a dependence upon his majesty.
s, a village live leagues from Savona in the territory of Genoa, but others derive him from a branch of a noble family. He was born in 1413, entered the Franciscan
, originally called Francis Albisola Della
Rovera, is said by some writers to have been the son of a
fisherman at Celles, a village live leagues from Savona in
the territory of Genoa, but others derive him from a branch
of a noble family. He was born in 1413, entered the Franciscan order, took a doctor’s degree at Padua, and taught
with reputation in the universities of Bologna, Pavia, Sienna,
Florence, and Perugia. After this he became general of
the Franciscans, then cardinal through the interest of cardinal Bessarion, and at length pope, August 9, 1471, on
the death of Paul II. He immediately armed a fleet
against the Turks, and displayed great magnificence and
liberality during his whole pontificate. He was almost the
founder of, and certainly greatly enriched the Vatican library, and entrusted the care of it to the learned Platina.
He published a bull, March 1, 1746, granting indulgences
to those who should celebrate the festival of the Immaculate Conception of the Holy Virgin; the first decree of the
Roman church concerning that festival. The establishment of the feast of St. Joseph, for which Gerson had
taken great pains, is also ascribed to this pope. Historians
have reproached him with conniving at the vices of his
nephews, being too violent against the Medici family and
the Venetians, and having joined in the conspiracy of the
Pazzi at Florence. There seems upon the whole to have
been little in his character to command the respect of posterity, except his patronage of literature. He died
August 13, 1484, aged 71. Before his election to the pontificate, he wrote the following treatises “De Sanguine
Christi,
” Rome, De futuris contigentibus
” “De potentia Dei;
” “De Conceptione beatse
V.irginis,
” &c.; a very scarce work is also attributed to him,
entitled “Regulne Cuncellariae,
” La Banque Romaine,
”
, was born at Montpellier in 16S7, of a noble family, and went early to Paris, where he was noticed
, was born at Montpellier in 16S7, of a noble family, and
went early to Paris, where he was noticed at court, and
soon employed in an honourable station in Poland. He
there became acquainted with king Stanislaus, who took
him, after a time, not only as his secretary, but as his
friend. He followed this prince into France, when he went
to take possession of Lorraine, and became secretary of
that province, and perpetual secretary to the academy of
Nanci. There he found leisure to cultivate literature and
philosophy, and employed himself in writing. His learning
was extensive and his manners amiable. He died in 1773,
at the age of eighty. His principal works are, 1. “A History of Poland,
” in 5 vols. 12mo. 2. “Eloge Historique
du Roi Stanislas,
” 8vo, written with feeling and with genius. 3. Several detached pieces in the Memoirs of the
academy of Nanci.
, a German of great learning, was of a noble family of Strasburg, and was born there in 1489 or 1490.
, a German of great learning, was
of a noble family of Strasburg, and was born there in 1489
or 1490. He made himself illustrious by the services he
did his country; and discharged the most considerable
offices of state with the greatest ability and probity, particularly in several deputations to the diets of the empire,
the imperial court, and that of England. He contributed
very much to the reformation of religion at Strasburg,
to the erecting of a college which was opened there ten
years after, and to the compilation of the history of the reformation in Germany by Sleidan, which that author acknowledges in his preface. “I received the assistance of
that noble and excellent person, James Sturmius, who, having been above thirty years engaged in public and important affairs with the highest reputation, and having generously honoured me with his friendship, frequently cleared
up my doubts, and put me into the right way; and, at my
request before his last illness, read over the greatest part
of the work, and made the necessary remarks upon it.
”
He died at Strasburg Oct. 20, 1555, after languishing of
a fever for two months. Sleidan says that “he was a man
of great prudence and integrity, and the glory of the German nobility, on account of the excellent qualities of his
mind, and his distinguished learning.
”
, an Italian prelate and biographer, was born at Padua, Nov. 17, 1597, of a noble family, originally of Lucca. He was instructed in Greek,
, an Italian prelate and biographer, was born at Padua, Nov. 17, 1597, of a noble family, originally of Lucca. He was instructed in Greek, Latin, and logic, by the learned divine and lawyer, Benedetti, of Legnano, and afterwards entered the congregation of the regular canons of St. George, in Alga, where he studied philosophy and theology, and received the degree of doctor in the latter faculty at Padua, in 1619. He would then have made profession, but the rules of the congregation not permitting it, he employed himself in the composition of his various works. At length his merit advanced him to the first situations in his order; and when he went to Rome, as visitor, he was very favourably received by many persons of eminence, and especially by pope Urban VIII. who would have appointed him to a bishopric in the island of Candy, but at his own request this was exchanged for the see of Citta Nuova, in Istria, to which he was consecrated in 1642. Study and the care of his diocese occupied the whole of his time until his death in 1654, in the fifty-seventh year of his age.
, a learned antiquary, was born in 1657, of a noble family at Ciudad in the Frioul. His connexions with
, a learned antiquary, was born
in 1657, of a noble family at Ciudad in the Frioul. His
connexions with Octavio Ferrari, one of the most learned
antiquaries of Italy, increased his natural taste for that
study. Haying settled at Rome, he gained the esteem and
friendship of the cardinals Imperial! and Noris, pope Innocent XII. and Clement XI. which latter gav<- him the
bishopric of Adria, in 1702, where he died in 1717. His
works are, “Monumenta veteris Antii,
” Taurobolium antiquum,
” Lugduni, Thesaurus Antiquitatum;
” “De
annis imperil M. Antonii Aurelii Heliogabali,
” &c.
, a Spanish reformer of the sixteenth century, was of a noble family in Spain; and a soldier under Charles the Vth,
, a Spanish reformer
of the sixteenth century, was of a noble family in Spain;
and a soldier under Charles the Vth, who knighted him.
After some years spent in a military life, he desired leave
to retire; and when Charles inquired whether his request
proceeded from disgust, his answer was, “It is necessary
that a soldier, before his death, should give some time to
religious meditation.*' He left his native country, and retired to Naples, where he became the head of a sect of
the reformed, and many persons of great distinction attended his lectures. He was particularly connected with
Bernard Ochin, Peter Martyr, and other learned men of
great character amongst the reformers of that time; and
he attacked, with success, many of the corruptions of the
church of Rome. Thus far is collected from the old French
preface to his
” Considerations," and confirmed by Mr.
Ferrar’s (the translator) account in a letter of Mr. George
Herbert.
, count de Tressan, a lively French writer, was born at Mons, Nov. 4, 1705, of a noble family originally from Languedoc, one branch of which
, count de Tressan, a lively French writer, was born at Mons, Nov. 4, 1705, of a noble family originally from Languedoc, one branch of which had been protestants, and fought on that side in the civil wars preceding the massacre. He came early in life to Paris, and attached himself to Voltaire and Fontenelle, who initiated him in the belles lettres, and in those principles which afterwards made him be ranked among the philosophers of France. He served afterwards in the French army, and attained the rank of lieutenant-general. In 1750 he was admitted a free associate of the French academy, and contributed a memoir on Electricity, a subject then not much known, and written with so much ability that it was supposed he might have acquired no small fame in pursuing scientific subjects. This, however, was not agreeable to his disposition. After the battle of Fontenoy, in 1741, in which he served as aide-de-camp to Louis XV. he went to the court of Stanislaus, king of Poland, at Luneville, where he recommended himself by the sprightliness of his temper, and by the freedom of his remarks, but at the same time made some enemies by his satirical and epigrammatic productions. On the death of Stanislaus, he retired from active life, and devoted his time to the composition of a variety of works, particularly romances. Some of which were however translations, and others abridgments. These fill 12 octavo volumes published in 1791. His translation of Ariosto seems to have done him most credit. A light, trifling spirit never deserted him, but still sported even in his grey-hairs, until death put a serious end to it, Oct. 31, 1782, in his seventy-seventh year. Almost up to this period he was abridging Amadis de Gaul, and writing tales of chivalry, after having begun his career with the grave and abstruse parts of science. While in this latter employment he was, in 1749, chosen a member of our Royal Society.
ierus, and sometimes Piscinarius, was born in 1515, at Grave, on the Meuse, in the duchy of Brabant, of a noble family. He studied philosophy under the famous Henry
, an able physician, called in Latin
Wierus, and sometimes Piscinarius, was born in 1515, at
Grave, on the Meuse, in the duchy of Brabant, of a noble
family. He studied philosophy under the famous Henry
Cornelius Agrippa; made several voyages even to Africa,
but returned again into Europe, and was physician to the
duke of Cleves during thirty years. Wier had so strong a
constitution, that he frequently passed three or four days
without eating gr drinking, and found not the least inconvenience from it. He died suddenly Feb. 4, 1588, at
Tecklenbourg, a German town in the circle of Westphalia,
in the seventy-third year of his age. His works were printed
at Amsterdam, 1660, one volume, quarto, which includes
his treatise “De Prestigiis et Incantationibus,
” translated
into French, by James Grevin